gmane.ietf.ldapext archive

362 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: DBIS commentary
Tue, 1 Dec 2015 09:52:56 -0800
Jordan Brown <[email protected]> • #1815
Re: DBIS commentary
Tue, 1 Dec 2015 03:51:03 -0800
Ludovic Poitou <[email protected]> • #1814
Re: DBIS commentary
Tue, 1 Dec 2015 10:13:28 +0000
"Bannister, Mark" <[email protected]> • #1813
Re: DBIS commentary
Mon, 30 Nov 2015 12:06:08 -0800
Jordan Brown <[email protected]> • #1812
Re: DBIS commentary
Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:36:46 -0500
Charlie <[email protected]> • #1811
Re: DBIS commentary
Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:06:42 -0500
Simo Sorce <[email protected]> • #1810
Re: OATH-LDAP as ldapext WG item?
Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:06:32 -0500
Simo Sorce <[email protected]> • #1809
Re: DBIS commentary
Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:40:08 +1100
Steven Legg <[email protected]> • #1808
Re: DBIS commentary
Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:01:44 +0000
"Bannister, Mark" <[email protected]> • #1807
Re: OATH-LDAP as ldapext WG item?
Wed, 25 Nov 2015 16:34:26 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1806
Re: OATH-LDAP as ldapext WG item?
Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:20:25 +0100
Petr Spacek <[email protected]> • #1805
Re: New LDAPEXT charter
Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:58:14 +0000
"Mark R Bannister" <[email protected]> • #1804
Re: New LDAPEXT charter
Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:07:51 -0500
Barry Leiba <[email protected]> • #1803
OATH-LDAP as ldapext WG item?
Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:49:30 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1802
Next LDAPExt draft charter...
Tue, 24 Nov 2015 08:46:06 +0100
Ludovic Poitou <[email protected]> • #1801
Re: New LDAPEXT charter
Tue, 24 Nov 2015 07:29:44 +0000
"Mark R Bannister" <[email protected]> • #1800
Re: New LDAPEXT charter
Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:26:32 -0500
Barry Leiba <[email protected]> • #1799
Re: New LDAPEXT charter
Thu, 19 Nov 2015 22:57:23 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1798
Re: New LDAPEXT charter
Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:14:31 +0000
Mark R Bannister <[email protected]> • #1797
Re: New LDAPEXT charter
Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:45:36 +0000
Chris Ridd <[email protected]> • #1796
Re: New LDAPEXT charter
Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:25:35 +0000
Mark R Bannister <[email protected]> • #1795
Re: New LDAPEXT charter
Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:47:57 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1794
Re: New LDAPEXT charter
Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:34:31 +0000
Mark R Bannister <[email protected]> • #1793
Re: Content Synchronization Operation + Transactions
Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:16:11 +0100
Petr Spacek <[email protected]> • #1792
Re: New LDAPEXT charter
Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:20:33 -0800
Sean Leonard <[email protected]> • #1791
New LDAPEXT charter
Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:01:04 +0000
Mark R Bannister <[email protected]> • #1790
Re: Comparing RFC2307, RFC2307bis and DBIS
Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:36:19 +0100
Mark R Bannister <[email protected]> • #1789
Re: parsing LDIF: leading spaces
Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:06:11 +0200
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1788
Re: parsing LDIF: leading spaces
Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:18:30 -0500
[email protected] • #1787
parsing LDIF: leading spaces
Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:21:11 +0200
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1786
Re: request that ldap-pkcs9 be in LDAP charter scope, or not
Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:00:12 +0200
Ludovic Poitou <[email protected]> • #1785
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:58:58 +0200
Ludovic Poitou <[email protected]> • #1784
request that ldap-pkcs9 be in LDAP charter scope, or not
Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:37:09 -0700
Sean Leonard <[email protected]> • #1783
New Version Notification for draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9-03.txt
Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:33:21 -0700
Sean Leonard <[email protected]> • #1782
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Wed, 02 Sep 2015 23:33:44 +0200
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1781
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:55:25 -0400
Barry Leiba <[email protected]> • #1780
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:49:37 -0400
Barry Leiba <[email protected]> • #1779
Re: Content Synchronization Operation + Transactions
Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:32:04 +0200
Petr Spacek <[email protected]> • #1778
Re: Content Synchronization Operation + Transactions
Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:23:30 +0100
Howard Chu <[email protected]> • #1777
Re: Content Synchronization Operation + Transactions
Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:07:53 +0200
Petr Spacek <[email protected]> • #1776
Content Synchronization Operation + Transactions
Wed, 03 Jun 2015 09:35:35 +0200
Petr Spacek <[email protected]> • #1775
Comparing RFC2307, RFC2307bis and DBIS
Tue, 14 Apr 2015 00:07:27 +0100
Mark R Bannister <[email protected]> • #1774
Working on password policy standardization
Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:37:05 +0100
Clément OUDOT <[email protected]> • #1773
Re: Fwd: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-10
Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:50:37 +0000
Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> • #1772
Fwd: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-10
Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:40:01 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1771
Re: Schema for posixGroup successor (RFC 2307 bis)
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:54:36 +0000
Andrew Findlay <[email protected]> • #1770
Re: Schema for posixGroup successor (RFC 2307 bis)
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:33:05 +0100
Ludovic Poitou <[email protected]> • #1769
Re: Schema for posixGroup successor (RFC 2307 bis)
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:30:53 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1768
Re: Schema for posixGroup successor (RFC 2307 bis)
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:26:05 +0100
Ludovic Poitou <[email protected]> • #1767
Re: Schema for posixGroup successor (RFC 2307 bis)
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:53:00 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1766
Re: Schema for posixGroup successor (RFC 2307 bis)
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:48:07 +0000
Andrew Findlay <[email protected]> • #1765
Re: Schema for posixGroup successor (RFC 2307 bis)
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:17:43 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1764
Re: Schema for posixGroup successor (RFC 2307 bis)
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:27:38 +0000
Andrew Findlay <[email protected]> • #1763
Re: RFC2307, netgroups, DBIS
Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:52:56 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1762
Re: RFC2307, netgroups, DBIS
Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:35:20 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1761
Re: RFC2307, netgroups, DBIS
Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:11:12 +0000
Mark R Bannister <[email protected]> • #1760
Re: RFC2307, netgroups, DBIS
Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:56:44 +0000
Mark R Bannister <[email protected]> • #1759
Re: Schema for posixGroup successor (RFC 2307 bis)
Wed, 11 Feb 2015 06:29:30 -0500
Simo Sorce <[email protected]> • #1758
Re: Schema for posixGroup successor (RFC 2307 bis)
Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:24:40 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1757
Schema for posixGroup successor (RFC 2307 bis)
Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:58:31 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1756
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 10:48:24 +0100
Ludovic Poitou <[email protected]> • #1755
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 09:51:18 +0100
Clément OUDOT <[email protected]> • #1754
Re: RFC2307, netgroups, DBIS
Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:18:55 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1753
Re: RFC2307, netgroups, DBIS
Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:06:48 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1752
Re: RFC2307, netgroups, DBIS
Wed, 04 Feb 2015 21:55:42 +0000
Mark R Bannister <[email protected]> • #1751
Re: RFC2307, netgroups, DBIS
Wed, 04 Feb 2015 21:41:01 +0000
Mark R Bannister <[email protected]> • #1750
RFC2307, netgroups, DBIS (was: LDAP work at IETF...)
Mon, 02 Feb 2015 11:20:22 +0100
"[email protected] (POP3)" <[email protected]> • #1749
RFC2307, netgroups, DBIS (was: LDAP work at IETF...)
Mon, 02 Feb 2015 11:29:12 +0100
"[email protected] (POP3)" <[email protected]> • #1748
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Sun, 01 Feb 2015 22:50:36 +0000
Mark R Bannister <[email protected]> • #1747
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Sun, 01 Feb 2015 22:33:08 +0000
Mark R Bannister <[email protected]> • #1746
LDAPCon 2015 Call for Papers
Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:49:02 +0000
Andrew Findlay <[email protected]> • #1745
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:51:39 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1744
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Tue, 27 Jan 2015 23:26:53 +0000
Mark R Bannister <[email protected]> • #1743
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Tue, 27 Jan 2015 23:14:17 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1742
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Tue, 27 Jan 2015 20:50:43 +0000
Mark R Bannister <[email protected]> • #1741
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:47:54 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1740
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:03:06 +0000
Mark R Bannister <[email protected]> • #1739
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:55:01 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1738
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:16:17 +0000
Andrew Findlay <[email protected]> • #1737
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:06:56 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1736
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Sun, 25 Jan 2015 22:55:33 +0100
Clément OUDOT <[email protected]> • #1735
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Sun, 25 Jan 2015 22:03:35 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1734
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Sun, 25 Jan 2015 20:40:55 +0000
Gavin Henry <[email protected]> • #1733
LDAP work at IETF...
Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:36:00 +0100
Ludovic Poitou <[email protected]> • #1732
Re: LDAP work at IETF...
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:22:18 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1731
Re: why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:07:40 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1730
Re: why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:53:17 +0000
Andrew Findlay <[email protected]> • #1729
Re: why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:43:03 +1100
Luke Howard <[email protected]> • #1728
Re: why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
Wed, 17 Dec 2014 04:21:18 -0500
Jim Willeke <[email protected]> • #1727
Re: why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
Tue, 16 Dec 2014 23:11:40 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1726
Re: why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:09:53 -0800
Kurt Zeilenga <[email protected]> • #1725
Re: why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:50:44 -0500
Charlie <[email protected]> • #1724
Re: why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:04:24 +0000
Mark R Bannister <[email protected]> • #1723
Re: why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:03:06 -0500
Jim Willeke <[email protected]> • #1722
Re: why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
Mon, 15 Dec 2014 01:17:28 +0100
Hallvard Breien Furuseth <[email protected]> • #1721
Re: why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
Sun, 14 Dec 2014 23:49:35 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1720
Re: why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:11:02 -0800
Kurt Zeilenga <[email protected]> • #1719
Re: why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
Sun, 14 Dec 2014 21:19:53 +0100
Michael Ströder <[email protected]> • #1718
Re: why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
Sun, 14 Dec 2014 12:06:04 -0800
Kurt Zeilenga <[email protected]> • #1717
Re: why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
Sun, 14 Dec 2014 12:05:11 -0800
Kurt Zeilenga <[email protected]> • #1716
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.