gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.guidelines archive

428 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 5). Latest articles →

Re: Numbering Success Criteria
Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:09:10 -0900
"Doyle B" <[email protected]> • #1057
FW: Checkpoint 1.2 - handling comments
Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:15:37 -0600
john_slatin <[email protected]> • #1056
W3C Weekly News - 10 December 2002
Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:08:40 -0500
Susan Lesch <[email protected]> (by way of Wendy A Chisholm <[email protected]>) • #1055
Re: Agenda
Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:06:47 +0100
"Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <[email protected]> • #1054
Re: 4.1 latest version
Tue, 10 Dec 2002 20:53:38 +1100
Jason White <[email protected]> • #1053
Agenda
Tue, 10 Dec 2002 20:38:56 +1100
Jason White <[email protected]> • #1052
RE: Numbering Success Criteria
Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:42:59 +1100
"Gian Sampson-Wild \(PurpleTop\)" <[email protected]> • #1051
Re: Numbering Success Criteria
Mon, 09 Dec 2002 15:42:47 -0500
Marja-Riitta Koivunen <[email protected]> • #1050
Re: Numbering Success Criteria
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 21:26:27 +0100
"Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <[email protected]> • #1049
RE: Numbering Success Criteria
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 14:20:37 -0800
"Lee Roberts" <[email protected]> • #1048
RE: Numbering Success Criteria
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 15:08:43 -0500
"Slaydon, Eugenia" <[email protected]> • #1047
RE: Numbering Success Criteria
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:58:27 -0500
Michael Cooper <[email protected]> • #1046
RE: Numbering Success Criteria
Mon, 09 Dec 2002 13:59:19 -0500
Wendy A Chisholm <[email protected]> • #1045
Re: Numbering Success Criteria
Mon, 09 Dec 2002 13:52:13 -0500
Avi Arditti <[email protected]> • #1044
Re: Numbering Success Criteria
Mon, 09 Dec 2002 10:37:28 -0800
Loretta Guarino Reid <[email protected]> • #1043
RE: Numbering Success Criteria
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 10:31:13 -0800
"Cynthia Shelly" <[email protected]> • #1042
RE: Numbering Success Criteria
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 11:43:42 -0500 (EST)
Charles McCathieNevile <[email protected]> • #1041
Re: Numbering Success Criteria
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 17:40:53 +0100
"Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <[email protected]> • #1040
RE: Numbering Success Criteria
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 10:23:41 -0600
john_slatin <[email protected]> • #1039
Numbering Success Criteria
Mon, 09 Dec 2002 10:22:20 -0500
Wendy A Chisholm <[email protected]> • #1038
Re: The meaning and value of telephone conferences
Sat, 7 Dec 2002 09:00:37 +0000
Jonathan Chetwynd <[email protected]> • #1037
Re: The meaning and value of telephone conferences
Fri, 06 Dec 2002 15:29:40 -0800
"Charles F. Munat" <[email protected]> • #1036
Re: Mailing list
Fri, 06 Dec 2002 18:13:40 -0500
Wendy A Chisholm <[email protected]> • #1035
Mailing list
Fri, 06 Dec 2002 23:30:23 +0100
Maurizio Vittoria <[email protected]> • #1034
Re: The meaning and value of telephone conferences
Fri, 6 Dec 2002 13:02:53 -0500 (EST)
Joe Clark <[email protected]> • #1033
Re: 05 Dec 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
Fri, 06 Dec 2002 12:02:38 -0500
Avi Arditti <[email protected]> • #1032
Re: The meaning and value of telephone conferences
Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:51:13 +0000
Jonathan Chetwynd <[email protected]> • #1031
05 Dec 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes
Fri, 06 Dec 2002 01:20:35 -0500
Wendy A Chisholm <[email protected]> • #1030
Re: The meaning and value of telephone conferences
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 21:03:22 -0500 (EST)
Charles McCathieNevile <[email protected]> • #1029
test
Thu, 05 Dec 2002 18:54:18 -0500
Wendy A Chisholm <[email protected]> • #1028
RE: passcode not valid?
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 13:18:22 -0800
"Cynthia Shelly" <[email protected]> • #1027
Re: passcode not valid?
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 22:12:40 +0100
"Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <[email protected]> • #1026
passcode not valid?
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 13:06:59 -0800
"Cynthia Shelly" <[email protected]> • #1025
Re: The meaning and value of telephone conferences
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 21:08:07 +0100
"Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <[email protected]> • #1024
The meaning and value of telephone conferences
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 20:01:21 +0000
Jonathan Chetwynd <[email protected]> • #1023
I may be late ...
Thu, 05 Dec 2002 14:51:15 -0500
Avi Arditti <[email protected]> • #1022
RE: Checkpoint 1.2 - handling comments
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:45:31 -0600
Andi Snow-Weaver <[email protected]> • #1021
regrets
Thu, 05 Dec 2002 16:32:27 +0100 (CET)
"Patrizia Bertini - WebAccessibile.org" <[email protected]> • #1020
RE: Agenda
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:31:16 -0500
"Slaydon, Eugenia" <[email protected]> • #1019
Re: Checkpoint 1.2 - handling comments
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:17:45 +0100
"Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <[email protected]> • #1018
RE: Agenda
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 00:35:25 -0800
"Lee Roberts" <[email protected]> • #1017
Re: Agenda
Wed, 04 Dec 2002 19:33:29 -0800
Loretta Guarino Reid <[email protected]> • #1016
RE: Checkpoint 1.2 - handling comments
Wed, 04 Dec 2002 19:04:19 -0500
Gregg Vanderheiden <[email protected]> • #1015
RE: Checkpoint 1.1 - handling the rest of the comments
Wed, 04 Dec 2002 19:04:19 -0500
Gregg Vanderheiden <[email protected]> • #1014
Re: Agenda
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:52:33 +1100
Jason White <[email protected]> • #1013
Re: Agenda
Wed, 04 Dec 2002 10:35:33 -0500
Avi Arditti <[email protected]> • #1012
Agenda
Wed, 4 Dec 2002 13:31:27 +1100
Jason White <[email protected]> • #1011
Re: WCAG2 feedback
Tue, 3 Dec 2002 20:12:55 -0500 (EST)
Charles McCathieNevile <[email protected]> • #1010
Re: Requirements for Techniques: Draft 0.2
Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:36:47 +1100
Jason White <[email protected]> • #1009
WCAG2 feedback
Tue, 03 Dec 2002 14:15:20 -0500
"Ines Robbers" <[email protected]> (by way of Wendy A Chisholm <[email protected]>) • #1008
RE: Checkpoint 1.1, p.s.
Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:59:54 -0600
john_slatin <[email protected]> • #1007
W3C Weekly News - 2 December 2002
Tue, 03 Dec 2002 00:17:33 -0500
Susan Lesch <[email protected]> (by way of Wendy A Chisholm <[email protected]>) • #1006
Checkpoint 1.2 - handling comments
Mon, 02 Dec 2002 21:02:46 -0500
Wendy A Chisholm <[email protected]> • #1005
Re: Checkpoint 1.1, p.s.
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 19:14:17 -0500 (EST)
Charles McCathieNevile <[email protected]> • #1004
Checkpoint 1.1, p.s.
Mon, 02 Dec 2002 18:33:24 -0500
Wendy A Chisholm <[email protected]> • #1003
Checkpoint 1.1 - handling the rest of the comments
Mon, 02 Dec 2002 16:24:54 -0500
Wendy A Chisholm <[email protected]> • #1002
FW: Subject: Sign language in the web
Sun, 01 Dec 2002 20:51:30 -0600
Gregg Vanderheiden <[email protected]> • #1001
captions and descriptions
Sun, 1 Dec 2002 05:24:53 -0500 (EST)
Charles McCathieNevile <[email protected]> • #1000
Re: When?
Sun, 1 Dec 2002 10:54:39 +1100
Jason White <[email protected]> • #999
When?
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 20:34:37 +0100
"Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <[email protected]> • #998
regrets
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 10:19:02 -0900
"Doyle B" <[email protected]> • #997
regrets
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 11:19:43 -0600
Gregg Vanderheiden <[email protected]> • #996
Re: Proposal: substitute "provisions" for "success criteria" throughout document
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:04:31 -0800
Matt May <[email protected]> • #995
Re: More absurdity with captions and descriptions
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 21:10:03 -0500 (EST)
Joe Clark <[email protected]> • #994
More absurdity with captions and descriptions
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:09:53 -0900
Doyle <[email protected]> • #993
RE: More absurdity with captions and descriptions
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:43:42 -0600
Gregg Vanderheiden <[email protected]> • #992
W3C Weekly News - 25 November 2002
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:55:47 -0500
Susan Lesch <[email protected]> (by way of Wendy A Chisholm <[email protected]>) • #991
RE: More absurdity with captions and descriptions
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:20:18 -0700
"Paul Bohman" <[email protected]> • #990
More absurdity with captions and descriptions
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:44:14 -0500
Joe Clark <[email protected]> • #989
RE: November 21 FTF
Sun, 24 Nov 2002 09:23:45 +0200
Lisa Seeman <[email protected]> • #988
Regrets
Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:49:26 -0500
"Patrizia Bertini - Webaccessibile.org" <[email protected]> (by way of Wendy A Chisholm <[email protected]>) • #987
Re: Proposal: substitute "provisions" for "success criteria" throughout document
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 08:58:17 +0100
"Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <[email protected]> • #986
Re: November 21 Minutes Posted
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 08:56:15 +0100
"Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <[email protected]> • #985
Re: Requirements for Techniques: Draft 0.2
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:12:14 +1100
Jason White <[email protected]> • #984
Proposal: substitute "provisions" for "success criteria" throughout document
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:51:43 +1100
Jason White <[email protected]> • #983
November 21 Minutes Posted
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:15:20 -0600
"Ben Caldwell" <[email protected]> • #982
Regrets
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 20:36:32 +0100
"Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <[email protected]> • #981
Regrets
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:19:05 -0800
"Lee Roberts" <[email protected]> • #980
Re: Requirements for Techniques: Draft 0.2
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:10:31 +0100
"Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <[email protected]> • #979
Requirements for Techniques: Draft 0.2
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:57:43 -0500
Michael Cooper <[email protected]> • #978
Re: 4.1 latest version
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:02:40 +1100
Jason White <[email protected]> • #977
RE: Agenda
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:09:50 +1100
"Gian Sampson-Wild \(PurpleTop\)" <[email protected]> • #976
Re: 4.1 latest version
Wed, 20 Nov 2002 19:57:39 -0500
Avi Arditti <[email protected]> • #975
Agenda
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:04:46 +1100
Jason White <[email protected]> • #974
[techs] old, old draft of technology-specific checkpoints
Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:20:56 -0500
Wendy A Chisholm <[email protected]> • #973
Regrets
Wed, 20 Nov 2002 04:57:39 -0900
"Doyle B" <[email protected]> • #972
RE: WCAG conformance profiles (no plain text)
Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:48:48 -0500 (EST)
Charles McCathieNevile <[email protected]> • #971
RE: WCAG conformance profiles (no plain text)
Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:32:37 +0200
Lisa Seeman <[email protected]> • #970
Fw:
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:23:35 -0500
"Preety Kumar" <[email protected]> • #969
W3C Weekly News - 18 November 2002
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:51:48 -0500
Susan Lesch <[email protected]> (by way of Wendy A Chisholm <[email protected]>) • #968
Re: SVG Icons [Re: Guideline 3.4 comment (ralative vs. absolute units)]
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:31:59 +0300
Vadim Plessky <[email protected]> • #967
Re: WCAG conformance profiles (no plain text)
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:35:44 +1100
Jason White <[email protected]> • #966
Re: WCAG conformance profiles (no plain text)
Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:16:31 -0500
Al Gilman <[email protected]> • #965
Re: WCAG conformance profiles (claims vs. certificates)
Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:49:32 +0100
"Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <[email protected]> • #964
Re: WCAG conformance profiles (claims vs. certificates)
Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:31:14 -0500
Al Gilman <[email protected]> • #963
Re: WCAG conformance profiles (claims vs. certificates)
Sun, 17 Nov 2002 15:53:18 +0100
"Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <[email protected]> • #962
Re: WCAG conformance profiles (claims vs. certificates)
Sun, 17 Nov 2002 09:38:56 -0500
Al Gilman <[email protected]> • #961
Re: SVG Icons [Re: Guideline 3.4 comment (ralative vs. absolute units)]
Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:56:24 +0000
Jonathan Chetwynd <[email protected]> • #960
Re: WCAG conformance profiles
Sun, 17 Nov 2002 11:08:34 +0100
"Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <[email protected]> • #959
Re: WCAG conformance profiles
Sun, 17 Nov 2002 20:58:45 +1100
Jason White <[email protected]> • #958
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.