org.kernel.vger.linux-8086 archive

383 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: New feature: a "poweroff" command
Thu, 26 May 2016 13:21:45 +0100
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #2165
Re: Fwd: Fwd: New feature: a "poweroff" command
Thu, 26 May 2016 08:12:50 -0400
Jody Bruchon <[email protected]> • #2164
Re: What device for ROMFS ?
Thu, 26 May 2016 14:11:42 +0200
Marc-François LUCCA-DANIAU <[email protected]> • #2163
Fwd: Fwd: New feature: a "poweroff" command
Thu, 26 May 2016 14:02:46 +0200
Marc-François LUCCA-DANIAU <[email protected]> • #2162
Fwd: New feature: a "poweroff" command
Thu, 26 May 2016 11:31:04 +0200
Marc-François LUCCA-DANIAU <[email protected]> • #2161
Re: What device for ROMFS ?
Thu, 26 May 2016 09:22:28 +0200
Marc-François LUCCA-DANIAU <[email protected]> • #2160
New feature: a "poweroff" command
Wed, 25 May 2016 21:51:16 -0400
Jody Bruchon <[email protected]> • #2159
Re: ls not working
Wed, 25 May 2016 22:42:59 +0200
Marc-François LUCCA-DANIAU <[email protected]> • #2158
Re: ls not working
Wed, 25 May 2016 21:16:31 +0200
"Marc-F. LUCCA-DANIAU" <[email protected]> • #2157
Re: ls not working
Wed, 25 May 2016 12:08:22 -0400 (EDT)
- - <[email protected]> • #2156
Fwd: Re: ls not working [confirmed]
Wed, 25 May 2016 11:41:56 -0400 (EDT)
- - <[email protected]> • #2155
Re: ls not working
Wed, 25 May 2016 16:38:13 +0200
Marc-François LUCCA-DANIAU <[email protected]> • #2154
Re: ls not working
Wed, 25 May 2016 16:35:17 +0200
Marc-François LUCCA-DANIAU <[email protected]> • #2153
Re: ls not working
Wed, 25 May 2016 07:59:54 -0600
Derek Johansen <[email protected]> • #2152
Re: ls not working
Wed, 25 May 2016 07:55:34 -0600
Derek Johansen <[email protected]> • #2151
Please revert unwanted change in BCC
Wed, 25 May 2016 11:00:33 +0200
Marc-François LUCCA-DANIAU <[email protected]> • #2150
Re: ls not working
Wed, 25 May 2016 10:44:18 +0200
Marc-François LUCCA-DANIAU <[email protected]> • #2149
Re: ls not working
Wed, 25 May 2016 08:58:10 +0200
"Marc-F. LUCCA-DANIAU" <[email protected]> • #2148
Re: ls not working
Wed, 25 May 2016 08:56:15 +0200
"Marc-F. LUCCA-DANIAU" <[email protected]> • #2147
Re: ls not working
Tue, 24 May 2016 23:55:11 -0600
Derek Johansen <[email protected]> • #2146
Re: ls not working
Tue, 24 May 2016 23:53:52 -0600
Derek Johansen <[email protected]> • #2145
Re: ls not working
Wed, 25 May 2016 00:55:54 -0400
Jody Bruchon <[email protected]> • #2144
ls not working
Tue, 24 May 2016 22:52:54 -0600
Derek Johansen <[email protected]> • #2143
Re: What device for ROMFS ?
Mon, 23 May 2016 18:07:43 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2142
What device for ROMFS ?
Mon, 23 May 2016 19:09:07 +0200
"Marc-F. LUCCA-DANIAU" <[email protected]> • #2141
Re: Build failed on latest ELKS
Fri, 20 May 2016 12:52:40 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2140
Re: Build failed on latest ELKS
Fri, 20 May 2016 14:23:44 +0200
"Marc-F. LUCCA-DANIAU" <[email protected]> • #2139
Re: fix for keyboard driver config
Fri, 20 May 2016 14:16:55 +0200
"Marc-F. LUCCA-DANIAU" <[email protected]> • #2138
Re: Build failed on latest ELKS
Thu, 19 May 2016 21:34:01 -0400
Jody Bruchon <[email protected]> • #2137
Re: Build failed on latest ELKS
Thu, 19 May 2016 19:53:05 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2136
Re: Build failed on latest ELKS
Thu, 19 May 2016 10:44:25 +0200
Marc-François LUCCA-DANIAU <[email protected]> • #2135
Re: Build failed on latest ELKS
Wed, 18 May 2016 15:27:43 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2134
Re: Build failed on latest ELKS
Wed, 18 May 2016 21:37:27 +0200
"Marc-F. LUCCA-DANIAU" <[email protected]> • #2133
Re: Build failed on latest ELKS
Tue, 17 May 2016 15:15:30 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2132
Build failed on latest ELKS
Tue, 17 May 2016 14:37:25 +0200
"Marc-F. LUCCA-DANIAU" <[email protected]> • #2131
Re: ktcp not building
Tue, 10 May 2016 20:34:30 +0200
"Marc-F. LUCCA-DANIAU" <[email protected]> • #2130
ktcp not building
Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:58:59 -0600
Derek Johansen <[email protected]> • #2129
Re: Help test recent Dev86 changes against ELKS
Tue, 1 Dec 2015 14:37:35 -0500
Jody Bruchon <[email protected]> • #2128
Help test recent Dev86 changes against ELKS
Tue, 1 Dec 2015 06:52:48 -0500
Jody Bruchon <[email protected]> • #2127
fix for keyboard driver config
Mon, 02 Nov 2015 20:59:24 +0100
Stefan Pietzonke <[email protected]> • #2126
Building ia16-gcc
Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:46:08 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2125
What is ia16-unknown-elks-gcc
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 10:45:55 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2124
[PATCH] Final bits to compile using ia16-unknown-elks-gcc
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 10:29:01 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2123
Re: Retrieving ELKS source code and building it
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 11:28:17 -0400
Jody Bruchon <[email protected]> • #2122
Retrieving ELKS source code and building it
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 11:26:58 -0400
Gregg Levine <[email protected]> • #2121
Re: [PATCH] Changes to reduce warnings using ia16-unknown-elks-gcc
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 10:53:18 -0400
Jody Bruchon <[email protected]> • #2120
Re: [PATCH] Changes to reduce warnings using ia16-unknown-elks-gcc
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 10:25:20 -0400
Jody Bruchon <[email protected]> • #2119
[PATCH] More separation of C and assembly functions
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 09:11:43 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2118
Re: [PATCH] Separation C and assembly functions to different files
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 12:20:54 +0200
[email protected] • #2117
[PATCH] Separation C and assembly functions to different files
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 23:52:17 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2116
Re: [PATCH] Changes to reduce warnings using ia16-unknown-elks-gcc
Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:10:04 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2115
[PATCH] Changes to reduce warnings using ia16-unknown-elks-gcc
Tue, 2 Jun 2015 00:10:10 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2114
Resending [PATCH 4/5]
Sat, 30 May 2015 12:05:03 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2113
[PATCH 5/5] Removal of inline assembly in several functions
Thu, 21 May 2015 09:50:57 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2112
[PATCH 4/5] Removal of ia16-unknown-elks-gcc warnings
Thu, 21 May 2015 09:25:35 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2111
[PATCH 3/5] More removal of open-watcom warnings
Thu, 21 May 2015 09:16:52 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2110
Re: Patch set to ease replacement of BCC compiler
Thu, 21 May 2015 09:13:47 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2109
[PATCH 2/5] Removal of assembly file segment.c
Thu, 21 May 2015 08:52:15 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2108
[PATCH 1/5] Fix errors and warnings by open-watcom
Thu, 21 May 2015 08:12:15 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2107
Re: Patch set to ease replacement of BCC compiler
Thu, 21 May 2015 08:27:28 +0200
[email protected] • #2106
Re: Patch set to ease replacement of BCC compiler
Thu, 21 May 2015 08:23:24 +0200
[email protected] • #2105
Patch set to ease replacement of BCC compiler
Thu, 21 May 2015 00:47:35 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2104
Re: the memory model being used in elks?
Mon, 11 May 2015 13:25:03 +0200
[email protected] • #2103
Re: the memory model being used in elks?
Mon, 11 May 2015 10:27:08 +0100
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #2102
Re: the memory model being used in elks?
Mon, 11 May 2015 08:10:24 +0200
[email protected] • #2101
Re: the memory model being used in elks?
Sun, 10 May 2015 22:51:18 +0100
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #2100
Re: the memory model being used in elks?
Sun, 10 May 2015 23:19:44 +0200
[email protected] • #2099
Re: the memory model being used in elks?
Sun, 10 May 2015 21:27:44 +0100
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #2098
Re: the memory model being used in elks?
Sun, 10 May 2015 20:40:27 +0200
[email protected] • #2097
Re: the memory model being used in elks?
Sun, 10 May 2015 10:31:38 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2096
Re: the memory model being used in elks?
Sat, 9 May 2015 20:38:36 +0200
[email protected] • #2095
Re: the memory model being used in elks?
Sat, 09 May 2015 13:50:44 -0400
Jody Bruchon <[email protected]> • #2094
Re: the memory model being used in elks?
Sat, 9 May 2015 19:47:03 +0200
[email protected] • #2093
Re: the memory model being used in elks?
Sat, 9 May 2015 18:03:33 +0100
One Thousand Gnomes <[email protected]> • #2092
the memory model being used in elks?
Fri, 8 May 2015 22:14:34 +0200
[email protected] • #2091
another fix for huge data (Re: a compression tool useful with constrained memory)
Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:10:48 +0200
[email protected] • #2090
Re: a compression tool useful with constrained memory
Mon, 27 Apr 2015 23:04:09 +0200
[email protected] • #2089
Re: We have a whole new ton of goodies to investigate...
Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:44:49 +0200
[email protected] • #2088
Re: We have a whole new ton of goodies to investigate...
Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:35:54 +0100
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #2087
Re: We have a whole new ton of goodies to investigate...
Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:30:37 +0200
[email protected] • #2086
Re: We have a whole new ton of goodies to investigate...
Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:53:27 +0100
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #2085
Re: We have a whole new ton of goodies to investigate...
Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:06:43 +0200
[email protected] • #2084
Re: We have a whole new ton of goodies to investigate...
Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:31:28 +0100
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #2083
Re: We have a whole new ton of goodies to investigate...
Sun, 26 Apr 2015 23:22:23 +0200
[email protected] • #2082
Status updates: compression tool, kernel fixes, BCC features, etc.
Sun, 26 Apr 2015 12:49:51 -0400
Jody Bruchon <[email protected]> • #2081
Re: a compression tool useful with constrained memory
Sun, 26 Apr 2015 15:11:14 +0200
[email protected] • #2080
Re: a compression tool useful with constrained memory
Sun, 26 Apr 2015 08:36:19 -0400
Jody Bruchon <[email protected]> • #2079
a compression tool useful with constrained memory
Sun, 26 Apr 2015 14:29:26 +0200
[email protected] • #2078
Re: We have a whole new ton of goodies to investigate...
Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:49:25 +0100
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #2077
Re: We have a whole new ton of goodies to investigate...
Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:39:23 +0100
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #2076
Re: We have a whole new ton of goodies to investigate...
Thu, 16 Apr 2015 07:14:03 -0400
LM <[email protected]> • #2075
Re: We have a whole new ton of goodies to investigate...
Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:35:34 +0200
MFLD <[email protected]> • #2074
Re: I haven't forgotten!
Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:50:27 +0200
MFLD <[email protected]> • #2073
I haven't forgotten!
Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:58:16 -0400
Jody Bruchon <[email protected]> • #2072
Re: We have a whole new ton of goodies to investigate...
Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:41:07 +0100
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #2071
Re: We have a whole new ton of goodies to investigate...
Wed, 15 Apr 2015 19:10:05 +0200
MFLD <[email protected]> • #2070
[PATCH PROPOSAL] a.out.h port to 64 bits
Mon, 13 Apr 2015 21:54:42 +0200
MFLD <[email protected]> • #2069
Re: Question on import symbols generated by BCC
Sat, 11 Apr 2015 21:42:34 +0200
MFLD <[email protected]> • #2068
[PATCH PROPOSAL] Bcc: output an import directive on external function declaration
Sat, 11 Apr 2015 21:33:13 +0200
MFLD <[email protected]> • #2067
[PATCH] Miscelaneous improvements to kernel
Sat, 11 Apr 2015 12:43:22 -0500
Juan Perez-Sanchez <[email protected]> • #2066
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.