gmane.mail.procmail archive

375 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Changing the subject
Mon, 05 Oct 2015 21:05:27 -0400
[email protected] (Dale R. Worley) • #48367
Re: Changing the subject
Mon, 5 Oct 2015 18:01:20 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48366
Changing the subject
Sun, 4 Oct 2015 20:45:23 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48365
Re: Computed list of destinations?
9 Sep 2015 21:00:17 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #48364
Computed list of destinations?
Wed, 9 Sep 2015 09:39:32 -0400 (EDT)
R P Herrold <[email protected]> • #48363
Re: Computed list of destinations?
Wed, 9 Sep 2015 04:24:43 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48362
Re: Computed list of destinations?
Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:42:31 +0300
udi M <[email protected]> • #48361
Re: Computed list of destinations?
Tue, 8 Sep 2015 11:50:01 -0700
Ian Zimmerman <[email protected]> • #48360
Re: Computed list of destinations?
Tue, 08 Sep 2015 20:51:02 +0300
udi M <[email protected]> • #48359
Computed list of destinations?
Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:49:34 -0400 (EDT)
R P Herrold <[email protected]> • #48358
Re: Computed list of destinations?
Tue, 08 Sep 2015 02:25:46 +0200
"Julian H. Stacey" <[email protected]> • #48357
Computed list of destinations?
Mon, 7 Sep 2015 16:21:55 -0700
Ian Zimmerman <[email protected]> • #48356
Re: egrep matches, but procmail recipe not
Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:40:11 +1000
Erik Christiansen <[email protected]> • #48355
Re: egrep matches, but procmail recipe not
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 08:44:55 -0700
Ian Zimmerman <[email protected]> • #48354
Re: egrep matches, but procmail recipe not
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 17:09:13 +0200
Eric Smith <[email protected]> • #48353
Re: egrep matches, but procmail recipe not
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 17:03:11 +0200
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #48352
Re: egrep matches, but procmail recipe not
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 16:59:42 +0200
Eric Smith <[email protected]> • #48351
Re: egrep matches, but procmail recipe not
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 07:54:05 -0700
Ian Zimmerman <[email protected]> • #48350
Re: egrep matches, but procmail recipe not
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 16:44:34 +0200
Eric Smith <[email protected]> • #48349
Re: egrep matches, but procmail recipe not
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 06:56:25 -0700
Ian Zimmerman <[email protected]> • #48348
egrep matches, but procmail recipe not
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 11:06:29 +0200
Eric Smith <[email protected]> • #48347
Re: Command died with status 134
Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:37:51 +0200
Eric Smith <[email protected]> • #48346
Re: Command died with status 134
Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:59:46 -0700
Ian Zimmerman <[email protected]> • #48345
Re: Command died with status 134
Mon, 10 Aug 2015 23:22:35 +0200
Eric Smith <[email protected]> • #48344
Re: environment passed from sendmail?
Sun, 9 Aug 2015 21:10:21 +0200
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #48343
Re: environment passed from sendmail?
Sun, 9 Aug 2015 11:49:09 -0700
Ian Zimmerman <[email protected]> • #48342
Re: environment passed from sendmail?
Sun, 9 Aug 2015 20:38:35 +0200
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #48341
Re: environment passed from sendmail?
Sun, 9 Aug 2015 20:30:56 +0200
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #48340
Re: environment passed from sendmail?
9 Aug 2015 17:37:03 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #48339
Re: environment passed from sendmail?
Sun, 9 Aug 2015 10:25:53 -0700
Ian Zimmerman <[email protected]> • #48338
Re: environment passed from sendmail?
9 Aug 2015 17:18:43 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #48337
Re: environment passed from sendmail?
Sun, 9 Aug 2015 13:13:42 -0400
Patrick Shanahan <[email protected]> • #48336
Re: environment passed from sendmail?
Sun, 9 Aug 2015 09:40:07 -0700
Ian Zimmerman <[email protected]> • #48335
Re: environment passed from sendmail?
Sun, 9 Aug 2015 17:28:39 +0100 (BST)
Alan Clifford <[email protected]> • #48334
Re: environment passed from sendmail?
Sun, 9 Aug 2015 09:09:43 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48333
Re: environment passed from sendmail?
Sun, 09 Aug 2015 17:05:35 +0200
wolfgang <[email protected]> • #48332
Re: environment passed from sendmail?
Sun, 9 Aug 2015 07:50:07 -0700
Ian Zimmerman <[email protected]> • #48331
Re: environment passed from sendmail?
Sun, 9 Aug 2015 13:30:08 +0100 (BST)
Alan Clifford <[email protected]> • #48330
environment passed from sendmail?
Sat, 8 Aug 2015 23:47:30 -0700
Ian Zimmerman <[email protected]> • #48329
Re: Command died with status 134
Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:43:53 -0700
Ian Zimmerman <[email protected]> • #48328
Re: Command died with status 134Reply-To:
Wed, 5 Aug 2015 15:37:56 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48327
Re: Command died with status 134Reply-To:
Wed, 5 Aug 2015 16:10:42 +0200
Eric Smith <[email protected]> • #48326
Re: Command died with status 134Reply-To:
Wed, 5 Aug 2015 08:04:16 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48325
Command died with status 134Reply-To:
Wed, 5 Aug 2015 09:16:01 +0200
Eric Smith <[email protected]> • #48324
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Sun, 14 Jun 2015 19:43:35 -0500
Moby <[email protected]> • #48323
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Sun, 14 Jun 2015 10:11:22 -0700
LuKreme <[email protected]> • #48322
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Mon, 15 Jun 2015 01:29:37 +1000
Erik Christiansen <[email protected]> • #48321
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Sun, 14 Jun 2015 16:52:18 +0200
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #48320
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:01:40 +1000
Erik Christiansen <[email protected]> • #48319
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Sun, 14 Jun 2015 23:50:03 +1000
Erik Christiansen <[email protected]> • #48318
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Sun, 14 Jun 2015 14:31:41 +0200
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #48317
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Sun, 14 Jun 2015 08:30:53 -0400
Chuck Martin <[email protected]> • #48316
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Sun, 14 Jun 2015 19:38:30 +1000
Erik Christiansen <[email protected]> • #48315
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 18:21:41 -0500
Moby <[email protected]> • #48314
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 16:16:36 +0200
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #48313
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 23:56:54 +1000
Erik Christiansen <[email protected]> • #48312
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 12:58:19 +0200
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #48311
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 20:22:40 +1000
Erik Christiansen <[email protected]> • #48310
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 21:14:15 -0500
Moby <[email protected]> • #48309
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 21:11:31 -0400
Chuck Martin <[email protected]> • #48308
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:41:32 -0700
LuKreme <[email protected]> • #48307
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:51:17 -0500
Moby <[email protected]> • #48306
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 00:06:47 +0100 (BST)
Alan Clifford <[email protected]> • #48305
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:02:27 -0500
Moby <[email protected]> • #48304
Re: Matching literal dot in To
Thu, 11 Jun 2015 21:27:53 -0700
Bart Schaefer <[email protected]> • #48303
Matching literal dot in To
Thu, 11 Jun 2015 23:00:46 -0500
Moby <[email protected]> • #48302
Re: Time-based filtering in Procmail
Mon, 1 Jun 2015 06:35:38 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #48301
Re: Time-based filtering in Procmail
Mon, 01 Jun 2015 08:27:02 +0200
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #48300
Re: Time-based filtering in Procmail
Mon, 01 Jun 2015 07:40:03 +0200
"M. Fioretti" <[email protected]> • #48299
Re: Time-based filtering in Procmail
Sun, 31 May 2015 21:38:59 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48298
Re: Time-based filtering in Procmail
Sat, 30 May 2015 11:51:46 +0200
"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]> • #48297
Time-based filtering in Procmail
Fri, 29 May 2015 16:38:07 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48296
Re: Limit user actions in .procmailrc
Thu, 21 May 2015 05:15:58 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48295
Re: Limit user actions in .procmailrc
Wed, 20 May 2015 12:20:15 -0500
Andrew Edelstein <[email protected]> • #48294
Re: Limit user actions in .procmailrc
Wed, 20 May 2015 17:46:58 +0100 (BST)
Alan Clifford <[email protected]> • #48293
Re: Limit user actions in .procmailrc
Tue, 19 May 2015 17:39:09 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #48292
Re: Limit user actions in .procmailrc
Tue, 19 May 2015 16:57:28 -0500
"Christopher P. Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #48291
Re: Limit user actions in .procmailrc
Tue, 19 May 2015 22:39:32 +0100 (BST)
Alan Clifford <[email protected]> • #48290
Limit user actions in .procmailrc
Tue, 19 May 2015 16:17:04 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #48289
Re: Stripping extra stuff from text
Fri, 1 May 2015 05:04:07 +0300
Andrey Repin <[email protected]> • #48288
test
Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:40:48 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48287
Re: Stripping extra stuff from text
Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:24:08 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48286
Stripping extra stuff from text
Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:30:39 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48285
Re: strange error in my procmailrc
Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:11:42 -0400
Patrick Shanahan <[email protected]> • #48284
Re: strange error in my procmailrc
Tue, 24 Mar 2015 00:30:53 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48283
Re: strange error in my procmailrc
Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:55:39 -0400
[email protected] (Dale R. Worley) • #48282
Re: strange error in my procmailrc
Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:03:50 +0100
Mathias Bauer <[email protected]> • #48281
Re: Any dangers with this recipe?
Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:52:54 +0000 (GMT)
Alan Clifford <[email protected]> • #48280
Re: Any dangers with this recipe?
Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:31:49 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48279
strange error in my procmailrc
Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:22:11 -0600
"@lbutlr" <[email protected]> • #48278
Any dangers with this recipe?
Mon, 23 Mar 2015 15:22:08 +0000 (GMT)
Alan Clifford <[email protected]> • #48277
Re: help with a recipe
Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:37:38 -0700
LuKreme <[email protected]> • #48276
Re: help with a recipe
Fri, 20 Feb 2015 23:19:59 +0100
Klaus Johannes Rusch <[email protected]> • #48275
Re: help with a recipe
Fri, 20 Feb 2015 18:42:05 +0100
Mathias Bauer <[email protected]> • #48274
help with a recipe
Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:46:18 -0600 (CST)
Zhiliang Hu <[email protected]> • #48273
Re: procmailrc to match body
Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:35:43 -0600
Juliani Moon <[email protected]> • #48272
Re: procmailrc to match body
Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:38:59 -0700
LuKreme <[email protected]> • #48271
procmailrc to match body
Sat, 31 Jan 2015 15:13:32 -0600
Julianony M <[email protected]> • #48270
Re: procmail local delivery and aliases expansion
Tue, 6 Jan 2015 20:49:38 +0100
Richard Z <[email protected]> • #48269
Re: procmail local delivery and aliases expansion
Tue, 6 Jan 2015 05:06:38 -0700
LuKreme <[email protected]> • #48268
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.