gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general archive

782 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 8). Latest articles →

Re: Changes to /etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-rules.cf not taking after restarting spamassassin service
Thu, 08 Jan 2026 14:28:58 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168333
Re: Changes to /etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-rules.cf not taking after restarting spamassassin service
Thu, 8 Jan 2026 13:11:37 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168332
Re: Changes to /etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-rules.cf not taking after restarting spamassassin service
Wed, 7 Jan 2026 21:25:42 -0700
"Philip Prindeville via users" <[email protected]> • #168331
Re: Changes to /etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-rules.cf not taking after restarting spamassassin service
Wed, 7 Jan 2026 21:14:13 -0600 (CST)
David B Funk <[email protected]> • #168330
Changes to /etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-rules.cf not taking after restarting spamassassin service
Wed, 7 Jan 2026 18:44:13 -0700
"Philip Prindeville via users" <[email protected]> • #168329
Re: Sub-dividing 'non-spam'
Mon, 5 Jan 2026 18:01:52 -0500
"Michael Grant via users" <[email protected]> • #168328
Re: Sub-dividing 'non-spam'
Mon, 05 Jan 2026 17:02:07 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168327
Re: Sub-dividing 'non-spam'
Mon, 5 Jan 2026 13:17:06 -0500
"Alan via users" <[email protected]> • #168326
Re: Sub-dividing 'non-spam'
Mon, 5 Jan 2026 12:17:19 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #168325
Sub-dividing 'non-spam'
Mon, 5 Jan 2026 11:02:34 -0600
Jerry Malcolm <[email protected]> • #168324
Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature?
Tue, 23 Dec 2025 10:43:06 +0100
"Thomas Barth via users" <[email protected]> • #168323
Re: [VOTE] Re: SpamAssassin Logo Contest !!
Mon, 22 Dec 2025 17:49:56 +0100
Giovanni Bechis <[email protected]> • #168322
Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature?
Mon, 22 Dec 2025 17:40:49 +0100
bOnK <[email protected]> • #168321
Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature?
Mon, 22 Dec 2025 17:14:11 +0100
"Thomas Barth via users" <[email protected]> • #168320
Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature?
Mon, 22 Dec 2025 12:21:25 +0100
"Thomas Barth via users" <[email protected]> • #168319
Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature?
Mon, 22 Dec 2025 10:25:04 +1000
Noel Butler <[email protected]> • #168318
Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature?
Sun, 21 Dec 2025 13:23:22 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168317
Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature?
Sun, 21 Dec 2025 12:52:18 +0100
"A.Schulze via users" <[email protected]> • #168316
Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature?
Sat, 20 Dec 2025 18:31:58 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168315
Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature?
Sun, 21 Dec 2025 00:24:09 +0100
Matija Nalis <[email protected]> • #168314
Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature?
Sat, 20 Dec 2025 23:54:26 +0100
"Thomas Barth via users" <[email protected]> • #168313
Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature?
Sat, 20 Dec 2025 22:16:16 +0100
"A.Schulze via users" <[email protected]> • #168312
What breaks the validity of DKIM signature?
Sat, 20 Dec 2025 13:28:03 +0100
"Thomas Barth via users" <[email protected]> • #168311
Re: Weird characters (again) getting around filter rules.
Wed, 17 Dec 2025 01:08:05 -0500
Mark London <[email protected]> • #168310
Re: Weird characters (again) getting around filter rules.
Tue, 16 Dec 2025 12:05:27 +0100
"Martin F via users" <[email protected]> • #168309
Re: Weird characters (again) getting around filter rules.
Mon, 15 Dec 2025 09:33:34 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168308
Re: Weird characters (again) getting around filter rules.
Mon, 15 Dec 2025 06:23:44 +0100
Thomas Krichel <[email protected]> • #168307
Weird characters (again) getting around filter rules.
Sun, 14 Dec 2025 20:04:10 -0500
Mark London <[email protected]> • #168306
Re: welcomelist_from_spf
Sun, 14 Dec 2025 19:37:25 +0100
Antony Stone <[email protected]> • #168305
Re: welcomelist_from_spf
Sun, 14 Dec 2025 10:20:48 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168304
Re: welcomelist_from_spf
Sat, 13 Dec 2025 10:08:11 +0000
Otto Cooper <[email protected]> • #168303
Re: welcomelist_from_spf
Fri, 12 Dec 2025 18:08:24 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168302
Re: welcomelist_from_spf
Sat, 13 Dec 2025 01:26:13 +0100
"Benny Pedersen via users" <[email protected]> • #168301
Re: welcomelist_from_spf
Sat, 13 Dec 2025 00:15:51 +0000
Otto Cooper <[email protected]> • #168300
Re: welcomelist_from_spf
Sat, 13 Dec 2025 00:33:52 +0100
"Benny Pedersen via users" <[email protected]> • #168299
Re: welcomelist_from_spf
Fri, 12 Dec 2025 23:13:05 +0000
Otto Cooper <[email protected]> • #168298
Re: welcomelist_from_spf
Fri, 12 Dec 2025 22:14:12 +0000
Otto Cooper <[email protected]> • #168297
Re: welcomelist_from_spf
Fri, 12 Dec 2025 22:08:34 +0000
Otto Cooper <[email protected]> • #168296
Re: welcomelist_from_spf
Fri, 12 Dec 2025 21:32:03 +0000
Otto Cooper <[email protected]> • #168295
Re: welcomelist_from_spf
Fri, 12 Dec 2025 22:06:37 +0100
"Benny Pedersen via users" <[email protected]> • #168294
Re: welcomelist_from_spf
Fri, 12 Dec 2025 20:55:43 +0000
Otto Cooper <[email protected]> • #168293
Re: welcomelist_from_spf
Fri, 12 Dec 2025 20:44:55 +0000
Otto Cooper <[email protected]> • #168292
welcomelist_from_spf
Fri, 12 Dec 2025 20:18:34 +0000
"otto.cooper" <[email protected]> • #168291
(No Subject)
Sun, 07 Dec 2025 11:25:18 +0000
Rupert Gallagher <[email protected]> • #168290
Re: False positive from DONATION_BODY
Sat, 06 Dec 2025 13:53:06 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168289
Re: False positive from DONATION_BODY
Sat, 06 Dec 2025 14:49:56 +0000
Rupert Gallagher <[email protected]> • #168288
Re: QR code phish in Word docs?
Fri, 5 Dec 2025 22:24:06 -0500
Ricky Boone <[email protected]> • #168287
Re: False positive from DONATION_BODY
Fri, 5 Dec 2025 17:27:33 -0800
jdow <[email protected]> • #168286
QR code phish in Word docs?
Fri, 5 Dec 2025 15:42:34 -0500
Alex <[email protected]> • #168285
Re: False positive from DONATION_BODY
Fri, 05 Dec 2025 14:58:44 +0000
Rupert Gallagher <[email protected]> • #168284
Re: False positive from DONATION_BODY
Fri, 05 Dec 2025 09:39:05 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168283
False positive from DONATION_BODY
Fri, 05 Dec 2025 10:47:13 +0000
Rupert Gallagher <[email protected]> • #168282
Re: Wrong DMARC results for subdomains?
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 18:08:39 +0100
Wolfgang Breyha <[email protected]> • #168281
Re: Wrong DMARC results for subdomains?
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 16:16:15 +0100
Matija Nalis <[email protected]> • #168280
Wrong DMARC results for subdomains?
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 14:14:01 +0100
Wolfgang Breyha <[email protected]> • #168279
Re: Latest time a masscheck must be submitted?
Wed, 19 Nov 2025 18:28:23 +0100
Giovanni Bechis <[email protected]> • #168278
Re: [VOTE] Re: SpamAssassin Logo Contest !!
Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:07:51 +0100
Giovanni Bechis <[email protected]> • #168277
Re: Latest time a masscheck must be submitted?
Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:02:37 +0100
[email protected] • #168276
Re: dkim failed, but bonus?
Tue, 18 Nov 2025 13:32:27 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168275
Latest time a masscheck must be submitted?
Tue, 18 Nov 2025 12:26:34 +0100
Tobi <[email protected]> • #168274
Re: dkim failed, but bonus?
Fri, 14 Nov 2025 01:12:08 +0100
Matija Nalis <[email protected]> • #168273
Re: dkim failed, but bonus?
Thu, 13 Nov 2025 10:29:05 +0100
"Thomas Barth via users" <[email protected]> • #168272
Re: dkim failed, but bonus?
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 23:39:20 +0100
Matija Nalis <[email protected]> • #168271
Re: dkim failed, but bonus?
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 11:52:20 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168270
Re: url blacklist
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 11:43:27 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168269
Re: url blacklist
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 16:30:23 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168268
Re: dkim failed, but bonus?
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 13:41:45 +0100
"Thomas Barth via users" <[email protected]> • #168267
Re: url blacklist
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 18:54:49 +0700
Jimmy <[email protected]> • #168266
Re: url blacklist
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 12:56:09 +0100
natan <[email protected]> • #168265
url blacklist
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 11:45:16 +0100
natan <[email protected]> • #168264
dkim failed, but bonus?
Tue, 11 Nov 2025 18:58:09 +0100
"Thomas Barth via users" <[email protected]> • #168263
Re[2]: unknown rDNS
Sun, 09 Nov 2025 11:41:13 +0000
Tobi <[email protected]> • #168262
Re: Score based on MX of evelope / from domain?
Sun, 9 Nov 2025 09:39:35 +0100
Benoît Panizzon <[email protected]> • #168261
Re: unknown rDNS
Sat, 08 Nov 2025 21:53:11 +0100
"Thomas Barth via users" <[email protected]> • #168260
Re: unknown rDNS
Sat, 8 Nov 2025 15:15:33 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168259
unknown rDNS
Sat, 08 Nov 2025 14:35:55 +0100
"Thomas Barth via users" <[email protected]> • #168258
Re: AR headers
Sat, 08 Nov 2025 12:34:29 +0100
"Benny Pedersen via users" <[email protected]> • #168257
Re[2]: Score based on MX of evelope / from domain?
Sat, 08 Nov 2025 07:32:12 +0000
Tobi <[email protected]> • #168256
Re: Score based on MX of evelope / from domain?
Fri, 07 Nov 2025 08:34:02 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168255
Re: Score based on MX of evelope / from domain?
Fri, 07 Nov 2025 09:31:24 +0100
Tobi <[email protected]> • #168254
Re: Score based on MX of evelope / from domain?
Fri, 7 Nov 2025 08:45:46 +0100
Benoît Panizzon <[email protected]> • #168253
Re: Score based on MX of evelope / from domain?
Fri, 7 Nov 2025 14:43:25 +0700
Jimmy <[email protected]> • #168252
Re: Score based on MX of evelope / from domain?
Fri, 7 Nov 2025 15:29:50 +0800
<[email protected]> • #168251
Score based on MX of evelope / from domain?
Fri, 7 Nov 2025 08:04:57 +0100
Benoît Panizzon <[email protected]> • #168250
RE: [VOTE] SpamAssassin Logo Contest !!
Thu, 6 Nov 2025 15:33:29 -0800
Kenneth Porter <[email protected]> • #168249
Re: [VOTE] SpamAssassin Logo Contest !!
Thu, 6 Nov 2025 23:03:55 +0100
Antony Stone <[email protected]> • #168248
Re: [VOTE] SpamAssassin Logo Contest !!
Thu, 6 Nov 2025 16:49:26 -0500
"Kevin A. McGrail" <[email protected]> • #168247
Re: [VOTE] SpamAssassin Logo Contest !!
Thu, 6 Nov 2025 16:39:13 -0500
Michael Orlitzky <[email protected]> • #168246
Re: [VOTE] SpamAssassin Logo Contest !!
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 14:18:46 -0500
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168245
Re: URLs in ExtractText?
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 01:54:15 -0500
"Jared Hall via users" <[email protected]> • #168244
Re: URLs in ExtractText?
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 17:35:52 +0100
[email protected] • #168243
Re: URLs in ExtractText?
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 10:10:38 -0500
"Jared Hall via users" <[email protected]> • #168242
Re: [VOTE] Re: SpamAssassin Logo Contest !!
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 09:59:52 +0100
Giovanni Bechis <[email protected]> • #168241
Re: URLs in ExtractText?
Sun, 2 Nov 2025 15:14:44 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168240
URLs in ExtractText?
Sun, 2 Nov 2025 06:51:31 -0500
"Jared Hall via users" <[email protected]> • #168239
Re: AR headers
Sat, 1 Nov 2025 20:52:30 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168238
Re: [VOTE] Re: SpamAssassin Logo Contest !!
Sat, 1 Nov 2025 12:00:28 -0400
"Kevin A. McGrail" <[email protected]> • #168237
Re: MySQL Bayes store, and bayes_auto_expire, not auto-expiring
Sat, 1 Nov 2025 13:10:43 +0100
[email protected] • #168236
[VOTE] Re: SpamAssassin Logo Contest !!
Sat, 1 Nov 2025 12:41:12 +0100
Giovanni Bechis <[email protected]> • #168235
MySQL Bayes store, and bayes_auto_expire, not auto-expiring
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:19:09 +0000 (GMT)
"Jess Robinson" <[email protected]> • #168234
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.