gmane.comp.web.voice archive

382 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Missing SCXML Test Coverage
Tue, 01 Jul 2014 12:16:35 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3432
Re: Missing SCXML Test Coverage
Tue, 01 Jul 2014 09:32:26 -0600
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3431
Re: Missing SCXML Test Coverage
Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:28:12 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3430
Re: SCXML Test Plan Coverage
Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:23:29 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3429
[Icmi2014:21] ICMI 2014: The 3rd Call for Demonstrations and Exhibits
Tue, 1 Jul 2014 09:21:26 +0900
"Toyoaki Nishida" <[email protected]> • #3428
Re: SCXML Test 354 uses datamodel-specific <content>?
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:37:23 +0000 (GMT)
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3427
Re: SCXML Test 354 uses datamodel-specific <content>?
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:25:59 +0000 (GMT)
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3426
Re: Understanding manual SCXML test 307.
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:24:09 +0000 (GMT)
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3425
Re: SCXML Test 354 uses datamodel-specific <content>?
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:21:06 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3424
Re: Understanding manual SCXML test 307.
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:17:35 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3423
Re: SCXML Test 354 uses datamodel-specific <content>?
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:15:29 +0000 (GMT)
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3422
Re: Understanding manual SCXML test 307.
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:12:08 +0000 (GMT)
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3421
Re: Bad SCXML test ID for assertion 415.
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:59:13 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3420
Re: Understanding manual SCXML test 307.
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:54:52 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3419
Re: SCXML Test 354 uses datamodel-specific <content>?
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 23:41:02 +0200
David Junger <[email protected]> • #3418
Missing SCXML Test Coverage
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 21:16:54 +0000 (GMT)
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3417
SCXML Test Plan Coverage
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:56:56 +0000 (GMT)
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3416
LXSC SCXML Implementation Report
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:45:24 +0000 (GMT)
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3415
Bad SCXML test ID for assertion 415.
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:33:11 +0000 (GMT)
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3414
Understanding manual SCXML test 307.
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:17:52 +0000 (GMT)
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3413
Re: SCXML Test 354 uses datamodel-specific <content>?
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:47:49 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3412
Re: SCXML Algorithm fails for test 579
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:28:03 -0600
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3411
Re: SCXML Test 354 uses datamodel-specific <content>?
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:28:33 +0200
David Junger <[email protected]> • #3410
Re: SCXML Test 354 uses datamodel-specific <content>?
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:53:59 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3409
Re: SCXML Test 354 uses datamodel-specific <content>?
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:37:36 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3408
Re: Change to SCXML Test 298
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:19:29 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3407
Re: SCXML Test 354 uses datamodel-specific <content>?
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:16:06 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3406
Re: SCXML Test 343 needs invalidLocation
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:06:58 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3405
Re: SCXML Algorithm fails for test 579
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:02:56 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3404
SCXML Test 343 needs invalidLocation
Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:23:41 -0600
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3403
Re: SCXML Test 354 uses datamodel-specific <content>?
Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:19:44 -0600
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3402
Re: Change to SCXML Test 298
Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:17:38 -0600
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3401
Re: SCXML Algorithm fails for test 579
Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:08:41 -0600
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3400
RE: SCXML Algorithm fails for test 579
Sun, 29 Jun 2014 14:53:49 +0000
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3399
Re: SCXML Algorithm fails for test 579
Sun, 29 Jun 2014 08:47:16 -0600
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3398
Re: SCXML Algorithm fails for test 579
Sun, 29 Jun 2014 10:17:21 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3397
Re: SCXML Test 553 assumes unset variables are invalid
Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:57:07 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3396
Re: Make SCXML IRP tests more CI-able
Sun, 29 Jun 2014 08:39:30 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3395
Re: Make SCXML IRP tests more CI-able
Sun, 29 Jun 2014 10:45:19 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3394
SCXML Algorithm fails for test 579
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 22:29:25 -0600
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3393
SCXML Test 553 assumes unset variables are invalid
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 21:21:56 -0600
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3392
Re: Make SCXML IRP tests more CI-able
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 22:00:17 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3391
Re: Make SCXML IRP tests more CI-able
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 21:05:32 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3390
Re: Make SCXML IRP tests more CI-able
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:43:03 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3389
Re: Make SCXML IRP tests more CI-able
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 09:38:12 -0600
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3388
Re: Make SCXML IRP tests more CI-able
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 09:35:00 -0600
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3387
Re: Make SCXML IRP tests more CI-able
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 15:09:22 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3386
RE: Make SCXML IRP tests more CI-able
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 14:10:37 +0000
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3385
Re: Make SCXML IRP tests more CI-able
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 08:34:59 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3384
Re: SCXML Algorithm minor markup tweaks
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 08:32:05 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3383
RE: Interpretation Algorithm calls some() on an OrderedSet
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:31:41 +0000
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3382
Make SCXML IRP tests more CI-able
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:09:26 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3381
Re: Interpretation Algorithm calls some() on an OrderedSet
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 21:05:57 -0600
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3380
Re: Interpretation Algorithm calls some() on an OrderedSet
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 21:00:58 -0600
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3379
SCXML Algorithm minor markup tweaks
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 20:24:07 -0600
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3378
Re: Updated IRP for uSCXML
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 21:00:10 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3377
Re: More issues with the IRP tests
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 20:37:47 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3376
RE: More issues with the IRP tests
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 20:24:35 +0000
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3375
More issues with the IRP tests
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 20:14:03 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3374
Re: IDL for SCXML interpreters
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:30:46 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3373
IDL for SCXML interpreters
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:10:48 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3372
Re: Updated IRP for uSCXML
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:22:17 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3371
Re: Updated IRP for uSCXML
Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:34:07 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3370
Re: Updated IRP for uSCXML
Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:58:51 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3369
Re: Updated IRP for uSCXML
Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:20:17 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3368
Re: Updated IRP for uSCXML
Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:17:44 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3367
Re: Updated IRP for uSCXML
Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:21:15 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3366
Re: Updated IRP for uSCXML
Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:57:58 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3365
Re: Updated IRP for uSCXML
Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:42:03 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3364
Re: test534 - quote the search string please
Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:36:36 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3363
Re: Interpretation Algorithm calls some() on an OrderedSet
Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:02:10 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3362
Updated IRP for uSCXML
Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:48:25 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3361
test534 - quote the search string please
Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:39:47 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3360
Interpretation Algorithm calls some() on an OrderedSet
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 23:21:26 +0200
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3359
Re: x-www-form-urlencoded unsuited for basichttp [was IRP for uSCXML]
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:20:04 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3358
RE: x-www-form-urlencoded unsuited for basichttp [was IRP for uSCXML]
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:24:51 +0000
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3357
Re: IRP for uSCXML
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:10:45 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3356
x-www-form-urlencoded unsuited for basichttp [was IRP for uSCXML]
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:04:58 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3355
Re: IRP for uSCXML
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:48:53 +0200
David Junger <[email protected]> • #3354
Re: IRP for uSCXML
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:50:13 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3353
Re: IRP for uSCXML
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:35:20 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3352
Re: IRP for uSCXML
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:24:52 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3351
Re: IRP for uSCXML
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:58:51 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3350
Re: IRP for uSCXML
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:21:20 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3349
CfP: FINANCEcom - deadline 10/9 - Enterprise Applications, Markets, and Services in the Finance Industry, Sydney, Australia
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 17:53:40 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #3348
Re: IRP for uSCXML
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 10:58:53 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3347
Re: IRP for uSCXML
Mon, 23 Jun 2014 23:51:52 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3346
IRP for uSCXML
Mon, 23 Jun 2014 23:46:28 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3345
Re: More Test Issues [was: Dead links on IRP page]
Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:33:27 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3344
More Test Issues [was: Dead links on IRP page]
Mon, 23 Jun 2014 20:10:08 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3343
Re: IRP: Dead links on IRP page
Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:06:48 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3342
Re: Synchronizing Data Models
Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:54:46 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3341
IRP: Dead links on IRP page
Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:55:29 +0000
Stefan Radomski <[email protected]> • #3340
Re: SCXML Test 354 uses datamodel-specific <content>?
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 17:53:07 +0200
David Junger <[email protected]> • #3339
Re: SCXML Test 354 uses datamodel-specific <content>?
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 10:34:53 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3338
Re: SCXML Test 354 uses transform-dependent values directly
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 10:20:12 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3337
Re: Change to SCXML Test 298
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:45:33 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3336
Re: Remove <log> from SCXML test 331?
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:34:48 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3335
Re: Change to SCXML Test 298
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:27:05 -0400
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> • #3334
SCXML Test 354 uses datamodel-specific <content>?
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:27:36 +0200
Gavin Kistner <[email protected]> • #3333
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.