org.kernel.vger.linux-toolchains archive

415 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 5). Latest articles →

Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] sframe: Introduce in-kernel SFRAME_VALIDATION.
Mon, 20 Apr 2026 18:29:29 -0700
Dylan Hatch <[email protected]> • #2709
Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] arm64, unwind: build kernel with sframe V3 info
Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:44:12 +0200
Jens Remus <[email protected]> • #2708
Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] sframe: Introduce in-kernel SFRAME_VALIDATION.
Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:30:54 +0200
Jens Remus <[email protected]> • #2707
Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] arm64, unwind: build kernel with sframe V3 info
Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:16:34 +0200
Jens Remus <[email protected]> • #2706
Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] arm64/module, sframe: Add sframe support for modules.
Mon, 20 Apr 2026 11:54:57 +0200
Jens Remus <[email protected]> • #2705
Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] unwind: arm64: Use sframe to unwind interrupt frames.
Mon, 20 Apr 2026 10:42:35 +0200
Jens Remus <[email protected]> • #2704
Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] unwind: arm64: Use sframe to unwind interrupt frames.
Sun, 19 Apr 2026 22:56:25 -0700
Dylan Hatch <[email protected]> • #2703
Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] sframe: Introduce in-kernel SFRAME_VALIDATION.
Sun, 19 Apr 2026 22:02:28 -0700
Dylan Hatch <[email protected]> • #2702
Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] arm64, unwind: build kernel with sframe V3 info
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:20:48 -0700
Dylan Hatch <[email protected]> • #2701
Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] unwind: arm64: Use sframe to unwind interrupt frames.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:45:10 +0200
Jens Remus <[email protected]> • #2700
Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] arm64/module, sframe: Add sframe support for modules.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 16:07:37 +0200
Jens Remus <[email protected]> • #2699
Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] arm64: entry: add unwind info for various kernel entries
Thu, 16 Apr 2026 18:49:28 +0200
Jens Remus <[email protected]> • #2698
Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] sframe: Provide PC lookup for vmlinux .sframe section.
Thu, 16 Apr 2026 17:10:16 +0200
Jens Remus <[email protected]> • #2697
Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] sframe: Introduce in-kernel SFRAME_VALIDATION.
Thu, 16 Apr 2026 17:04:19 +0200
Jens Remus <[email protected]> • #2696
Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] sframe: Allow unsorted FDEs.
Thu, 16 Apr 2026 16:57:40 +0200
Jens Remus <[email protected]> • #2695
Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] arm64: entry: add unwind info for various kernel entries
Thu, 16 Apr 2026 16:09:48 +0200
Jens Remus <[email protected]> • #2694
Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel
Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:10:31 +0200
Jens Remus <[email protected]> • #2693
Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] arm64, unwind: build kernel with sframe V3 info
Tue, 14 Apr 2026 14:43:43 +0200
Jens Remus <[email protected]> • #2692
Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] sframe: Allow kernelspace sframe sections.
Tue, 14 Apr 2026 14:09:42 +0200
Jens Remus <[email protected]> • #2691
Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Discard .interp sections
Wed, 8 Apr 2026 19:20:57 +0200
Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> • #2690
Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Discard .interp sections
Wed, 8 Apr 2026 16:57:41 +0100
Nam Le <[email protected]> • #2689
Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Discard .interp sections
Wed, 8 Apr 2026 17:21:40 +0200
Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> • #2688
Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Discard .interp sections
Wed, 8 Apr 2026 14:30:06 +0100
Nam Le <[email protected]> • #2687
Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Discard .interp sections
Wed, 8 Apr 2026 14:49:50 +0200
Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> • #2686
Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Discard .interp sections
Wed, 8 Apr 2026 14:09:09 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Matz <[email protected]> • #2685
Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Discard .interp sections
Wed, 8 Apr 2026 13:01:24 +0100
Nam Le <[email protected]> • #2684
Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Discard .interp sections
Wed, 8 Apr 2026 12:09:44 +0200
Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> • #2683
Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Discard .interp sections
Wed, 8 Apr 2026 04:58:08 -0500
Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]> • #2682
Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Discard .interp sections
Wed, 8 Apr 2026 11:52:02 +0200
Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> • #2681
Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] arm64, unwind: build kernel with sframe V3 info
Mon, 6 Apr 2026 14:36:55 -0700
Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> • #2680
[PATCH v3 8/8] unwind: arm64: Use sframe to unwind interrupt frames.
Mon, 6 Apr 2026 18:50:00 +0000
Dylan Hatch <[email protected]> • #2679
[PATCH v3 7/8] sframe: Introduce in-kernel SFRAME_VALIDATION.
Mon, 6 Apr 2026 18:49:59 +0000
Dylan Hatch <[email protected]> • #2678
[PATCH v3 6/8] arm64/module, sframe: Add sframe support for modules.
Mon, 6 Apr 2026 18:49:58 +0000
Dylan Hatch <[email protected]> • #2677
[PATCH v3 5/8] sframe: Allow unsorted FDEs.
Mon, 6 Apr 2026 18:49:57 +0000
Dylan Hatch <[email protected]> • #2676
[PATCH v3 4/8] sframe: Provide PC lookup for vmlinux .sframe section.
Mon, 6 Apr 2026 18:49:56 +0000
Dylan Hatch <[email protected]> • #2675
[PATCH v3 3/8] arm64: entry: add unwind info for various kernel entries
Mon, 6 Apr 2026 18:49:55 +0000
Dylan Hatch <[email protected]> • #2674
[PATCH v3 2/8] arm64, unwind: build kernel with sframe V3 info
Mon, 6 Apr 2026 18:49:54 +0000
Dylan Hatch <[email protected]> • #2673
[PATCH v3 1/8] sframe: Allow kernelspace sframe sections.
Mon, 6 Apr 2026 18:49:53 +0000
Dylan Hatch <[email protected]> • #2672
[PATCH v3 0/8] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel
Mon, 6 Apr 2026 18:49:52 +0000
Dylan Hatch <[email protected]> • #2671
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Noinstr fixes for K[CA]SAN with GCOV
Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:21:07 +0100
Marco Elver <[email protected]> • #2670
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Noinstr fixes for K[CA]SAN with GCOV
Thu, 18 Dec 2025 06:54:39 -0600
Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]> • #2669
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Noinstr fixes for K[CA]SAN with GCOV
Thu, 18 Dec 2025 13:18:13 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> • #2668
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Noinstr fixes for K[CA]SAN with GCOV
Thu, 18 Dec 2025 05:58:44 -0600
Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]> • #2667
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Noinstr fixes for K[CA]SAN with GCOV
Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:56:48 +0100
Marco Elver <[email protected]> • #2666
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 01:04:02 -0800
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> • #2665
Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] unwind: build kernel with sframe info
Wed, 19 Nov 2025 15:59:13 +0100
Jens Remus <[email protected]> • #2664
Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] unwind: arm64: Add reliable stacktrace with sframe unwinder.
Tue, 18 Nov 2025 23:12:01 -0800
Indu Bhagat <[email protected]> • #2663
Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] unwind: arm64: Add reliable stacktrace with sframe unwinder.
Tue, 18 Nov 2025 19:17:26 -0800
Dylan Hatch <[email protected]> • #2662
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel
Tue, 18 Nov 2025 10:29:46 -0800
Indu Bhagat <[email protected]> • #2661
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel
Tue, 18 Nov 2025 13:20:54 -0500
Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> • #2660
Re: [PATCH 2/4] media: atomisp: Fix startup() section placement with -ffunction-sections
Tue, 18 Nov 2025 09:57:11 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> • #2659
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel
Mon, 17 Nov 2025 21:18:41 -0800
Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> • #2658
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel
Tue, 18 Nov 2025 01:49:06 +0100
Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]> • #2657
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel
Mon, 17 Nov 2025 16:10:46 -0800
Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> • #2656
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel
Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:50:09 +0100
Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]> • #2655
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel
Mon, 17 Nov 2025 18:42:23 -0500
Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> • #2654
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel
Mon, 17 Nov 2025 15:06:32 -0800
Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> • #2653
Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] unwind: arm64: Add reliable stacktrace with sframe unwinder.
Mon, 17 Nov 2025 15:01:37 -0800
Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> • #2652
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel
Fri, 14 Nov 2025 22:50:16 -0800
Dylan Hatch <[email protected]> • #2651
Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] unwind: arm64: Add reliable stacktrace with sframe unwinder.
Fri, 14 Nov 2025 22:44:20 -0800
Dylan Hatch <[email protected]> • #2650
Re: [PATCH 2/4] media: atomisp: Fix startup() section placement with -ffunction-sections
Fri, 14 Nov 2025 12:43:10 -0800
Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> • #2649
Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] unwind: build kernel with sframe info
Fri, 14 Nov 2025 13:34:25 +0000
Will Deacon <[email protected]> • #2648
Re: [PATCH 2/4] media: atomisp: Fix startup() section placement with -ffunction-sections
Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:56:57 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> • #2647
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Sat, 8 Nov 2025 16:23:03 -0800
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> • #2646
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 6 Nov 2025 13:02:11 -0800
Indu Bhagat <[email protected]> • #2645
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 6 Nov 2025 12:42:41 -0800
Indu Bhagat <[email protected]> • #2644
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 6 Nov 2025 01:20:54 -0800
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> • #2643
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 08:51:22 +0100
Florian Weimer <[email protected]> • #2642
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Wed, 5 Nov 2025 16:44:24 -0800
Indu Bhagat <[email protected]> • #2641
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Wed, 5 Nov 2025 00:21:20 -0800
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> • #2640
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 01:21:12 -0800
Indu <[email protected]> • #2639
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Fri, 31 Oct 2025 15:37:02 +0100
"Jose E. Marchesi" <[email protected]> • #2638
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Fri, 31 Oct 2025 11:46:25 +0000
Mark Brown <[email protected]> • #2637
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Fri, 31 Oct 2025 01:24:52 -0700
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> • #2636
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 22:28:33 -0700
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> • #2635
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 21:22:40 -0700
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> • #2634
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 19:51:03 -0700
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> • #2633
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 19:57:25 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> • #2632
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 18:45:20 +0000
Mark Brown <[email protected]> • #2631
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 11:31:38 -0700
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #2630
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 19:22:38 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> • #2629
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 18:07:49 +0000
Mark Brown <[email protected]> • #2628
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:53:13 -0700
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #2627
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:33:23 -0400
Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> • #2626
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 18:03:23 +0100
"Jose E. Marchesi" <[email protected]> • #2625
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 09:48:50 -0700
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> • #2624
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:47:28 +0100
"Jose E. Marchesi" <[email protected]> • #2623
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 11:26:26 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> • #2622
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 09:05:53 +0100
Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]> • #2621
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 00:50:42 -0700
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> • #2620
Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:30:34 +0100
Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]> • #2619
Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Wed, 29 Oct 2025 23:53:32 -0700
Fangrui Song <[email protected]> • #2618
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel
Mon, 29 Sep 2025 21:55:34 +0200
Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]> • #2617
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel
Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:46:08 -0700
Song Liu <[email protected]> • #2616
Re: Thread Safety Analysis and the Linux kernel
Thu, 18 Sep 2025 13:10:32 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> • #2615
Re: Unaligned access trade-offs for SFrame FRE layout
Thu, 18 Sep 2025 12:39:18 +0200
Jens Remus <[email protected]> • #2614
Re: Thread Safety Analysis and the Linux kernel
Thu, 18 Sep 2025 12:37:15 +0200
Marco Elver <[email protected]> • #2613
Re: Unaligned access trade-offs for SFrame FRE layout
Thu, 18 Sep 2025 09:25:17 +0930
Alan Modra <[email protected]> • #2612
Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] unwind: arm64: Add reliable stacktrace with sframe unwinder.
Wed, 17 Sep 2025 16:41:41 -0700
Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> • #2611
Re: Unaligned access trade-offs for SFrame FRE layout
Wed, 17 Sep 2025 17:12:51 -0400
Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> • #2610
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.