gmane.network.dns.bind.user archive

425 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 5). Latest articles →

Re: New BIND 9 releases: 9.18.44, 9.20.18, 9.21.17
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 15:34:06 +0100
Michał Kępień <[email protected]> • #68959
Re: New BIND 9 releases: 9.18.44, 9.20.18, 9.21.17
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 15:32:47 +0100
Michal Nowak <[email protected]> • #68958
Re: New BIND 9 releases: 9.18.44, 9.20.18, 9.21.17
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 15:31:11 +0100
Nicki Křížek <[email protected]> • #68957
Re: New BIND 9 releases: 9.18.44, 9.20.18, 9.21.17
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 14:24:45 +0000 (GMT)
"G.W. Haywood" <[email protected]> • #68956
Re: Development version of BIND 9 - 9.21.10 with meson build system
Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:52:29 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #68955
Re: Development version of BIND 9 - 9.21.10 with meson build system
Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:28:35 +0100 (CET)
Havard Eidnes via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68954
What is the consequence for 'error sending response: would block' log message
Thu, 08 Jan 2026 09:48:54 +0000
Vladimir Nikolic via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68953
BIND DLZ Plugin for Netbird VPN - Dynamic Peer DNS Resolution
Thu, 8 Jan 2026 08:17:56 +0000
joshuadoucette--- via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68952
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Wed, 7 Jan 2026 11:51:32 -0800 (PST)
Fred Morris <[email protected]> • #68951
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Wed, 7 Jan 2026 11:56:52 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68950
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Wed, 7 Jan 2026 19:56:06 +0100
Marco Moock <[email protected]> • #68949
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Wed, 7 Jan 2026 11:43:59 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68948
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 22:59:27 -0800 (PST)
Fred Morris <[email protected]> • #68947
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Wed, 7 Jan 2026 07:25:20 +0100
Marco Moock <[email protected]> • #68946
Re: Can BIND synthesize v6 PTRs ?
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 22:49:47 -0500
vom513 <[email protected]> • #68945
Re: Can BIND synthesize v6 PTRs ?
Wed, 7 Jan 2026 03:43:17 +0000
Evan Hunt <[email protected]> • #68944
Can BIND synthesize v6 PTRs ?
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 22:29:59 -0500
vom513 <[email protected]> • #68943
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 15:25:37 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68942
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 14:30:33 -0600
Richard Laager via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68941
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 13:23:23 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68940
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 21:04:39 +0100
Marco Moock <[email protected]> • #68939
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 13:02:18 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68938
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 12:58:35 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68937
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 12:24:21 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68936
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 20:24:09 +0100
Marco Moock <[email protected]> • #68935
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 12:07:24 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68934
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 12:01:57 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68933
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 09:02:41 +0100
Marco Moock <[email protected]> • #68932
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Mon, 5 Jan 2026 16:51:46 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68931
Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Mon, 5 Jan 2026 16:29:07 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68930
Re: resolver change between 9.20.16 and 9.20.17
Mon, 5 Jan 2026 14:21:30 +0100
Kurt Jaeger <[email protected]> • #68929
Re: resolver change between 9.20.16 and 9.20.17
Mon, 5 Jan 2026 09:58:53 +0100
Petr Špaček <[email protected]> • #68928
Can’t register to Gitlab
Sat, 3 Jan 2026 23:31:32 +0100
Giulio Benetti <[email protected]> • #68927
Re: resolver change between 9.20.16 and 9.20.17
Sat, 3 Jan 2026 09:17:48 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #68926
Re: resolver change between 9.20.16 and 9.20.17
Fri, 2 Jan 2026 22:44:32 +0100
Kurt Jaeger <[email protected]> • #68925
Re: resolver change between 9.20.16 and 9.20.17
Fri, 2 Jan 2026 22:37:42 +0100
Kurt Jaeger <[email protected]> • #68924
account "schildbach" at ISC GitLab blocked
Mon, 22 Dec 2025 18:43:40 +0100
Andreas Schildbach via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68923
Re: bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Sun, 21 Dec 2025 19:11:06 -0800
Dan Mahoney <[email protected]> • #68922
Re: bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Mon, 22 Dec 2025 02:14:15 +0100
Benny Pedersen via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68921
Re: bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:48:17 +0000
* Neustradamus * <[email protected]> • #68920
Re: bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Sun, 21 Dec 2025 13:37:50 -0800
Dan Mahoney <[email protected]> • #68919
Re: bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Sun, 21 Dec 2025 20:48:31 +0100
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #68918
Re: bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Sun, 21 Dec 2025 20:22:56 +0100
tale via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68917
Re: resolver change between 9.20.16 and 9.20.17
Fri, 19 Dec 2025 18:33:01 +1100
Mark Andrews <[email protected]> • #68916
resolver change between 9.20.16 and 9.20.17
Thu, 18 Dec 2025 16:55:02 +0100
"Andreas S. Kerber via bind-users" <[email protected]> • #68915
Re: validating the fix for CVE-2025-40778
Mon, 15 Dec 2025 08:53:47 +0100
Petr Špaček <[email protected]> • #68914
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Sun, 14 Dec 2025 13:37:13 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68913
Re: How to remove all signatures from zonefile (inline signing trouble after upgrading to 9.20)
Fri, 12 Dec 2025 19:25:20 +0100
Petr Špaček <[email protected]> • #68912
Re: How to remove all signatures from zonefile (inline signing trouble after upgrading to 9.20)
Fri, 12 Dec 2025 09:30:48 -0800
Crist Clark <[email protected]> • #68911
How to remove all signatures from zonefile (inline signing trouble after upgrading to 9.20)
Fri, 12 Dec 2025 16:56:05 +0100
Benoit Panizzon <[email protected]> • #68910
Re: IPv6 logging noise
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 14:05:58 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68909
Re: IPv6 logging noise
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 14:54:06 -0600
Doug Freed <[email protected]> • #68908
Re: IPv6 logging noise
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 13:48:41 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68907
Re: Bind 9.20.15 denying transfer to secondaries?
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 10:33:44 +0000
Carsten Strotmann via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68906
Re: Bind 9.20.15 denying transfer to secondaries?
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 11:01:04 +0100
Michał Kępień <[email protected]> • #68905
Re: validating the fix for CVE-2025-40778
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 03:34:33 -0500
Veaceslav Revutchi <[email protected]> • #68904
Re: Bind 9.20.15 denying transfer to secondaries?
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 09:02:16 +0100
Anand Buddhdev <[email protected]> • #68903
Re: Bind 9.20.15 denying transfer to secondaries?
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 07:28:39 +0100
Benoît Panizzon <[email protected]> • #68902
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:35:58 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68901
Re: Bind 9.20.15 denying transfer to secondaries?
Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:36:01 -0500
Ben Scott <[email protected]> • #68900
Bind 9.20.15 denying transfer to secondaries?
Wed, 10 Dec 2025 12:13:29 +0100
Benoît Panizzon <[email protected]> • #68899
Re: validating the fix for CVE-2025-40778
Wed, 10 Dec 2025 05:28:51 -0500
Darren Ankney <[email protected]> • #68898
Re: validating the fix for CVE-2025-40778
Tue, 9 Dec 2025 16:45:11 +0100
Petr Špaček <[email protected]> • #68897
Re: validating the fix for CVE-2025-40778
Tue, 9 Dec 2025 15:39:19 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #68896
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Tue, 9 Dec 2025 15:53:12 +1100
Mark Andrews <[email protected]> • #68895
Re: validating the fix for CVE-2025-40778
Tue, 9 Dec 2025 08:41:48 +0700
Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]> • #68894
validating the fix for CVE-2025-40778
Mon, 8 Dec 2025 18:24:05 -0500
Veaceslav Revutchi <[email protected]> • #68893
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Sat, 6 Dec 2025 23:02:28 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68892
Re: twice as many RRs in 9.20?
Fri, 5 Dec 2025 16:45:59 -0500
Ben Scott <[email protected]> • #68891
Re: An experimental RPZ plugin (was Re: Using a DLZ as RPZ?)
Fri, 5 Dec 2025 17:57:40 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #68890
An experimental RPZ plugin (was Re: Using a DLZ as RPZ?)
Fri, 5 Dec 2025 17:47:01 +0100
Jesus Cea <[email protected]> • #68889
Re: twice as many RRs in 9.20?
Thu, 4 Dec 2025 16:09:49 +0100
"Peter 'PMc' Much" <[email protected]> • #68888
Re: twice as many RRs in 9.20?
Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:13:15 -0500
Ben Scott <[email protected]> • #68887
Re: twice as many RRs in 9.20?
Wed, 3 Dec 2025 17:04:41 +0100
"Peter 'PMc' Much" <[email protected]> • #68886
Re: twice as many RRs in 9.20?
Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:50:12 -0500
Ben Scott <[email protected]> • #68885
twice as many RRs in 9.20?
Wed, 3 Dec 2025 12:43:57 +0100
"Peter 'PMc' Much" <[email protected]> • #68884
Re: bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 22:04:17 -0500
tale via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68883
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 17:31:25 -0500
Ben Scott <[email protected]> • #68882
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 13:18:16 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68881
Re: bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 02:25:29 -0800
Dan Mahoney <[email protected]> • #68880
Re: Using a DLZ as RPZ?
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 10:26:08 +0100
Petr Špaček <[email protected]> • #68879
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 08:37:08 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #68878
Re: Using a DLZ as RPZ?
Tue, 02 Dec 2025 07:52:49 +0100
Colin Vidal <[email protected]> • #68877
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 21:40:43 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68876
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 11:12:52 +1100
Mark Andrews <[email protected]> • #68875
bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 00:24:14 +0100
Jesus Cea <[email protected]> • #68874
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 16:16:43 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68873
Re: Using a DLZ as RPZ?
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 00:11:11 +0100
Jesus Cea <[email protected]> • #68872
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 16:00:14 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68871
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 08:58:11 +1100
Mark Andrews <[email protected]> • #68870
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 16:55:41 -0500
Darren Ankney <[email protected]> • #68869
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 21:54:24 +0000
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68868
Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 13:50:25 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68867
Dynamic zone with fixed include of DKIM entries on server
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 06:00:17 +0200
Matthias Fechner <[email protected]> • #68866
Re: Using a DLZ as RPZ?
Sat, 29 Nov 2025 05:57:12 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #68865
Using a DLZ as RPZ?
Sat, 29 Nov 2025 04:33:48 +0100
Jesus Cea <[email protected]> • #68864
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sun, 23 Nov 2025 14:33:48 +0800
Chunhui Ouyang <[email protected]> • #68863
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 19:39:31 +0000
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #68862
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sun, 23 Nov 2025 01:15:58 +0800
Chunhui Ouyang <[email protected]> • #68861
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 18:08:39 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #68860
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.