gmane.mail.gotmail archive

329 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Guinea Pigs
Sun, 7 Dec 2003 10:38:06 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #130
Re: gotmail 7.9
Sun, 7 Dec 2003 12:25:44 +0100
"T. E." <[email protected]> • #129
gotmail 7.9
Sun, 7 Dec 2003 05:42:07 -0500 (EST)
"Kerry Blalock" <[email protected]> • #128
RE: RE: Gotmail-list Digest, Vol 8, Issue 11
Sat, 06 Dec 2003 12:20:11 -0800
"Garrick Sitongia" <[email protected]> • #127
RE: RE: Gotmail-list Digest, Vol 8, Issue 11
Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:43:34 -0800
Stephen Beaudry <[email protected]> • #126
Re: Ok, here's another one
Sat, 06 Dec 2003 10:24:43 +0100
Patrick Marquetecken <[email protected]> • #125
RE: Curl and Cookies
Sat, 6 Dec 2003 15:14:30 +0800
"Christoph Uloth" <[email protected]> • #124
Curl and Cookies
Fri, 5 Dec 2003 22:48:42 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #123
Re: Ok, here's another one
Fri, 5 Dec 2003 19:21:01 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #122
Inboxloc problem
Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:41:46 -0800
Stephen Beaudry <[email protected]> • #121
RE: Gotmail-list Digest, Vol 8, Issue 11
Sat, 06 Dec 2003 01:26:42 +0000
"Ben k" <[email protected]> • #120
RE: Ok, here's another one
Sat, 6 Dec 2003 01:20:02 +0100
"v. vergu" <[email protected]> • #119
RE: Ok, here's another one
Fri, 5 Dec 2003 14:41:15 -0800 (PST)
"Stephen Beaudry" <[email protected]> • #118
Re: Ok, here's another one
Fri, 05 Dec 2003 12:49:08 -0500
jschafer at NOrutgersSPAM dot edu <"jschafer at NOrutgersSPAM dot edu"@rutgers.edu> • #117
RE: Ok, here's another one
Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:51:05 -0500
"Jess Joymon" <[email protected]> • #116
Re: Ok, here's another one
Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:43:09 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #115
Re: Ok, here's another one
Fri, 05 Dec 2003 09:41:50 -0800
Tom Duffy <[email protected]> • #114
Re: Ok, here's another one
Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:26:09 +0000
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #113
Re: Ok, here's another one
Fri, 05 Dec 2003 16:54:52 +0100
Patrick Marquetecken <[email protected]> • #112
Re: Ok, here's another one
Fri, 05 Dec 2003 07:28:41 -0800
Tom Duffy <[email protected]> • #111
RE: Ok, here's another one
Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:01:05 -0300
"Joaqu?n P?rez" <[email protected]> • #110
Re: Ok, here's another one
Fri, 5 Dec 2003 09:28:57 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #109
Bye and thanks
Fri, 5 Dec 2003 06:37:27 +0000
Richard A Downing FBCS <[email protected]> • #108
Ok, here's another one
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 21:53:17 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #107
RE: Got it working slightly more than it was...
Thu, 04 Dec 2003 20:40:52 -0800
"Garrick Sitongia" <[email protected]> • #106
Re: New Gotmail
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 17:57:31 -0600
[email protected] • #105
Re: Got it working slightly more than it was...
Fri, 05 Dec 2003 10:58:30 +1100
Brian Murray <[email protected]> • #104
No <PRE> in message
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:57:56 -0800 (PST)
"Stephen Beaudry" <[email protected]> • #103
RE: Got it working slightly more than it was...
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:29:26 -0800 (PST)
"Stephen Beaudry" <[email protected]> • #102
RE: Got it working slightly more than it was...
Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:06:27 +0000
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #101
Got it working slightly more than it was...
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 11:24:25 -0800 (PST)
"Stephen Beaudry" <[email protected]> • #100
RE: New Gotmail
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:11:26 +0100 (CET)
Jesper Maartenson <[email protected]> • #99
Re: Re: New Gotmail
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:13:17 -0700
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #98
RE: New Gotmail
Thu, 04 Dec 2003 18:11:52 +0000
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #97
RE: New Gotmail
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 15:00:25 -0300
"Joaqu?n P?rez" <[email protected]> • #96
RE: New Gotmail
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:50:42 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #95
RE: New Gotmail
Thu, 04 Dec 2003 17:37:44 +0000
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #94
RE: Re: New Gotmail
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 16:47:59 -0000
"Ben Staniford" <[email protected]> • #93
Re: Re: New Gotmail
Thu, 04 Dec 2003 10:06:53 -0500
Default <[email protected]> • #92
Re: New Gotmail
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 09:33:30 -0500
"Bill Kearney" <[email protected]> • #91
Re: New Gotmail - not working for me
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:55:14 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #90
Re: New Gotmail
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 14:58:28 +0100
"T. E." <[email protected]> • #89
RE: New Gotmail
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 11:38:51 -0300
"Joaqu?n P?rez" <[email protected]> • #88
Re: New Gotmail
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:45:32 +0100 (CET)
Jesper Maartenson <[email protected]> • #87
Re: New Gotmail
Thu, 04 Dec 2003 06:16:15 -0800
"Garrick Sitongia" <[email protected]> • #86
Re: New Gotmail
04 Dec 2003 12:42:07 +0100
Antonino Albanese <[email protected]> • #85
Re: New Gotmail
Thu, 04 Dec 2003 10:41:47 +0100
Joël Bourquard <[email protected]> • #84
Fixed(?) gotmail
Wed, 3 Dec 2003 22:38:27 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #83
New Gotmail
Wed, 3 Dec 2003 23:21:07 -0800 (PST)
John Fruetel <[email protected]> • #82
Status: hotmail change
Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:42:11 -0700
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #81
gotmail is not downloading all messages
Wed, 03 Dec 2003 13:20:32 -0800
"Garrick Sitongia" <[email protected]> • #80
RE: gotmail patch (partial)
Wed, 3 Dec 2003 11:31:58 -0300
"Joaqu?n P?rez" <[email protected]> • #79
gotmail patch (partial)
Wed, 3 Dec 2003 01:45:25 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #78
Re: New Hotmail error report
Wed, 3 Dec 2003 00:20:47 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #77
Re: New Hotmail error report
Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:03:15 +0100
"T. E." <[email protected]> • #76
Re: Re: New Hotmail error report
Tue, 2 Dec 2003 20:03:02 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #75
Re: Re: New Hotmail error report
Tue, 2 Dec 2003 18:37:01 -0800
"Joel Maher" <[email protected]> • #74
Re: New Hotmail error report
Tue, 2 Dec 2003 20:09:31 -0500
"Bill Kearney" <[email protected]> • #73
New Hotmail error report
Tue, 2 Dec 2003 21:34:10 +0000
Richard A Downing FBCS <[email protected]> • #72
Re: Call for help: testers/debuggers/developers
Tue, 02 Dec 2003 17:47:34 +0200
Dana Schkolnik <[email protected]> • #71
RE: Call for help: testers/debuggers/developers
Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:02:53 -0300
"Joaquin Perez" <[email protected]> • #70
Gotmail adding headers to text/html emails
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:38:40 -0500
Christiam Camacho <[email protected]> • #69
Can --procmail option be used to deliver to maildrop?
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:22:03 -0600
John <[email protected]> • #68
Call for help: testers/debuggers/developers
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 12:01:08 -0700
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #67
Re: Can --procmail option be used to deliver to maildrop?
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:32:18 -0700
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #66
Gotmail and the upcoing Hotmail changes
Fri, 24 Oct 2003 22:21:39 -0700
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #65
Re: using gotmail with fetchmail
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 08:45:29 -0500 (CDT)
"James S. White" <[email protected]> • #64
Re: using gotmail with fetchmail
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 08:37:57 -0500 (CDT)
"James S. White" <[email protected]> • #63
Re: using gotmail with fetchmail
Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:54:42 -0800
"Cloids" <[email protected]> • #62
Re: using gotmail with fetchmail
Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
"geoffrey camps" <[email protected]> • #61
Re: using gotmail with fetchmail
Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:37:13 -0500 (CDT)
"James S. White" <[email protected]> • #60
using gotmail with fetchmail
Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:28:24 -0800
"Cloids" <[email protected]> • #59
Re: Getting emails that aren't mine
Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:33:53 -0600
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #58
Getting emails that aren't mine
Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:39:31 +0100
"Ben Staniford" <[email protected]> • #57
Anyone know of a "gotmail"-like program/script for netscape ?
Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:53:40 -0400
Ken M Edwards <[email protected]> • #55
Strip CC & BCC from mail
Sat, 09 Aug 2003 08:10:35 +0200
Micha Nelissen <[email protected]> • #54
Re: AW: multiple users
29 Jul 2003 00:09:32 -0700
grimiore <[email protected]> • #53
AW: multiple users
Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:30:32 +0200
"Franz Pentenrieder" <[email protected]> • #52
Re: multiple users
Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:56:54 +0100
Daniel Jaeggi <[email protected]> • #51
Malformed UTF-8 character Error
Sun, 06 Jul 2003 08:05:35 +0000
"Tamer Al-Nasser" <[email protected]> • #50
multiple users
Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:04:59 +1300
"Robert" <[email protected]> • #49
Re: Inboxloc problem (solved?)
Mon, 23 Jun 2003 12:06:50 -0600
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #48
Re: Inboxloc problem (solved?)
Sun, 22 Jun 2003 11:26:53 +0200
Maxim Burgerhout <[email protected]> • #47
Re: Inboxloc problem (solved?)
Sat, 21 Jun 2003 12:24:00 -0700
"Jim Gifford" <[email protected]> • #46
Re: Inboxloc problem (solved?)
Sat, 21 Jun 2003 09:19:58 -0700
Tom Duffy <[email protected]> • #45
Inboxloc problem (solved?)
Fri, 20 Jun 2003 23:35:10 -0600
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #44
Gotmail similar error
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:35:16 -0500 (CDT)
"Carlos Gerardo Hernandez Castrejon" <[email protected]> • #43
Confirmation of inboxloc error
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 13:37:34 +0200
Maxim Burgerhout <[email protected]> • #42
Re: error
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:09:00 -0600
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #41
Re: error
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:50:31 +0200 (CEST)
Dietmer Tan <[email protected]> • #40
Re: error
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:08:16 -0600
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #39
error
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:49:48 +0200 (CEST)
Dietmer Tan <[email protected]> • #38
Gotmail Problem - gotmail_log
Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:59:32 -0700
"Jim Gifford" <[email protected]> • #37
Gotmail Problem
Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:51:44 -0700
"Jim Gifford" <[email protected]> • #36
RE: Gotmail Fail
07 Jun 2003 17:01:46 -0400
Alvin Koffman <[email protected]> • #35
RE: Gotmail Fail
Fri, 6 Jun 2003 19:58:40 -0400
Mike Beattie <[email protected]> • #34
Sometime problem retrieving Messages people reply to
Fri, 06 Jun 2003 18:31:21 -0500
"Mike ?" <[email protected]> • #33
Gotmail Fail
Fri, 6 Jun 2003 18:19:03 -0500 (CDT)
"Carlos Gerardo Hernandez Castrejon" <[email protected]> • #32
Gotmail error
06 Jun 2003 16:48:51 -0400
Alvin Koffman <[email protected]> • #31
What's this?
05 Jun 2003 17:05:25 -0400
Alvin Koffman <[email protected]> • #30
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.