gmane.mail.gotmail archive

329 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

RE: Temporary file not being deleted
Wed, 7 Apr 2004 16:44:42 -0700
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #230
Temporary file not being deleted
Wed, 07 Apr 2004 10:13:48 -0600
"Jens E. Madsen Jr." <[email protected]> • #229
Re: Re: Gotmail cracked?!?!
Mon, 5 Apr 2004 20:05:12 -0600
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #228
RE: Re: Gotmail cracked?!?!
Mon, 5 Apr 2004 14:10:06 -0700
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #227
Re: Gotmail cracked?!?!
Mon, 5 Apr 2004 14:21:01 -0600
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #226
Re: Gotmail insecurity
Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:20:34 -0700
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #225
Re: Hi
Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:25:43 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #224
Re: Problems with curl (7.10.8+7.11.0-pre1-1) now in DebianSID
Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:32:26 +1100
"Steven D'Aprano" <[email protected]> • #223
Re: Hi
Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:26:08 +0000
James Stephen Mason <[email protected]> • #222
RE: Hi
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:21:05 -0600
"Warren, Tom" <[email protected]> • #221
RE: Hi
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:14:42 -0500
"Jess K. Joymon" <[email protected]> • #220
Re: Hi
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:09:27 -0800
Rob Bos <[email protected]> • #219
Hi
Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:00:04 -0500 (EST)
<[email protected]> • #218
Hi
Sat, 6 Mar 2004 17:58:53 -0500 (EST)
<[email protected]> • #217
Re: problem when trying to access my email
Wed, 04 Feb 2004 07:51:36 -0800
Ian Paterson <[email protected]> • #216
problem when trying to access my email
Wed, 04 Feb 2004 10:06:54 +0200
"xxxx xxxx" <[email protected]> • #215
Re: Idea for optimizing gotmail
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 12:38:25 -0400
Anderson Lizardo <[email protected]> • #214
Re: Idea for optimizing gotmail
Mon, 02 Feb 2004 14:24:08 +0100
Joël Bourquard <[email protected]> • #213
Re: Idea for optimizing gotmail
Sun, 1 Feb 2004 21:41:29 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #212
Idea for optimizing gotmail
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 23:47:55 +0100
Joël Bourquard <[email protected]> • #211
Re: Problems with curl (7.10.8+7.11.0-pre1-1) now in DebianSID
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:44:10 -0700
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #210
RE: Problems with curl (7.10.8+7.11.0-pre1-1) now in DebianSID
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:31:57 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #209
Re: Problems with curl (7.10.8+7.11.0-pre1-1) now in Debian SID
Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:24:08 -0700
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #208
gotmail died (only once)
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:43:26 -0700 (MST)
"Jake Hawkes" <[email protected]> • #207
Re: Problems with curl (7.10.8+7.11.0-pre1-1) now in Debian SID
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:24:08 -0700
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #206
Problems with curl (7.10.8+7.11.0-pre1-1) now in Debian SID
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:10:56 +0100
Horst Vissel <[email protected]> • #205
Re: Need some help with procmail ....
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:24:03 +0100
"T. E." <[email protected]> • #204
Re: Need some help with procmail ....
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:36:31 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #203
Version 0.8.1 - debug level
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:50:25 +0100
"T. E." <[email protected]> • #202
Re: Need some help with procmail ....
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:44:32 +0100
"T. Ermlich" <[email protected]> • #201
Re: Need some help with procmail ....
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 06:46:56 -0700
Jake Hawkes <[email protected]> • #200
Need some help with procmail ....
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:39:20 +0100
"T. E." <[email protected]> • #199
Re: Gotmail failing with 'Could not isolate folder indexlocation'
Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:16:23 -0000
"Laurence" <[email protected]> • #198
Re: Gotmail failing with 'Could not isolate folder index location'
Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:12:34 +0800
James Lick <[email protected]> • #197
Gotmail failing with 'Could not isolate folder index location'
Wed, 31 Dec 2003 08:51:50 -0000
"Laurence" <[email protected]> • #196
Re: out there suggestion...
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:28:28 -0500
Eric Robibaro <[email protected]> • #195
RE: Gotmail-list Digest, Vol 8, Issue 24
Sun, 28 Dec 2003 16:53:22 -0300
"Omar Villanueva" <[email protected]> • #194
site broken
Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:37:43 +0200
ron <[email protected]> • #193
Snippage [was Re: Gotmail-list Digest, Vol 8, Issue 23]
Sat, 20 Dec 2003 15:48:53 +1100
"Steven D'Aprano" <[email protected]> • #192
Gotmail v0.8.0 not fetching some messages
Sat, 20 Dec 2003 09:42:09 +0100
Horst Vissel <[email protected]> • #191
Re: RE: Gotmail-list Digest, Vol 8, Issue 22
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:50:43 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #190
Re: RE: Gotmail-list Digest, Vol 8, Issue 22
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:47:14 -0700
Dan Wilson <[email protected]> • #189
Re: RE: Gotmail-list Digest, Vol 8, Issue 22
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:22:33 -0700
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #188
Re: out there suggestion...
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:21:01 -0700
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #187
Re: out there suggestion...
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:05:19 -0700
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #186
Re: new gotmail
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:39:50 -0500 (EST)
"Kerry Blalock" <[email protected]> • #185
Re: RE: Gotmail-list Digest, Vol 8, Issue 22
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:20:22 -0800 (PST)
Elijah Saxon <[email protected]> • #184
RE: Gotmail-list Digest, Vol 8, Issue 22
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:23:11 -0300
"Omar Villanueva" <[email protected]> • #183
Re: out there suggestion...
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:48:36 -0800
Roger Knobbe <[email protected]> • #182
Re: out there suggestion...
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 09:24:40 -0700
Dan Wilson <[email protected]> • #181
gotmail sorta working
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 06:19:55 -0500 (EST)
"Kerry Blalock" <[email protected]> • #180
Re: out there suggestion...
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:22:20 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #179
Re: out there suggestion...
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 21:56:10 -0800
Roger Knobbe <[email protected]> • #178
RE: out there suggestion...
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:48:49 -0500
"Brian Forth" <[email protected]> • #177
Re: out there suggestion...
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 20:27:04 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #176
RE: Problems with gotmail.
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:42:04 +0100 (CET)
Jesper Maartenson <[email protected]> • #175
RE: out there suggestion...
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:40:34 -0500
E H R <[email protected]> • #174
RE: out there suggestion...
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 01:00:40 -0000
"Ben Staniford" <[email protected]> • #173
out there suggestion...
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:41:28 -0500
E H R <[email protected]> • #172
RE: Problems with gotmail.
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:36:55 -0300
"Joaquin Perez" <[email protected]> • #171
Problems with gotmail.
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:08:18 +0100 (CET)
Jesper Maartenson <[email protected]> • #170
Re: new gotmail
Sun, 14 Dec 2003 15:34:48 -0500 (EST)
"Kerry Blalock" <[email protected]> • #169
Re: Guinea Pigs
Sun, 14 Dec 2003 10:44:21 -0500 (EST)
"Kerry Blalock" <[email protected]> • #168
Re: new gotmail
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:11:23 +0100
Asbjorn Hoiland Aarrestad <[email protected]> • #167
Re: new gotmail
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:30:07 +0100
Asbjorn Hoiland Aarrestad <[email protected]> • #166
RE: new gotmail
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:57:15 -0300
"Joaqu?n P?rez" <[email protected]> • #165
Re: new gotmail
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 14:14:53 +0100
Asbjorn Hoiland Aarrestad <[email protected]> • #164
Re: new gotmail
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 08:19:46 +0100
Asbjorn Hoiland Aarrestad <[email protected]> • #163
Re: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 19:46:10 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #162
Re: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:02:45 -0500 (EST)
"Kerry Blalock" <[email protected]> • #161
Re: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 19:55:44 -0500 (EST)
"Kerry Blalock" <[email protected]> • #160
Re: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:42:09 -0700
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #159
Re: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:09:41 -0500
Eric Robibaro <[email protected]> • #158
Re: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 16:57:22 -0700
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #157
Re: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 08 Dec 2003 21:24:45 +0000
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #156
Re: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:39:32 -0700
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #155
Re: Guinea Pigs
08 Dec 2003 13:20:16 -0500
Dan Black <[email protected]> • #154
Re: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:23:31 -0700
paul cannon <[email protected]> • #153
Re: Guinea Pigs
Sun, 7 Dec 2003 22:03:23 +0100
"T. E." <[email protected]> • #152
Re: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:03:20 -0500 (EST)
"Dean Price" <[email protected]> • #151
Re: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:50:55 +0100
Patrick Marquetecken <[email protected]> • #150
Re: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:11:28 -0500 (EST)
"Kerry Blalock" <[email protected]> • #149
Re: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 09:02:21 -0800
"Jim Gifford" <[email protected]> • #148
Re: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 21:53:57 +1000
"Andrew Herron" <[email protected]> • #147
new gotmail
Mon, 08 Dec 2003 13:47:00 +0100
Asbjorn Hoiland Aarrestad <[email protected]> • #146
RE: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 19:30:50 +0800
"Christoph Uloth" <[email protected]> • #145
Re: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:34:32 +1000
"Andrew Herron" <[email protected]> • #144
Re: Guinea Pigs
Sun, 7 Dec 2003 18:59:17 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #143
RE: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 09:49:32 +0800
"Christoph Uloth" <[email protected]> • #142
Re: Guinea Pigs
Sun, 7 Dec 2003 20:37:34 -0500 (EST)
"Peter Pouliot" <[email protected]> • #141
Re: Inboxloc problem
Sun, 7 Dec 2003 20:06:58 -0500 (EST)
"Peter Pouliot" <[email protected]> • #140
Re: Guinea Pigs
Sun, 7 Dec 2003 16:17:53 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #139
Re: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 08 Dec 2003 00:57:24 +0100
Joël Bourquard <[email protected]> • #138
Re: Guinea Pigs
Sun, 7 Dec 2003 18:47:07 -0500 (EST)
"Dean Price" <[email protected]> • #137
Re: Guinea Pigs
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 00:42:13 +0100
"T. E." <[email protected]> • #136
Re: Guinea Pigs
Sun, 7 Dec 2003 15:10:28 -0800
"John Fruetel" <[email protected]> • #135
Re: Guinea Pigs
Sun, 07 Dec 2003 14:59:57 -0800
Tom Duffy <[email protected]> • #134
RE: Guinea Pigs
Sun, 7 Dec 2003 22:00:31 +0100
"v. vergu" <[email protected]> • #133
Re: got_hotmail
Sun, 7 Dec 2003 15:31:03 -0500 (EST)
"Kerry Blalock" <[email protected]> • #132
got_hotmail
Sun, 7 Dec 2003 15:24:26 -0500 (EST)
"Kerry Blalock" <[email protected]> • #131
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.