gmane.comp.web.zope.devel archive

9417 archived articles, newest first (page 76 of 95). Latest articles →

Re: zope.test.doctest made into monkey-patches
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:48:14 +0200
Wolfgang Schnerring <[email protected]> • #24139
Re: zope.testrunner (Was: Circular dependency hell.)
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:17:46 +0200
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> • #24138
Re: zope.test.doctest made into monkey-patches (Was: Circular dependency hell.)
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:10:38 +0200
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> • #24137
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:31:07 +0800
Martin Aspeli <[email protected]> • #24136
Re: Validating invariants with zope.schema.getValidationErrors and zope.schema.Object
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:33:42 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #24135
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:43:47 +0200
Christian Theune <[email protected]> • #24134
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:48:52 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #24133
Re: Validating invariants with zope.schema.getValidationErrors and zope.schema.Object
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:47:55 +0400
Andrey Popp <[email protected]> • #24132
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:11:06 -0400
Fred Drake <[email protected]> • #24131
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:09:55 +0200
Christian Theune <[email protected]> • #24130
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:05:43 -0400
Fred Drake <[email protected]> • #24129
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:47:39 +0200
Christian Theune <[email protected]> • #24128
Re: Wanted: representatives from Zope 2, grok, and BlueBream to engineer ZTK 1.0 release
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:41:13 +0000 (UTC)
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman <[email protected]> • #24127
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:24:14 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #24126
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:12:38 +0200
Christian Theune <[email protected]> • #24125
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:04:55 -0400
Fred Drake <[email protected]> • #24124
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:58:06 +0200
Christian Theune <[email protected]> • #24123
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:44:01 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #24122
Re: zope.test.doctest made into monkey-patches (Was: Circular dependency hell.)
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:35:30 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #24121
Re: Validating invariants with zope.schema.getValidationErrors and zope.schema.Object
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:15:48 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #24120
Validating invariants with zope.schema.getValidationErrors and zope.schema.Object
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:05:39 +0400
Andrey Popp <[email protected]> • #24119
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:43:15 +0200
Christian Theune <[email protected]> • #24118
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:41:46 +0200
Christian Theune <[email protected]> • #24117
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:40:53 +0200
Christian Theune <[email protected]> • #24116
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:26:26 +0200
Christian Theune <[email protected]> • #24115
Re: zope.testrunner (Was: Circular dependency hell.)
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:11:07 +0200
Christian Theune <[email protected]> • #24114
Re: zope.test.doctest made into monkey-patches (Was: Circular dependency hell.)
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:13:27 +0200
Christian Theune <[email protected]> • #24113
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:09:36 +0200
Christian Theune <[email protected]> • #24112
Re: Wanted: representatives from Zope 2, grok, and BlueBream to engineer ZTK 1.0 release
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:11:29 +0200
Christian Theune <[email protected]> • #24111
Re: Unauthorized handling in Zope2
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:01:30 +0200
yuppie <[email protected]> • #24110
Re: zope.i18nmessageid-3.5.1 py2.5 win binary
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:01:00 +0200
"Roger" <[email protected]> • #24109
Re: zope.test.doctest made into monkey-patches (Was: Circular dependency hell.)
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:59:20 +0800
Martin Aspeli <[email protected]> • #24108
Re: zope.test.doctest made into monkey-patches (Was: Circular dependency hell.)
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:44:57 -0400
Stephan Richter <[email protected]> • #24107
Re: zope.test.doctest made into monkey-patches (Was: Circular dependency hell.)
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:23:39 +0200
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> • #24106
Re: zope.test.doctest made into monkey-patches (Was: Circular dependency hell.)
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:23:01 +0200
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> • #24105
Re: Unauthorized handling in Zope2
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:22:22 +0200
Wichert Akkerman <[email protected]> • #24104
Re: Unauthorized handling in Zope2
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:17:31 +0200
yuppie <[email protected]> • #24103
Re: Unauthorized handling in Zope2
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:51:12 +0200
Wichert Akkerman <[email protected]> • #24102
Re: Unauthorized handling in Zope2
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:38:04 +0200
Wichert Akkerman <[email protected]> • #24101
Zope Tests: 10 OK, 4 Failed
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:59:04 +0200 (CEST)
Zope Tests Summarizer <[email protected]> • #24100
Re: zope.test.doctest made into monkey-patches (Was: Circular dependency hell.)
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:55:11 -0400
Fred Drake <[email protected]> • #24099
Re: zope.test.doctest made into monkey-patches (Was: Circular dependency hell.)
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:44:22 +0200
Wichert Akkerman <[email protected]> • #24098
Re: zope.test.doctest made into monkey-patches (Was: Circular dependency hell.)
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:37:58 -0400
Stephan Richter <[email protected]> • #24097
Agenda for today's meeting
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:06:37 +0200
Christian Theune <[email protected]> • #24096
zope.test.doctest made into monkey-patches (Was: Circular dependency hell.)
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:46:47 +0200
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> • #24095
Created bug tracker for repository policy
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:25:35 +0200
Christian Theune <[email protected]> • #24094
Re: SVN: ZConfig/trunk/setup.py correct metadata: I really did write this.
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:22:34 +0200
Christian Theune <[email protected]> • #24093
Re: "Comply with repository policy" ?
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:15:47 +0200
Christian Theune <[email protected]> • #24092
Re: Unauthorized handling in Zope2
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:51:39 +0200
yuppie <[email protected]> • #24091
zope.i18nmessageid-3.5.1 py2.5 win binary
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 08:26:42 +0200
Adam Groszer <[email protected]> • #24090
Re: Zope 2.12.5 - this weekend
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:26:04 +0200
"Charlie Clark" <[email protected]> • #24089
Zope 2.12.5 - this weekend
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:22:48 +0200
Hanno Schlichting <[email protected]> • #24088
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:59:25 +0100
Jonathan Lange <[email protected]> • #24087
Re: env var support for zc.buildout
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:50:00 +0200
Florian Friesdorf <[email protected]> • #24086
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:42:02 +0300
Marius Gedminas <[email protected]> • #24085
Re: KGS 3.4.1 versions
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:07:05 +0200
Adam GROSZER <[email protected]> • #24084
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:03:44 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #24083
Re: KGS 3.4.1 versions
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:56:34 +0200
Jonathan Ballet <[email protected]> • #24082
Re: Unauthorized handling in Zope2
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:35:44 +0200
yuppie <[email protected]> • #24081
Re: Zope Tests: 10 OK, 4 Failed
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:35:35 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #24080
Re: Unauthorized handling in Zope2
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:59:19 +0200
yuppie <[email protected]> • #24079
Unauthorized handling in Zope2
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:38:56 +0200
Wichert Akkerman <[email protected]> • #24078
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:34:58 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #24077
Re: env var support for zc.buildout
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:28:37 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #24076
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:17:24 +0100
Jonathan Lange <[email protected]> • #24075
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:07:12 -0400
Benji York <[email protected]> • #24074
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:06:08 +0200
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> • #24073
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:03:45 +0200
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> • #24072
Re: env var support for zc.buildout
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:00:40 +0200
Florian Friesdorf <[email protected]> • #24071
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:56:02 +0200
Wichert Akkerman <[email protected]> • #24070
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:48:14 +0300
Marius Gedminas <[email protected]> • #24069
Re: zope.testrunner (Was: Circular dependency hell.)
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:42:03 +0200
Jonathan Ballet <[email protected]> • #24068
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:19:22 -0400
Benji York <[email protected]> • #24067
Zope Tests: 10 OK, 4 Failed
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:59:05 +0200 (CEST)
Zope Tests Summarizer <[email protected]> • #24066
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:21:12 +0200
"Charlie Clark" <[email protected]> • #24065
zope.testrunner (Was: Circular dependency hell.)
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:03:28 +0200
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> • #24064
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:50:23 +0200
Adam GROSZER <[email protected]> • #24063
Re: KGS 3.4.1 versions
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:02:26 +0200
Adam GROSZER <[email protected]> • #24062
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 08:22:00 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #24061
Zope Tests: 10 OK, 4 Failed
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:59:06 +0200 (CEST)
Zope Tests Summarizer <[email protected]> • #24060
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:38:27 +0200
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> • #24059
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:35:40 +0200
Christophe Combelles <[email protected]> • #24058
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:29:24 +0200
Wichert Akkerman <[email protected]> • #24057
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:14:28 +0200
Godefroid Chapelle <[email protected]> • #24056
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 10:50:42 +0200
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> • #24055
Re: Repository for the zope mail summarizer
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 10:47:28 +0200
Christophe Combelles <[email protected]> • #24054
Re: Circular dependency hell.
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 10:37:20 +0200
Christophe Combelles <[email protected]> • #24053
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:27:06 +0800
Martin Aspeli <[email protected]> • #24052
Re: KGS 3.4.1 versions
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 02:54:08 +0200
Christophe Combelles <[email protected]> • #24051
Re: KGS 3.4.1 versions
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 02:50:04 +0200
Christophe Combelles <[email protected]> • #24050
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 19:26:34 -0400
Chris McDonough <[email protected]> • #24049
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:20:14 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #24048
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:01:44 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #24047
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:56:24 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #24046
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:42:58 +0200
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> • #24045
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:17:09 -0400
Tres Seaver <[email protected]> • #24044
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:35:01 +0200
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> • #24043
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 15:05:13 +0100
Laurence Rowe <[email protected]> • #24042
Zope Tests: 10 OK, 4 Failed
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:59:06 +0200 (CEST)
Zope Tests Summarizer <[email protected]> • #24041
Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:41:08 +0200
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> • #24040
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.