gmane.comp.web.xforms archive

289 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 3). Latest articles →

Argumentation needed -
Mon, 30 May 2011 11:50:24 +0200
Joern Turner <[email protected]> • #5368
Re: XForms 1.1 Implementers encouraged to enable multiple MIP bindings per data node
Fri, 27 May 2011 21:53:45 +0200
Joern Turner <[email protected]> • #5367
Re: XForms 1.1 Implementers encouraged to enable multiple MIP bindings per data node
Fri, 27 May 2011 09:04:34 -0700
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5366
Re: XForms 1.1 Implementers encouraged to enable multiple MIP bindings per data node
Fri, 27 May 2011 16:49:03 +0200
Joern Turner <[email protected]> • #5365
Fwd: [ubiquity-xforms] RFI | Server side .NET XForms Engine/Processor
Wed, 25 May 2011 08:03:27 -0700
"Leigh L. Klotz, Jr." <[email protected]> • #5364
Orbeon Forms 3.9.0 final now available
Tue, 17 May 2011 09:52:48 -0700
Erik Bruchez <[email protected]> • #5363
Christian Lebe wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn
Mon, 16 May 2011 16:33:08 +0000 (UTC)
Christian Lebe <[email protected]> • #5362
Sorry, I may be late to the call
Wed, 11 May 2011 07:46:30 -0700
Philip Fennell <[email protected]> • #5361
[announcement] reminder: early bird discount for XForms course 16-17 June 2011, San Carlos, California
Wed, 11 May 2011 09:10:11 -0400
"C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <[email protected]> • #5360
FW: XForms' transform function
Tue, 10 May 2011 23:00:22 -0700
Philip Fennell <[email protected]> • #5359
XForms' transform function
Tue, 10 May 2011 22:07:07 -0700
Philip Fennell <[email protected]> • #5358
Re: XForms' transform function
Tue, 10 May 2011 09:41:15 -0700
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5357
XForms' transform function
Tue, 10 May 2011 08:55:39 -0700
Philip Fennell <[email protected]> • #5356
JSONx sent to the IETF
Tue, 3 May 2011 11:58:18 -0700
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5355
Re: XForm template to import
Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:47:09 -0700
Erik Bruchez <[email protected]> • #5354
Re: normalizedString/input and string/textarea?
Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:08:02 -0700
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5353
Re: normalizedString/input and string/textarea?
Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:33:57 +0200
Alain Couthures <[email protected]> • #5352
Re: normalizedString/input and string/textarea?
Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:26:58 -0700
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5351
normalizedString/input and string/textarea?
Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:57:54 +0200
Alain Couthures <[email protected]> • #5350
[announcement] XForms course 16-17 June 2011, San Carlos, California
Sat, 9 Apr 2011 10:48:55 -0400
"C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <[email protected]> • #5349
XForm template to import
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:42:12 +0200
daniele ippoliti <[email protected]> • #5348
XForm template to import
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:56:08 +0200
daniele ippoliti <[email protected]> • #5347
Basic XML editor example
Sun, 03 Apr 2011 22:18:18 +0200
COUTHURES Alain <[email protected]> • #5346
Re: incremental delay considered harmful
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:54:54 -0700
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5345
Re: incremental delay considered harmful
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:52:13 +0200
Joern Turner <[email protected]> • #5344
Re: incremental delay considered harmful
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:13:32 +0530
raja mani <[email protected]> • #5343
Re: incremental delay considered harmful
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:05:01 +0200
COUTHURES Alain <[email protected]> • #5342
RE: incremental delay considered harmful
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:57:09 +0000
Nick Van den Bleeken <[email protected]> • #5341
Re: incremental delay considered harmful
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:05:23 +0200
COUTHURES Alain <[email protected]> • #5340
incremental delay considered harmful
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:32:12 -0700
"Leigh L. Klotz, Jr." <[email protected]> • #5339
Orbeon Forms 3.9.0 Release Candidate 1
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:42:29 -0700
Erik Bruchez <[email protected]> • #5338
[ANN] betterFORM limeGreen RC 1 available
Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:58:42 +0100
Joern Turner <[email protected]> • #5337
RE: XFOLITE
Mon, 7 Feb 2011 21:38:49 +0000
<[email protected]> • #5336
Re: XFOLITE
Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:03:27 +0530
Nalini karunanithi <[email protected]> • #5335
Re: XFOLITE
Mon, 7 Feb 2011 07:04:39 +0000
<[email protected]> • #5334
Re: XFOLITE
Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:13:43 +0530
Nalini karunanithi <[email protected]> • #5333
Re:XFOLITE
Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:53:06 +0000
<[email protected]> • #5332
Re: XFOLITE
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:38:56 -0800
Erik Bruchez <[email protected]> • #5331
Re:XFOLITE
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:11:22 +0530
Nalini karunanithi <[email protected]> • #5330
Note 2 on XForms 1.1 computational dependency definition. Short-circuting
Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:57:21 -0800
Vlad Trakhtenberg <[email protected]> • #5329
Announcement: IBM Forms 4.0 Released
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:26:04 -0800
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5328
Note on XForms 1.1 computation dependency definition. A 'counterexample'.
Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:48:35 -0500
Vlad Trakhtenberg <[email protected]> • #5327
[announcement] XForms course in Rockville, Maryland, 14-15 February 2011
Wed, 5 Jan 2011 11:16:15 -0700
"C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <[email protected]> • #5326
Re: Implementors please read: poll about select1 and empty values
Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:45:57 -0800
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5325
Re: Implementors please read: poll about select1 and empty values
Tue, 21 Dec 2010 19:06:04 -0800
Erik Bruchez <[email protected]> • #5324
1st CFP: IJCAI-11 Workshop on Discovering Meaning On the Go in Large & Heterogeneous Data (LHD-11)
Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:48:21 +0000
Michael Chan <[email protected]> • #5323
Re: Proposition for JSON internal storage for XForms
Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:40:39 +0100
COUTHURES Alain <[email protected]> • #5322
Re: Implementors please read: poll about select1 and empty values
Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:43:53 -0800
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5321
RE: Proposition for JSON internal storage for XForms
Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:28:25 +0100
Nick Van den Bleeken <[email protected]> • #5320
Re: Implementors please read: poll about select1 and empty values
Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:13:23 -0800
Erik Bruchez <[email protected]> • #5319
Proposition for JSON internal storage for XForms
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:48:25 +0100
COUTHURES Alain <[email protected]> • #5318
Re: Implementors please read: poll about select1 and empty values
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:36:12 -0800
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5317
Re: Implementors please read: poll about select1 and empty values
Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:13:28 -0800
Leigh L Klotz Jr <[email protected]> • #5316
Re: Implementors please read: poll about select1 and empty values
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:40:28 -0800
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5315
Re: select1 and whitespace handling
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:30:34 -0800
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5314
Re: select1 and whitespace handling
Wed, 8 Dec 2010 23:22:01 -0500
Kurt Cagle <[email protected]> • #5313
Re: select1 and whitespace handling
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:23:46 -0800
"Leigh L. Klotz, Jr." <[email protected]> • #5312
Implementors please read: poll about select1 and empty values
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:09:51 -0800
"Leigh L. Klotz, Jr." <[email protected]> • #5311
select1 and whitespace handling
Tue, 07 Dec 2010 22:58:52 +0100
Philipp Wagner <[email protected]> • #5310
Re: Nested binds in future versions of XForms spec
Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:43:23 -0800
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5309
Re: Nested binds in future versions of XForms spec
Thu, 2 Dec 2010 19:24:36 +0000 (UTC)
Claudius Teodorescu <[email protected]> • #5308
Re: Nested binds in future versions of XForms spec
Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:01:11 -0800 (PST)
Claudius Teodorescu <[email protected]> • #5307
Re: Nested binds in future versions of XForms spec
Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:29:58 -0800
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5306
Re: Nested binds in future versions of XForms spec
Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:03:15 -0500
Kurt Cagle <[email protected]> • #5305
Nested binds in future versions of XForms spec
Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:42:45 +0000 (UTC)
Claudius Teodorescu <[email protected]> • #5304
Re: XSLT extension action - continued
Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:47:21 +0000 (UTC)
Claudius Teodorescu <[email protected]> • #5303
Mailing lists for getting Help with XForms
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:43:20 -0700
"Leigh L. Klotz, Jr." <[email protected]> • #5302
Re: Rendering of xf:input with integer binding
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:10:09 -0700
"Leigh L. Klotz, Jr." <[email protected]> • #5301
Re: disabled controls bindset failure
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:30:18 +0200
"Steven Pemberton" <[email protected]> • #5300
Re: Rendering of xf:input with integer binding
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:57:55 +0200
"Steven Pemberton" <[email protected]> • #5299
Rendering of xf:input with integer binding
Tue, 12 Oct 2010 02:12:48 +0200
Philipp Wagner <[email protected]> • #5298
forum - 100% xforms -- free to all
Tue, 5 Oct 2010 18:37:14 +0800
Carl Ray <[email protected]> • #5297
Re: Example 11.9.n, 11.9.o, and
Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:09:53 +0200
COUTHURES Alain <[email protected]> • #5296
Example 11.9.n, 11.9.o, and
Sat, 25 Sep 2010 02:59:07 -0700 (PDT)
Claudius Teodorescu <[email protected]> • #5295
Using a regex pattern in an XForm
Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:49:11 -0700
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5294
ebMS submission
Sat, 18 Sep 2010 17:17:15 +0000
Alexi Margo <[email protected]> • #5293
Fw: XSLT extension action - continued
Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
Claudius Teodorescu <[email protected]> • #5292
Re: invalid binding expression error
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:35:47 +0200
"Ronald van Kuijk" <[email protected]> • #5291
Re: invalid binding expression error
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:13:40 -0700
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5290
Re: invalid binding expression error
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:01:35 -0700
Leigh L Klotz Jr <[email protected]> • #5289
Re: invalid binding expression error
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:05:15 -0700
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5288
RE: XSLT extension action - continued
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 07:25:00 -0700
Philip Fennell <[email protected]> • #5287
Re: invalid binding expression error
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:00:38 +0100
e-letter <[email protected]> • #5286
Re: XSLT extension action - continued
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:36:31 -0700 (PDT)
Claudius Teodorescu <[email protected]> • #5285
Re: invalid binding expression error
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:31:01 -0700
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5284
Re: invalid binding expression error
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:15:50 +0100
e-letter <[email protected]> • #5283
Re: invalid binding expression error
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:57:31 -0700
John Boyer <[email protected]> • #5282
Re: invalid binding expression error
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:49:17 +0100 (BST)
Swithun Crowe <[email protected]> • #5281
Re: invalid binding expression error
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:28:29 +0100
e-letter <[email protected]> • #5280
Re: invalid binding expression error
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:25:24 +0100
e-letter <[email protected]> • #5279
Re: invalid binding expression error
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 07:45:45 +0100
e-letter <[email protected]> • #5278
Re: invalid binding expression error
Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:37:00 -0600
"C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <[email protected]> • #5277
Re: base64 encoding for HTTP Basic Authentication - a gap in the XForms function library? (RFE )
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:22:13 +0200
"Ronald van Kuijk" <[email protected]> • #5276
Re: invalid binding expression error
Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:55:52 +0100
e-letter <[email protected]> • #5275
Re: base64 encoding for HTTP Basic Authentication - a gap in the XForms function library? (RFE)
Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:08:51 -0600
"C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <[email protected]> • #5274
Re: base64 encoding for HTTP Basic Authentication - a gap in the XForms function library? (RFE)
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:08:23 -0700
Erik Bruchez <[email protected]> • #5273
Re: invalid binding expression error
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:07:21 -0600
"C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <[email protected]> • #5272
Re: invalid binding expression error
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 17:54:06 +0100
e-letter <[email protected]> • #5271
invalid binding expression error
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 09:05:42 +0100
e-letter <[email protected]> • #5270
Re: base64 encoding for HTTP Basic Authentication - a gap in the XForms function library? (RFE )
Sat, 11 Sep 2010 17:38:44 +0200
"Ronald van Kuijk" <[email protected]> • #5269
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.