gmane.comp.web.zope.devel archive

9417 archived articles, newest first (page 31 of 95). Latest articles →

Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 19, UNKNOWN: 1
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:17:54 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #28639
zope.formlib's action decorator return Action() object, not the decorated function. Why?
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:44:30 +0200
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman <[email protected]> • #28638
zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 19, UNKNOWN: 1
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 01:00:01 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28637
Re: Zope 4 Sprint Report [was: (no subject)]
Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:49:19 +0200
"Charlie Clark" <[email protected]> • #28636
Re: QA
Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:52:09 +0200
Patrick Gerken <[email protected]> • #28635
Re: QA
Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:49:45 +0200
Patrick Gerken <[email protected]> • #28634
zope-tests - FAILED: 9, OK: 19
Thu, 13 Sep 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28633
QA
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:37:09 +0200
Adam GROSZER <[email protected]> • #28632
zope-tests - FAILED: 7, OK: 19
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28631
zope-tests - FAILED: 9, OK: 19
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28630
Zope 4 Sprint Report [was: (no subject)]
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:54:46 -0300
Leonardo Rochael Almeida <[email protected]> • #28629
(no subject)
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:51:46 -0300
Leonardo Rochael Almeida <[email protected]> • #28628
Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.12/ LP #1047318: Tighten import restrictions for restricted code.
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:57:40 -0300
Leonardo Rochael Almeida <[email protected]> • #28627
Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.12/ LP #1047318: Tighten import restrictions for restricted code.
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:09:27 +0200
Hanno Schlichting <[email protected]> • #28626
Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.12/ LP #1047318: Tighten import restrictions for restricted code.
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:31:21 +0200
yuppie <[email protected]> • #28625
zope-tests - FAILED: 12, OK: 19
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28624
zope-tests - FAILED: 7, OK: 19
Sun, 9 Sep 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28623
Re: Latest z3c.recipe.tag upload to PyPI is broken
Sat, 8 Sep 2012 12:58:54 -0400
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #28622
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 10, OK: 19
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 07:36:02 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #28621
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 10, OK: 19
Sat, 8 Sep 2012 14:34:14 +0300
Marius Gedminas <[email protected]> • #28620
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 19
Sat, 8 Sep 2012 14:29:36 +0300
Marius Gedminas <[email protected]> • #28619
zope-tests - FAILED: 10, OK: 19
Sat, 8 Sep 2012 01:00:01 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28618
Re: Latest z3c.recipe.tag upload to PyPI is broken
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 23:52:07 +0200
Maurits van Rees <[email protected]> • #28617
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 19
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 13:27:38 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #28616
Latest z3c.recipe.tag upload to PyPI is broken
Thu, 6 Sep 2012 22:53:38 -0400
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #28615
zope-tests - FAILED: 11, OK: 19
Fri, 7 Sep 2012 01:00:01 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28614
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 19
Thu, 6 Sep 2012 21:08:09 +0200
"Stefan H. Holek" <[email protected]> • #28613
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 19, OK: 19
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:04:58 +0200
Adam GROSZER <[email protected]> • #28612
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 19
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:57:12 +0200
Wichert Akkerman <[email protected]> • #28611
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 19
Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:58:24 +0300
Marius Gedminas <[email protected]> • #28610
zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 19
Thu, 6 Sep 2012 01:00:01 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28609
zope-tests - FAILED: 19, OK: 19
Wed, 5 Sep 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28608
Re: makeClass and makeClassForTemplate
Wed, 5 Sep 2012 01:15:26 +0200
Laurence Rowe <[email protected]> • #28607
Re: makeClass and makeClassForTemplate
Tue, 04 Sep 2012 22:23:56 +0200
yuppie <[email protected]> • #28606
makeClass and makeClassForTemplate
Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:51:53 +0200
Laurence Rowe <[email protected]> • #28605
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 19, OK: 19
Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:04:01 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #28604
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 19, OK: 19
Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:50:45 +0200
Adam GROSZER <[email protected]> • #28603
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 19, OK: 19
Tue, 04 Sep 2012 09:43:37 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #28602
zope-tests - FAILED: 19, OK: 19
Tue, 4 Sep 2012 01:00:01 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28601
Whats the right bugtracker for zc.relation?
Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:07:05 +0200
Patrick Gerken <[email protected]> • #28600
Re: release archetypes.querywidget
Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:49:30 +0200
"Jens W. Klein" <[email protected]> • #28599
release archetypes.querywidget
Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:47:57 +0200
"Jens W. Klein" <[email protected]> • #28598
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 19, OK: 19
Mon, 03 Sep 2012 08:46:36 +0200
Adam GROSZER <[email protected]> • #28597
zope-tests - FAILED: 22, OK: 19
Mon, 3 Sep 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28596
zope-tests - FAILED: 17, OK: 19
Sun, 2 Sep 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28595
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 19, OK: 19
Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:04:17 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #28594
zope-tests - FAILED: 19, OK: 19
Sat, 1 Sep 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28593
zope-tests - FAILED: 20, OK: 17, UNKNOWN: 2
Fri, 31 Aug 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28592
Storm/ZEO deadlocks (was Re: [ZODB-Dev] [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB)
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:14:49 +0300
Marius Gedminas <[email protected]> • #28591
Re: Restoring zLOG trunk
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:57:39 +0200
Laurence Rowe <[email protected]> • #28590
Restoring zLOG trunk
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:56:46 +0200
Laurence Rowe <[email protected]> • #28589
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 19, UNKNOWN: 3
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:21:02 +0200
Adam GROSZER <[email protected]> • #28588
zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 19, UNKNOWN: 3
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28587
Re: [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:37:22 +0200
Julien Muchembled <[email protected]> • #28586
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 24, OK: 17, UNKNOWN: 2
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:42:25 +0200
Hanno Schlichting <[email protected]> • #28585
Re: [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:54:27 -0300
Leonardo Santagada <[email protected]> • #28584
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 24, OK: 17, UNKNOWN: 2
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:44:49 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #28583
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 24, OK: 17, UNKNOWN: 2
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:25:34 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #28582
Re: [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:21:09 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #28581
Re: [Zope-dev] [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 06:30:50 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #28580
Re: [ZODB-Dev] [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:29:11 +0300
Marius Gedminas <[email protected]> • #28579
zope-tests - FAILED: 24, OK: 17, UNKNOWN: 2
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28578
Re: [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:31:05 +0200
Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]> • #28577
Re: [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:31:20 +0200
Martijn Pieters <[email protected]> • #28576
Re: [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:17:47 +0200
Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]> • #28575
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 29, OK: 15
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:21:49 +0200
Adam GROSZER <[email protected]> • #28574
zope-tests - FAILED: 13, OK: 14, UNKNOWN: 2
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28573
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 29, OK: 15
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:02:26 +0300
Marius Gedminas <[email protected]> • #28572
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 29, OK: 15
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:26:28 +0200
Adam GROSZER <[email protected]> • #28571
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 29, OK: 15
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:00:12 +0300
Marius Gedminas <[email protected]> • #28570
Re: [ZODB-Dev] [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:46:53 +0200
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> • #28569
[announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:37:37 +0200
Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]> • #28568
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 29, OK: 15
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:39:54 +0300
Marius Gedminas <[email protected]> • #28567
Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 29, OK: 15
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:22:51 +0200
Patrick Gerken <[email protected]> • #28566
zope-tests - FAILED: 46, OK: 15
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28565
zope-tests - FAILED: 31, OK: 15
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28564
Re: [ZODB-Dev] SVN: ZODB/trunk/ Note split of persistent.
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 15:26:51 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #28563
zope-tests - FAILED: 29, OK: 15
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28562
zope-tests - FAILED: 31, OK: 15, UNKNOWN: 2
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28561
Re: AccessControl bug fixed
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:34:56 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #28560
Re: AccessControl bug fixed
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:30:41 +0200
Hanno Schlichting <[email protected]> • #28559
Re: AccessControl bug fixed
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:23:21 +0200
[email protected] • #28558
zope-tests - FAILED: 58, OK: 15, UNKNOWN: 5
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28557
Re: AccessControl bug fixed
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:37:37 +0200
Hanno Schlichting <[email protected]> • #28556
Re: AccessControl bug fixed
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:46:31 +0530
Martin Aspeli <[email protected]> • #28555
AccessControl bug fixed
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 22:00:33 +0900
Yusei TAHARA <[email protected]> • #28554
zope-tests - FAILED: 114, OK: 15
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28553
zope-tests - FAILED: 115, OK: 15
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 01:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Zope tests summarizer <[email protected]> • #28552
Re: We need to change how code ownership works.
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:28:46 -0700
Ross Patterson <[email protected]> • #28551
zc.buildout in github foul
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:15:41 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #28550
Re: We need to change how code ownership works .
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:12:55 +0200
[email protected] • #28549
Re: zc.buildout semi-resolution
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:05:06 -0400
Alex Clark <[email protected]> • #28548
Re: zc.buildout semi-resolution
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:48:48 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #28547
zc.buildout semi-resolution
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:34:25 -0400
Alex Clark <[email protected]> • #28546
Re: We need to change how code ownership works.
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:33:57 +0200
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> • #28545
Re: We need to change how code ownership works.
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:49:52 +0200
"Charlie Clark" <[email protected]> • #28544
Re: We need to change how code ownership works.
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:46:40 +0200
"Charlie Clark" <[email protected]> • #28543
Re: [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:36:07 -0400
Alex Clark <[email protected]> • #28542
Re: We need to change how code ownership works.
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:25:51 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #28541
Re: We need to change how code ownership works.
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:11:23 +0200
Robert Niederreiter <[email protected]> • #28540
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.