gmane.ietf.x509 archive

395 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Critical certificate policies extension
Thu, 21 Jul 2022 06:09:18 +0000
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> • #34056
Re: Critical certificate policies extension
Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:28:08 +0200
Niklas Matthies <[email protected]> • #34055
Re: Critical certificate policies extension
Thu, 14 Jul 2022 08:31:26 +0000
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> • #34054
Re: Critical certificate policies extension
Tue, 12 Jul 2022 00:59:06 +0000 (UTC)
"Todd E. Johnson" <[email protected]> • #34053
Re: Critical certificate policies extension
Mon, 11 Jul 2022 23:59:19 +0200
Niklas Matthies <[email protected]> • #34052
Re: Critical certificate policies extension
Mon, 11 Jul 2022 23:36:17 +0200
Niklas Matthies <[email protected]> • #34051
Re: Critical certificate policies extension
Tue, 12 Jul 2022 07:28:43 +1000 (AEST)
[email protected] • #34050
Re: Critical certificate policies extension
Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:28:21 -0400
Carl Wallace <[email protected]> • #34049
Re: Critical certificate policies extension
Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:59:00 +0200
Niklas Matthies <[email protected]> • #34048
Re: Critical certificate policies extension
Mon, 11 Jul 2022 11:23:17 -0400
"Santosh Chokhani" <[email protected]> • #34047
Re: Critical certificate policies extension
Mon, 11 Jul 2022 14:52:40 +0000
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> • #34046
Critical certificate policies extension
Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:29:02 +0200
Niklas Matthies <[email protected]> • #34045
Re: TPM Privacy CA - in the wild?
Thu, 7 Jul 2022 14:44:00 -0400
Michael StJohns <[email protected]> • #34044
Re: TPM Privacy CA - in the wild?
Thu, 7 Jul 2022 11:44:37 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #34043
TPM Privacy CA - in the wild?
Thu, 7 Jul 2022 11:35:20 -0400
Michael StJohns <[email protected]> • #34042
Re: In-the-wild implementations of RFC6955?
Tue, 7 Jun 2022 20:29:33 +0000
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> • #34041
Re: In-the-wild implementations of RFC6955?
Fri, 27 May 2022 06:47:43 +0200
Anders Rundgren <[email protected]> • #34040
Re: In-the-wild implementations of RFC6955?
Thu, 26 May 2022 21:22:25 +0200
Anders Rundgren <[email protected]> • #34039
Re: In-the-wild implementations of RFC6955?
Thu, 26 May 2022 13:58:25 -0400
Michael StJohns <[email protected]> • #34038
Re: In-the-wild implementations of RFC6955?
Thu, 26 May 2022 19:42:00 +0200
Anders Rundgren <[email protected]> • #34037
Re: In-the-wild implementations of RFC6955?
Thu, 26 May 2022 13:33:45 -0400
Michael StJohns <[email protected]> • #34036
Re: In-the-wild implementations of RFC6955?
Thu, 26 May 2022 16:55:55 +0000
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> • #34035
Re: In-the-wild implementations of RFC6955?
Tue, 24 May 2022 12:33:26 -0400
Michael StJohns <[email protected]> • #34034
Re: In-the-wild implementations of RFC6955?
Tue, 24 May 2022 06:22:51 +0000
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> • #34033
In-the-wild implementations of RFC6955?
Mon, 23 May 2022 17:55:57 -0400
Michael StJohns <[email protected]> • #34032
Re: revocation of expired certificates
Fri, 20 May 2022 11:36:27 -0400
"David A. Cooper" <[email protected]> • #34031
revocation of expired certificates
Fri, 20 May 2022 04:05:59 +0000
KATA Tanej - Contractor <[email protected]> • #34030
[Errata Verified] RFC6402 (6571)
Mon, 9 May 2022 17:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #34029
[Errata Verified] RFC3029 (6444)
Mon, 9 May 2022 17:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #34028
Re: [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC4210 (5731)
Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:35:16 +0000
Roman Danyliw <[email protected]> • #34027
Re: [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC4210 (5731)
Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:38:55 +0000
Carlisle Adams <[email protected]> • #34026
[Errata Held for Document Update] RFC4210 (5731)
Tue, 26 Apr 2022 19:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #34025
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4210 (6897)
Tue, 29 Mar 2022 15:33:21 -0700
Chris Smiley <[email protected]> • #34024
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4210 (6897)
Mon, 28 Mar 2022 14:24:51 +0000
Carlisle Adams <[email protected]> • #34023
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4210 (6897)
Sun, 27 Mar 2022 16:43:01 -0700
Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> • #34022
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC4210 (6897)
Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #34021
[Errata Verified] RFC4210 (5201)
Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:17:37 -0800 (PST)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #34020
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5280 (6830)
Wed, 2 Feb 2022 21:29:06 +0100
Stefan Santesson <[email protected]> • #34019
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5280 (6830)
Wed, 2 Feb 2022 12:16:11 -0500
Russ Housley <[email protected]> • #34018
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC5280 (6830)
Wed, 2 Feb 2022 09:08:13 -0800 (PST)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #34017
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5912 (6806)
Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:28:28 -0800
Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> • #34016
[Errata Verified] RFC5912 (6806)
Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:27:38 -0800 (PST)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #34015
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5912 (6806)
Mon, 3 Jan 2022 16:39:56 -0500
Russ Housley <[email protected]> • #34014
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC5912 (6806)
Mon, 3 Jan 2022 13:14:55 -0800 (PST)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #34013
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3779 (6792)
Fri, 24 Dec 2021 20:15:55 -0800
Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> • #34012
[Errata Verified] RFC3779 (6792)
Fri, 24 Dec 2021 20:15:17 -0800 (PST)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #34011
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3779 (6792)
Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:59:08 -0500
Russ Housley <[email protected]> • #34010
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC3779 (6792)
Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:43:13 -0800 (PST)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #34009
Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6844 (6715)
Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:00:51 +0000
Rob Stradling <[email protected]> • #34008
Re: Time in CMC requests
Wed, 27 Oct 2021 03:34:14 +0200
Anders Rundgren <[email protected]> • #34007
Re: Time in CMC requests
Tue, 26 Oct 2021 21:36:38 +0200
Stefan Santesson <[email protected]> • #34006
Re: Time in CMC requests
Tue, 26 Oct 2021 19:15:05 +0200
Anders Rundgren <[email protected]> • #34005
Time in CMC requests
Tue, 26 Oct 2021 18:29:22 +0200
Stefan Santesson <[email protected]> • #34004
[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6844 (6715)
Mon, 18 Oct 2021 08:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #34003
[Errata Verified] RFC5480 (6670)
Wed, 1 Sep 2021 09:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #34002
[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3279 (6672)
Tue, 31 Aug 2021 18:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #34001
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC5480 (6670)
Tue, 31 Aug 2021 14:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #34000
Re: iPAddress name constraints encoding
Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:47:49 -0400
Russ Housley <[email protected]> • #33999
iPAddress name constraints encoding
Wed, 25 Aug 2021 21:06:11 +0000
Corey Bonnell <[email protected]> • #33998
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3029 (6445)
Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:15:45 -0400
Sean Turner <[email protected]> • #33997
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6402 (6571)
Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:07:14 -0400
Sean Turner <[email protected]> • #33996
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC6402 (6571)
Tue, 4 May 2021 14:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #33995
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC5755 (6567)
Sat, 1 May 2021 14:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #33994
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Fri, 30 Apr 2021 17:02:20 +0000
"Dars, Mihran [VendorPass]" <[email protected]> • #33993
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Thu, 22 Apr 2021 23:01:22 +0000
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> • #33992
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:58:02 +0200
Ernst G Giessmann <[email protected]> • #33991
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:21:24 +0000
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> • #33990
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:28:43 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #33989
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:07:58 +0200
Stefan Santesson <[email protected]> • #33988
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 22:51:31 +0200
Niklas Matthies <[email protected]> • #33987
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 22:18:58 +0200
Stefan Santesson <[email protected]> • #33986
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:04:02 -0400
Russ Housley <[email protected]> • #33985
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 21:38:20 +0200
Stefan Santesson <[email protected]> • #33984
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 11:55:54 -0400
Russ Housley <[email protected]> • #33983
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:47:53 +0000
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> • #33982
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 11:42:48 -0400
Russ Housley <[email protected]> • #33981
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:38:52 +0100
Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> • #33980
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 11:33:40 -0400
Russ Housley <[email protected]> • #33979
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:20:56 +0000
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> • #33978
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:23:05 +0200
Niklas Matthies <[email protected]> • #33977
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:55:52 +0000
"Manger, James" <[email protected]> • #33976
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:50:27 +0000
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> • #33975
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:42:14 +0000
"Manger, James" <[email protected]> • #33974
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:28:47 +0000
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> • #33973
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:16:08 -0700
"Paul Hoffman" <[email protected]> • #33972
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:13:59 -0700
"Paul Hoffman" <[email protected]> • #33971
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Tue, 20 Apr 2021 18:04:32 -0400
Russ Housley <[email protected]> • #33970
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:58:14 +0000
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> • #33969
Re: Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Tue, 20 Apr 2021 17:41:40 -0400
Russ Housley <[email protected]> • #33968
Why is the crlNumber an OCTET STRING?
Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:20:36 +0000
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> • #33967
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3029 (6444)
Tue, 2 Mar 2021 11:25:52 -0500
Russ Housley <[email protected]> • #33966
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3029 (6444)
Tue, 2 Mar 2021 03:07:03 +0000
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> • #33965
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3029 (6444)
Mon, 01 Mar 2021 19:45:41 -0500
Carl Wallace <[email protected]> • #33964
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3029 (6444)
Mon, 01 Mar 2021 19:40:15 -0500
Carl Wallace <[email protected]> • #33963
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3029 (6444)
Mon, 01 Mar 2021 23:53:28 +0100
Stefan Santesson <[email protected]> • #33962
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.