gmane.os.openbsd.pf archive

361 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

How not to ask questions + some resources (was: Re: IP Filter Documentation.)
Sun, 05 May 2013 13:29:01 +0200
[email protected] (Peter N. M. Hansteen) • #8098
Re: IP Filter Documentation.
Sun, 05 May 2013 12:20:51 +0200
[email protected] (Peter N. M. Hansteen) • #8097
IP Filter Documentation.
Sat, 04 May 2013 13:08:39 -0800
"Sioux C. Queue" <[email protected]> • #8096
Re: throttle traffic by amount of time or amount of used traffic in GB?
Sat, 13 Apr 2013 08:58:01 -0500
"Karl O. Pinc" <[email protected]> • #8095
Re: throttle traffic by amount of time or amount of used traffic in GB?
Fri, 12 Apr 2013 23:11:47 +0200
Sebastian Singer <[email protected]> • #8094
Re: throttle traffic by amount of time or amount of used traffic in GB?
Fri, 12 Apr 2013 20:27:16 +0200
[email protected] (Peter N. M. Hansteen) • #8093
Re: throttle traffic by amount of time or amount of used traffic in GB?
Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:23:47 -0700
Kirk Ismay <[email protected]> • #8092
throttle traffic by amount of time or amount of used traffic in GB?
Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:34:56 +0200
Sebastian Singer <[email protected]> • #8091
Re: I want to filter some/all inbound traffic twice
Sat, 6 Apr 2013 08:20:59 +1100
Cameron Simpson <[email protected]> • #8090
Re: I want to filter some/all inbound traffic twice
Fri, 5 Apr 2013 19:41:26 +0100
Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> • #8089
Re: I want to filter some/all inbound traffic twice
Fri, 5 Apr 2013 16:18:34 +0200
Henning Brauer <[email protected]> • #8088
Re: I want to filter some/all inbound traffic twice
Fri, 5 Apr 2013 11:34:27 +0200
Daniel Hartmeier <[email protected]> • #8087
Re: I want to filter some/all inbound traffic twice
Fri, 5 Apr 2013 19:03:52 +1100
Cameron Simpson <[email protected]> • #8086
Re: I want to filter some/all inbound traffic twice
Fri, 5 Apr 2013 08:45:44 +0200
Daniel Hartmeier <[email protected]> • #8085
I want to filter some/all inbound traffic twice
Fri, 5 Apr 2013 15:21:01 +1100
Cameron Simpson <[email protected]> • #8084
Re: Best/simplest/fastest approach for creating "virtual switch" out of
Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:34:15 +0000
Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> • #8083
Re: Best/simplest/fastest approach for creating "virtual switch" out of
Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:25:29 +0100
Daniel Hartmeier <[email protected]> • #8082
Re: Best/simplest/fastest approach for creating "virtual switch" out of
Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:17:39 -0500
"Karl O. Pinc" <[email protected]> • #8081
Re: Best/simplest/fastest approach for creating "virtual switch" out of
Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:03:39 -0500
"Karl O. Pinc" <[email protected]> • #8080
Re: Best/simplest/fastest approach for creating "virtual switch" out of
Sun, 17 Mar 2013 19:47:43 -0500
"Karl O. Pinc" <[email protected]> • #8079
Best/simplest/fastest approach for creating "virtual switch" out of
Sat, 16 Mar 2013 20:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
Bonnie Packet <[email protected]> • #8078
Re: Best/simplest/fastest approach for creating "virtual switch" out
Sat, 16 Mar 2013 23:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
Bonnie Packet <[email protected]> • #8077
(unknown)
Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:42:44 +0600
Nickolay Orekhov <[email protected]> • #8076
Re: Rule ordering changes
Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:45:52 +0000
Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> • #8075
Re: Rule ordering changes
Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:58:24 -0400
Andrew Siegel <[email protected]> • #8074
Rule ordering changes
Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:06:01 -0400
Andrew Siegel <[email protected]> • #8073
redirect outbound packets originating from localhost to locally assign address (-> ftp-proxy)
Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:05:01 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] • #8072
Re: forwarding loop
Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:45:34 +0100
Leslie Jensen <[email protected]> • #8071
Re: forwarding loop
Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:05:22 +0100
Leslie Jensen <[email protected]> • #8070
Re: forwarding loop
Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:56:56 +0100
Daniel Hartmeier <[email protected]> • #8069
Re: forwarding loop
Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:19:45 +0100
Leslie Jensen <[email protected]> • #8068
Re: forwarding loop
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:46:18 -0600
"Karl O. Pinc" <[email protected]> • #8067
Re: forwarding loop
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:25:50 +0100
Daniel Hartmeier <[email protected]> • #8066
Re: forwarding loop
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:46:37 -0600
"Karl O. Pinc" <[email protected]> • #8065
Re: route-to round-robin using single interface?
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:24:23 +0100
Johan Helsingius <[email protected]> • #8064
Re: route-to round-robin using single interface?
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:10:44 +0100
Johan Helsingius <[email protected]> • #8063
Re: route-to round-robin using single interface?
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:01:07 +0100
Daniel Hartmeier <[email protected]> • #8062
Re: forwarding loop
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:11:13 +0100
Leslie Jensen <[email protected]> • #8061
Re: forwarding loop
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:49:47 +0100
Daniel Hartmeier <[email protected]> • #8060
Re: forwarding loop
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:50:14 +0100
Leslie Jensen <[email protected]> • #8059
Re: forwarding loop
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:01:46 +0100
Daniel Hartmeier <[email protected]> • #8058
Re: forwarding loop
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:10:33 +0100
Daniel Hartmeier <[email protected]> • #8057
Re: route-to round-robin using single interface?
Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:13:14 +0000
Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> • #8056
Re: forwarding loop
Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:57:54 +0100
Leslie Jensen <[email protected]> • #8055
route-to round-robin using single interface?
Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:30:21 +0100
Johan Helsingius <[email protected]> • #8054
Re: forwarding loop
Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:50:23 +0100
Daniel Hartmeier <[email protected]> • #8053
forwarding loop
Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:03:41 +0100
Leslie Jensen <[email protected]> • #8052
Re: Apparent problem with divert-to rule parsing
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:19 -0500
[email protected] • #8051
Re: Apparent problem with divert-to rule parsing
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:24:33 +0000
Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> • #8050
Apparent problem with divert-to rule parsing
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 00:02:58 -0500
[email protected] • #8049
RE: Routing challenges with DHCP and static interfaces
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:39:22 -0500
[email protected] • #8048
Re: Routing challenges with DHCP and static interfaces
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:01:44 +0000
Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> • #8047
Re: Routing challenges with DHCP and static interfaces
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:08:07 +0200
Teemu Rinta-aho <[email protected]> • #8046
Re: Routing challenges with DHCP and static interfaces
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:11:44 +0200
Teemu Rinta-aho <[email protected]> • #8045
Re: Routing challenges with DHCP and static interfaces
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:39:07 +0000
Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> • #8044
Routing challenges with DHCP and static interfaces
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:34:33 -0500
[email protected] • #8043
Effect of route-to
Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:11:05 +0100
Joel Armengaud <[email protected]> • #8042
Block Google search after 17k requests in 24h
Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #8041
Re: Help with NAT to external carp interface
Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #8040
Source port translation only
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:16:36 +0200
Nejc Škoberne <[email protected]> • #8039
Re: Simultaneous CARP failover for multiple interfaces
Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:05:47 -0700
Kyle Lanclos <[email protected]> • #8038
Re: Simultaneous CARP failover for multiple interfaces
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:57:36 +0200
Daniel Hartmeier <[email protected]> • #8037
Re: Simultaneous CARP failover for multiple interfaces
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:34:31 -0700
Kyle Lanclos <[email protected]> • #8036
Re: Simultaneous CARP failover for multiple interfaces
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:23:20 -0700
Kyle Lanclos <[email protected]> • #8035
Re: Simultaneous CARP failover for multiple interfaces
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:20:56 -0500
"Karl O. Pinc" <[email protected]> • #8034
Re: Simultaneous CARP failover for multiple interfaces
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:19:44 +0100
Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> • #8033
Re: Simultaneous CARP failover for multiple interfaces
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:56:32 +0200
Daniel Hartmeier <[email protected]> • #8032
Simultaneous CARP failover for multiple interfaces
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:49:14 -0700
Kyle Lanclos <[email protected]> • #8031
Re: inbound queueing on external interface due to multiple internal interfaces
Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:38:01 -0500
"Karl O. Pinc" <[email protected]> • #8030
Re: inbound queueing on external interface due to multiple internal interfaces
Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:56:35 -0400
Kelley Reynolds <[email protected]> • #8029
Re: inbound queueing on external interface due to multiple internal interfaces
Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:40:47 +0100
Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> • #8028
Re: inbound queueing on external interface due to multiple internal interfaces
Thu, 12 Apr 2012 02:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Andy Lemin <[email protected]> • #8027
Re: inbound queueing on external interface due to multiple internal interfaces
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:48:46 -0500
"Karl O. Pinc" <[email protected]> • #8026
inbound queueing on external interface due to multiple internal interfaces
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
Andy Lemin <[email protected]> • #8025
CARP ip balancing on ExtremeWare
Tue, 7 Feb 2012 03:03:36 -0700
Kevin Bowling <[email protected]> • #8024
Re: handling local traffic
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:23:47 +0000
Justin Murdock <[email protected]> • #8023
handling local traffic
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:31:55 +0000
Justin Murdock <[email protected]> • #8022
Re: Matter with transparent proxy
Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:52:37 +0000
Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> • #8021
Matter with transparent proxy
Thu, 12 Jan 2012 06:15:54 -0800 (PST)
pizzahut <[email protected]> • #8020
Re: I want copy pf.conf from FreeBSD 8.2 to OpenBSD 5 and use it
Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:59:27 -0600
"Karl O. Pinc" <[email protected]> • #8019
Re: I want copy pf.conf from FreeBSD 8.2 to OpenBSD 5 and use it
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 08:28:37 -0800
Gary <[email protected]> • #8018
I want copy pf.conf from FreeBSD 8.2 to OpenBSD 5 and use it
Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:00:37 +0330
Gholam Mostafa Faridi <[email protected]> • #8017
problems with PF and DMZ nat
Tue, 1 Nov 2011 10:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Bentley78 <[email protected]> • #8016
Re: PF load balancing
Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:53:23 +0900
Ryan McBride <[email protected]> • #8015
anonymous VPN service and openbsd..
Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:00:26 +0200
Daniel Rapp <[email protected]> • #8014
Re: NAT out to two DSL modems
Tue, 23 Aug 2011 02:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
elerdin <[email protected]> • #8013
PF load balancing
Tue, 23 Aug 2011 03:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
elerdin <[email protected]> • #8012
???a?~??2%?C?????G?L?C?N?????|?X?k?O???CThu, 18 Aug 2011 11:24:41 +0400
Thu, 11 Aug 2011 08:00:52 +0000 (UTC)
"?g?a?G?L?C?????@.?G?L?C?A???q???G?????????????????????E?????????CThu, 18 Aug 2011 05:22:41 -0200" <[email protected]> • #8011
pf reply-to problem
Mon, 8 Aug 2011 16:11:49 +0200
Schmurfy <[email protected]> • #8010
Re: NAT out to two DSL modems
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:15:16 +0200
Ben Harper <[email protected]> • #8009
Re: NAT out to two DSL modems
Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:42:00 +0100
Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> • #8008
NAT out to two DSL modems
Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Ben Harper <[email protected]> • #8007
Incorrect NAT translation?
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 06:32:43 +0200
Magnus Rixtorp <[email protected]> • #8006
PFtabler application
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 03:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
Todor Todorov <[email protected]> • #8005
Firewall Builder's pf.conf import tool
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:41:58 -0700
Gary <[email protected]> • #8004
Log overload rule
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:16:48 +0000 (UTC)
"Helmut Schneider" <[email protected]> • #8003
Re: nat-to and route-to specified in a single rule
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:48:13 +0100
Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> • #8002
RE: nat-to and route-to specified in a single rule
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:36:02 +0200
"Rob Sessink" <[email protected]> • #8001
Re: nat-to and route-to specified in a single rule
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:13:22 +0300
Bojidara Marinchovska <[email protected]> • #8000
nat-to and route-to specified in a single rule
Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:05:50 +0200
"Rob Sessink" <[email protected]> • #7999
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.