gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips archive

2301 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 24). Latest articles →

Bug#1110684: RM: rust-tiny-dfr [armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el riscv64 s390x] -- ROM; update only builds on arm64 and amd64
Sun, 10 Aug 2025 03:26:34 +0200
NoisyCoil <[email protected]> • #10231
Payment for Order is now complete
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 07:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
Joshua Bouchard <[email protected]> • #10230
Ihre Rechnung RE41695 von Ai LO GmbH
Mon, 28 Jul 2025 09:31:40 +0100
"Rechnung" <[email protected]> • #10229
Re: Difference between mips64el builders?
Sun, 18 May 2025 11:57:16 +0200
Hilmar Preusse <[email protected]> • #10228
Bug#1105965: Remove mips64el from testing
Sun, 18 May 2025 10:54:32 +0200
Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> • #10227
Re: Bug#1093859: release.debian.org: status of mips64el for trixie
Sun, 18 May 2025 10:34:16 +0200
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #10226
Bug#1105913: RM: python-freecontact [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Not provided on 32bit architectures any more
Sat, 17 May 2025 07:57:38 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #10225
Bug#1105912: RM: libfreecontact-perl [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Not provided on 32bit architectures any more
Sat, 17 May 2025 07:57:25 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #10224
Re: NA and NaN representation on mips64el
Sat, 17 May 2025 06:17:25 +0200
Rafael Laboissière <[email protected]> • #10223
Re: NA and NaN representation on mips64el
Fri, 16 May 2025 19:15:06 -0400
James Cloos <[email protected]> • #10222
Re: Difference between mips64el builders?
Fri, 16 May 2025 22:49:31 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #10221
Re: NA and NaN representation on mips64el
Fri, 16 May 2025 09:52:52 -0400
James Cloos <[email protected]> • #10220
Re: NA and NaN representation on mips64el
Fri, 16 May 2025 07:31:19 +0200
Rafael Laboissière <[email protected]> • #10219
Re: NA and NaN representation on mips64el
Thu, 15 May 2025 23:50:40 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #10218
Re: NA and NaN representation on mips64el
Tue, 13 May 2025 09:24:53 +0200
Rafael Laboissière <[email protected]> • #10217
Re: NA and NaN representation on mips64el
Mon, 12 May 2025 23:53:48 -0400
"John W. Eaton" <[email protected]> • #10216
Re: NA and NaN representation on mips64el
Tue, 13 May 2025 08:49:07 +0800
YunQiang Su <[email protected]> • #10215
NA and NaN representation on mips64el
Mon, 12 May 2025 18:12:01 +0200
Rafael Laboissière <[email protected]> • #10214
Bug#1104802: RM: freecontact [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Not provided on 32bit architectures any more
Tue, 06 May 2025 20:03:54 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #10213
Re: Bug#1100544: reopening, c-t-b-mipsen is still unfixed
Thu, 1 May 2025 13:55:58 +0200
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #10212
Bug#1050872: MIPS Linux kernel versions for trixie/sid
Mon, 28 Apr 2025 07:02:02 +0200 (CEST)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #10211
MIPS Linux kernel versions for trixie/sid
Sat, 26 Apr 2025 01:32:23 +0200 (CEST)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #10210
Re: Bug#1103627: openjdk-20: Remove from Debian?
Thu, 24 Apr 2025 03:40:11 +0200
"Matthias Klose (Ubuntu)" <[email protected]> • #10209
Re: Bug#1102299: patchelf: FTBFS on mips64el
Sun, 20 Apr 2025 19:57:50 -0400
Sergio Durigan Junior <[email protected]> • #10208
Re: Bug#1102299: patchelf: FTBFS on mips64el
Sat, 19 Apr 2025 17:43:13 -0400
Sergio Durigan Junior <[email protected]> • #10207
Re: Bug#1102299: patchelf: FTBFS on mips64el
Sat, 19 Apr 2025 16:16:14 -0400
Sergio Durigan Junior <[email protected]> • #10206
Bug#1102299: patchelf: FTBFS on mips64el
Sat, 19 Apr 2025 15:04:43 -0400
Sergio Durigan Junior <[email protected]> • #10205
Bug#1102299: patchelf: FTBFS on mips64el
Sat, 19 Apr 2025 18:13:51 +0200
Chris Hofstaedtler <[email protected]> • #10204
Bug#1103585: RM: lomiri-docviewer-app [mips64el] -- RoQA; build-depends unavailable
Sat, 19 Apr 2025 13:25:40 +0200
Chris Hofstaedtler <[email protected]> • #10203
Re: Bug#1093859: release.debian.org: status of mips64el for trixie
Sat, 12 Apr 2025 11:35:40 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10202
Re: go test SIGSEGV on mips64el for gitsign/0.13.0-1
Sat, 12 Apr 2025 08:58:21 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #10201
Re: Bug#1093859: release.debian.org: mips64el vs. librsvg needs resolving for trixie
Fri, 11 Apr 2025 20:37:44 +0200
Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> • #10200
Re: go test SIGSEGV on mips64el for gitsign/0.13.0-1
Fri, 11 Apr 2025 10:43:52 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #10199
go test SIGSEGV on mips64el for gitsign/0.13.0-1
Fri, 11 Apr 2025 10:30:42 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #10198
Bug#1102418: RM: lloconv [mips64el] -- ANAIS; LibreOffice no longer built on mips64el
Wed, 9 Apr 2025 09:08:48 +1200
Olly Betts <[email protected]> • #10197
Bug#1102279: lib{,n}32atomic1 have an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib32/libatomic.so.1*
Mon, 7 Apr 2025 11:39:38 +0200
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #10196
Bug#1102277: RM: endless-sky [mips64el] -- ROM; let it migrate to Trixie
Mon, 07 Apr 2025 09:39:17 +0200
Alexandre Detiste <[email protected]> • #10195
boost1.88 also ftbfs on alpha, hppa, m68k, sh4.
Sun, 6 Apr 2025 11:05:53 +0200
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #10194
Bug#1102196: boost1.88 unknown architectures
Sun, 6 Apr 2025 11:02:39 +0200
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #10193
Bug#1102111: src:lomiri-docviewer-app: fails to migrate to testing for too long
Sat, 5 Apr 2025 08:22:14 +0200
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #10192
Bug#1102007: RM: gitaly/experimental [amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el riscv64 s390x] -- ROM; replaced by gitaly-installer
Fri, 04 Apr 2025 02:43:01 +0530
Pirate Praveen <[email protected]> • #10191
Bug#1101954: RM: iitii [mips64el] -- RoQA; last revision of build dep not available
Wed, 02 Apr 2025 22:26:43 +0200
Bastian Germann <[email protected]> • #10190
Bug#1101692: singularity-container: FTBFS on mips64el: cannot use stat.Dev (variable of type uint32) as uint64 value in struct literal
Sun, 30 Mar 2025 14:11:44 +0200
Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> • #10189
Bug#1101103: RM: gitaly [amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el riscv64 s390x] -- ROM; it only build arch:all package
Sun, 23 Mar 2025 17:59:34 +0530
Pirate Praveen <[email protected]> • #10188
Bug#1100904: src:libcap2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el
Thu, 20 Mar 2025 23:40:58 +0100
Christian Kastner <[email protected]> • #10187
Bug#1100904: src:libcap2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el
Thu, 20 Mar 2025 11:05:52 +0100
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #10186
Re: Please apply 8fa507083388 ("mm/memory: Use exception ip to search exception tables") (and one required dependency) to v6.1.y
Wed, 5 Mar 2025 15:09:44 +0100
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> • #10185
Bug#1099064: src:bfs: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el
Thu, 27 Feb 2025 20:33:15 +0100
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #10184
Please apply 8fa507083388 ("mm/memory: Use exception ip to search exception tables") (and one required dependency) to v6.1.y
Wed, 26 Feb 2025 20:36:45 +0100
Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]> • #10183
Re: Bug#1087809: Bug#1086028: I've reproduced the bug in QEMU
Wed, 26 Feb 2025 16:15:53 +0100
Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]> • #10182
Re: Bug#1086028: I've reproduced the bug in QEMU
Wed, 26 Feb 2025 16:23:29 +0300
Sergei Golovan <[email protected]> • #10181
Re: Bug#1086028: I've reproduced the bug in QEMU
Wed, 26 Feb 2025 00:21:14 +0300
Sergei Golovan <[email protected]> • #10180
Re: Bug#1086028: I've reproduced the bug in QEMU
Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:36:05 +0100
Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]> • #10179
Re: mips64el in trixie: [was: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds]
Tue, 25 Feb 2025 16:18:05 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #10178
Bug#1098511: RM: jnettop [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Does not build on (most) 32 bit architectures
Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:04:25 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #10177
Re: Bug#1086028: I've reproduced the bug in QEMU
Thu, 20 Feb 2025 23:50:41 +0100
Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]> • #10176
Bug#1098428: RM: angelfish [mips64el] -- ROM; It's stuck because the new version in unstable can't migrate because a dependency no longer build on a minor architecture.
Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:51:46 +0100
Salvo 'LtWorf' Tomaselli <[email protected]> • #10175
Bug#1086028: I've reproduced the bug in QEMU
Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:55:45 +0000
"Jiaxun Yang" <[email protected]> • #10174
Re: Bug#1086028: I've reproduced the bug in QEMU
Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:02:21 +0100
Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]> • #10173
Bug#1098331: RM: genwqe-user [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Build issues on 32 bit architectures
Wed, 19 Feb 2025 10:12:24 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #10172
Re: mips64el in trixie: [was: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds]
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 23:37:23 +0300
Sergei Golovan <[email protected]> • #10171
mips64el in trixie: [was: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds]
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 21:14:24 +0100
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #10170
wabt mips64el ftbfs
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 12:49:43 +0100
Jérémy Lal <[email protected]> • #10169
Re: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds
Wed, 5 Feb 2025 23:25:24 +0300
Sergei Golovan <[email protected]> • #10168
Re: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds
Tue, 4 Feb 2025 11:59:49 +0300
Sergei Golovan <[email protected]> • #10167
Re: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds
Wed, 29 Jan 2025 20:44:56 +0100
Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]> • #10166
Bug#1093859: release.debian.org: mips64el vs. librsvg needs resolving for trixie
Mon, 27 Jan 2025 20:32:20 +0100
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]> • #10165
Bug#1093862: mame: FTBFS on mips64el: collect2: fatal error: cannot find ‘ld’
Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:15:53 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10164
Bug#1093859: release.debian.org: mips64el vs. librsvg needs resolving for trixie
Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:32:26 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10163
Bug#1093752: coot: fix ftbfs on riscv64 and mips64el
Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:51:38 +0800
Bo YU <[email protected]> • #10162
Re: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds
Sun, 19 Jan 2025 11:41:04 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10161
Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14)
Fri, 17 Jan 2025 07:43:14 +0800
Shengjing Zhu <[email protected]> • #10160
Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14)
Fri, 17 Jan 2025 01:12:41 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #10159
Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14)
Thu, 16 Jan 2025 23:22:11 +0100
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #10158
Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14)
Th, 16 Jan 2025 21:08:45 +0100
Matthias Geiger <[email protected]> • #10157
Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14)
Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:27:18 +0100
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #10156
Re: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds
Thu, 16 Jan 2025 12:39:39 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10155
Re: Bug#1086028: loupe: FTBFS on mips64el: failed to acquire jobserver token: Bad address (os error 14)
Thu, 16 Jan 2025 12:14:24 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10154
Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14)
Thu, 16 Jan 2025 12:40:07 +0100 (CET)
Fabian Grünbichler <[email protected]> • #10153
Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14)
Thu, 16 Jan 2025 11:02:57 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10152
Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14)
Thu, 16 Jan 2025 10:45:28 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10151
Re: Debian 12.8 on QEMU MIPS64el: installation failure
Mon, 13 Jan 2025 17:22:16 -0700
"Nelson H. F. Beebe" <[email protected]> • #10150
Re: Debian 12.8 on QEMU MIPS64el: installation failure
Mon, 6 Jan 2025 19:16:13 +0100
Mateusz Jończyk <[email protected]> • #10149
Re: Debian 12.8 on QEMU MIPS64el: installation failure
Mon, 6 Jan 2025 19:21:19 +0100
Mateusz Jończyk <[email protected]> • #10148
Source package quantlib-swig now fails on mips64el
Sat, 28 Dec 2024 07:42:56 -0600
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[email protected]> • #10147
Bug#1091091: src:wings3d: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el
Sun, 22 Dec 2024 15:38:10 +0100
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #10146
Debian 12.8 on QEMU MIPS64el: installation failure
Thu, 5 Dec 2024 08:38:08 -0700
"Nelson H. F. Beebe" <[email protected]> • #10145
Re: Bug#1082751: nbdkit --help segfault from within printf() on mips64el: libc bug?
Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:27:02 +0100
Hilko Bengen <[email protected]> • #10144
Re: nbdkit --help segfault from within printf() on mips64el: libc bug?
Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:55:42 +0100
Petter Reinholdtsen <[email protected]> • #10143
nbdkit --help segfault from within printf() on mips64el: libc bug?
Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:05:57 +0100
Hilko Bengen <[email protected]> • #10142
Bug#1087809: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1087809: cargo: [mipsel64] failed to acquire jobserver token/Bad address (os error 14)
Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:40:02 +0100
Fabian Grünbichler <[email protected]> • #10141
Differences between mips64 buildds?
Sat, 16 Nov 2024 21:27:45 +0100
Ole Streicher <[email protected]> • #10140
Re: Bug#1087562: pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation mode: elf
Fri, 15 Nov 2024 14:09:30 +0000
Matthew Vernon <[email protected]> • #10139
Bug#1087562: pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation mode: elf
Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:00:14 +0000
Matthew Vernon <[email protected]> • #10138
Re: pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation mode: elf
Fri, 15 Nov 2024 12:32:04 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10137
Re: Bug#1087562: pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation mode: elf
Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:54:07 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10136
Bug#1087562: pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation mode: elf
Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:24:31 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10135
Bug#1087281: llvm-defaults: Please provide libomp5 and libomp-dev on riscv64 (and mips64el and loong64)
Sun, 10 Nov 2024 17:33:42 +0100
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #10134
Bug#1087280: llvm-toolchain-19: Please re-enable OpenMP (without offloading) on riscv64 (and mips64el and loong64)
Sun, 10 Nov 2024 17:30:03 +0100
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #10133
Re: Bug#1086028: loupe: FTBFS on mips64el: failed to acquire jobserver token: Bad address (os error 14)
Fri, 25 Oct 2024 11:06:23 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10132
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.