gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel archive

1418 archived articles, newest first (page 8 of 15). Latest articles →

Re: Retrieving MAC address from struct ifnet
Sun, 8 Jun 2025 16:49:51 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #59470
Retrieving MAC address from struct ifnet
Sun, 8 Jun 2025 16:00:22 +0200
Beesdeckar <[email protected]> • #59469
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Sun, 8 Jun 2025 07:21:19 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #59468
Working on Discard for FFS
Sun, 8 Jun 2025 08:00:38 +0700
Joshua Gillett <[email protected]> • #59467
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 11:58:22 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #59466
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 11:56:28 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #59465
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 17:54:13 +0300
Vadim Goncharov <[email protected]> • #59464
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 14:21:05 +0000
Emmanuel Nyarko <[email protected]> • #59463
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 17:07:29 +0300
Vadim Goncharov <[email protected]> • #59462
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:43:59 -0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Michael van Elst) • #59461
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 06 Jun 2025 09:42:42 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #59460
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:37:44 +0000
Emmanuel Nyarko <[email protected]> • #59459
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:30:06 +0000
Emmanuel Nyarko <[email protected]> • #59458
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 09:31:58 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #59457
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 06 Jun 2025 09:28:31 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #59456
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 09:23:24 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #59455
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 06 Jun 2025 09:17:04 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #59454
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:45:43 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #59453
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 06 Jun 2025 08:45:08 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #59452
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 11:51:22 -0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Christos Zoulas) • #59451
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 09:52:51 +0000
Emmanuel Nyarko <[email protected]> • #59450
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 06 Jun 2025 16:18:57 +0700
Robert Elz <[email protected]> • #59449
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 07:33:37 +0000
Emmanuel Nyarko <[email protected]> • #59448
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 06:58:51 +0000
Emmanuel Nyarko <[email protected]> • #59447
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 19:57:09 -0700
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #59446
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 03:04:01 +0000
Emmanuel Nyarko <[email protected]> • #59445
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 03:00:03 +0000
Emmanuel Nyarko <[email protected]> • #59444
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 02:51:05 +0000
Emmanuel Nyarko <[email protected]> • #59443
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 18:42:51 -0700
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #59442
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 02:30:03 +0000
Emmanuel Nyarko <[email protected]> • #59441
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 19:12:39 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #59440
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 17:30:44 +0000
Emmanuel Nyarko <[email protected]> • #59439
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 17:12:57 +0000 (UTC)
Jonathan Stone <[email protected]> • #59438
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 16:36:43 +0000
Emmanuel Nyarko <[email protected]> • #59437
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 15:17:14 +0000 (UTC)
Jonathan Stone <[email protected]> • #59436
Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 14:49:20 +0000
Emmanuel Nyarko <[email protected]> • #59435
Re: More serial ports in EFI bootstrap?
Wed, 4 Jun 2025 09:56:44 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #59434
Re: More serial ports in EFI bootstrap?
Wed, 4 Jun 2025 13:27:39 +0000
Emmanuel Dreyfus <[email protected]> • #59433
Re: More serial ports in EFI bootstrap?
Wed, 4 Jun 2025 09:05:36 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #59432
Re: More serial ports in EFI bootstrap?
Wed, 4 Jun 2025 11:53:21 +0000
Emmanuel Dreyfus <[email protected]> • #59431
Re: More serial ports in EFI bootstrap?
Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:49:58 +0100
Robert Swindells <[email protected]> • #59430
Re: More serial ports in EFI bootstrap?
Wed, 4 Jun 2025 07:29:40 +0000
Emmanuel Dreyfus <[email protected]> • #59429
Re: patch review: VirtIO early console support
Wed, 21 May 2025 09:41:09 +0200 (CEST)
Emile `iMil' Heitor <[email protected]> • #59428
patch review: VirtIO early console support
Wed, 21 May 2025 06:57:21 +0200 (CEST)
Emile `iMil' Heitor <[email protected]> • #59427
Re: PHP performance on Xen domU with mulitple vcpu
Wed, 21 May 2025 00:20:34 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #59426
Re: PHP performance on Xen domU with mulitple vcpu
Tue, 20 May 2025 14:34:51 +0000
Emmanuel Dreyfus <[email protected]> • #59425
Re: PHP performance on Xen domU with mulitple vcpu
Tue, 20 May 2025 13:53:45 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #59424
Re: ioctl() and driver function d_ioctl return values
Tue, 20 May 2025 07:15:20 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #59423
ioctl() and driver function d_ioctl return values
Mon, 19 May 2025 17:12:37 +0200
Beesdeckar <[email protected]> • #59422
Re: PHP performance on Xen domU with mulitple vcpu
Mon, 19 May 2025 13:23:18 +0000
Emmanuel Dreyfus <[email protected]> • #59421
Re: PHP performance on Xen domU with mulitple vcpu
Mon, 19 May 2025 13:02:19 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #59420
Re: PHP performance on Xen domU with mulitple vcpu
Mon, 19 May 2025 12:34:01 +0000
Emmanuel Dreyfus <[email protected]> • #59419
Re: PHP performance on Xen domU with mulitple vcpu
Mon, 19 May 2025 12:11:37 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #59418
Re: PHP performance on Xen domU with mulitple vcpu
Sun, 18 May 2025 18:49:51 +0000
Emmanuel Dreyfus <[email protected]> • #59417
Re: PHP performance on Xen domU with mulitple vcpu
Sun, 18 May 2025 12:29:51 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #59416
Re: PHP performance on Xen domU with mulitple vcpu
Sun, 18 May 2025 00:25:32 +0000
Emmanuel Dreyfus <[email protected]> • #59415
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Fri, 16 May 2025 06:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Goyette <[email protected]> • #59414
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Fri, 16 May 2025 19:33:23 +0700
Robert Elz <[email protected]> • #59413
Re: PR_GROWINGNOWAIT useless ?
Fri, 16 May 2025 13:13:33 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #59412
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Fri, 16 May 2025 11:12:38 +0200
Christoph Badura <[email protected]> • #59411
Re: More serial ports in EFI bootstrap?
Fri, 16 May 2025 10:00:29 +0100
"Jiaxun Yang" <[email protected]> • #59410
More serial ports in EFI bootstrap?
Fri, 16 May 2025 07:39:31 +0000
Emmanuel Dreyfus <[email protected]> • #59409
Re: PR_GROWINGNOWAIT useless ?
Fri, 16 May 2025 02:08:33 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #59408
Re: unkillable ps processes
Thu, 15 May 2025 19:31:56 +0200
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #59407
Re: unkillable ps processes
Thu, 15 May 2025 11:25:40 +0200
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #59406
Re: unkillable ps processes
Thu, 15 May 2025 11:20:33 +0200
Stephan <[email protected]> • #59405
Re: unkillable ps processes
Thu, 15 May 2025 11:00:10 +0200
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #59404
Re: unkillable ps processes
Thu, 15 May 2025 15:53:19 +0700
Robert Elz <[email protected]> • #59403
Re: unkillable ps processes
Thu, 15 May 2025 10:15:08 +0200
Stephan <[email protected]> • #59402
unkillable ps processes
Thu, 15 May 2025 09:45:00 +0200
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #59401
Re: tar x cpu bound
Thu, 15 May 2025 00:13:42 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #59400
Re: tar x cpu bound
Wed, 14 May 2025 13:49:09 +0200
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #59399
Re: tar x cpu bound
Wed, 14 May 2025 12:28:58 +0200
Christoph Badura <[email protected]> • #59398
Re: tar x cpu bound
Wed, 14 May 2025 11:30:56 +0200
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #59397
Re: tar x cpu bound
Wed, 14 May 2025 11:17:13 +0200
Christoph Badura <[email protected]> • #59396
Re: tar x cpu bound
Wed, 14 May 2025 11:12:18 +0200
Christoph Badura <[email protected]> • #59395
Re: tar x cpu bound
Wed, 14 May 2025 10:39:49 +0200
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #59394
Re: tar x cpu bound
Tue, 13 May 2025 22:09:21 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #59393
Re: tar x cpu bound
Wed, 14 May 2025 00:07:47 +0200
Jörg Sonnenberger <[email protected]> • #59392
re: tar x cpu bound
Tue, 13 May 2025 22:06:16 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #59391
re: tar x cpu bound
Wed, 14 May 2025 06:45:20 +1000
matthew green <[email protected]> • #59390
Enabling KGDB for AM335x
Tue, 13 May 2025 13:38:28 -0700
James B <[email protected]> • #59389
Re: tar x cpu bound
Tue, 13 May 2025 15:56:03 -0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Michael van Elst) • #59388
Re: Proposal on WSDISPLAYIO damage reporting IOCTL
Tue, 13 May 2025 15:46:15 +0100
"Jiaxun Yang" <[email protected]> • #59387
Re: Proposal on WSDISPLAYIO damage reporting IOCTL
Tue, 13 May 2025 08:33:19 -0400
Michael <[email protected]> • #59386
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Tue, 13 May 2025 13:07:04 +0100
David Brownlee <[email protected]> • #59385
Re: Proposal on WSDISPLAYIO damage reporting IOCTL
Tue, 13 May 2025 08:04:31 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #59384
Re: tar x cpu bound
Tue, 13 May 2025 08:54:11 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #59383
Re: tar x cpu bound
Tue, 13 May 2025 10:34:02 +0200
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #59382
Re: Proposal on WSDISPLAYIO damage reporting IOCTL
Tue, 13 May 2025 03:25:48 -0400
Michael <[email protected]> • #59381
Re: deadlock between KERNEL_LOCK and a mutex ?
Tue, 13 May 2025 09:16:29 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #59380
Re: deadlock between KERNEL_LOCK and a mutex ?
Tue, 13 May 2025 00:25:47 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #59379
re: tar x cpu bound
Tue, 13 May 2025 07:27:33 +1000
matthew green <[email protected]> • #59378
Re: tar x cpu bound
Mon, 12 May 2025 18:45:06 +0200
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #59377
Proposal on WSDISPLAYIO damage reporting IOCTL
Mon, 12 May 2025 13:54:01 +0100
"Jiaxun Yang" <[email protected]> • #59376
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Sun, 11 May 2025 18:12:58 +0300
Andrew Randrianasulu <[email protected]> • #59375
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Sun, 11 May 2025 08:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Goyette <[email protected]> • #59374
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Sun, 11 May 2025 14:39:10 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #59373
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Sun, 11 May 2025 07:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Goyette <[email protected]> • #59372
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Sun, 11 May 2025 10:29:27 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #59371
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.