gmane.comp.web.voice archive

384 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

SCXML Test 354 uses transform-dependent values directly
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:53:48 +0200
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3332
SCXML Test 350 uses datamodel-specific expression
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:47:09 +0200
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3331
Re: Change to SCXML Test 298
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:29:04 +0200
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3330
Remove <log> from SCXML test 331?
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:20:34 +0200
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3329
Re: Test 330 is missing SCXML namespace
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 04:20:30 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3328
Test 330 is missing SCXML namespace
Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:34:52 +0200
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3327
Synchronizing Data Models
Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:45:44 +0200
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3326
Change to SCXML Test 298
Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:50:24 +0200
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3325
CfP: Academic MindTrek Conference 2014 (30th June'14): MEDIA - Social Media/Digital Games/Ambient Media/Media Business/Information Systems in Media Industries/ICT&E-Gonvernment
Sat, 7 Jun 2014 22:22:09 +0300 (EEST)
[email protected] • #3324
[Icmi2014:20] 2nd Call for papers for Workshops at ICMI 2014
Thu, 5 Jun 2014 23:12:31 +0900
"Toyoaki Nishida" <[email protected]> • #3323
SCXML is returning to Last Call
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 21:03:53 -0400
Dan Burnett <[email protected]> • #3322
Re: Consequences of the final state?
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 20:53:50 +0200
"c64zottel ." <[email protected]> • #3321
Re: Consequences of the final state?
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 20:32:07 +0200
"c64zottel ." <[email protected]> • #3320
new draft of SCXML published
Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:47:39 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3319
Re: Consequences of the final state?
Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:41:34 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3318
Re: When are cond-expressions evaluated?
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:19:25 +0200
David Junger <[email protected]> • #3317
When are cond-expressions evaluated?
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:46:39 +0200
"c64zottel ." <[email protected]> • #3316
Re: Recommendation for xml:lang expressions
Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:51:56 +0200
Pavel Cenek <[email protected]> • #3315
Consequences of the final state?
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 16:00:21 +0200
"c64zottel ." <[email protected]> • #3314
Re: Transitions between parallel tags.
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 15:37:24 +0200
"c64zottel ." <[email protected]> • #3313
RE: Recommendation for xml:lang expressions
Fri, 30 May 2014 20:01:43 +0000
Michael Bodell <[email protected]> • #3312
RE: Recommendation for xml:lang expressions
Wed, 28 May 2014 23:13:13 +0000
"Ales Dolecek (Europe)" <[email protected]> • #3311
RE: Recommendation for xml:lang expressions
Tue, 27 May 2014 16:56:46 -0400
David Wright <[email protected]> • #3310
RE: Recommendation for xml:lang expressions
Tue, 27 May 2014 20:22:30 +0000
Michael Bodell <[email protected]> • #3309
RE: Recommendation for xml:lang expressions
Tue, 27 May 2014 15:51:48 -0400
David Wright <[email protected]> • #3308
RE: Recommendation for xml:lang expressions
Tue, 27 May 2014 19:44:53 +0000
Michael Bodell <[email protected]> • #3307
RE: Recommendation for new behavior for <subdialog>
Tue, 27 May 2014 19:31:40 +0000
Michael Bodell <[email protected]> • #3306
RE: Recommendation for xml:lang expressions
Tue, 27 May 2014 15:13:04 -0400
David Wright <[email protected]> • #3305
RE: Recommendation for xml:lang expressions
Tue, 27 May 2014 19:01:43 +0000
Michael Bodell <[email protected]> • #3304
Re: Transitions between parallel tags.
Tue, 27 May 2014 12:30:54 +0200
David Junger <[email protected]> • #3303
Transitions between parallel tags.
Mon, 26 May 2014 13:43:11 +0200
"c64zottel ." <[email protected]> • #3302
Recommendation for xml:lang expressions
Wed, 21 May 2014 14:45:27 -0400
David Wright <[email protected]> • #3301
Recommendation for new behavior for <subdialog>
Wed, 21 May 2014 14:56:32 -0400
David Wright <[email protected]> • #3300
[Icmi2014:19] ICMI 2014: The 2nd Call for Demonstrations and Exhibits
Mon, 19 May 2014 22:33:29 +0900
"Toyoaki Nishida" <[email protected]> • #3299
[Icmi2014:18] ICMI 2014: CALL FOR WORKSHOP PAPERS
Wed, 14 May 2014 07:59:45 +0900
"Toyoaki Nishida" <[email protected]> • #3298
[Icmi2014:17] ICMI 2014: CALL FOR PAPERS -- the new submission deadline
Mon, 5 May 2014 08:32:02 +0900
"Toyoaki Nishida" <[email protected]> • #3297
Re: How many transition tags are allowed under <initial>?
Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:11:10 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3296
How many transition tags are allowed under <initial>?
Sun, 27 Apr 2014 13:15:26 +0200
"c64zottel ." <[email protected]> • #3295
Re: Broken SCXML test links
Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:15:04 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3294
Re: SCXML Tests assume Invalid Data Model Locations
Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:56:57 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3293
Re: Need to pre-declare SCXML data?
Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:36:40 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3292
Re: SCXML Tests assume Invalid Data Model Locations
Wed, 16 Apr 2014 07:20:09 +0200
David Junger <[email protected]> • #3291
Re: Need to pre-declare SCXML data?
Wed, 16 Apr 2014 07:18:15 +0200
David Junger <[email protected]> • #3290
Broken SCXML test links
Tue, 15 Apr 2014 23:07:17 +0000 (GMT)
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3289
SCXML Tests assume Invalid Data Model Locations
Tue, 15 Apr 2014 22:59:50 +0000 (GMT)
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3288
Need to pre-declare SCXML data?
Tue, 15 Apr 2014 22:54:43 +0000 (GMT)
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3287
RE: Has anyone had a chance to review the revised algorithm yet?
Mon, 14 Apr 2014 19:49:22 +0000
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3286
Re: Has anyone had a chance to review the revised algorithm yet?
Sun, 13 Apr 2014 13:10:11 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3285
Re: Has anyone had a chance to review the revised algorithm yet?
Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:54:57 +0100
Zjnue Brzavi <[email protected]> • #3284
Re: Has anyone had a chance to review the revised algorithm yet?
Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:59:18 -0600
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3283
Has anyone had a chance to review the revised algorithm yet?
Sat, 12 Apr 2014 08:27:19 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3282
Intelligent Personal Assistants and Education Technology
Sat, 5 Apr 2014 07:49:03 +0000
Adam Sobieski <[email protected]> • #3281
another try at fixing history states
Wed, 09 Apr 2014 15:47:54 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3280
Re: test for default history content
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 22:11:21 +0100
Zjnue Brzavi <[email protected]> • #3279
Re: added test 580
Tue, 08 Apr 2014 16:45:34 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3278
RE: test for default history content
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 20:30:30 +0000
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3277
RE: test for default history content
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 20:25:16 +0000
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3276
Re: test for default history content
Tue, 08 Apr 2014 14:24:19 -0600
Ate Douma <[email protected]> • #3275
Re: test for default history content
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 22:03:29 +0200
David Junger <[email protected]> • #3274
Re: test for default history content
Tue, 08 Apr 2014 15:36:59 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3273
Re: added test 580
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 21:29:43 +0200
David Junger <[email protected]> • #3272
Re: test 579 updated
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 20:36:15 +0200
David Junger <[email protected]> • #3271
added test 580
Tue, 08 Apr 2014 14:34:14 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3270
Re: test 579 updated
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 20:04:06 +0200
David Junger <[email protected]> • #3269
Re: test 579 updated
Tue, 08 Apr 2014 13:44:28 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3268
Re: test 579 updated
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 18:44:27 +0100
Zjnue Brzavi <[email protected]> • #3267
Re: test 579 updated
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 19:30:19 +0200
David Junger <[email protected]> • #3266
Re: test 579 updated
Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:29:18 -0600
Ate Douma <[email protected]> • #3265
Re: test for default history content
Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:26:50 -0600
Ate Douma <[email protected]> • #3264
test 579 updated
Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:58:54 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3263
RE: test for default history content
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:19:49 +0000
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3262
Re: test for default history content
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 10:57:00 +0100
Zjnue Brzavi <[email protected]> • #3261
Re: test for default history content
Wed, 02 Apr 2014 10:10:07 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3260
Re: test for default history content
Wed, 02 Apr 2014 16:39:02 +0200
Ate Douma <[email protected]> • #3259
Re: test for default history content
Wed, 02 Apr 2014 11:27:17 +0200
Ate Douma <[email protected]> • #3258
[Icmi2014:16] Second Call for Participation: ICMI 2014 Doctoral Consortium 16th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
Thu, 3 Apr 2014 06:43:57 +0900
"Toyoaki Nishida" <[email protected]> • #3257
Re: test for default history content
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 18:10:39 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3256
Re: test for default history content
Tue, 1 Apr 2014 20:22:37 +0100
Zjnue Brzavi <[email protected]> • #3255
Re: test for default history content
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 20:45:13 +0200
Ate Douma <[email protected]> • #3254
Re: test for default history content
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 11:47:02 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3253
[Icmi2014:15] ICMI 2014: Call for Demonstrations and Exhibits
Tue, 1 Apr 2014 23:30:31 +0900
"Toyoaki Nishida" <[email protected]> • #3252
Re: test for default history content
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 09:27:15 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3251
Re: test for default history content
Tue, 1 Apr 2014 10:51:09 +0100
Zjnue Brzavi <[email protected]> • #3250
Re: Test 530
Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:41:05 +0200
David Junger <[email protected]> • #3249
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.