gmane.mail.procmail archive

374 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Looking inside MIME (was Re: State of procmail)
Mon, 22 Aug 2016 05:34:25 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48467
Looking inside MIME (was Re: State of procmail)
Sat, 20 Aug 2016 23:11:29 -0400
R A Lichtensteiger <[email protected]> • #48466
missing "Content-type: ... boundary" from header on a forward
Sat, 20 Aug 2016 19:51:12 -0500 (CDT)
Zhiliang Hu <[email protected]> • #48465
Re: State of procmail [was Re: Is this the official procmail list?]
Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:50:56 +0300
udi M <[email protected]> • #48464
Re: State of procmail [was Re: Is this the official procmail list?]
16 Aug 2016 23:47:05 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #48463
Re: State of procmail [was Re: Is this the official procmail list?]
16 Aug 2016 23:45:28 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #48462
Re: State of procmail [was Re: Is this the official procmail list?]
Tue, 16 Aug 2016 19:04:18 +0300
udi M <[email protected]> • #48461
Re: State of procmail [was Re: Is this the official procmail list?]
Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:56:21 +1000
Erik Christiansen <[email protected]> • #48460
Re: State of procmail [was Re: Is this the official procmail list?]
Tue, 16 Aug 2016 02:16:05 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48459
Re: State of procmail
10 Aug 2016 02:13:32 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #48458
Re: State of procmail
Tue, 09 Aug 2016 18:46:54 -0400
Erich Veyhl <[email protected]> • #48457
Re: State of procmail
Tue, 09 Aug 2016 17:45:37 -0400
Erich Veyhl <[email protected]> • #48456
Re: State of procmail [was Re: Is this the official procmail list?]
Mon, 8 Aug 2016 20:12:00 +1000
Erik Christiansen <[email protected]> • #48455
Re: State of procmail [was Re: Is this the official procmail list?]
Sun, 7 Aug 2016 21:03:28 -0700
Bob Holtzman <[email protected]> • #48454
State of procmail [was Re: Is this the official procmail list?]
Sun, 07 Aug 2016 10:59:04 -0400
Erich Veyhl <[email protected]> • #48453
Re: Is this the official procmail list?
Sun, 7 Aug 2016 17:00:22 +1000
Erik Christiansen <[email protected]> • #48452
Re: Is this the official procmail list?
Sat, 6 Aug 2016 22:56:17 -0500
Andrew Edelstein <[email protected]> • #48451
Re: Is this the official procmail list?
Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:15:04 +0200
"Julian H. Stacey" <[email protected]> • #48450
Re: Is this the official procmail list?
Sat, 6 Aug 2016 12:55:11 -0400
Patrick Shanahan <[email protected]> • #48449
Re: Is this the official procmail list?
Sat, 06 Aug 2016 12:21:47 -0400
Erich Veyhl <[email protected]> • #48448
Re: Is this the official procmail list?
Sat, 6 Aug 2016 14:15:15 +0200
Gabriel Philippe <[email protected]> • #48447
Re: Is this the official procmail list?
Sat, 06 Aug 2016 13:39:29 +0200
"Julian H. Stacey" <[email protected]> • #48446
Re: Is this the official procmail list?
Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:32:29 +0200
Santiago Vila <[email protected]> • #48445
Is this the official procmail list?
Sat, 6 Aug 2016 11:57:01 +0200
Gabriel Philippe <[email protected]> • #48444
Re: Working sms time check?
Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:56:14 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48443
Re: Working sms time check?
Thu, 2 Jun 2016 15:47:27 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48442
Re: Working sms time check?
Thu, 2 Jun 2016 15:18:39 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48441
Re: excessive output quenched
Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:24:18 +0300
udi M <[email protected]> • #48440
Re: Working sms time check?
Thu, 2 Jun 2016 08:30:12 +0200
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #48439
Re: Working sms time check?
Wed, 1 Jun 2016 23:31:25 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48438
Re: excessive output quenched
Wed, 01 Jun 2016 18:02:25 -0400
[email protected] (Dale R. Worley) • #48437
Re: Working sms time check?
Wed, 1 Jun 2016 19:28:49 +0300
udi M <[email protected]> • #48436
Re: stripping the signature from an email
Wed, 1 Jun 2016 09:49:53 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48435
Re: stripping the signature from an email
Wed, 01 Jun 2016 11:22:19 -0400
[email protected] (Dale R. Worley) • #48434
Re: Working sms time check?
Wed, 1 Jun 2016 08:22:52 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48433
Working sms time check?
Wed, 1 Jun 2016 07:41:34 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48432
Re: stripping the signature from an email
Tue, 31 May 2016 23:21:58 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48431
stripping the signature from an email
Tue, 31 May 2016 23:06:09 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48430
Re: Triggering after a timeout?
Tue, 31 May 2016 19:09:52 +0300
udi M <[email protected]> • #48429
Re: Triggering after a timeout?
Tue, 31 May 2016 09:31:13 +0200
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #48428
excessive output quenched
Mon, 30 May 2016 15:18:34 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48427
Re: Triggering after a timeout?
Mon, 30 May 2016 14:48:21 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48426
Re: Triggering after a timeout?
Mon, 30 May 2016 14:41:36 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48425
Re: Triggering after a timeout?
Mon, 30 May 2016 20:07:09 +0200
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #48424
Triggering after a timeout?
Mon, 30 May 2016 11:51:22 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48423
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Mon, 30 May 2016 12:36:53 -0400
Xu Wang <[email protected]> • #48422
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Mon, 30 May 2016 13:12:20 +0300
udi M <[email protected]> • #48421
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Sun, 29 May 2016 23:14:08 -0400
Xu Wang <[email protected]> • #48420
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Sun, 29 May 2016 18:59:17 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48419
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Sun, 29 May 2016 17:59:41 -0400
Xu Wang <[email protected]> • #48418
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Sun, 29 May 2016 17:12:16 -0400
Patrick Shanahan <[email protected]> • #48417
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Sun, 29 May 2016 17:09:49 -0400
Xu Wang <[email protected]> • #48416
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Sun, 29 May 2016 16:11:24 -0400
Xu Wang <[email protected]> • #48415
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Sun, 29 May 2016 12:35:56 +0300
udi M <[email protected]> • #48414
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Fri, 27 May 2016 15:45:25 -0400
Xu Wang <[email protected]> • #48413
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Fri, 27 May 2016 09:09:57 -0500 (CDT)
Zhiliang Hu <[email protected]> • #48412
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Thu, 26 May 2016 23:00:32 -0400
Xu Wang <[email protected]> • #48411
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
27 May 2016 01:51:09 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #48410
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Thu, 26 May 2016 21:03:15 -0400
Xu Wang <[email protected]> • #48409
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
27 May 2016 00:23:22 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #48408
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Thu, 26 May 2016 20:02:59 -0400
Patrick Shanahan <[email protected]> • #48407
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Thu, 26 May 2016 18:04:04 -0400
Xu Wang <[email protected]> • #48406
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Thu, 26 May 2016 09:39:48 +0300
udi M <[email protected]> • #48405
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
25 May 2016 22:02:01 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #48404
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Wed, 25 May 2016 15:41:32 -0400
Xu Wang <[email protected]> • #48403
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Wed, 25 May 2016 15:40:14 -0400
Xu Wang <[email protected]> • #48402
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Wed, 25 May 2016 07:41:46 -0600
LuKreme <[email protected]> • #48401
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Wed, 25 May 2016 16:25:38 +0300
udi M <[email protected]> • #48400
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
25 May 2016 13:19:33 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #48399
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Wed, 25 May 2016 16:11:13 +0300
udi M <[email protected]> • #48398
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Wed, 25 May 2016 15:06:01 +0200
"Julian H. Stacey" <[email protected]> • #48397
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Wed, 25 May 2016 15:55:48 +0300
udi M <[email protected]> • #48396
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Wed, 25 May 2016 15:46:52 +0300
udi M <[email protected]> • #48395
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Wed, 25 May 2016 14:24:50 +0200
"Julian H. Stacey" <[email protected]> • #48394
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Wed, 25 May 2016 15:12:37 +0300
udi M <[email protected]> • #48393
Re: Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Wed, 25 May 2016 09:38:44 +0200
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #48392
Extract last email from an email file (mbox format)
Wed, 25 May 2016 02:12:30 -0400
Xu Wang <[email protected]> • #48391
Re: recepient's email address truncated
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:32:24 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48390
Re: recepient's email address truncated
Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:05:11 +1100
Erik Christiansen <[email protected]> • #48389
recepient's email address truncated
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:25:38 -0600 (CST)
Zhiliang Hu <[email protected]> • #48388
Re: my first procmail rules
Wed, 3 Feb 2016 23:58:06 +0100
Bernard Schoenacker <[email protected]> • #48387
my first procmail rules
Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:55:01 +0100
Bernard Schoenacker <[email protected]> • #48386
Re: Appending contents to file
Fri, 22 Jan 2016 01:07:46 +0100
"Julian H. Stacey" <[email protected]> • #48385
Re: Appending contents to file
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 14:17:09 -0700
Bob Holtzman <[email protected]> • #48384
Re: Appending contents to file
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 22:02:28 +0200
Danny de Bont <[email protected]> • #48383
Re: Appending contents to file
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:13:33 +0200
udi M <[email protected]> • #48382
Re: Transform part of a message body
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:42:31 +0200
udi M <[email protected]> • #48381
Appending contents to file
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:34:47 +0200
Danny de Bont <[email protected]> • #48380
Re: Transform part of a message body
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:13:54 -0500
[email protected] (Dale R. Worley) • #48379
Re: Transform part of a message body
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:12:40 +0200
udi M <[email protected]> • #48378
Re: Transform part of a message body
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 05:02:16 -0700
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48377
Re: Transform part of a message body
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:25:28 +0200
udi M <[email protected]> • #48376
Re: Transform part of a message body
Sun, 17 Jan 2016 16:19:17 +0200
udi M <[email protected]> • #48375
Re: Transform part of a message body
Sun, 17 Jan 2016 06:02:02 -0700
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48374
Re: Transform part of a message body
Sun, 17 Jan 2016 14:19:33 +0200
udi M <[email protected]> • #48373
Transform part of a message body
Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:33:02 -0700
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48372
Re: Create a rule for utf8 subject
Sun, 11 Oct 2015 12:03:16 +0300
udi M <[email protected]> • #48371
Solved for: mime-encoded iso-8859-1, utf-8, and windows-1251 was: Re: Create a rule for utf8 subject
Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:30:52 -0400 (EDT)
R P Herrold <[email protected]> • #48370
Re: Create a rule for utf8 subject
Tue, 06 Oct 2015 14:48:07 +0200
Jostein Berntsen <[email protected]> • #48369
Create a rule for utf8 subject
Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:22:11 +0200
Penguinfriend <[email protected]> • #48368
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.