org.kernel.vger.linux-c-programming archive

345 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Pointer to a char
Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:04:02 -0700
Jon Mayo <[email protected]> • #4091
RE: Pointer to a char
Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:33:01 +0000
Duan Fugang-B38611 <[email protected]> • #4090
Re: Pointer to a char
Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:29:56 +0200
Phil Sutter <[email protected]> • #4089
Pointer to a char
Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:29:32 +0700
Randi Botse <[email protected]> • #4088
Introduction to exploit for newbie
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:42:25 +0800
Shawn <[email protected]> • #4087
Re: "reboot" detection ...
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 20:14:51 +0200
Peter Hüwe <[email protected]> • #4086
Re: "reboot" detection ...
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 20:34:45 +0400
"Anatoly Sivov" <[email protected]> • #4085
Re: "reboot" detection ...
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:22:58 +0200
Peter Hüwe <[email protected]> • #4084
"reboot" detection ...
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 15:34:03 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #4083
Re: chage command source code
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:41:12 +0200
Phil Sutter <[email protected]> • #4082
chage command source code
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:09:28 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #4081
UVCVideo - Webcam not stopping after opening and closing the device file /dev/video0
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 02:32:25 +0530
Aniruddha Bhattacharyya <[email protected]> • #4080
Re: warning message on macro.
Fri, 17 Aug 2012 18:24:27 +0400
"Anatoly Sivov" <[email protected]> • #4079
warning message on macro.
Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:22:35 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #4078
Question on shared memory across processes with Linux/x86_64
Fri, 17 Aug 2012 02:34:11 -0400
Super Groomers <[email protected]> • #4077
Re: nanosleep over multiple processes
Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:44:36 +0700
Randi Botse <[email protected]> • #4076
Re: nanosleep over multiple processes
Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:11:28 +0400
Vladimir Murzin <[email protected]> • #4075
Re: nanosleep over multiple processes
Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:08:20 +0200
Hendrik Visage <[email protected]> • #4074
Re: nanosleep over multiple processes
Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:38:14 +0700
Randi Botse <[email protected]> • #4073
Re: nanosleep over multiple processes
Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:53:56 +0200
Nicholas Mc Guire <[email protected]> • #4072
nanosleep over multiple processes
Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:07:03 +0700
Randi Botse <[email protected]> • #4071
Re: Is it helpful for a compiler to optimize?
Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:39:07 +0530
Srinivasa T N <[email protected]> • #4070
Re: Is it helpful for a compiler to optimize?
Sun, 03 Jun 2012 04:03:44 -0400
Jesse Ruffin <[email protected]> • #4069
Re: Is it helpful for a compiler to optimize?
Sun, 03 Jun 2012 08:59:13 +0200
Krzysztof <[email protected]> • #4068
Is it helpful for a compiler to optimize?
Sun, 03 Jun 2012 08:38:00 +0200
Krzysztof <[email protected]> • #4067
Re: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type and ICMP undeclared
Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:38:10 +0530
Srinivasa T N <[email protected]> • #4066
error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type and ICMP undeclared
Fri, 27 Apr 2012 06:43:30 +0000 (UTC)
Himalay <[email protected]> • #4065
Re: close socket and TCP RST
Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:43:47 +0100
Glynn Clements <[email protected]> • #4064
Re: close socket and TCP RST
Sun, 15 Apr 2012 02:41:14 +0200
Celelibi <[email protected]> • #4063
Re: close socket and TCP RST
Sat, 14 Apr 2012 17:13:20 +0100
Glynn Clements <[email protected]> • #4062
Re: close socket and TCP RST
Sat, 14 Apr 2012 17:37:06 +0200
Celelibi <[email protected]> • #4061
Re: close socket and TCP RST
Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:32:21 +0100
Glynn Clements <[email protected]> • #4060
Re: close socket and TCP RST
Fri, 13 Apr 2012 03:54:03 +0200
Celelibi <[email protected]> • #4059
Re: close socket and TCP RST
Fri, 13 Apr 2012 03:37:04 +0200
Celelibi <[email protected]> • #4058
Re: close socket and TCP RST
Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:31:41 +0100
Glynn Clements <[email protected]> • #4057
Re: close socket and TCP RST
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:42:44 +0200
Bogdan Cristea <[email protected]> • #4056
Re: close socket and TCP RST
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:33:37 +0100
Glynn Clements <[email protected]> • #4055
Re: close socket and TCP RST
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:38:10 +0200
Celelibi <[email protected]> • #4054
Re: close socket and TCP RST
Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:01:32 +0200
Bogdan Cristea <[email protected]> • #4053
close socket and TCP RST
Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:46:45 +0200
Celelibi <[email protected]> • #4052
Re: Unicode or not?
Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:52:45 +0100
Andrej Gelenberg <[email protected]> • #4051
Re: Unicode or not?
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 19:57:25 +0000
Glynn Clements <[email protected]> • #4050
Re: Unicode or not?
Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:19:11 +0100
Krzysztof <[email protected]> • #4049
Re: Unicode or not?
Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:04:18 +0100
Andrej Gelenberg <[email protected]> • #4048
Unicode or not?
Mon, 05 Mar 2012 13:23:50 +0100
Krzysztof <[email protected]> • #4047
Re: c inline assembly
Sun, 19 Feb 2012 11:46:46 -0500
Gedare Bloom <[email protected]> • #4046
Re: c inline assembly
Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:14:54 -0800
Ian Lance Taylor <[email protected]> • #4045
Re: c inline assembly
Sat, 18 Feb 2012 06:26:00 +0000
"Vladimir Murzin" <[email protected]> • #4044
c inline assembly
Sat, 18 Feb 2012 11:31:12 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #4043
Re: boolean result from a test for a bit
Sat, 18 Feb 2012 02:47:03 +0100
Phil Sutter <[email protected]> • #4042
Re: user defined functions
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:39:13 +0800
Shawn <[email protected]> • #4041
boolean result from a test for a bit
Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:29:13 +0000
"Allan, Bruce W" <[email protected]> • #4040
Re: function instrumentation
Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:08:28 +0100
Bert Wesarg <[email protected]> • #4039
function instrumentation
Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:34:34 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #4038
Re: user defined functions
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:43:16 +0530
Srinivasa T N <[email protected]> • #4037
user defined functions
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:21:40 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #4036
Re: Query: Declaring arrays as extern
Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:27:15 -0800
Alok Singhal <[email protected]> • #4035
Re: Query: Declaring arrays as extern
Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:38:29 -0600
subin gangadharan <[email protected]> • #4034
Re: Query: Declaring arrays as extern
Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:34:47 +0530
viresh kumar <[email protected]> • #4033
Query: Declaring arrays as extern
Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:34:05 +0530
viresh kumar <[email protected]> • #4032
Re: header files missing
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:20:29 -0500
Yichao Yu <[email protected]> • #4031
Re: header files missing
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:15:06 -0500
Yichao Yu <[email protected]> • #4030
Re: header files missing
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:44:10 +0530
Aniruddha Bhattacharyya <[email protected]> • #4029
RE: header files missing
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:18:53 +0000
Glynn Clements <[email protected]> • #4028
RE: header files missing
Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:04:55 +0000
Renjith Gopinadhan <[email protected]> • #4027
Re: header files missing
Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:03:43 +0100
Jean-Marc Simohand <[email protected]> • #4026
Re: header files missing
Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:01:07 -0600
Jonathan Isom <[email protected]> • #4025
Re: header files missing
Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:59:16 +0100
Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]> • #4024
Re: header files missing
Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:34:16 +0100
Jean-Marc Simohand <[email protected]> • #4023
Re: header files missing
Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:08:18 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #4022
header files missing
Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:46:00 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #4021
Re: program icon
Sun, 11 Dec 2011 21:30:09 +0100
Krzysztof <[email protected]> • #4020
Re: program icon
Mon, 12 Dec 2011 00:03:35 +0530
Aniruddha Bhattacharyya <[email protected]> • #4019
Re: program icon
Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:30:47 +0100
Krzysztof <[email protected]> • #4018
Re: program icon
Sun, 11 Dec 2011 05:19:36 -0500
Jesse Ruffin <[email protected]> • #4017
Re: program icon
Sun, 11 Dec 2011 09:57:49 +0100
Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]> • #4016
program icon
Sun, 11 Dec 2011 09:17:08 +0100
Krzysztof <[email protected]> • #4015
Re: Co-thread for parallel processing
Sat, 3 Dec 2011 23:13:46 +0200
Hendrik Visage <[email protected]> • #4014
Re: Co-thread for parallel processing
Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:56:57 +0530
Srinivasa T N <[email protected]> • #4013
Re: Co-thread for parallel processing
Fri, 2 Dec 2011 17:10:52 +0700
Randi Botse <[email protected]> • #4012
Re: Co-thread for parallel processing
Fri, 2 Dec 2011 10:28:38 +0100
Bogdan Cristea <[email protected]> • #4011
Co-thread for parallel processing
Fri, 2 Dec 2011 16:23:49 +0700
Randi Botse <[email protected]> • #4010
Re: virtual -->physical --> virtual address
Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:57:35 +0200
Mirko Banchi <[email protected]> • #4009
virtual -->physical --> virtual address
Sat, 15 Oct 2011 12:31:08 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #4008
proc entry getting created in wrong directory?
Fri, 30 Sep 2011 23:43:38 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #4007
Re: Errors with ->*
Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:27:12 +0530
Shriramana Sharma <[email protected]> • #4006
Re: Errors with ->*
Tue, 2 Aug 2011 21:52:31 +0100
Glynn Clements <[email protected]> • #4005
Re: Errors with ->*
Tue, 2 Aug 2011 14:47:37 -0300
Darío Mariani <[email protected]> • #4004
Re: Errors with ->*
Tue, 2 Aug 2011 22:25:27 +0530
Aniruddha Bhattacharyya <[email protected]> • #4003
Re: Errors with ->*
Tue, 2 Aug 2011 22:24:23 +0530
Aniruddha Bhattacharyya <[email protected]> • #4002
Errors with ->*
Tue, 02 Aug 2011 22:01:02 +0530
Shriramana Sharma <[email protected]> • #4001
Re: c++ code - not getting compiled !!!!!!!!!
Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:30:04 +0530
Srinivasa T N <[email protected]> • #4000
Re: c++ code - not getting compiled !!!!!!!!!
Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:25:39 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #3999
Re: c++ code - not getting compiled !!!!!!!!!
Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:21:54 +0530
vipul kumar samar <[email protected]> • #3998
Re: c++ code - not getting compiled !!!!!!!!!
Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:14:43 +0530
Srinivasa T N <[email protected]> • #3997
Re: c++ code - not getting compiled !!!!!!!!!
Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:40:22 +0200
Steve Graegert (スティーブ) <[email protected]> • #3996
Re: c++ code - not getting compiled !!!!!!!!!
Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:56:32 +0530
Srinivasa T N <[email protected]> • #3995
Re: c++ code - not getting compiled !!!!!!!!!
Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:56:07 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #3994
c++ code - not getting compiled !!!!!!!!!
Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:31:54 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #3993
Re: time system call expensive?
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:27:18 +0530
Vadiraj <[email protected]> • #3992
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.