gmane.linux.leaf.devel archive

390 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

uboot compile broken
Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:01:45 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5921
Re: [leaf:bering-uclibc] New commit by Andrew Denisenko
Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:37:56 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5920
Re: [leaf:bering-uclibc] New commit by Andrew Denisenko
Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:15:32 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5919
Re: [leaf:bering-uclibc] New commit by Andrew Denisenko
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:55:44 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5918
Re: ALIX specific kmodules
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:06:31 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5917
Re: ALIX specific kmodules
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:12:16 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5916
Re: ALIX specific kernel
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:09:52 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5915
Re: ALIX specific kmodules
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:22:32 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5914
Re: ALIX specific kernel
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:09:30 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5913
Re: ALIX specific kmodules
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:28:15 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5912
Re: ALIX specific kernel
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:24:20 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5911
ALIX specific kmodules
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:55:52 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5910
Re: ALIX specific kernel
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:35:20 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5909
Re: ALIX specific kernel
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:30:47 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5908
Re: ALIX specific kernel
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:50:22 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5907
Re: usefullness of kernel config cdiff files
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:29:29 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5906
ALIX specific kernel
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:15:30 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5905
Re: usefullness of kernel config cdiff files
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:45:43 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5904
Re: usefullness of kernel config cdiff files
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:32:59 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5903
Re: usefullness of kernel config cdiff files
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:28:19 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5902
Re: usefullness of kernel config cdiff files
Sat, 12 Mar 2016 20:40:49 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5901
Re: usefullness of kernel config cdiff files
Sat, 12 Mar 2016 12:02:08 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5900
Re: usefullness of kernel config cdiff files
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 19:19:00 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5899
Re: usefullness of kernel config cdiff files
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:24:06 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5898
Re: usefullness of kernel config cdiff files
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:50:30 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5897
Re: usefullness of kernel config cdiff files
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 07:48:43 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5896
Re: usefullness of kernel config cdiff files
Thu, 10 Mar 2016 22:19:24 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5895
Re: usefullness of kernel config cdiff files
Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:07:45 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5894
Re: usefullness of kernel config cdiff files
Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:39:37 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5893
Re: usefullness of kernel config cdiff files
Thu, 10 Mar 2016 19:03:24 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5892
Re: usefullness of kernel config cdiff files
Thu, 10 Mar 2016 19:53:30 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5891
usefullness of kernel config cdiff files
Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:11:35 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5890
git master building bcmrpi broken?
Wed, 9 Mar 2016 22:12:38 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5889
Re: master vs. new-initrd-6.x
Wed, 9 Mar 2016 21:02:27 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5888
Re: master vs. new-initrd-6.x
Wed, 09 Mar 2016 19:09:45 +0100
kp kirchdoerfer <[email protected]> • #5887
Re: master vs. new-initrd-6.x
Wed, 9 Mar 2016 13:00:01 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5886
Re: master vs. new-initrd-6.x
Wed, 9 Mar 2016 13:52:14 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5885
master vs. new-initrd-6.x
Wed, 9 Mar 2016 12:38:05 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5884
git master perf broken?
Wed, 9 Mar 2016 11:28:53 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5883
Re: git master
Tue, 8 Mar 2016 17:35:04 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5882
Re: git master
Mon, 7 Mar 2016 23:46:11 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5881
Re: git master
Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:31:50 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5880
Re: git master
Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:26:17 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5879
Re: git master
Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:46:37 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5878
Re: git master broken?
Mon, 7 Mar 2016 20:50:20 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5877
Re: git master
Mon, 7 Mar 2016 20:34:38 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5876
Re: git master
Mon, 7 Mar 2016 20:29:12 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5875
Re: git master
Mon, 07 Mar 2016 19:45:42 +0100
kp kirchdoerfer <[email protected]> • #5874
Re: git master
Mon, 07 Mar 2016 19:41:20 +0100
kp kirchdoerfer <[email protected]> • #5873
Re: git master
Mon, 7 Mar 2016 20:26:58 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5872
git master
Mon, 7 Mar 2016 18:06:39 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5871
Re: git master broken?
Mon, 07 Mar 2016 18:42:50 +0100
kp kirchdoerfer <[email protected]> • #5870
git master broken?
Mon, 7 Mar 2016 11:13:47 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5869
Re: git master
Sun, 6 Mar 2016 15:29:41 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5868
Re: git master
Sun, 6 Mar 2016 16:22:12 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5867
Re: git master
Sun, 6 Mar 2016 14:48:58 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5866
Re: git master
Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:05:12 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5865
Re: git master
Sat, 5 Mar 2016 23:33:28 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5864
Re: git master
Sat, 5 Mar 2016 23:20:45 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5863
Re: git master
Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:30:44 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5862
Re: git master
Sat, 5 Mar 2016 13:55:37 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5861
Re: git master
Sat, 5 Mar 2016 12:54:36 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5860
Re: git master
Sat, 5 Mar 2016 11:51:23 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5859
Re: git master
Sat, 05 Mar 2016 00:57:26 +0100
kp kirchdoerfer <[email protected]> • #5858
git master
Fri, 4 Mar 2016 22:50:09 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5857
Re: Sourceforge refuses connection using wget (solved)
Wed, 10 Feb 2016 23:30:13 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5856
Sourceforge refuses connection using wget
Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:17:54 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5855
Re: status of modules loading - old, proposed new and questions
Mon, 8 Feb 2016 23:44:59 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5854
Re: status of modules loading - old, proposed new and questions
Mon, 08 Feb 2016 19:34:42 +0100
kp kirchdoerfer <[email protected]> • #5853
Re: status of modules loading - old, proposed new and questions
Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:17:37 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5852
Re: status of modules loading - old, proposed new and questions
Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:59:59 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5851
Re: status of modules loading - old, proposed new and questions
Mon, 8 Feb 2016 19:54:10 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5850
Re: status of modules loading - old, proposed new and questions
Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:32:07 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5849
Re: status of modules loading - old, proposed new and questions
Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:26:07 +0100
kp kirchdoerfer <[email protected]> • #5848
Re: status of modules loading - old, proposed new and questions
Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:20:07 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5847
Re: status of modules loading - old, proposed new and questions
Sun, 7 Feb 2016 22:28:38 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5846
Re: status of modules loading - old, proposed new and questions
Sun, 07 Feb 2016 14:09:55 +0100
kp kirchdoerfer <[email protected]> • #5845
Re: status of modules loading - old, proposed new and questions
Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:43:18 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5844
Re: status of modules loading - old, proposed new and questions
Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:49:46 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5843
Re: status of modules loading - old, proposed new and questions
Wed, 3 Feb 2016 23:56:50 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5842
Re: status of modules loading - old, proposed new and questions
Wed, 3 Feb 2016 21:47:13 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5841
Re: status of modules loading - old, proposed new and questions
Wed, 3 Feb 2016 20:03:19 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5840
status of modules loading - old, proposed new and questions
Wed, 03 Feb 2016 16:44:38 +0100
kp kirchdoerfer <[email protected]> • #5839
Re: Another router
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 13:06:59 -0800
Mike Noyes <[email protected]> • #5838
Re: Leaf master branch
Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:48:28 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5837
Re: Leaf master branch
Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:45:51 +0100
kp kirchdoerfer <[email protected]> • #5836
Re: LEAF rebase/merge
Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:08:52 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5835
Re: LEAF rebase/merge
Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:04:36 +0200
Andrew <[email protected]> • #5834
Leaf master branch
Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:49:05 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5833
LEAF Project
Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:33:26 +0100
Erich Titl <[email protected]> • #5832
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.