org.kernel.vger.linux-gcc archive

403 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 5). Latest articles →

Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 23:06:13 -0500
Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> • #241
[BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++
Wed, 22 Dec 2004 08:42:19 +0500
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #240
Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 04:14:30 +0500
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #239
Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 17:48:17 -0500
Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> • #238
Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 03:46:37 +0500
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #237
Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 17:35:49 -0500
Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> • #236
Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 17:32:39 -0500
Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> • #235
Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 03:26:21 +0500
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #234
Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 03:07:55 +0500
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #233
Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 17:03:45 -0500
Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> • #232
Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:53:52 -0500
Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> • #231
Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:50:19 -0800
Zack Weinberg <[email protected]> • #230
Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 02:48:11 +0500
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #229
Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:38:36 -0500
Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> • #228
[PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 02:35:48 +0500
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #227
The Linux binutils 2.15.94.0.2 is released
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 12:59:23 -0800
"H. J. Lu" <[email protected]> • #226
Generating shellcode at compile time
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 22:55:15 -0500
John Richard Moser <[email protected]> • #225
Repost: gcc cross mips output sizes too big
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 04:15:54 -0800
David Wuertele <[email protected]> • #224
The Linux binutils 2.15.94.0.1 is released
Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:10:44 -0800
"H. J. Lu" <[email protected]> • #223
gcc cross mips output sizes too big
Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:51:08 -0800
David Wuertele <[email protected]> • #222
Re: Shared libraries: How to share global variaables?
Sat, 30 Oct 2004 16:45:23 +0200
Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]> • #221
Re: Shared libraries: How to share global variaables?
Sat, 30 Oct 2004 18:43:43 +0530
Naga Raju <[email protected]> • #220
Re: Shared libraries: How to share global variaables?
Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:50:11 +0200
Robin Doer <[email protected]> • #219
Shared libraries: How to share global variaables?
Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:51:28 +0530
Naga Raju <[email protected]> • #218
The linux binutils 2.15.92.0.2 is released
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:17:43 -0700
"H. J. Lu" <[email protected]> • #217
RE: Segmentation fault from free()
Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:26:23 -0300
"Mariano Moreyra" <[email protected]> • #216
Re: Segmentation fault from free()
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:35:45 +0530
joy <[email protected]> • #215
Re: Segmentation fault from free()
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 23:49:59 +0200
Robert Schiele <[email protected]> • #214
Re: Segmentation fault from free()
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 17:25:07 -0400
Lei Yang <[email protected]> • #213
Re: Segmentation fault from free()
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 23:12:36 +0200
Robert Schiele <[email protected]> • #212
Segmentation fault from free()
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:34:24 -0400
Lei Yang <[email protected]> • #211
BUG: g++ 3.x.x -fomit-frame-pointer: exception handling doesn't work
Sat, 7 Aug 2004 20:22:57 +0600
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #210
The Linux binutils 2.15.91.0.2 is released
Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:19:47 -0700
"H. J. Lu" <[email protected]> • #209
Re: Why -fPIC stops some optimization?
Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:28:47 -0700
Michel Lespinasse <[email protected]> • #208
Re: Why -fPIC stops some optimization?
Sat, 10 Jul 2004 03:58:01 +0600
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #207
Re: Why -fPIC stops some optimization?
Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:45:50 -0700
Michel Lespinasse <[email protected]> • #206
Why -fPIC stops some optimization?
Fri, 9 Jul 2004 21:02:30 +0600
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #205
Re: [new-ra] GCC-3.3.2/x86: some suspicious behaviour
Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:18:56 +0600
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #204
Re: [new-ra] GCC-3.3.2/x86: some suspicious behaviour
Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:52:57 +0100
Paul Brook <[email protected]> • #203
Re: [new-ra] GCC-3.3.2/x86: some suspicious behaviour
Thu, 8 Jul 2004 22:31:19 +0600
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #202
Re: [new-ra] GCC-3.3.2/x86: some suspicious behaviour
Thu, 8 Jul 2004 16:46:33 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Matz <[email protected]> • #201
[new-ra] GCC-3.3.2/x86: some suspicious behaviour
Thu, 8 Jul 2004 04:06:43 +0600
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #200
Re: GCC 3.3.2 -Wall affects the code generated...
Wed, 7 Jul 2004 13:44:35 +0600
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #199
Re: x86 D flag: what's its status thru the program?
Tue, 06 Jul 2004 17:32:32 -0700
Jim Wilson <[email protected]> • #198
Re: GCC 3.3.2 -Wall affects the code generated...
06 Jul 2004 17:20:21 -0700
Jim Wilson <[email protected]> • #197
Re: GCC 3.3.2 -Wall affects the code generated...
Wed, 7 Jul 2004 04:46:04 +0600
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #196
Re: GCC 3.3.2 -Wall affects the code generated...
Tue, 06 Jul 2004 17:11:34 -0400
John Richard Moser <[email protected]> • #195
Re: GCC 3.3.2 -Wall affects the code generated...
Tue, 06 Jul 2004 13:41:02 -0700
Jim Wilson <[email protected]> • #194
Objective-C Objects and Locking
Tue, 06 Jul 2004 15:17:46 -0400
John Richard Moser <[email protected]> • #193
Re: x86 D flag: what's its status thru the program?
Tue, 6 Jul 2004 16:05:07 +0200 (CEST)
Lukasz Michal Rak <[email protected]> • #192
Re: x86 D flag: what's its status thru the program?
Tue, 6 Jul 2004 01:04:04 +0600
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #191
Re: x86 D flag: what's its status thru the program?
Mon, 5 Jul 2004 19:19:06 +0200 (CEST)
Lukasz Michal Rak <[email protected]> • #190
Re: x86 D flag: what's its status thru the program?
Mon, 5 Jul 2004 22:26:48 +0600
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #189
Re: x86 D flag: what's its status thru the program?
Mon, 5 Jul 2004 15:23:44 +0200 (CEST)
Lukasz Michal Rak <[email protected]> • #188
x86 D flag: what's its status thru the program?
Sun, 4 Jul 2004 21:37:48 +0600
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #187
GCC 3.3.2 -Wall affects the code generated...
Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:03:03 +0600
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #186
Viability of a New Allocator
Thu, 24 Jun 2004 02:34:06 -0400
John Richard Moser <[email protected]> • #185
The Linux binutils 2.15.91.0.1 is released
Thu, 27 May 2004 12:02:15 -0700
"H. J. Lu" <[email protected]> • #184
Re: build
Thu, 6 May 2004 15:55:09 +0200
Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]> • #183
Re: (unknown)
Thu, 06 May 2004 14:12:06 +0500
"Sreekandh Iyer" <[email protected]> • #182
Re: build
Wed, 5 May 2004 16:15:18 +0200
Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]> • #181
build
Wed, 5 May 2004 19:26:17 +0530
"Dominic VP" <[email protected]> • #180
The Linux binutils 2.15.90.0.3 is released
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 08:48:24 -0700
"H. J. Lu" <[email protected]> • #179
The Linux binutils 2.15.90.0.2 is released
Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:23:22 -0700
"H. J. Lu" <[email protected]> • #178
The Linux binutils 2.15.90.0.1.1 is released
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 18:43:43 -0800
"H. J. Lu" <[email protected]> • #177
Re: binutils 2.15.90.0.1 doesn't install as.1 man page
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:21:42 -0800
"H. J. Lu" <[email protected]> • #176
The Linux binutils 2.15.90.0.1 is released
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:13:32 -0800
"H. J. Lu" <[email protected]> • #175
Re: Kernel Cross Compiling
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:26:54 +0100 (CET)
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]> • #174
Re: Kernel Cross Compiling
16 Feb 2004 14:50:41 -0800
Jim Wilson <[email protected]> • #173
Re: Kernel Cross Compiling
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:41:20 -0800
cliff white <[email protected]> • #172
Re: Kernel Cross Compiling
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:03:13 +1100
Peter Chubb <[email protected]> • #171
Re: Kernel Cross Compiling
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 23:08:46 +0100
Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]> • #170
Re: Kernel Cross Compiling
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 11:25:41 -0800
"Timothy D. Witham" <[email protected]> • #169
Re: Kernel Cross Compiling
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 14:03:22 +0100
Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]> • #168
Re: Kernel Cross Compiling
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:32:07 -0800
"Timothy D. Witham" <[email protected]> • #167
Re: Kernel Cross Compiling
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:51:05 -0800
David Mosberger <[email protected]> • #166
Re: Kernel Cross Compiling
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 03:35:03 +0100
Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]> • #165
Re: Kernel Cross Compiling
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 02:08:41 +0100
Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]> • #164
Re: Kernel Cross Compiling
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:58:56 -0800
David Mosberger <[email protected]> • #163
Re: Kernel Cross Compiling
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:31:28 -0800
David Mosberger <[email protected]> • #162
Re: Kernel Cross Compiling
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:44:20 +0100
Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]> • #161
Kernel Cross Compiling
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:57:43 +0100
Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]> • #160
Re: GCC 3.3.2: Some bug in the preprocessor?
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:44:07 +0500
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #159
Re: GCC 3.3.2: Some bug in the preprocessor?
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:34:04 -0800
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> • #158
GCC 3.3.2: Some bug in the preprocessor?
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:29:58 +0500
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #157
Re: Why __memrchr vs. memrchr ?
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 05:08:09 +0500
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #156
Re: Why __memrchr vs. memrchr ?
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 07:03:40 +0100
Andreas Jaeger <[email protected]> • #155
Re: Why __memrchr vs. memrchr ?
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 05:30:02 +0500
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #154
Re: Why __memrchr vs. memrchr ?
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 01:17:23 +0300
"Dmitry V. Levin" <[email protected]> • #153
Why __memrchr vs. memrchr ?
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 02:37:21 +0500
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #152
Adventure Awaits Linux-admin
Thu, 22 Jan 04 03:39:10 -0500
"Angelita Sherwood" <[email protected]> • #151
The Linux binutils 2.14.90.0.8 is released
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:30:04 -0800
"H. J. Lu" <[email protected]> • #150
Re: strcmp is too heavy for its everyday usage...
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:09:18 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #149
Re: strcmp is too heavy for its everyday usage...
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:49:28 +0500
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #148
Re: strcmp is too heavy for its everyday usage...
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:12:31 -0800
Richard Henderson <[email protected]> • #147
Re: strcmp is too heavy for its everyday usage...
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:11:45 +0500
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #146
Re: strcmp is too heavy for its everyday usage...
Thu, 08 Jan 2004 10:30:04 +0100
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #145
Re: strcmp is too heavy for its everyday usage...
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 06:36:36 +0500
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #144
Re: strcmp is too heavy for its everyday usage...
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:13:11 -0800
Roland McGrath <[email protected]> • #143
strcmp is too heavy for its everyday usage...
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 06:09:24 +0500
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> • #142
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.