org.kernel.vger.linux-c-programming archive

347 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: time system call expensive?
Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:46:17 +0200
Akos Marton <[email protected]> • #3991
Re: time system call expensive?
Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:20:18 +0200
"Michal Nazarewicz" <[email protected]> • #3990
time system call expensive?
Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:11:14 +0530
Vadiraj <[email protected]> • #3989
Fwd: Problem with scatter/gather IO
Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:33:40 +0700
Randi Botse <[email protected]> • #3988
Re: Problem with scatter/gather IO
Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:16:14 +0300
Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]> • #3987
Problem with scatter/gather IO
Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:54:45 +0700
Randi Botse <[email protected]> • #3986
Re: initializing a struct
Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:58:06 -0400
Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> • #3985
Re: initializing a struct
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:03:26 +0200
"Michal Nazarewicz" <[email protected]> • #3984
Re: initializing a struct
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:48:25 +0530
Vadiraj <[email protected]> • #3983
Re: extra slash in current path
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:02:26 -0400
俞颐超 <[email protected]> • #3982
Re: extra slash in current path
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:53:17 -0400
yuyichao-mit <[email protected]> • #3981
Re: extra slash in current path
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:31:06 +0400
Michael Tokarev <[email protected]> • #3980
Re: extra slash in current path
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:27:06 -0400
Nick Bowler <[email protected]> • #3979
Re: extra slash in current path
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:25:06 +0200
richard -rw- weinberger <[email protected]> • #3978
Re: extra slash in current path
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:11:04 -0400
yuyichao-mit <[email protected]> • #3977
Re: extra slash in current path
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:26:55 -0400
yuyichao-mit <[email protected]> • #3976
Re: extra slash in current path
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:17:54 +0200
Alessandro Suardi <[email protected]> • #3975
extra slash in current path
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:14:18 -0400
yuyichao-mit <[email protected]> • #3974
Re: Hi, Needs suggestions for finding and fixing stack/memory corruption when calling a function
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:25:22 +0100
Fawad Lateef <[email protected]> • #3973
Re: macro to print filename
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:11:02 +0200
"Michal Nazarewicz" <[email protected]> • #3972
Re: macro to print filename
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:41:05 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #3971
Re: macro to print filename
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:39:52 +0800
Zhongye Jia <[email protected]> • #3970
RE: macro to print filename
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:10:32 -0700
Libin Yang <[email protected]> • #3969
Re: macro to print filename
Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:27:33 +0200
"Michal Nazarewicz" <[email protected]> • #3968
Re: macro to print filename
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:54:59 +0530
Aniruddha Bhattacharyya <[email protected]> • #3967
Re: macro to print filename
Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:11:18 +0200
"Michal Nazarewicz" <[email protected]> • #3966
Re: macro to print filename
Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:08:51 +0200
"Michal Nazarewicz" <[email protected]> • #3965
Re: macro to print filename
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 02:45:06 +0800
Zhongye Jia <[email protected]> • #3964
Re: macro to print filename
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 02:08:50 +0800
Zhongye Jia <[email protected]> • #3963
Re: macro to print filename
Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:38:32 +0200
"Michal Nazarewicz" <[email protected]> • #3962
macro to print filename
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:37:42 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #3961
Re: Hi, Needs suggestions for finding and fixing stack/memory corruption when calling a function
Wed, 25 May 2011 12:07:14 +0100
Glynn Clements <[email protected]> • #3960
Re: Hi, Needs suggestions for finding and fixing stack/memory corruption when calling a function
Tue, 24 May 2011 16:33:03 +0100
Fawad Lateef <[email protected]> • #3959
Re: Hi, Needs suggestions for finding and fixing stack/memory corruption when calling a function
Tue, 24 May 2011 13:48:20 +0100
Glynn Clements <[email protected]> • #3958
Re: Hi, Needs suggestions for finding and fixing stack/memory corruption when calling a function
Tue, 24 May 2011 10:02:25 +0100
Fawad Lateef <[email protected]> • #3957
Re: Hi, Needs suggestions for finding and fixing stack/memory corruption when calling a function
Tue, 24 May 2011 13:59:59 +0530
Mahavir Jain <[email protected]> • #3956
Re: Hi, Needs suggestions for finding and fixing stack/memory corruption when calling a function
Mon, 23 May 2011 16:45:53 +0200
Andrej Gelenberg <[email protected]> • #3955
Re: Hi, Needs suggestions for finding and fixing stack/memory corruption when calling a function
Mon, 23 May 2011 15:59:12 +0100
Fawad Lateef <[email protected]> • #3954
Re: Hi, Needs suggestions for finding and fixing stack/memory corruption when calling a function
Mon, 23 May 2011 22:59:09 +0800
Zhongye Jia <[email protected]> • #3953
Hi, Needs suggestions for finding and fixing stack/memory corruption when calling a function
Mon, 23 May 2011 15:41:22 +0100
Fawad Lateef <[email protected]> • #3952
Fwd: message queue for two processes.
Sat, 14 May 2011 22:00:58 +0530
Aniruddha Bhattacharyya <[email protected]> • #3951
message queue for two processes.
Sat, 14 May 2011 21:10:11 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #3950
Re: malloc question
Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:05:46 +0100
Glynn Clements <[email protected]> • #3949
Re: malloc question
Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:20:22 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #3948
Re: malloc question
Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:57:56 +0300
Daniel Baluta <[email protected]> • #3947
Re: malloc question
Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:24:05 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #3946
Re: malloc question
Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:40:07 +0300
Daniel Baluta <[email protected]> • #3945
malloc question
Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:33:50 +0700
Randi Botse <[email protected]> • #3944
Re: close() on tcp socket.
Sun, 17 Apr 2011 17:56:15 +0530
Mahavir Jain <[email protected]> • #3943
pthread_create hangs.
Thu, 14 Apr 2011 03:36:24 -0400
[email protected] • #3942
Re: programming examples for X.509 signing
Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:41:56 -0700
Joe Damato <[email protected]> • #3941
programming examples for X.509 signing
Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:33:46 +0200
Kristoff Bonne <[email protected]> • #3940
Re: close() on tcp socket.
Wed, 6 Apr 2011 20:20:29 +0100
Glynn Clements <[email protected]> • #3939
Re: close() on tcp socket.
Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:54:46 +0200
Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]> • #3938
close() on tcp socket.
Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:30:43 +0530
ratheesh kannoth <[email protected]> • #3937
Re: duplicated modulo
Mon, 4 Apr 2011 10:26:05 +0200
Hendrik Visage <[email protected]> • #3936
Re: duplicated modulo
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:20:28 +0200
"Michal Nazarewicz" <[email protected]> • #3935
Re: duplicated modulo
Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:30:46 +0200
Bogdan Cristea <[email protected]> • #3934
Re: duplicated modulo
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:28:09 +0200
Bastian Bloessl <[email protected]> • #3933
Re: duplicated modulo
Fri, 1 Apr 2011 12:19:16 +0200
Nicolas Kaiser <[email protected]> • #3932
Re: duplicated modulo
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:50:35 +0200
"Michal Nazarewicz" <[email protected]> • #3931
duplicated modulo
Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:41:13 +0200
Nicolas Kaiser <[email protected]> • #3930
Re: gcc Cortex M3 Programming
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:06:44 +0200
".: formica :." <[email protected]> • #3929
gcc Cortex M3 Programming
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:32:20 +0200
Dello Iacono salvatore <[email protected]> • #3928
Re: dynamic shared library .
Sat, 19 Mar 2011 23:57:07 +0200
Hendrik Visage <[email protected]> • #3927
Re: g++ without typecast
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:23:38 +0100
ern0 <[email protected]> • #3926
g++ without typecast
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:12:42 +0530
ratheesh k <[email protected]> • #3925
URGENT R_PPC_REL24 relocation at ... for symbol out of range
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:45:55 +0100
Stefano Bonifazi <[email protected]> • #3924
Re: same pid ?
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:32:51 +0530
ratheesh k <[email protected]> • #3923
Re: same pid ?
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:49:23 +0530
ratheesh k <[email protected]> • #3922
Re: same pid ?
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:12:06 +0100
Steve Graegert (スティーブ) <[email protected]> • #3921
Re: same pid ?
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:48:35 +0530
ratheesh k <[email protected]> • #3920
Re: same pid ?
Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:26:46 -0600
Jonathan Isom <[email protected]> • #3919
Re: UDP data
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:49:15 +1100
Chris Donovan <[email protected]> • #3918
Re: UDP data
Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:43:38 -0600
David Astua <[email protected]> • #3917
Re: same pid ?
Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:39:01 +0530
ratheesh k <[email protected]> • #3916
Re: UDP data
Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:41:20 +0000
Glynn Clements <[email protected]> • #3915
Re: same pid ?
Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:22:41 +0100
"Michal Nazarewicz" <[email protected]> • #3914
same pid ?
Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:07:25 +0530
ratheesh k <[email protected]> • #3913
Re: UDP data
Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:14:29 +0700
Randi <[email protected]> • #3912
Re: UDP data
Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:14:26 +1100
Chris Donovan <[email protected]> • #3911
UDP data
Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:41:02 +0700
Randi <[email protected]> • #3910
Re: dynamic shared library .
Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:59:44 +0100
"Michal Nazarewicz" <[email protected]> • #3909
dynamic shared library .
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:20:27 +0530
ratheesh k <[email protected]> • #3908
Re: Any problem ?
Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:01:45 -0600
David Astua <[email protected]> • #3907
Re: Any problem ?
Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:46:18 +0200
Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]> • #3906
Re: Any problem ?
Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:32:43 +0530
Santosh Sivaraj <[email protected]> • #3905
Any problem ?
Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:23:43 +0530
ratheesh k <[email protected]> • #3904
setsockopt on connect()
Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:01:17 +0530
ratheesh k <[email protected]> • #3903
Re: Dynamic linking library
Fri, 21 Jan 2011 01:17:01 +0000
Glynn Clements <[email protected]> • #3902
Re: Dynamic linking library
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:50:36 +0100
"Michal Nazarewicz" <[email protected]> • #3901
Dynamic linking library
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:07:25 +0530
ratheesh k <[email protected]> • #3900
Re: array pointer
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:33:31 +0000
Glynn Clements <[email protected]> • #3899
Re: array pointer
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:59:44 +0000
David McMurray <[email protected]> • #3898
Re: array pointer
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:46:48 +0100
"Michal Nazarewicz" <[email protected]> • #3897
Re: array pointer
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:02:43 +0530
ratheesh k <[email protected]> • #3896
Re: array pointer
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:53:53 +0530
ratheesh k <[email protected]> • #3895
array pointer
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:52:51 +0530
ratheesh k <[email protected]> • #3894
Re: linux C array simplified.
Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:09:13 +0000
Andrej Gelenberg <[email protected]> • #3893
Re: linux C array simplified.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:39:25 +0100
"Michal Nazarewicz" <[email protected]> • #3892
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.