gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general archive

782 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 8). Latest articles →

Re: Is every email that comes from googleusercontent.com, spam?
Tue, 31 Mar 2026 10:38:51 -0400
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168433
Re: Is every email that comes from googleusercontent.com, spam?
Tue, 31 Mar 2026 18:40:46 +0900
Byunghee HWANG (황병희) <[email protected]> • #168432
Re: Is every email that comes from googleusercontent.com, spam?
Tue, 31 Mar 2026 11:04:55 +0200
Vincent Lefevre <[email protected]> • #168431
RE: Is every email that comes from googleusercontent.com, spam?
Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:35:10 +0000
Marc <[email protected]> • #168430
Is every email that comes from googleusercontent.com, spam?
Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:03:18 -0400
Mark London <[email protected]> • #168429
Re: Trying to listen to spamd with both ssl and non-ssl fails under FreeBSD.
Mon, 30 Mar 2026 05:15:51 +0000 (UTC)
"Dan Mahoney (Gushi)" <[email protected]> • #168428
Trying to listen to spamd with both ssl and non-ssl fails under FreeBSD.
Sun, 29 Mar 2026 20:14:27 -0700
Dan Mahoney <[email protected]> • #168427
Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x
Sat, 28 Mar 2026 11:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168426
Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x
Sat, 28 Mar 2026 14:38:37 +0100
Jona Müller <[email protected]> • #168425
Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x
Fri, 27 Mar 2026 09:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168424
Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x
Fri, 27 Mar 2026 09:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168423
Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x
Fri, 27 Mar 2026 13:37:21 +0100
Jona Müller <[email protected]> • #168422
Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x
Fri, 27 Mar 2026 03:18:01 +0100
Jona Müller <[email protected]> • #168421
Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x
Thu, 26 Mar 2026 18:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168420
Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x
Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168419
Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x
Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:17:42 +0100
Jona Müller <[email protected]> • #168418
Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x
Thu, 26 Mar 2026 07:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168417
UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x
Wed, 25 Mar 2026 10:47:06 +0100
Jona Müller <[email protected]> • #168416
Re: Help with KAM rule set setup
Mon, 16 Mar 2026 12:24:34 +0100
[email protected] • #168415
RE: Help with KAM rule set setup
Sat, 14 Mar 2026 12:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168414
RE: Help with KAM rule set setup
Sat, 14 Mar 2026 11:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168413
RE: Help with KAM rule set setup
Fri, 13 Mar 2026 18:36:51 -0500
"Scott Techlist" <[email protected]> • #168412
Re: Help with KAM rule set setup
Fri, 13 Mar 2026 16:41:52 -0400
"Jared Hall via users" <[email protected]> • #168411
Re: Help with KAM rule set setup
Fri, 13 Mar 2026 16:03:26 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #168410
Re: Help with KAM rule set setup
Fri, 13 Mar 2026 12:54:29 -0400
"Jared Hall via users" <[email protected]> • #168409
Help with KAM rule set setup
Fri, 13 Mar 2026 11:07:27 -0500
"Scott Techlist" <[email protected]> • #168408
Re: T_DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q
Sun, 8 Mar 2026 18:25:47 +0100
Matija Nalis <[email protected]> • #168407
T_DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q
Sun, 8 Mar 2026 11:05:47 +0000
Marc <[email protected]> • #168406
Re: TXREP gone wild?
Mon, 2 Mar 2026 09:43:56 +0100
[email protected] • #168405
Re: TXREP gone wild?
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 09:29:38 -0500
Alex <[email protected]> • #168404
Re: TXREP gone wild?
Sat, 28 Feb 2026 22:20:51 +0100
[email protected] • #168403
TXREP gone wild?
Fri, 27 Feb 2026 16:11:08 -0500
Alex <[email protected]> • #168402
Re: google mail issue
Fri, 27 Feb 2026 14:10:41 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168401
RE: google mail issue
Thu, 26 Feb 2026 21:16:34 +0000
Marc <[email protected]> • #168400
RE: google mail issue
Thu, 26 Feb 2026 20:30:42 +0000
Marc <[email protected]> • #168399
Re: google mail issue
Thu, 26 Feb 2026 11:31:33 -0700
JPP1 <[email protected]> • #168398
google mail issue
Thu, 26 Feb 2026 13:21:04 -0500
"Newlon, Phil" <[email protected]> • #168397
Re: Debugging white/black-listing
Thu, 19 Feb 2026 08:22:14 -0500
"Jared Hall via users" <[email protected]> • #168396
Re: Debugging white/black-listing
Wed, 18 Feb 2026 19:30:46 -0600 (CST)
David B Funk <[email protected]> • #168395
Re: Debugging white/black-listing
Wed, 18 Feb 2026 16:49:59 -0800
jdow <[email protected]> • #168394
Re: Debugging white/black-listing
Wed, 18 Feb 2026 13:41:34 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168393
Re: Debugging white/black-listing
Wed, 18 Feb 2026 13:30:02 -0500
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #168392
Debugging white/black-listing
Wed, 18 Feb 2026 10:59:42 -0700
"Philip Prindeville via users" <[email protected]> • #168391
RE: recently updated to 4.0.2
Wed, 11 Feb 2026 10:27:04 +0000
Marc <[email protected]> • #168390
Re: recently updated to 4.0.2
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 19:29:15 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168389
RE: recently updated to 4.0.2
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 22:21:54 +0000
Marc <[email protected]> • #168388
Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Resolving the Validity situation
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 11:05:19 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168387
Re: recently updated to 4.0.2
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 15:35:20 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168386
Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Resolving the Validity situation
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 15:29:59 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168385
recently updated to 4.0.2
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 13:18:37 +0000
Marc <[email protected]> • #168384
Re: rule assistence
Mon, 9 Feb 2026 11:55:00 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168383
Re: rule assistence
Mon, 09 Feb 2026 09:59:14 +0100
"A. Schulze via users" <[email protected]> • #168382
Re: rule assistence
Sun, 08 Feb 2026 23:13:52 +0100
"Benny Pedersen via users" <[email protected]> • #168381
Re: rule assistence
Mon, 09 Feb 2026 08:07:32 +1000
Noel Butler <[email protected]> • #168380
Re: rule assistence
Sun, 08 Feb 2026 22:39:24 +0100
"Benny Pedersen via users" <[email protected]> • #168379
Re: rule assistence
Sun, 8 Feb 2026 17:05:03 +0100
Matija Nalis <[email protected]> • #168378
Re: rule assistence
Sun, 8 Feb 2026 13:05:10 +0100
"A.Schulze via users" <[email protected]> • #168377
Re: rule assistence
Sun, 8 Feb 2026 12:10:32 +0100
Axb <[email protected]> • #168376
rule assistence
Sun, 8 Feb 2026 11:18:37 +0100
"A.Schulze via users" <[email protected]> • #168375
Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Resolving the Validity situation
Wed, 4 Feb 2026 18:19:08 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168374
Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Resolving the Validity situation
Wed, 04 Feb 2026 08:42:57 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168373
Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Resolving the Validity situation
Wed, 04 Feb 2026 07:49:38 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168372
Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Resolving the Validity situation
Wed, 4 Feb 2026 10:31:53 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168371
Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish?
24 Jan 2026 14:41:13 -0500
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #168370
RE: mailchip and negative points - new phish?
Sat, 24 Jan 2026 13:16:27 +0000
Marc <[email protected]> • #168369
Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish?
Fri, 23 Jan 2026 12:18:49 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168368
Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish?
Fri, 23 Jan 2026 05:01:00 +0100
Vincent Lefevre <[email protected]> • #168367
Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish?
22 Jan 2026 22:39:32 -0500
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #168366
Re: How to debug SA to identify long running body check?
Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:29:23 +0000
"Lichtinger, Bernhard" <[email protected]> • #168365
Re: How to debug SA to identify long running body check?
Thu, 22 Jan 2026 10:51:35 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168364
Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish?
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 12:32:13 -0700
"Anne P. Mitchell, Esq." <[email protected]> • #168363
Re: How to debug SA to identify long running body check?
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 17:10:38 +0000
"Lichtinger, Bernhard" <[email protected]> • #168362
Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish?
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 18:02:16 +0100
"Martin F via users" <[email protected]> • #168361
Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish?
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 11:51:53 -0500
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #168360
Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish?
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 11:17:06 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168359
Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish?
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 11:09:41 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168358
Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish?
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 23:04:12 +0700
Jimmy <[email protected]> • #168357
RE: mailchip and negative points - new phish?
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 15:57:38 +0000
Marc <[email protected]> • #168356
Re: How to debug SA to identify long running body check?
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 10:56:42 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168355
mailchip and negative points - new phish?
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 10:50:51 -0500
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #168354
How to debug SA to identify long running body check?
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 15:45:26 +0000
"Lichtinger, Bernhard" <[email protected]> • #168353
Re: [ANN] Mailuminati Guardian: open source collaborative fuzzy learning (TLSH/LSH) seeking beta testers
Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:31:10 +0100
Simon Bressier <[email protected]> • #168352
Re: [ANN] Mailuminati Guardian: open source collaborative fuzzy learning (TLSH/LSH) seeking beta testers
Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:17:20 +0700
Jimmy <[email protected]> • #168351
[ANN] Mailuminati Guardian: open source collaborative fuzzy learning (TLSH/LSH) seeking beta testers
Thu, 15 Jan 2026 13:01:25 +0100
Simon Bressier <[email protected]> • #168350
Re: Amazon links + Google groups phishing spam. And big boxes?
Thu, 15 Jan 2026 08:18:57 +0000
Niamh Holding <[email protected]> • #168349
Amazon links + Google groups phishing spam. And big boxes?
Wed, 14 Jan 2026 18:23:50 -0500
Mark London <[email protected]> • #168348
URIBL_BLACK
Tue, 13 Jan 2026 09:44:45 +0000
Niamh Holding <[email protected]> • #168347
Re: Still seeing lots of false positives caused by SHOPIFY_IMG_NOT_RCVD_SFY
Sun, 11 Jan 2026 12:16:32 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168346
Re: Still seeing lots of false positives caused by SHOPIFY_IMG_NOT_RCVD_SFY
Sun, 11 Jan 2026 07:24:12 +0000
Niamh Holding <[email protected]> • #168345
Re: Still seeing lots of false positives caused by SHOPIFY_IMG_NOT_RCVD_SFY
Sat, 10 Jan 2026 14:27:08 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168344
Re: Still seeing lots of false positives caused by SHOPIFY_IMG_NOT_RCVD_SFY
Sat, 10 Jan 2026 13:25:53 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168343
Re: Still seeing lots of false positives caused by SHOPIFY_IMG_NOT_RCVD_SFY
Sat, 10 Jan 2026 12:59:13 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168342
Re: Still seeing lots of false positives caused by SHOPIFY_IMG_NOT_RCVD_SFY
Sat, 10 Jan 2026 12:57:53 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168341
Re: Still seeing lots of false positives caused by SHOPIFY_IMG_NOT_RCVD_SFY
Sat, 10 Jan 2026 12:54:49 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168340
Re: Still seeing lots of false positives caused by SHOPIFY_IMG_NOT_RCVD_SFY
Sat, 10 Jan 2026 19:29:58 +0000
Niamh Holding <[email protected]> • #168339
Re: Still seeing lots of false positives caused by SHOPIFY_IMG_NOT_RCVD_SFY
Sat, 10 Jan 2026 14:12:55 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168338
Re: Still seeing lots of false positives caused by SHOPIFY_IMG_NOT_RCVD_SFY
Sat, 10 Jan 2026 13:54:03 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168337
Re: Still seeing lots of false positives caused by SHOPIFY_IMG_NOT_RCVD_SFY
Sat, 10 Jan 2026 18:05:10 +0000
Niamh Holding <[email protected]> • #168336
Re: Still seeing lots of false positives caused by SHOPIFY_IMG_NOT_RCVD_SFY
Sat, 10 Jan 2026 12:34:02 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168335
Still seeing lots of false positives caused by SHOPIFY_IMG_NOT_RCVD_SFY
Sat, 10 Jan 2026 15:29:55 +0000
Niamh Holding <[email protected]> • #168334
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.