gmane.linux.rpm.yum archive

3458 archived articles, newest first (page 19 of 35). Latest articles →

yum-versionlock: needs better output
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:52:32 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12769
Re: rpm 4.2
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:46:55 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12768
Re: rpm 4.2
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:46:18 -0700
Joshua Bahnsen <[email protected]> • #12767
Re: rpm 4.2
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:51:47 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12766
Re: rpm 4.2
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:44:12 -0700
Joshua Bahnsen <[email protected]> • #12765
Re: Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:29:06 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12764
Re: Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:26:05 -0500
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #12763
Re: Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:36:55 -0400 (EDT)
William Stearns <[email protected]> • #12762
Re: Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:19:25 -0500
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #12761
Re: Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:36:56 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12760
Re: Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:30:31 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12759
Re: Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:26:19 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12758
Re: Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:20:53 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12757
Re: Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:19:35 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12756
Re: Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:10:08 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12755
Re: Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:02:24 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12754
Re: Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:58:03 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12753
Re: Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:54:44 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12752
Re: Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:50:58 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12751
Can yum show a listing of just the locally installed packages?
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:47:01 -0400
Gerry Reno <[email protected]> • #12750
Re: rpm 4.2
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:19:49 -0700
Joshua Bahnsen <[email protected]> • #12749
Re: rpm 4.2
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:35:01 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12748
Re: Error using yum
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:32:23 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12747
Re: rpm 4.2
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:19:01 -0700
Joshua Bahnsen <[email protected]> • #12746
Re: Error using yum
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:16:29 +0530
Ashwini Dhiman <[email protected]> • #12745
Re: Error using yum
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:25:42 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12744
Re: Error using yum
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:54:25 +0530
Ashwini Dhiman <[email protected]> • #12743
Re: Error using yum
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:13:51 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12742
Re: Error using yum
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:43:08 +0530
Ashwini Dhiman <[email protected]> • #12741
Re: Error using yum
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:36:12 +1100
David Timms <[email protected]> • #12740
Re: Error using yum
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:56:30 +0530
Ashwini Dhiman <[email protected]> • #12739
Error using yum
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:53:06 +0530
Ashwini Dhiman <[email protected]> • #12738
Re: error compiling yum source
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:27:01 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12737
Re: error compiling yum source
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:25:41 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12736
Re: error compiling yum source
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:54:37 +0530
pranjal pandit <[email protected]> • #12735
Re: error compiling yum source
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:43:29 +0530
Ashwini Dhiman <[email protected]> • #12734
Re: error compiling yum source
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:07:27 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12733
Re: yum source code
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:57:03 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12732
error compiling yum source
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:26:05 +0530
pranjal pandit <[email protected]> • #12731
Re: yum source code
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:38:32 +0530
pranjal pandit <[email protected]> • #12730
Re: yum source code
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 07:17:57 +0100
Tim Lauridsen <[email protected]> • #12729
yum source code
Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:25:39 +0530
pranjal pandit <[email protected]> • #12728
Re: Yum error: SyntaxError: not well-formed (invalid token):
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:20:17 -0500
"Heimburger,Justin C" <[email protected]> • #12727
Re: Yum error: SyntaxError: not well-formed (invalid token):
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:49:50 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12726
Re: Yum error: SyntaxError: not well-formed (invalid token):
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 07:54:34 -0500
"Heimburger,Justin C" <[email protected]> • #12725
Re: yum source code
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:23:59 -0400
pranjal pandit <[email protected]> • #12724
Re: Yum error: SyntaxError: not well-formed (invalid token):
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:42:30 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12723
Re: yum source code
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:09:06 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12722
Yum error: SyntaxError: not well-formed (invalid token):
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:02:42 -0500
"Heimburger,Justin C" <[email protected]> • #12721
yum source code
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:59:33 +0530
pranjal pandit <[email protected]> • #12720
Re: rpm 4.2
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:58:00 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12719
Re: rpm 4.2
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:48:18 -0700
Joshua Bahnsen <[email protected]> • #12718
Re: rpm 4.2
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:54:01 -0700
Joshua Bahnsen <[email protected]> • #12717
Re: rpm 4.2
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:52:40 -0700
Joshua Bahnsen <[email protected]> • #12716
Re: rpm 4.2
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:36:40 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12715
Re: rpm 4.2
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:23:20 -0700
Joshua Bahnsen <[email protected]> • #12714
Re: rpm 4.2
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:25:37 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12713
rpm 4.2
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:24:21 -0700
Joshua Bahnsen <[email protected]> • #12712
Re: Running yum built from source
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:09:31 -0400 (EDT)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #12711
Re: [PATCH] Minor sqlite.py improvements
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:12:22 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12710
[PATCH] Minor sqlite.py improvements
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 00:24:13 +0200
Ville Skyttä <[email protected]> • #12709
Re: yum simultaneous download of packages
Sun, 08 Mar 2009 15:49:50 -0400
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12708
yum simultaneous download of packages
Sun, 8 Mar 2009 18:40:35 +0530
pranjal pandit <[email protected]> • #12707
Running yum built from source
Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:43:12 +0530
Ashwini Dhiman <[email protected]> • #12706
Re: rpm.RPMTAG_SOURCERPM vs rpm.RPMTAG_SOURCEPACKAGE
Fri, 6 Mar 2009 23:12:47 +0200
Ville Skyttä <[email protected]> • #12705
Re: Error: cannot import name RpmUtilsError after last RHEL 5.x upgrade
Fri, 6 Mar 2009 15:17:57 -0200
"Esteban B." <[email protected]> • #12704
Re: rpm.RPMTAG_SOURCERPM vs rpm.RPMTAG_SOURCEPACKAGE
Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:44:53 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12703
Re: Error: cannot import name RpmUtilsError after last RHEL 5.x upgrade
Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:38:00 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12702
Error: cannot import name RpmUtilsError after last RHEL 5.x upgrade
Thu, 5 Mar 2009 20:46:24 -0200
"Esteban B." <[email protected]> • #12701
Re: rpm.RPMTAG_SOURCERPM vs rpm.RPMTAG_SOURCEPACKAGE
Fri, 6 Mar 2009 00:18:41 +0200
Ville Skyttä <[email protected]> • #12700
Re: [PATCH] returnLeafNodes () speedup s
Tue, 3 Mar 2009 23:07:06 +0200
Ville Skyttä <[email protected]> • #12699
Re: A question..... on packaging application plugins - get started
Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:38:50 +1100
David Timms <[email protected]> • #12698
Re: A question.....
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:25:04 +0100
DB <[email protected]> • #12697
Re: [PATCH] returnLeafNodes () speedup s
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:31:16 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #12696
Re: multithreaded package download
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:19:05 -0500
Brian Long <[email protected]> • #12695
Re: multithreaded package download
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:00:51 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12694
Re: A question.....
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:45:22 +1100
David Timms <[email protected]> • #12693
Re: yum-utils 1.1.20 released
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:54:55 +0100
Tim Lauridsen <[email protected]> • #12692
Re: yum-utils 1.1.20 released
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:08:52 +0100
Tim Lauridsen <[email protected]> • #12691
Re: [PATCH] returnLeafNodes () speedups
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 00:31:58 +0200
Ville Skyttä <[email protected]> • #12690
[PATCH] returnLeafNodes () speedup s
Sun, 1 Mar 2009 23:52:02 +0200
Ville Skyttä <[email protected]> • #12689
A question.....
Sun, 01 Mar 2009 16:58:41 +0100
DB <[email protected]> • #12688
Re: multithreaded package download
Sun, 1 Mar 2009 17:53:39 +0530
pranjal pandit <[email protected]> • #12687
Re: yum-utils 1.1.20 released
Sun, 1 Mar 2009 16:51:07 +0700
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[email protected]> • #12686
yum-utils 1.1.20 released
Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:30:39 +0100
Tim Lauridsen <[email protected]> • #12685
Re: error while using yum
Sun, 1 Mar 2009 12:37:16 +0530
shashidhar velagandula <[email protected]> • #12684
Re: error while using yum
Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:51:15 +0530
shashidhar velagandula <[email protected]> • #12683
Re: error while using yum
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:47:07 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12682
Re: error while using yum
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:00:45 +0530
shashidhar velagandula <[email protected]> • #12681
Re: error while using yum
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:39:44 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12680
Re: 'yum group' configuration - perhaps
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:08:30 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12679
'yum group' configuration - perhaps
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:27:58 +0000
Tom Brown <[email protected]> • #12678
Re: yum package name
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:24:42 -0500
Maurizio Vitale <[email protected]> • #12677
yum package name
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:27:40 -0500
Maurizio Vitale <[email protected]> • #12676
error while using yum
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:43:19 +0530
shashidhar velagandula <[email protected]> • #12675
Re: multithreaded package download
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:08:38 +0100
Tim Lauridsen <[email protected]> • #12674
Re: dependency failure w/ yum (and pirut), ok with rpm -i
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:46:09 -0800
Garrick Staples <[email protected]> • #12673
Re: Initializing a new chroot with yum
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:21:27 +0100
Felix Schwarz <[email protected]> • #12672
Re: Initializing a new chroot with yum
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:13:43 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12671
Re: dependency failure w/ yum (and pirut), ok with rpm -i
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:57:02 -0500
Brian Long <[email protected]> • #12670
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.