gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch archive

2357 archived articles, newest first (page 12 of 24). Latest articles →

WS-friendly XML profile?
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 00:14:06 -0500
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #3036
Re: Binding
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 00:09:46 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #3035
RE: A different binding example (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 21:06:10 -0800
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <[email protected]> • #3034
Re: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 23:43:50 -0500
"Christopher B Ferris" <[email protected]> • #3033
RE: Myth of loose coupling
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 20:21:46 -0800
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <[email protected]> • #3032
RE: A different binding example (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 21:17:55 -0700
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #3031
Re: Binding
Mon, 06 Jan 2003 21:52:22 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #3030
Re: REST; good for humans and machines
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 21:32:54 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #3029
RE: Myth of loose coupling
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:15:19 -0800
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <[email protected]> • #3028
RE: Myth of loose coupling
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:04:08 -0800
"Ugo Corda" <[email protected]> • #3027
Re: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 20:56:17 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #3026
RE: Myth of loose coupling
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 20:53:29 -0500
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #3025
RE: A different binding example (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:47:14 -0800
"Ugo Corda" <[email protected]> • #3024
Re: A Modest Proposal (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 06 Jan 2003 19:35:03 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #3023
RE: A Modest Proposal (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 19:24:14 -0500
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #3022
RE: A different binding example (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 19:25:46 -0500
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #3021
Re: Terminology (was RE: Issue 5 and "webarch")
Mon, 06 Jan 2003 19:02:19 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #3020
RE: A different binding example (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:47:01 -0800
"Ugo Corda" <[email protected]> • #3019
Re: <none>
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:09:15 -0500
[email protected] • #3018
RE: REST; good for humans and machines
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 22:34:53 -0000
"Peter Furniss" <[email protected]> • #3017
RE: A different binding example (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 14:39:03 -0800
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <[email protected]> • #3016
RE: A different binding example (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 14:32:07 -0800
"Ugo Corda" <[email protected]> • #3015
Re: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 14:28:43 -0800
James M Snell <[email protected]> • #3014
RE: A different binding example (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 14:20:46 -0800
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <[email protected]> • #3013
RE: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 14:03:36 -0800
"Ugo Corda" <[email protected]> • #3012
Re: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 22:04:25 +0000
Miles Sabin <[email protected]> • #3011
Re: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 21:54:13 +0000
Miles Sabin <[email protected]> • #3010
RE: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 21:46:41 -0000
"Peter Furniss" <[email protected]> • #3009
Re: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 13:47:34 -0800
Francis McCabe <[email protected]> • #3008
RE: A Modest Proposal (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 13:47:14 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #3007
Re: A Modest Proposal (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 16:39:25 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #3006
Re: A different binding example (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 16:37:36 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #3005
RE: Myth of loose coupling
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 13:20:15 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #3004
A different binding example (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 14:20:58 -0700
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #3003
Re: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 16:15:01 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #3002
RE: Myth of loose coupling
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 13:03:44 -0800
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <[email protected]> • #3001
Re: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:48:39 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #3000
RE: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 12:41:00 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2999
RE: A Modest Proposal (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 13:46:22 -0700
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2998
Re: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 20:30:06 +0000
Miles Sabin <[email protected]> • #2997
RE: A Modest Proposal (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 12:02:26 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2996
RE: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 11:32:43 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2995
Myth of loose coupling
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 11:21:43 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2994
RE: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 11:25:05 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2993
RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 13:08:59 -0500
"Christopher B Ferris" <[email protected]> • #2992
RE: WS-I and RPC
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 10:01:29 -0800
"Burdett, David" <[email protected]> • #2991
RE: WS-I and RPC
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 09:55:12 -0800
"Burdett, David" <[email protected]> • #2990
Re: Binding
Mon, 06 Jan 2003 12:35:08 -0500
Geoff Arnold <[email protected]> • #2989
Re: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 16:54:21 +0000
Miles Sabin <[email protected]> • #2988
RE: A Modest Proposal (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 08:37:36 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2987
Re: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 11:27:28 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2986
Re: A Modest Proposal (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 11:23:43 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2985
RE: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 11:18:31 -0500
"Jean-Jacques Dubray" <[email protected]> • #2984
RE: A Modest Proposal (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 11:16:21 -0500
"Abbie Barbir" <[email protected]> • #2983
Re: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 16:07:04 +0000
Miles Sabin <[email protected]> • #2982
A Modest Proposal (was RE: Binding)
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 08:48:33 -0700
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2981
Re: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 10:47:51 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2980
Re: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:23:15 +0000
Miles Sabin <[email protected]> • #2979
Re: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 10:09:13 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2978
Re: REST; good for humans and machines
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 08:42:00 -0500
"Christopher B Ferris" <[email protected]> • #2977
Re: REST; good for humans and machines
Mon, 06 Jan 2003 08:39:09 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #2976
RE: WS-I and RPC
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 03:27:50 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2975
RE: WS-I and RPC
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 01:07:11 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2974
Re: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 08:38:24 +0000
Miles Sabin <[email protected]> • #2973
RE: WS-I and RPC
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 22:58:02 -0800
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <[email protected]> • #2972
Re: WS-I and RPC
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 01:24:05 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2971
Terminology (was RE: Issue 5 and "webarch")
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 00:18:29 -0500
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2970
RE: WS-I and RPC
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 21:02:02 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2969
Re: Binding
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 00:00:29 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2968
RE: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 20:55:49 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2967
Re: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 05 Jan 2003 23:36:32 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #2966
WS-I and RPC
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 23:28:45 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2965
RE: Binding
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 23:27:20 -0500
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2964
RE: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 20:20:57 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2963
RE: Binding
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 20:14:23 -0800
"Ugo Corda" <[email protected]> • #2962
Re: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 05 Jan 2003 23:13:01 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #2961
Re: Issue 5 and "webarch"
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 23:13:21 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2960
Re: Issue 5 and "webarch"
Sun, 05 Jan 2003 23:09:26 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #2959
Re: Issue 5 and "webarch"
Sun, 05 Jan 2003 22:56:35 -0500
Walden Mathews <[email protected]> • #2958
RE: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 17:18:22 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2957
Re: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 18:51:33 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2956
RE: Issue 5 and "webarch"
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 14:42:02 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2955
RE: Binding
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 13:59:25 -0700
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2954
Re: Binding
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 20:54:15 +0000
Miles Sabin <[email protected]> • #2953
RE: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 15:49:21 -0500
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2952
Re: Binding
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 15:48:33 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2951
RE: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 12:37:11 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2950
RE: Issue 5 and "webarch"
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 12:33:49 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2949
RE: Binding
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 15:31:36 -0500
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]> • #2948
Re: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 15:29:06 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2947
RE: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 12:21:19 -0800
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> • #2946
Re: Binding
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 20:00:35 +0000
Miles Sabin <[email protected]> • #2945
Re: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 14:57:17 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2944
Binding
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 14:47:32 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2943
RE: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 14:45:34 -0500
"Newcomer, Eric" <[email protected]> • #2942
Re: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 05 Jan 2003 14:35:15 -0500
Geoff Arnold <[email protected]> • #2941
Re: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 14:31:42 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #2940
Re: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 05 Jan 2003 14:21:49 -0500
Geoff Arnold <[email protected]> • #2939
Re: REST; good for humans and machines
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 19:19:28 +0000
Miles Sabin <[email protected]> • #2938
RE: Issue 5 and "webarch"
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 11:15:14 -0800
"David Orchard" <[email protected]> • #2937
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.