alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt archive

Re: Are chips ... electronics runs on magic smoke??

Sun, 21 Jun 2026 19:34:46 +0800

"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #69107

Re: Are chips ... electronics runs on magic smoke??

Sun, 21 Jun 2026 06:34:15 -0400

Paul <[email protected]> • #69106

Re: Discharging ... *plonk* plonked

29 Jun 2026 18:36:33 GMT

Roger Hayter <[email protected]> • #69105

Re: Discharging fixed, hidden batteries

Mon, 29 Jun 2026 08:57:43 -0400

legg <[email protected]> • #69104

Re: Summer Wars - Official Trailer - YouTube

Mon, 29 Jun 2026 19:33:42 +0800

"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #69103

Summer Wars - Official Trailer - YouTube

Mon, 29 Jun 2026 19:25:07 +0800

"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #69102

Re: Discharging ... popcorn? plastic?

Mon, 29 Jun 2026 01:39:19 +0800

"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #69101

[HK01]USB插口五種顏色代表不同規 格 藍黑白紫綠可辨別快充速度與廠 商

Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:02:21 +0800

"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #69100

[HK01]IBM研發首款0.7nm晶片 指甲大 小塞滿1000億電晶體 效能飆升50%

Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:01:18 +0800

"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #69099

Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage

Sun, 28 Jun 2026 16:29:27 +0100

David Higton <[email protected]> • #69098

Re: Discharging fixed, hidden batteries

Sun, 28 Jun 2026 16:19:49 +0100

mm0fmf <[email protected]> • #69097

Holy Light and laser

Sun, 28 Jun 2026 22:38:22 +0800

"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #69096

The Computer Circle

Sun, 28 Jun 2026 21:25:56 +0800

"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #69095

Fwd: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Sun, 28 Jun 2026 19:19:15 +0800

"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #69094

Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage

Sun, 28 Jun 2026 10:35:43 +0100

Andy Burns <[email protected]> • #69093

Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard... safe state?

Sat, 27 Jun 2026 10:36:57 +0100

Andy Burns <[email protected]> • #69092

Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage

Sat, 27 Jun 2026 09:04:02 +0100

druck <[email protected]> • #69091

Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage

Sat, 27 Jun 2026 08:57:34 +0100

druck <[email protected]> • #69090

Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage

Sat, 27 Jun 2026 07:03:07 +0100

David Taylor <[email protected]> • #69089

Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage

Sat, 27 Jun 2026 06:42:56 +0100

David Taylor <[email protected]> • #69088

Re: Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage

Sat, 27 Jun 2026 06:14:09 +0100

Chris Green <[email protected]> • #69087

Discharging a wireless USB keyboard for long-term storage

Sat, 27 Jun 2026 12:21:20 +0800

"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #69086

Re: fabrication ... chip? paper? seal?

Wed, 24 Jun 2026 15:13:03 +0800

"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #69085

Re: Are chips more vulnerable to ... the Force?

Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:28:30 +0800

"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #69084

Re: fabrication ... American english vs English english

Mon, 22 Jun 2026 21:43:10 +0800

"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #69083

Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"?

Mon, 22 Jun 2026 12:20:55 +0100

Andy Burns <[email protected]> • #69082

Re: fabrication ... American english vs English english

Mon, 22 Jun 2026 18:50:33 +0800

"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #69081

Re: fabrication of wafer (computer chips) ... "fabrication"?

Mon, 22 Jun 2026 17:59:59 +1000

Daniel70 <[email protected]> • #69080

Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters?

Sun, 21 Jun 2026 17:49:32 +0800

Woozy Song <[email protected]> • #69079

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Wed, 1 Jul 2026 10:15:10 +0100

The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #69078

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Wed, 1 Jul 2026 10:11:33 +0100

The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #69077

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Wed, 1 Jul 2026 10:08:03 +0100

The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #69076

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Wed, 1 Jul 2026 10:05:05 +0100

The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #69075

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Wed, 1 Jul 2026 03:29:06 -0400

c186282 <[email protected]> • #69074

Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is quantitative philiosphy?

Wed, 1 Jul 2026 15:29:55 +0800

"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #69073

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Wed, 1 Jul 2026 03:16:55 -0400

c186282 <[email protected]> • #69072

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Wed, 1 Jul 2026 03:13:06 -0400

c186282 <[email protected]> • #69071

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Wed, 1 Jul 2026 02:04:34 -0400

c186282 <[email protected]> • #69070

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Wed, 1 Jul 2026 01:15:21 -0400

c186282 <[email protected]> • #69069

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Wed, 1 Jul 2026 00:48:17 -0400

c186282 <[email protected]> • #69068

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer.... physics? "quantum"?

Wed, 1 Jul 2026 12:24:41 +0800

"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #69067

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Tue, 30 Jun 2026 22:09:52 -0400

Paul <[email protected]> • #69066

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

30 Jun 2026 23:51:45 GMT

rbowman <[email protected]> • #69065

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

30 Jun 2026 23:45:53 GMT

rbowman <[email protected]> • #69064

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

30 Jun 2026 23:28:00 GMT

rbowman <[email protected]> • #69063

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:58:08 -0400

Paul <[email protected]> • #69062

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Tue, 30 Jun 2026 18:51:03 GMT

Charlie Gibbs <[email protected]> • #69061

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:06:38 -0400

c186282 <[email protected]> • #69060

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:27:24 +0100

The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> • #69059

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Wed, 1 Jul 2026 04:33:15 -0400

Paul <[email protected]> • #69058

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Tue, 30 Jun 2026 21:51:17 +0800

"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <[email protected]> • #69057

Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

Tue, 30 Jun 2026 05:14:15 -0400

c186282 <[email protected]> • #69056

Re: IBM - New SUB .... quantum mechanics is quantitative philiosphy?

Wed, 1 Jul 2026 04:22:38 -0400

c186282 <[email protected]> • #69055

Re: I feel sorry for people who don't know how to work with computers

Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:24:09 -0500

Harry S Robins <[email protected]> • #68300

Re: That unholy ECC trinity

Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:01:19 -0400

bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> • #68299

Re: That unholy ECC trinity

Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:15:52 -0400

Paul <[email protected]> • #68298

That unholy ECC trinity

Sun, 18 Aug 2024 06:26:06 -0400

bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> • #68297

Lucked out

Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:49:51 +0000

[email protected] (philo) • #68173

Re: building new workstation PC?

Tue, 11 Jun 2024 00:16:22 -0000 (UTC)

David Chmelik <[email protected]> • #68172

building new workstation PC?

Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:30:17 -0000 (UTC)

David Chmelik <[email protected]> • #68171

Re: upgrading old PCs (RAM... overclock or not)?

Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:46:31 +0000

[email protected] (philo) • #68170

Re: upgrading old PCs (RAM... overclock or not)?

Sat, 1 Jun 2024 09:35:47 -0400

Paul <[email protected]> • #68169

Re: upgrading old PCs (RAM... overclock or not)?

Fri, 31 May 2024 22:42:34 -0500

philo <[email protected]> • #68168

Re: upgrading old PCs (RAM... overclock or not)?

Fri, 31 May 2024 18:41:42 -0400

Paul <[email protected]> • #68167

Re: upgrading old PCs (RAM... overclock or not)?

Fri, 31 May 2024 15:56:54 -0500

philo <[email protected]> • #68166

Re: upgrading old PCs (RAM... overclock or not)?

Fri, 31 May 2024 10:14:40 -0400

Paul <[email protected]> • #68165

Re: upgrading old PCs (RAM... overclock or not)?

Fri, 31 May 2024 09:25:13 +0000

[email protected] (philo) • #68164

Re: YOU NEED THIS!!!

Tue, 28 May 2024 07:34:54 +0200 (CEST)

Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> • #68163

Microsoft's AI chatbot will 'recall' everything you do on its new PCs

Mon, 20 May 2024 23:26:06 -0700

Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> • #68162

Re: A Software hero

Sat, 6 Apr 2024 22:03:04 -0500

VanguardLH <[email protected]> • #68161

A Software hero

Sat, 6 Apr 2024 15:52:34 -0700

Bob F <[email protected]> • #68160

Re: upgrading old PCs (RAM... overclock or not)?

Fri, 5 Apr 2024 11:53:46 -0400

Paul <[email protected]> • #68159

Re: finding (or alternatives) 16GB 3866MHz DDR4 SDRAM UDIMMs?

Fri, 5 Apr 2024 11:03:55 -0400

Paul <[email protected]> • #68158

upgrading old PCs (RAM... overclock or not)?

Fri, 5 Apr 2024 07:56:46 -0000 (UTC)

David Chmelik <[email protected]> • #68157

Re: finding (or alternatives) 16GB 3866MHz DDR4 SDRAM UDIMMs?

Fri, 5 Apr 2024 06:30:43 -0000 (UTC)

David Chmelik <[email protected]> • #68156

Re: Hard to Remove PM 2.0 x 3.0 Battery Hold Down Screws

Thu, 4 Apr 2024 03:59:21 -0000 (UTC)

Boris <[email protected]> • #68155

Re: Hard to Remove PM 2.0 x 3.0 Battery Hold Down Screws

Wed, 3 Apr 2024 22:47:19 -0500

VanguardLH <[email protected]> • #68154

Re: Hard to Remove PM 2.0 x 3.0 Battery Hold Down Screws

Wed, 3 Apr 2024 22:49:02 -0000 (UTC)

Boris <[email protected]> • #68153

Re: finding (or alternatives) 16GB 3866MHz DDR4 SDRAM UDIMMs?

Tue, 2 Apr 2024 03:44:26 -0400

Paul <[email protected]> • #68152

finding (or alternatives) 16GB 3866MHz DDR4 SDRAM UDIMMs?

Mon, 1 Apr 2024 08:58:03 -0000 (UTC)

David Chmelik <[email protected]> • #68151

Re: choosing a motherboard

Sun, 31 Mar 2024 15:12:30 -0400

Paul <[email protected]> • #68150

Re: choosing a motherboard

Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:45:22 GMT

Mark Z <[email protected]> • #68149