gmane.linux.rpm.yum archive

3458 archived articles, newest first (page 18 of 35). Latest articles →

Re: yum traceback
Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:08:51 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12869
Re: a couple questions about yum and groups
Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:57:00 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12868
a couple questions about yum and groups
Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:36:49 -0400 (EDT)
"Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]> • #12867
Re: yum Traceback
Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:59:25 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12866
yum Traceback
Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:58:08 -0400 (EDT)
Steve Smith <[email protected]> • #12865
yum traceback
Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:23:02 -0500
"Steven H. Smith" <[email protected]> • #12864
Re: 'yum update yum' moves away current copy of installonlyn.conf but no replacement
Thu, 2 Apr 2009 15:30:15 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12863
Re: 'yum update yum' moves away current copy of installonlyn.conf but no replacement
Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:25:06 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12862
Re: 'yum update yum' moves away current copy of installonlyn.conf but no replacement
Thu, 2 Apr 2009 14:51:50 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12861
'yum update yum' moves away current copy of installonlyn.conf but no replacement
Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:06:23 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12860
Re: yum: recurring error 256 on nfs mounted repo
Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:08:50 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12859
Re: yum: recurring error 256 on nfs mounted repo
Wed, 1 Apr 2009 08:43:55 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12858
Re: yum: recurring error 256 on nfs mounted repo
Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:41:17 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12857
Re: yum: recurring error 256 on nfs mounted repo
Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:38:36 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12856
Re: yum: recurring error 256 on nfs mounted repo
Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:11:02 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12855
yum: recurring error 256 on nfs mounted repo
Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:02:30 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12854
Re: yum: F9 => F10 in-place upgrade
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:16:22 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12853
Re: yum: F9 => F10 in-place upgrade
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:12:06 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12852
Re: yum: F9 => F10 in-place upgrade
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:54:58 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12851
Re: yum: F9 => F10 in-place upgrade
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:47:05 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12850
Re: yum: F9 => F10 in-place upgrade
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:36:00 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12849
Re: yum: F9 => F10 in-place upgrade
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:00:56 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12848
Re: yum: F9 => F10 in-place upgrade
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:00:59 +1100
David Timms <[email protected]> • #12847
yum: F9 => F10 in-place upgrade
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:29:55 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12846
Authenticated Proxy
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:51:13 -0700
Joshua Bahnsen <[email protected]> • #12845
Re: yum: behavior with local NFS mounted repo
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:42:08 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12844
Re: yum: behavior with local NFS mounted repo
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:26:39 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12843
yum: behavior with local NFS mounted repo
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:19:45 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12842
Re: reposync always creating repo specific directories
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:25:39 +0100
Danny Smith <[email protected]> • #12841
Re: reposync always creating repo specific directories
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:56:54 +1000
Ian Mortimer <[email protected]> • #12840
Re: rpm.RPMTAG_SOURCERPM vs rpm.RPMTAG_SOURCEPACKAGE
Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:52:49 +0300
Ville Skyttä <[email protected]> • #12839
Re: yum: how do expire mirrorlist
Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:08:09 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12838
Re: yum: how do expire mirrorlist
Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:45:49 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12837
yum: how do expire mirrorlist
Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:21:07 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12836
Re: [PATCH] Fix prereq flag checking
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:41:20 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12835
Re: [PATCH] Fix prereq flag checking
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:07:05 +0200
Ville Skyttä <[email protected]> • #12834
Re: [PATCH] Fix prereq flag checking
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:40:16 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12833
[PATCH] Fix prereq flag checking
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:34:39 +0200
Ville Skyttä <[email protected]> • #12832
Re: reposync always creating repo specific directories
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:08:22 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12831
reposync always creating repo specific directories
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:43:44 +0000
Danny Smith <[email protected]> • #12830
Re: Maintaining my own copy of UPDATES
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:58:55 +0700
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[email protected]> • #12829
Re: Maintaining my own copy of UPDATES
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:49:57 -0400
"Joe_Wulf" <[email protected]> • #12828
Re: Maintaining my own copy of UPDATES
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:25:17 -0500
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #12827
Re: Maintaining my own copy of UPDATES
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:40:09 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12826
Re: Maintaining my own copy of UPDATES
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:28:28 -0500
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #12825
Re: [PATCH] package-cleanup output formatting patch set
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:19:02 +0100
Tim Lauridsen <[email protected]> • #12824
Re: Maintaining my own copy of UPDATES
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:13:35 -0500
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #12823
Re: Maintaining my own copy of UPDATES
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:50:08 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12822
Re: Maintaining my own copy of UPDATES
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12821
Re: Maintaining my own copy of UPDATES
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:33:53 -0500
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #12820
Re: preupgrade: can it upgrade system to latest set of updates?
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:15:20 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12819
Re: Maintaining my own copy of UPDATES
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:55:27 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12818
Re: Maintaining my own copy of UPDATES
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:47:07 -0500
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #12817
Re: Maintaining my own copy of UPDATES
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:10:03 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12816
Re: Maintaining my own copy of UPDATES
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:05:52 -0500
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #12815
Re: Maintaining my own copy of UPDATES
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:40:55 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12814
Re: Maintaining my own copy of UPDATES
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:38:19 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12813
Maintaining my own copy of UPDATES
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:46:48 -0400
"Joe_Wulf" <[email protected]> • #12812
preupgrade: can it upgrade system to latest set of updates?
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:39:03 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12811
Re: yum: segmentation fault when number of packages over about 300
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:59:11 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12810
Re: yum: segmentation fault when number of packages over about 300
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:42:20 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12809
Re: yum: segmentation fault when number of packages over about 300
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:58:06 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12808
yum: segmentation fault when number of packages over about 300
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:10:34 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12807
Re: preupgrade locked up, we rebooted, ran preupgrade again and it succeeded but many dup pkgs now in rpmdb
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:07:15 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12806
Re: preupgrade: Generating metadata hang
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:52:57 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12805
Re: [PATCH] Fix same arch duplicate checking in package-cleanup
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:41:01 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12804
yum-utils 1.1.21 released
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:35:30 +0100
Tim Lauridsen <[email protected]> • #12803
[PATCH] package-cleanup output formatting patch set
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:08:14 +0200
Ville Skyttä <[email protected]> • #12802
[PATCH] Fix same arch duplicate checking in package-cleanup
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:03:03 +0200
Ville Skyttä <[email protected]> • #12801
Re: preupgrade locked up, we rebooted, ran preupgrade again and it succeeded but many dup pkgs now in rpmdb
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:34:14 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12800
Re: preupgrade: Generating metadata hang
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:21:20 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12799
preupgrade: Generating metadata hang
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:26:05 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12798
Re: preupgrade locked up, we rebooted, ran preupgrade again and it succeeded but many dup pkgs now in rpmdb
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:46:44 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12797
Re: yum-fastestmirror
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:17:18 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12796
Re: preupgrade locked up, we rebooted, ran preupgrade again and it succeeded but many dup pkgs now in rpmdb
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:08:36 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12795
preupgrade locked up, we rebooted, ran preupgrade again and it succeeded but many dup pkgs now in rpmdb
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:45:13 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12794
Yum 3.2.22 released
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:34:32 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12793
yum-fastestmirror
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:16:04 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12792
yum problem
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:41:11 +0530 (IST)
"kesavan \(K7\)" <[email protected]> • #12791
Re: Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:46:14 -0700
"Nifty nifty.hat Mitch" <[email protected]> • #12790
yum-3.2.21-2.fc10.noarch: refuses to localinstall pkg even with --disableexclude=all
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:24:44 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12789
Re: Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:17:53 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12788
Re: Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:03:23 -0700
"Nifty nifty.hat Mitch" <[email protected]> • #12787
Requested range not satisfiable error for yum update
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:11:03 -0400
"Patel, Chirag" <[email protected]> • #12786
Re: Obsoletes
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:47:12 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12785
Obsoletes
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:42:41 -0700
Joshua Bahnsen <[email protected]> • #12784
Re: yum+preupgrade+anaconda: Cannot upgrade release with 'exclude=' entries in /etc/yum.conf
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:43:04 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12783
Re: rpm 4.2
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:57:14 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12782
Re: yum+preupgrade+anaconda: Cannot upgrade release with 'exclude=' entries in /etc/yum.conf
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:46:54 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12781
Re: yum source code
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:44:18 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12780
yum+preupgrade+anaconda: Cannot upgrade release with 'exclude=' entries in /etc/yum.conf
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:54:19 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12779
Re: yum source code
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:54:20 +0530
pranjal pandit <[email protected]> • #12778
yum source code
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:42:45 +0530
pranjal pandit <[email protected]> • #12777
Re: rpm 4.2
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:43:01 -0700
Joshua Bahnsen <[email protected]> • #12776
Re: yum-versionlock: needs better output
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:28:48 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12775
Re: rpm 4.2
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:07:58 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12774
Re: yum-versionlock: needs better output
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:35:30 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12773
Re: rpm 4.2
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:20:49 -0700
Joshua Bahnsen <[email protected]> • #12772
Re: yum-versionlock: needs better output
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:59:42 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12771
Re: yum-versionlock: needs better output
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:36:30 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12770
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.