gmane.comp.windows.wtl archive

Re: question about thunk

Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:33:49 -0000

"tom_gee" <tom_gee-/[email protected]> • #16711

Re: Re: question about thunk

Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:26:28 +0200

Philipp Kursawe <[email protected]> • #16710

Re: question about thunk

Wed, 13 Apr 2011 03:46:07 -0000

"tom_gee" <tom_gee-/[email protected]> • #16709

Re: question about thunk

Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:07:30 -0400

"Igor Tandetnik" <[email protected]> • #16708

question about thunk

Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:24:28 -0000

"tom_gee" <tom_gee-/[email protected]> • #16707

Re: WTL docking windows

Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:59:43 -0000

"yarp" <lac-3QW3q7+2X3hWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #16706

Handling LVN_DELETEITEM in directly in subclass

Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:18:29 +0200

Philipp Kursawe <[email protected]> • #16705

Re: WTL docking windows

Mon, 11 Apr 2011 07:03:13 -0000

"PABLO" <[email protected]> • #16704

WTL docking windows

Sun, 10 Apr 2011 06:21:57 -0000

"umeca74" <[email protected]> • #16703

Re: Processing after OnInitDialog OnShow ?

Sun, 27 Mar 2011 08:16:42 -0000

"yarp" <lac-3QW3q7+2X3hWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #16702

Re: Processing after OnInitDialog OnShow ?

Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:41:48 +0100

Ilker Aksen <[email protected]> • #16701

Re: Processing after OnInitDialog OnShow ?

Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:44:18 -0000

"yarp" <lac-3QW3q7+2X3hWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #16700

ATLCPImplMT.h updated

Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:04:01 -0000

"codewizok51" <gene_harris_88-/[email protected]> • #16699

Re: Processing after OnInitDialog OnShow ?

Fri, 25 Mar 2011 07:35:03 -0400

"Igor Tandetnik" <[email protected]> • #16698

Processing after OnInitDialog OnShow ?

Fri, 25 Mar 2011 07:03:24 -0000

"yarp" <lac-3QW3q7+2X3hWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #16697

Re: custom-drawing a CTabCtrl

Sat, 12 Mar 2011 21:18:33 -0000

"chuck_berrys_bastard_son" <[email protected]> • #16696

Re: SDI, mainframe without menu?

Sun, 13 Mar 2011 21:23:24 -0000

"Dani" <dmagn25-/[email protected]> • #16695

Re: SDI, mainframe without menu?

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:02:27 -0000

"domehead100" <[email protected]> • #16694

SDI, mainframe without menu?

Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:58:10 -0000

"Dani" <dmagn25-/[email protected]> • #16693

atltheme.h nitpick

Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:20:35 -0000

"umeca74" <[email protected]> • #16692

Re: WTL dialogs in MFC application

Mon, 21 Feb 2011 08:10:57 -0000

"sagymz" <[email protected]> • #16691

RE: WTL dialogs in MFC application

Sun, 20 Feb 2011 21:02:22 -0500

"Michael Stephenson" <[email protected]> • #16690

WTL dialogs in MFC application

Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:21:29 -0000

"sagymz" <[email protected]> • #16689

Re: NM_DBLCLK handler for a CListViewCtrl

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:20:56 +0000

Jim Barry <[email protected]> • #16688

NM_DBLCLK handler for a CListViewCtrl

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:44:52 -0000

"addicted2freefall" <addicted2freefall-/[email protected]> • #16687

Re: Re: CTreeViewCtrl and WM_PAINT

Mon, 07 Feb 2011 11:37:08 +0200

Andrey Sergienko <[email protected]> • #16686

custom-drawing a CTabCtrl

Fri, 04 Feb 2011 23:02:09 -0000

"lighth7015" <[email protected]> • #16685

Re: CTreeViewCtrl and WM_PAINT

Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:46:20 -0500

Igor Tandetnik <[email protected]> • #16684

RE: CTreeViewCtrl and WM_PAINT

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:06:41 -0500

"Michael Stephenson" <[email protected]> • #16683

CTreeViewCtrl and WM_PAINT

Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:56:22 +0200

Andrey Sergienko <[email protected]> • #16682

menu bar painting issue for large DPI

Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:52:52 -0000

"umeca74" <[email protected]> • #16681

Re: Mainframe menu position (as in explorer)

Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:48:26 -0000

"Dani" <dmagn25-/[email protected]> • #16680

Re: Mainframe menu position (as in explorer)

Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:14:57 -0000

"Shan Lin" <[email protected]> • #16679

Re: Mainframe menu position (as in explorer)

Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:26:13 -0500

"Igor Tandetnik" <[email protected]> • #16678

Mainframe menu position (as in explorer)

Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:39:52 -0000

"Dani" <dmagn25-/[email protected]> • #16677

RE: Dialog activation issue (hard problem?)

Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:26:13 -0500

Dan Jiang <[email protected]> • #16676

RE: Dialog activation issue (hard problem?)

Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:12:06 -0500

Dan Jiang <[email protected]> • #16675

Re: Dialog activation issue (hard problem?)

Sun, 12 Dec 2010 05:35:46 -0800

Joe Andrieu <joe-SkMv+1uwgv/[email protected]> • #16674

Dialog activation issue (hard problem?)

Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:32:02 -0000

"dennisyjiang" <[email protected]> • #16673

menu does not work

Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:24:39 -0000

"song.huiju" <song.huiju-/[email protected]> • #16672

Re: Do you know "big" commercial software developed with WTL ?

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:20:16 +0000

"Angus Comber" <angus-v2qo0/[email protected]> • #16671

RE: Do you know "big" commercial software developed with WTL ?

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:50:12 -0800

"Peter Kvitek" <[email protected]> • #16670

Re: Do you know "big" commercial software developed with WTL ?

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:00:45 +0100

Cristian Adam <[email protected]> • #16669

RE: Do you know "big" commercial software developed with WTL ?

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:46:41 -0000

"Anna-Jayne Metcalfe" <[email protected]> • #16668

Re: Do you know "big" commercial software developed with WTL ?

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:13:20 +0100

"Alain Rist" <[email protected]> • #16667

Do you know "big" commercial software developed with WTL ?

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:19:52 -0000

"jean_davy" <[email protected]> • #16666

Re: Newbie question about WTL

Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:16:58 +0000

Anthony Williams <anthony_w.geo-/[email protected]> • #16665

Re: Re: Newbie question about WTL

Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:20:46 +0100

<[email protected]> • #16664

Re: Newbie question about WTL

Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:47:08 +0000

Anthony Williams <anthony_w.geo-/[email protected]> • #16663

Re: Newbie question about WTL

Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:10:46 -0000

"japydooge" <japydooge-/[email protected]> • #16662

Re: What is the latest on formal plans for the next official WTL version?

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 03:34:07 -0800

Nenad Stefanovic <[email protected]> • #16661

RE: What is the latest on formal plans for the next official WTL version?

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:08:49 -0800

"Peter Kvitek" <[email protected]> • #16660

Re: Re: What is the latest on formal plans for the next official WTL version?

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:56:33 +0300

Elijah Zarezky <[email protected]> • #16659

Re: Re: What is the latest on formal plans for the next official WTL version?

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 07:54:36 -0500

Igor Vigdorchik <igorv007-/[email protected]> • #16658

Re: Re: What is the latest on formal plans for the next official WTL version?

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 03:36:30 -0800

Joe Andrieu <joe-SkMv+1uwgv/[email protected]> • #16657

Re: What is the latest on formal plans for the next official WTL version?

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:52:12 -0000

"umeca74" <[email protected]> • #16656

Re: What is the latest on formal plans for the next official WTL version?

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:23:23 -0800

Nenad Stefanovic <[email protected]> • #16655

Re: What is the latest on formal plans for the next official WTL version?

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 04:37:00 -0000

"yarp" <lac-3QW3q7+2X3hWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #16654

Re: What is the latest on formal plans for the next official WTL version?

Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:27:11 +0100

Philipp Kursawe <[email protected]> • #16653

Re: What is the latest on formal plans for the next official WTL version?

Tue, 9 Nov 2010 18:42:50 -0800

Nenad Stefanovic <[email protected]> • #16652

What is the latest on formal plans for the next official WTL version?

Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:09:28 -0000

"Mike Diack" <[email protected]> • #16651

RE: GDI leak in command bar?

Mon, 8 Nov 2010 22:14:29 +0000

Mark Kramer <[email protected]> • #16650