gmane.linux.debian.ports.windows archive

364 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: How to get started
Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:57:08 -0000 (GMT)
<[email protected]> • #266
Re: How to get started
Wed, 3 Dec 2003 14:44:14 -0500
Satadru Pramanik <[email protected]> • #265
Re: How to get started
Wed, 03 Dec 2003 10:35:18 +0100
Arend Lammertink <[email protected]> • #264
Re: How to get started
Tue, 02 Dec 2003 21:02:09 +0100
Holger Spielmann <[email protected]> • #263
Re: How to get started
Tue, 02 Dec 2003 13:52:01 +0100
Arend Lammertink <[email protected]> • #262
Re: How to get started
Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:42:01 +0100
[email protected] • #261
Re: How to get started
Tue, 02 Dec 2003 10:59:25 +0100
Arend Lammertink <[email protected]> • #260
Re: How to get started
Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:24:55 +0100
Arend Lammertink <[email protected]> • #259
Re: How to get started
Mon, 01 Dec 2003 12:36:26 +1100
Robert Collins <[email protected]> • #258
Re: How to get started
Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:04:45 -0500
Satadru Pramanik <[email protected]> • #257
Re: How to get started
Mon, 01 Dec 2003 06:04:19 +0900
Junichi Uekawa <[email protected]> • #256
Re: How to get started
Sun, 30 Nov 2003 10:58:45 -0500
Earnie Boyd <[email protected]> • #255
Re: How to get started
Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:28:02 +0900
Junichi Uekawa <[email protected]> • #254
How to get started
Fri, 28 Nov 2003 08:29:50 -0800 (PST)
Jaap Aap <[email protected]> • #253
(no subject)
Fri, 28 Nov 2003 09:18:34 EST
[email protected] • #252
Re: Glibc for win32
Wed, 01 Oct 2003 19:55:31 +0200
Per Abrahamsen <[email protected]> • #251
Re: Glibc for win32
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 13:37:48 -0400
Christopher Faylor <[email protected]> • #250
Re: Glibc for win32
Wed, 01 Oct 2003 16:17:37 +0200
Per Abrahamsen <[email protected]> • #249
Re: Glibc for win32
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 08:28:00 -0400
Christopher Faylor <[email protected]> • #248
Re: Glibc for win32
Wed, 01 Oct 2003 14:17:17 +0200
Per Abrahamsen <[email protected]> • #247
Re: Glibc for win32
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 12:46:17 +0200
[email protected] • #246
Re: Glibc for win32
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 12:42:41 +0200
Thomas Uwe Gruettmueller <[email protected]> • #245
Re: Glibc for win32
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:07:22 -0400
Christopher Faylor <[email protected]> • #244
Re: Glibc for win32
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:45:37 +0200
Jakob Eriksson <[email protected]> • #243
Re: Glibc for win32
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:38:55 -0400
Christopher Faylor <[email protected]> • #242
Re: Glibc for win32
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 01:22:57 +0200
Jakob Eriksson <[email protected]> • #241
Re: Glibc for win32
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:09:29 +0100
Carlos Sousa <[email protected]> • #240
Re: Glibc for win32
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:34:07 +0200
Jakob Eriksson <[email protected]> • #239
Re: Glibc for win32
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:56:13 +0200
Jakob Eriksson <[email protected]> • #238
Re: Glibc for win32
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:27:59 +0000
Robert Millan <[email protected]> • #237
Glibc for win32
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:06:07 +0000
Robert Millan <[email protected]> • #236
Re: Current Status
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 02:05:27 +0200
Jakob Eriksson <[email protected]> • #235
Re: Current Status
Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:59:47 +0200
Jakob Eriksson <[email protected]> • #234
Current Status
Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:00:36 +0100
"Saqib Shaikh" <[email protected]> • #233
searching
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:53:11 EDT
[email protected] • #232
Re: Planning: Minimum System Requirements
Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:31:28 -0400
Brian White <[email protected]> • #231
Re: Planning: Minimum System Requirements
28 Jul 2003 21:20:25 +0200
Andreas Kostyrka <[email protected]> • #230
Re: Planning: Minimum System Requirements
Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:21:18 -0400
Brian White <[email protected]> • #229
Re: Planning: Minimum System Requirements
Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:11:34 +0100 (BST)
"John Ineson" <[email protected]> • #228
Re: Planning: Minimum System Requirements
Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:22:55 -0400
Brian White <[email protected]> • #227
Re: Planning: Minimum System Requirements
Sat, 26 Jul 2003 17:35:29 +0100 (BST)
"John Ineson" <[email protected]> • #226
Re: Planning: Who Can Do What?
Sat, 26 Jul 2003 17:04:48 +0800
"Johnny" <[email protected]> • #225
Re: Planning: Minimum System Requirements
Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:53:22 -0400
Brian White <[email protected]> • #224
Re: Planning: Who Can Do What?
Fri, 25 Jul 2003 07:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
James Michael DuPont <[email protected]> • #223
Re: Planning: Who Can Do What?
Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:00:38 +0200
Jakob Eriksson <[email protected]> • #222
Planning: Who Can Do What?
Fri, 25 Jul 2003 09:42:28 -0400
Brian White <[email protected]> • #221
Re: Planning: General Timelime
Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:50:41 -0400
Earnie Boyd <[email protected]> • #220
Re: Planning: General Timelime
Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:45:45 -0400
Brian White <[email protected]> • #219
Re: Planning: General Timelime
Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:44:04 -0400
Brian White <[email protected]> • #218
Re: Planning: General Timelime
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:26:09 -0400
Brian White <[email protected]> • #217
Fwd: Undeliverable: Re: Planning: General Timelime
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 12:20:31 -0400
Brian White <[email protected]> • #216
Re: Planning: General Timelime
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:57:30 -0400
Brian White <[email protected]> • #215
Re: Planning: General Timelime
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:27:52 +0200
jakob <[email protected]> • #214
Re: Planning: General Timelime
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:00:23 -0400
Christopher Faylor <[email protected]> • #213
Re: Planning: General Timelime
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:58:36 +0200
Jakob Eriksson <[email protected]> • #212
Planning: General Timelime
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 08:38:11 -0400
Brian White <[email protected]> • #211
Re: Planning: Minimum System Requirements
Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:56:53 +0200
Dirk Prösdorf <[email protected]> • #210
Re: Planning: Minimum System Requirements
Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:23:31 -0400
Brian White <[email protected]> • #209
Re: Planning: Minimum System Requirements
Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:26:35 -0300
Peter Cordes <[email protected]> • #208
Re: Planning: Minimum System Requirements
Mon, 21 Jul 2003 13:15:54 -0400
Earnie Boyd <[email protected]> • #207
Re: Planning: Minimum System Requirements
Mon, 21 Jul 2003 13:14:10 -0400
Brian White <[email protected]> • #206
RE: Planning: Minimum System Requirements
Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:16:46 -0700
"Dominic Wu" <[email protected]> • #205
Re: Planning: Minimum System Requirements
Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:52:44 +0100
Stephen Stafford <[email protected]> • #204
Re: Planning: Minimum System Requirements
Mon, 21 Jul 2003 17:14:05 +0200
Michelle Konzack <[email protected]> • #203
Re: Planning: Minimum System Requirements
Mon, 21 Jul 2003 17:11:47 +0200
jakob <[email protected]> • #202
Planning: Minimum System Requirements
Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:04:46 -0400
Brian White <[email protected]> • #201
Re: Make and .exe Files
Fri, 18 Jul 2003 21:30:11 +0200
Michelle Konzack <[email protected]> • #200
Minimum System Requirements (was: Make and .exe Files)
Fri, 18 Jul 2003 13:50:12 -0400
Brian White <[email protected]> • #199
Re: Make and .exe Files
Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:13:12 -0400
Christopher Faylor <[email protected]> • #198
[Fwd: Undeliverable: Re: Make and .exe Files]
Fri, 18 Jul 2003 08:19:46 -0400
Earnie Boyd <[email protected]> • #197
Re: Make and .exe Files
Fri, 18 Jul 2003 07:21:58 -0400
Earnie Boyd <[email protected]> • #196
Re: Make and .exe Files
Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:18:15 +0200
Jakob Eriksson <[email protected]> • #195
Re: Make and .exe Files
Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:12:47 -0400
Earnie Boyd <[email protected]> • #194
Re: Make and .exe Files
Thu, 17 Jul 2003 18:55:24 -0400
Brian White <[email protected]> • #193
evolution
15 Jun 2003 22:08:16 -0400
satadru pramanik <[email protected]> • #192
Re: Unidentified subject!
Mon, 09 Jun 2003 17:10:48 +0100
"${john}$" <${john}[email protected]> • #191
Re: executable extensions
Mon, 9 Jun 2003 17:33:09 +0200
Jeremie Koenig <[email protected]> • #190
Re: executable extensions
Mon, 9 Jun 2003 10:53:22 -0400
Christopher Faylor <[email protected]> • #189
Re: Unidentified subject!
Mon, 9 Jun 2003 10:50:49 -0400
Christopher Faylor <[email protected]> • #188
executable extensions
Mon, 9 Jun 2003 13:57:21 +0200
Jeremie Koenig <[email protected]> • #187
Setup and Apt issues
09 Jun 2003 13:14:33 +0200
Holger Spielmann <[email protected]> • #186
Re: Unidentified subject!
09 Jun 2003 19:47:34 +1000
Robert Collins <[email protected]> • #185
Re: Unidentified subject!
09 Jun 2003 11:23:08 +0200
Holger Spielmann <[email protected]> • #184
Re: Unidentified subject!
09 Jun 2003 19:18:56 +1000
Robert Collins <[email protected]> • #183
Re: Unidentified subject!
Mon, 09 Jun 2003 09:31:41 +0100
"${john}$" <${john}[email protected]> • #182
Re: Unidentified subject!
09 Jun 2003 15:34:21 +1000
Robert Collins <[email protected]> • #181
Re: Unidentified subject!
Mon, 09 Jun 2003 06:09:24 +0100
"${john}$" <${john}[email protected]> • #180
RE: Unidentified subject!
Mon, 9 Jun 2003 01:57:25 +0200
Arnau Marcé <[email protected]> • #179
Re: Unidentified subject!
Mon, 02 Jun 2003 19:11:18 -0400
"David Krovich" <[email protected]> • #178
Unidentified subject!
Mon, 02 Jun 2003 19:09:10 -0300
"Leonardo Pereira" <[email protected]> • #177
Personals
Mon, 2 Jun 2003 03:04:16 EDT
[email protected] • #176
non
Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:28:46 -0800 (PST)
Edwyna Faulkner <[email protected]> • #175
Re: Newbie question
Sun, 23 Feb 2003 01:08:54 -0800 (PST)
James Michael DuPont <[email protected]> • #174
Re: Newbie question
Sun, 23 Feb 2003 14:44:26 +0900
Junichi Uekawa <[email protected]> • #173
Re: Newbie question
Sun, 16 Feb 2003 21:40:53 +0100 (CET)
James Michael DuPont <[email protected]> • #172
Re: Newbie question
Mon, 17 Feb 2003 00:57:57 +1100
Fergus Henderson <[email protected]> • #171
Re: Newbie question
Fri, 14 Feb 2003 17:52:09 +0100
Jeremie Koenig <[email protected]> • #170
Re: Newbie question
Fri, 14 Feb 2003 17:14:46 +0100 (CET)
James Michael DuPont <[email protected]> • #169
Re: Three concepts, not one [WAS: Newbie question]
Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:44:20 +0100
Jeremie Koenig <[email protected]> • #168
Re: Newbie question
Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:40:56 +0100
Jeremie Koenig <[email protected]> • #167
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.