gmane.os.netbsd.ports.m68k archive

369 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 17:37:07 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #1553
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 17:23:44 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1552
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 17:20:35 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #1551
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 17:19:17 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1550
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 17:03:12 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #1549
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 16:54:43 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1548
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 16:38:23 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #1547
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 15:57:19 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1546
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 15:53:24 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1545
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 15:50:58 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1544
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 7 Jun 2025 14:55:40 +0200
Anders Magnusson <[email protected]> • #1543
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 13:11:17 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #1542
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 7 Jun 2025 12:02:32 +0200
Anders Magnusson <[email protected]> • #1541
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 11:58:03 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #1540
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 11:44:23 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1539
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 11:44:16 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1538
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 20:20:57 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #1537
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 09:01:30 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> • #1536
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 12:33:43 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #1535
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 10:49:08 +0200
Anders Magnusson <[email protected]> • #1534
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 05 Jun 2025 09:36:39 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1533
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 09:16:32 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> • #1532
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 05 Jun 2025 08:56:22 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1531
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:50:53 +0200
Jean-Michel Hautbois <[email protected]> • #1530
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 05 Jun 2025 08:39:24 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1529
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:24:11 +0200
Jean-Michel Hautbois <[email protected]> • #1528
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Mon, 02 Jun 2025 21:53:03 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1527
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Mon, 02 Jun 2025 21:41:07 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #1526
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Mon, 02 Jun 2025 19:56:27 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1525
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Mon, 02 Jun 2025 19:44:44 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #1524
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Mon, 02 Jun 2025 19:37:35 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1523
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Mon, 02 Jun 2025 17:34:59 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #1522
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Mon, 02 Jun 2025 08:04:39 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1521
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Sun, 1 Jun 2025 19:44:53 -0600
Jeff Law <[email protected]> • #1520
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Sun, 01 Jun 2025 16:21:09 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1519
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Wed, 28 May 2025 18:10:14 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #1518
DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Wed, 28 May 2025 09:19:46 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1517
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Mon, 26 May 2025 20:50:12 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1516
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Mon, 26 May 2025 14:48:36 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #1515
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Mon, 26 May 2025 11:25:05 -0700
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #1514
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Mon, 26 May 2025 20:23:07 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1513
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Mon, 26 May 2025 14:16:46 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #1512
Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Mon, 26 May 2025 17:05:37 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1511
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Sun, 4 May 2025 16:26:52 -0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Michael van Elst) • #1510
'881/'882 instruction usage (Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility)
Sun, 4 May 2025 14:56:38 +0200
Romain Dolbeau <[email protected]> • #1509
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Sun, 4 May 2025 12:15:18 +0200
Romain Dolbeau <[email protected]> • #1508
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Sun, 4 May 2025 12:10:07 +0200
Romain Dolbeau <[email protected]> • #1507
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Sun, 4 May 2025 18:51:38 +1000
Nat Sloss <[email protected]> • #1506
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Sat, 3 May 2025 19:06:39 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #1505
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Sat, 3 May 2025 18:25:34 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #1504
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Sat, 3 May 2025 18:20:59 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #1503
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Sat, 3 May 2025 16:13:12 -0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Michael van Elst) • #1502
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Sat, 3 May 2025 17:53:51 +0200
Romain Dolbeau <[email protected]> • #1501
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Sun, 4 May 2025 00:41:12 +0900
Izumi Tsutsui <[email protected]> • #1500
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Sat, 3 May 2025 17:39:45 +0200
Romain Dolbeau <[email protected]> • #1499
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Sun, 4 May 2025 00:57:06 +1000
Nat Sloss <[email protected]> • #1498
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Sun, 4 May 2025 00:57:47 +1000
Nat Sloss <[email protected]> • #1497
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Sun, 4 May 2025 01:00:23 +1000
Nat Sloss <[email protected]> • #1496
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Sun, 4 May 2025 00:44:41 +1000
Nat Sloss <[email protected]> • #1495
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Sun, 4 May 2025 00:43:26 +1000
Nat Sloss <[email protected]> • #1494
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:24:55 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #1493
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:40:34 +0900
Tetsuya Isaki <[email protected]> • #1492
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:27:29 +0900
Izumi Tsutsui <[email protected]> • #1491
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Tue, 29 Apr 2025 07:08:40 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #1490
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Mon, 28 Apr 2025 18:10:28 -0700
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #1489
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Mon, 28 Apr 2025 23:05:54 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #1488
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Tue, 29 Apr 2025 07:55:10 +1000
Nat Sloss <[email protected]> • #1487
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:23:51 +0900
Izumi Tsutsui <[email protected]> • #1486
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Sun, 27 Apr 2025 23:44:50 +1000
Nat Sloss <[email protected]> • #1485
Re: Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:53:17 +0100
David Brownlee <[email protected]> • #1484
Intermediate step for new arch for lc040 compatibility
Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:37:04 +1000
Nathanial Sloss <[email protected]> • #1483
Re: Shared m68k packages (Was: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/m68k/m68k)
Thu, 3 Apr 2025 09:44:18 -0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Michael van Elst) • #1482
Re: Shared m68k packages (Was: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/m68k/m68k)
Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:49:39 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #1481
Re: Shared m68k packages (Was: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/m68k/m68k)
Thu, 3 Apr 2025 13:21:47 +1100
Nat Sloss <[email protected]> • #1480
Shared m68k packages (Was: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/m68k/m68k)
Tue, 1 Apr 2025 17:44:49 +0100
David Brownlee <[email protected]> • #1479
Re: List of packages that fail to build with 4 byte alignment
Fri, 14 Mar 2025 22:03:54 +0900
Izumi Tsutsui <[email protected]> • #1478
List of packages that fail to build with 4 byte alignment
Fri, 14 Mar 2025 12:09:03 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1477
Re: Porting to my custom 030 board
Tue, 4 Mar 2025 10:38:04 +0000
Lawrence Manning <[email protected]> • #1476
Re: Porting to my custom 030 board
Tue, 25 Feb 2025 10:49:52 +0000
Lawrence Manning <[email protected]> • #1475
Re: Porting to my custom 030 board
Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:57:49 -0500
Zachary Rowitsch <[email protected]> • #1474
Re: Porting to my custom 030 board
Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:19:23 +0100
Romain Dolbeau <[email protected]> • #1473
Re: Porting to my custom 030 board
Mon, 17 Feb 2025 19:29:23 -0800
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #1472
Re: Porting to my custom 030 board
Mon, 17 Feb 2025 15:54:58 +0100
Hauke Fath <[email protected]> • #1471
Re: Porting to my custom 030 board
Mon, 17 Feb 2025 15:22:34 +0100
Hauke Fath <[email protected]> • #1470
Re: Porting to my custom 030 board
Mon, 17 Feb 2025 15:01:19 +0100
Romain Dolbeau <[email protected]> • #1469
Porting to my custom 030 board
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:29:36 +0000
Lawrence Manning <[email protected]> • #1468
Re: Setting up NetBSD/m68k on qemu-virt for LLVM CI
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 01:20:59 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #1467
Re: Natural alignment used on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 15 Feb 2025 15:06:47 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1466
Re: Natural alignment used on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 15 Feb 2025 17:49:55 +0900
Izumi Tsutsui <[email protected]> • #1465
Motorola 68000 SysV ABI Documentation
Sat, 15 Feb 2025 09:41:47 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1464
Re: Natural alignment used on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 15 Feb 2025 09:37:14 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1463
Re: Natural alignment used on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 15 Feb 2025 13:04:02 +0900
Izumi Tsutsui <[email protected]> • #1462
Re: NetBSD/virt68k live-image
Sat, 15 Feb 2025 10:42:26 +0900
Izumi Tsutsui <[email protected]> • #1461
Re: NetBSD/virt68k live-image
Thu, 13 Feb 2025 02:52:41 +0900
Izumi Tsutsui <[email protected]> • #1460
Re: NetBSD/virt68k live-image
Sun, 9 Feb 2025 16:32:10 -0800
Chris Hanson <[email protected]> • #1459
Re: Setting up NetBSD/m68k on qemu-virt for LLVM CI
Sun, 9 Feb 2025 16:39:37 -0800
Chris Hanson <[email protected]> • #1458
Re: Natural alignment used on NetBSD/m68k
Sun, 9 Feb 2025 16:36:00 -0800
Chris Hanson <[email protected]> • #1457
Re: Setting up NetBSD/m68k on qemu-virt for LLVM CI
Sun, 9 Feb 2025 18:13:52 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #1456
Setting up NetBSD/m68k on qemu-virt for LLVM CI
Sun, 09 Feb 2025 09:12:53 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1455
Re: sync DFLSSIZ and MAXXSIZ among m68k ports?
Sun, 9 Feb 2025 14:33:05 +0900
Izumi Tsutsui <[email protected]> • #1454
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.