gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch archive

2357 archived articles, newest first (page 13 of 24). Latest articles →

RE: Issue 5 and "webarch"
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 11:05:56 -0800
"Ugo Corda" <[email protected]> • #2936
Re: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 13:57:32 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2935
RE: Issue 5 and "webarch"
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 13:27:47 -0500
"Newcomer, Eric" <[email protected]> • #2934
Re: Issue 5 and "webarch"
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 13:27:52 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2933
RE: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 10:46:45 -0700
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2932
RE: Issue 5 and "webarch"
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 11:44:37 -0500
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2931
RE: Issue 5 and "webarch"
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 10:04:37 -0500
"Newcomer, Eric" <[email protected]> • #2930
RE: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 10:02:20 -0500
"Newcomer, Eric" <[email protected]> • #2929
Re: Issue 5 and "webarch"
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 00:47:05 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2928
Re: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 00:40:52 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2927
RE: Issue 5 and "webarch"
Sat, 4 Jan 2003 18:05:57 -0700
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2926
RE: REST; good for humans and machines
Sat, 4 Jan 2003 16:08:51 -0700
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2925
REST; good for humans and machines
Sat, 4 Jan 2003 17:29:44 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2924
Re: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Fri, 03 Jan 2003 20:17:03 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #2923
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Fri, 3 Jan 2003 12:43:54 -0700
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2922
Re: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Fri, 03 Jan 2003 14:26:00 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #2921
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Fri, 3 Jan 2003 11:22:39 -0500
Katia Sycara <[email protected]> • #2920
Re: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Fri, 03 Jan 2003 11:00:29 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #2919
Re: [xml-dist-app] <none>
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 20:20:26 -0500 (EST)
Rich Salz <[email protected]> • #2918
Re: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:17:16 -0800
"Roy T. Fielding" <[email protected]> • #2917
Issue 5 and "webarch"
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 19:50:43 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2916
<none>
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:53:06 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2915
Re: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 02 Jan 2003 17:54:17 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #2914
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:17:34 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2913
Re: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 02 Jan 2003 17:11:17 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #2912
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:52:06 -0500
"Abbie Barbir" <[email protected]> • #2911
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:33:46 -0500
Katia Sycara <[email protected]> • #2910
RE: Useful article on WS Choreography
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 15:48:03 -0500
"Jean-Jacques Dubray" <[email protected]> • #2909
HTTP authentication & timeouts
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 15:35:39 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2908
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 12:00:28 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2907
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:59:03 -0500
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2906
Useful article on WS Choreography
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 12:41:43 -0700
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2905
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:36:52 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2904
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:33:02 -0500
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2903
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:25:54 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2902
GET vs GetLastTradePrice...Is a unified interface bad?
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:10:44 -0800
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <[email protected]> • #2901
Re: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:12:33 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2900
Re: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 13:25:16 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2899
Re: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 02 Jan 2003 13:17:36 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #2898
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 10:13:57 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2897
Re: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 10:04:02 -0800
Francis McCabe <[email protected]> • #2896
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 09:38:27 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2895
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 09:41:22 -0700
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2894
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:00:04 -0500
"Newcomer, Eric" <[email protected]> • #2893
Re: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 02 Jan 2003 10:37:29 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #2892
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 07:53:46 -0700
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2891
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 09:39:02 -0500
"Newcomer, Eric" <[email protected]> • #2890
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 09:33:32 -0500
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2889
Re: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 02 Jan 2003 09:24:46 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #2888
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 07:44:37 -0500
"Newcomer, Eric" <[email protected]> • #2887
Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Wed, 1 Jan 2003 23:44:15 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2886
Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Wed, 1 Jan 2003 21:39:53 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2885
RE: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
Wed, 1 Jan 2003 14:44:14 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2884
Re: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
Wed, 01 Jan 2003 14:38:16 -0600
bhaugen <[email protected]> • #2883
Re: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:27:26 +0000
Miles Sabin <[email protected]> • #2882
RE: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
Wed, 1 Jan 2003 14:16:38 -0500
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2881
RE: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
Wed, 1 Jan 2003 11:48:53 -0500
"Newcomer, Eric" <[email protected]> • #2880
Re: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
Wed, 01 Jan 2003 10:31:40 -0600
bhaugen <[email protected]> • #2879
Re: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
Tue, 31 Dec 2002 23:08:30 +0000
Miles Sabin <[email protected]> • #2878
Re: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
Tue, 31 Dec 2002 16:57:50 -0500
"Christopher B Ferris" <[email protected]> • #2877
RE: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
Tue, 31 Dec 2002 15:49:32 -0500
"Anne Thomas Manes" <[email protected]> • #2876
Re: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
Tue, 31 Dec 2002 15:16:42 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2875
RE: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
Tue, 31 Dec 2002 10:30:55 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2874
Re: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
Tue, 31 Dec 2002 12:23:35 -0500
"Christopher B Ferris" <[email protected]> • #2873
Hypermedia vs. data
Mon, 30 Dec 2002 21:38:55 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2872
BTP without RM scenario
Mon, 30 Dec 2002 09:30:45 -0800
Ricky Ho <[email protected]> • #2871
Re: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Wed, 25 Dec 2002 23:38:47 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #2870
RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Tue, 24 Dec 2002 12:21:08 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2869
Re: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Tue, 24 Dec 2002 13:18:54 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #2868
RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 18:10:32 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2867
Re: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 19:36:34 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #2866
RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 14:47:42 -0800
"Mark Potts" <[email protected]> • #2865
RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 10:38:59 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2864
RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 09:45:44 -0800
"Mark Potts" <[email protected]> • #2863
Re: Hypermedia workflow
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 08:49:33 -0800
Francis McCabe <[email protected]> • #2862
Re: Multiparty interactions (was Re: Hypermedia workflow)
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 16:24:53 +0000
Miles Sabin <[email protected]> • #2861
Multiparty interactions (was Re: Hypermedia workflow)
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 09:47:23 -0600
bhaugen <[email protected]> • #2860
RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 09:51:31 -0500
"Newcomer, Eric" <[email protected]> • #2859
Re: Hypermedia workflow
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 09:34:04 -0500
Geoff Arnold <[email protected]> • #2858
Re: Hypermedia workflow
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 09:23:20 -0500
Geoff Arnold <[email protected]> • #2857
RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Sun, 22 Dec 2002 19:53:41 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2856
RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Sun, 22 Dec 2002 19:16:17 -0800
"Mark Potts" <[email protected]> • #2855
RE: Hypermedia workflow
Sun, 22 Dec 2002 12:34:57 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2854
RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Servic es)
Sun, 22 Dec 2002 10:04:27 -0800
"Burdett, David" <[email protected]> • #2853
Re: Hypermedia workflow
Sun, 22 Dec 2002 07:08:42 -0600
bhaugen <[email protected]> • #2852
Re: Hypermedia workflow
Sun, 22 Dec 2002 12:05:28 +0000
Miles Sabin <[email protected]> • #2851
RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Sat, 21 Dec 2002 21:40:13 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2850
RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Sun, 22 Dec 2002 01:39:21 -0000
"Peter Furniss" <[email protected]> • #2849
RE: Hypermedia workflow
Sat, 21 Dec 2002 16:24:38 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2848
Re: Hypermedia workflow
Sat, 21 Dec 2002 11:58:02 -0600
bhaugen <[email protected]> • #2847
RE: Hypermedia workflow
Sat, 21 Dec 2002 10:53:59 -0600
"Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <[email protected]> • #2846
RE: Hypermedia workflow
Sat, 21 Dec 2002 06:19:23 -0600
bhaugen <[email protected]> • #2845
RE: Hypermedia workflow
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 20:24:54 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2844
RE: Hypermedia workflow
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 20:16:11 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2843
Re: Hypermedia workflow
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:21:36 -0600
bhaugen <[email protected]> • #2842
RE: Hypermedia workflow
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:04:45 -0500
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2841
Re: Hypermedia workflow
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:26:33 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #2840
RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Servic es)
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:41:52 -0800
"Burdett, David" <[email protected]> • #2839
Re: Hypermedia workflow
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:49:19 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2838
RE: Hypermedia workflow
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:06:07 -0500
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2837
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.