gmane.linux.fbdev.user archive
861 archived articles, newest first (page 9 of 9). Latest articles →
SuSE
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:20:48 +0000 (UTC)Re: SuSE
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:39:00 +0100Re: SuSE
25 Feb 2003 07:13:19 +0800Re: Re: Monocrom Display
25 Feb 2003 06:46:36 +0800Re: Re: Monocrom Display
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:33:16 +0100 (MET)SuSE
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:02:07 +0000 (UTC)Re: framebufer and radeonfb
24 Feb 2003 07:39:01 +0800When will the agp / framebuffer code be working in linuxppc 2.5?
Sun, 23 Feb 2003 15:03:52 -0800Re: framebufer and radeonfb
Sun, 23 Feb 2003 23:49:51 +0100Re: framebufer and radeonfb
24 Feb 2003 05:34:05 +0800framebufer and radeonfb
Sun, 23 Feb 2003 13:33:40 +0100Re: Re: Monocrom Display
23 Feb 2003 19:43:19 +0800Re: Re: Monocrom Display
23 Feb 2003 19:31:44 +0800Re: Re: Monocrom Display
Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:22:53 +0100 (CET)Re: Monocrom Display
21 Feb 2003 22:11:44 +0800Monocrom Display
Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:24:31 +0100 (MET)Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] vesafb and too much RAM?
Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:51:52 -0700 (MST)Re: rivafb + X11 4.2.1-5
Wed, 12 Feb 2003 20:53:51 +0000 (GMT)Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] vesafb and too much RAM?
Wed, 12 Feb 2003 20:03:00 +0000 (GMT)rivafb + X11 4.2.1-5
Sun, 9 Feb 2003 22:11:34 +0100Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] vesafb and too much RAM?
Tue, 28 Jan 2003 18:26:56 -0700 (MST)vesafb too much ram crash?
Sat, 25 Jan 2003 13:59:11 -0700 (MST)Re: matroxfb on powerpc ?
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 21:37:51 +0000 (GMT)Re: Problems with framebuffer and Matrox G400 dual-head
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 21:23:35 +0000 (GMT)matroxfb on powerpc ?
Sat, 4 Jan 2003 10:58:36 +0100Problems with framebuffer and Matrox G400 dual-head
Sun, 29 Dec 2002 00:25:35 +0100Re: anybody got any preliminary matroxfb-for-after-2.5.50 patches?
Tue, 24 Dec 2002 23:44:48 +0100anybody got any preliminary matroxfb-for-after-2.5.50 patches?
Tue, 24 Dec 2002 21:01:28 +0100Re: Bigger fonts in Framebuffer
Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:15:22 -0800Bigger fonts in Framebuffer
Tue, 10 Dec 2002 18:15:22 +0100Mirrored Charakters
Sat, 07 Dec 2002 13:41:42 +0100Monocrom Display
Sat, 07 Dec 2002 13:38:33 +0100Re: Framebuffer support in 2.5.46
Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:03:17 +0000 (GMT)Framebuffer support in 2.5.46
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 15:04:16 +0100Re: Setting up framebuffer on ATI Radeon Mobility
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 01:05:56 +0000 (GMT)Setting up framebuffer on ATI Radeon Mobility
31 Oct 2002 15:21:08 +0100Re: Is anyone porting rivafb to the new 2.5 kernel API?
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:37:59 -0700 (PDT)Is anyone porting rivafb to the new 2.5 kernel API?
15 Oct 2002 21:53:23 -0700offb problems
Sun, 13 Oct 2002 01:07:35 +0300 (EEST)Problem in displaying logo at boot up time
Fri, 27 Sep 2002 12:52:14 +0530 (IST)Problem of fading of Linux logo in portrait mode
Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:55:02 +0530Re: mmap() doesn't work for /dev/fb# ?
Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:36:37 +0200 (MEST)mmap() doesn't work for /dev/fb# ?
Tue, 24 Sep 2002 15:59:28 -0700frame buffer on cs89712
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:13:21 -0500Re: Linux-fbdev-users digest, Vol 1 #77 - 1 msg
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 09:23:08 +0300 (EEST)Can I get the savage4 frame buffer driver? "savagefb.c"
Mon, 16 Sep 2002 22:06:36 +0900Re: rivafb woes...
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 11:48:19 +0530 (IST)Re: rivafb woes...
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 07:28:13 +0200rivafb woes...
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 08:54:01 +0530 (IST)Interlaced video with atyfb?
Sun, 8 Sep 2002 11:43:30 +0100 (BST)Interlaced video with atyfb?
Sun, 8 Sep 2002 11:35:48 +0100 (BST)Re: Framebuffer with 1024x600
Fri, 6 Sep 2002 21:51:17 +0200Re: Framebuffer with 1024x600
Sat, 7 Sep 2002 00:35:11 +0200Framebuffer with 1024x600
Fri, 6 Sep 2002 19:35:32 +0200480x234 resolution with MediaGX card
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 09:01:36 -0400VGA bashing
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 06:31:04 -0500no Framebuffer option in kernel
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 22:52:40 +0200Re: screen clearing
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 19:11:15 +0200Re: screen clearing
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 12:17:01 -0700 (PDT)screen clearing
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 21:57:44 +0200second fb-device
2 Aug 2002 14:28:36 -0000
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.