gmane.comp.gnome.glademm archive

385 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: [glade--] problem with glademm/win32 (XP)
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:57:11 +0100
"J. Baltasar García Perez-Schofield" <[email protected]> • #769
[glade--] Generating Code error
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 19:32:58 +0100
"Daniel Lang" <[email protected]> • #768
Re: [glade--] problem with glademm/win32 (XP)
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:01:26 +0100
Baltasarq <[email protected]> • #767
[glade--] problem with glademm/win32 (XP)
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:36:28 +0000 (UTC)
andreas <[email protected]> • #766
[glade--] Inserting more cpp files in a Glademm project
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:33:57 +0100
Baltasarq <[email protected]> • #765
Re: [glade--] Glademm and Autogen.sh
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:11:42 +0100
Baltasarq <[email protected]> • #764
[glade--] Glademm and Autogen.sh
Tue, 01 Feb 2005 16:24:50 -0200
Arthur Maciel <[email protected]> • #763
Re: [glade--] Glademm autogen.sh
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:00:00 +0100
Baltasarq <[email protected]> • #762
[glade--] Glademm autogen.sh
Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:46:23 -0200
Arthur Maciel <[email protected]> • #761
[glade--] Solved (patched)
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:58:05 +0100
Baltasarq <[email protected]> • #760
[glade--] A question and two errors
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:23:39 +0100
Baltasarq <[email protected]> • #759
[glade--] Perceived Software Quality Survey (PESQUS) for GNOME
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:36:29 -0500
Human Aspects of Software Engineering <[email protected]> • #758
[glade--] libglademm and derived widgets
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:24:14 +0200
"Damon Oberholster" <[email protected]> • #757
Re: [glade--] Custom Widgets using glademm
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:04:12 +0100
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #756
[glade--] Custom Widgets using glademm
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:57:25 +0200
"Damon Oberholster" <[email protected]> • #755
[glade--] Return: glade2.6.7 can't generate C++ code on Windows2000?
Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:30:24 +0800
"Bob Zhu" <[email protected]> • #754
Re: [glade--] glade2.6.7 can't generate C++ code on Windows2000?
Sat, 01 Jan 2005 22:10:36 +0100
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #753
[glade--] glade2.6.7 can't generate C++ code on Windows2000?
Sun, 2 Jan 2005 00:20:59 +0800
"Bob Zhu" <[email protected]> • #752
Re: [glade--] Examples of programs using libglademm
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08:44:31 +0100
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #751
[glade--] Examples of programs using libglademm
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 18:19:18 -0600
Justin Guenther <[email protected]> • #750
Re: [glade--] Learning to use glademm-generated code
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:34:12 +0100
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #749
Re: [glade--] Learning to use glademm-generated code
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:38:27 +0100
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #748
Re: [glade--] Learning to use glademm-generated code
Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:32:29 +0100
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #747
Re: [glade--] Learning to use glademm-generated code
Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:37:36 +0100
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #746
Re: [glade--] Learning to use glademm-generated code
Sun, 12 Dec 2004 00:46:30 +0100
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #745
Re: [glade--] Re: FileChooser bug?
Sun, 12 Dec 2004 00:42:38 +0100
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #744
[glade--] Re: FileChooser bug?
Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:32:38 -0800
Konstantin L Kouptsov <[email protected]> • #743
[glade--] Re: glademm install problems
Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:50:38 +0100
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #742
Re: [glade--] help!!!
Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:57:12 +0100
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #741
[glade--] Re: FileChooser bug?
Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:44:29 +0100
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #740
Re: [glade--] Learning to use glademm-generated code
Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:28:06 +0100
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #739
Re: [glade--] Re: Is this C++ [I mean, object oriented] code ????
Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:37:18 +0100
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #738
Re: [glade--] Learning to use glademm-generated code
Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:48:26 +0100
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #737
[glade--] Re: Is this C++ [I mean, object oriented] code ????
Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:35:27 +0100
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #736
Re: [glade--] Learning to use glademm-generated code
Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:32:28 +0100
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #735
Re: [glade--] Learning to use glademm-generated code
Wed, 08 Dec 2004 12:47:03 -0600
Rob Benton <[email protected]> • #734
[glade--] Learning to use glademm-generated code
Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:02:57 +0100
Baltasarq <[email protected]> • #733
Re: [glade--] Where is glade-- ?
Tue, 07 Dec 2004 18:56:10 +0100
Immanuel Scheerer <[email protected]> • #732
[glade--] Where is glade-- ?
Tue, 7 Dec 2004 18:32:34 +0100
Baltasarq <[email protected]> • #731
Re: [glade--] Simple .glade file that aborts glade--
Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:48:47 +0100
Miguel Angel Polo <[email protected]> • #730
[glade--] Simple .glade file that aborts glade--
Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:20:20 +0100
Miguel Angel Polo <[email protected]> • #729
[Fwd: RE: Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?]
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:33:53 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #728
Re: [gtkmm] Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:18:26 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #727
Re: [gtkmm] Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:43:08 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #726
Re: [gtkmm] Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:50:04 +0200 (CEST)
"Murray Cumming" <[email protected]> • #725
Re: Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:40:24 -0500
Paul Elliott <[email protected]> • #724
Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:43:51 -0400
Carl Nygard <[email protected]> • #723
Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:21:08 -0500
Paul Elliott <[email protected]> • #722
Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:33:54 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #721
Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:19:41 +0200 (CEST)
"Murray Cumming" <[email protected]> • #720
Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:15:29 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #719
Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:44:01 +0200 (CEST)
"Murray Cumming" <[email protected]> • #718
Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:38:49 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #717
Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:59:44 +0200 (CEST)
"Murray Cumming" <[email protected]> • #716
Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:54:45 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #715
Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:52:40 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #714
[glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:44:31 -0500
Paul Elliott <[email protected]> • #713
[glade--] Toolbar + ToolItem (gtkmm 2.4) fixed
Thu, 07 Oct 2004 16:41:37 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #712
Re: [glade--] Current development?
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:50:13 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #711
[glade--] Current development?
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:14:25 -0700
Dan Lyke <[email protected]> • #710
[glade--] Debian packages
Sun, 01 Aug 2004 12:38:01 +0200
Philipp Klaus Krause <[email protected]> • #709
FW: [glade--] help!!!
Fri, 30 Jul 2004 07:36:30 +0000
"rosalinda pinto" <[email protected]> • #708
[glade--] help!!!
Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:19:46 +0000
"rosalinda pinto" <[email protected]> • #707
[glade--] validator
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 23:17:44 +0700
"Ari Puji P" <[email protected]> • #706
RE: Can we combine efforts for C++ project skeleton creation?
Sat, 10 Jul 2004 05:56:45 -0300
"Claudio Polegato Jr." <[email protected]> • #705
[glade--] Re: [gnomemm] Re: [gtkmm] Can we combine efforts for C++ project skeleton creation?
Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:40:59 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #704
Re: Can we combine efforts for C++ project skeleton creation?
Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:12:52 -0300
SilvioCVdeAlmeida <[email protected]> • #703
Re: [gtkmm] Can we combine efforts for C++ project skeleton creation?
Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:07:57 +0200
Murray Cumming <[email protected]> • #702
Re: Can we combine efforts for C++ project skeleton creation?
Thu, 08 Jul 2004 10:50:05 -0300
SilvioCVdeAlmeida <[email protected]> • #701
[glade--] Can we combine efforts for C++ project skeleton creation?
Wed, 07 Jul 2004 11:43:10 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #700
Re: [glade--] error of FC2 and glade--?
Wed, 07 Jul 2004 11:56:09 +0200
Murray Cumming <[email protected]> • #699
Re: [glade--] error of FC2 and glade--?
Wed, 07 Jul 2004 08:40:19 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #698
Re: [glade--] error of FC2 and glade--?
Fri, 02 Jul 2004 17:19:19 +0200
Murray Cumming <[email protected]> • #697
Re: [glade--] error of FC2 and glade--?
Fri, 02 Jul 2004 15:10:02 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #696
Re: [glade--] glademm generated filechooserdialog code broken?
Fri, 02 Jul 2004 14:55:13 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #695
[glade--] glademm generated filechooserdialog code broken?
Fri, 02 Jul 2004 12:14:25 +0200
"Johan Kohler" <[email protected]> • #694
[glade--] Re: error of FC2 and glade--?
Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:15:32 +0200
Murray Cumming <[email protected]> • #693
Re: [glade--] error of FC2 and glade--?
Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:33:01 +0200
Murray Cumming <[email protected]> • #692
Re: [glade--] error of FC2 and glade--?
Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:05:21 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #691
Re: [glade--] error of FC2 and glade--?
Thu, 01 Jul 2004 09:12:58 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #690
Re: [glade--] error of FC2 and glade--?
Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:38:14 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #689
Re: [glade--] error of FC2 and glade--?
Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:49:51 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #688
[glade--] error of FC2 and glade--?
Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:33:58 +0800
Rolly Ng <[email protected]> • #687
Re: [glade--] Bug in glade?
Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:18:46 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #686
[glade--] Bug in glade?
Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:08:31 +0200
Michał Byrecki <[email protected]> • #685
[glade--] drag_data_received signal fixed
Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:15:33 -0400
"Miller, Ryan D" <[email protected]> • #684
[glade--] Installing Glademm??
Fri, 25 Jun 2004 22:30:09 +0550
"Vishal Kothari" <[email protected]> • #683
[glade--] Re: [gtkmm] Drag and drop code problem
Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:26:05 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #682
[glade--] Re: [gtkmm] Drag and drop code problem
Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:27:31 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #681
Re: [glade--] i need help!
Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:16:39 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #680
Re: Drag and drop code problem
Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:24:57 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #679
[glade--] Drag and drop code problem
Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:55:22 -0400
"Miller, Ryan D" <[email protected]> • #678
Re: [glade--] Glademm code generation problems
Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:53:30 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #677
[glade--] Re:Gtkmm documentation question
Wed, 16 Jun 2004 10:16:41 -0400
"Miller, Ryan D" <[email protected]> • #676
[glade--] i need help!
Fri, 11 Jun 2004 18:22:50 +0700
"Ari Puji P" <[email protected]> • #675
Re: [glade--] Glademm code generation problems
Wed, 16 Jun 2004 10:05:46 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #674
Re: [glade--] Glademm code generation problems
Tue, 15 Jun 2004 22:07:34 +0200
Murray Cumming <[email protected]> • #673
[glade--] Glademm code generation problems
Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:54:16 -0400
"Miller, Ryan D" <[email protected]> • #672
Re: [glade--] Treeview, drag_data_get event
Wed, 09 Jun 2004 09:59:10 +0200
Christof Petig <[email protected]> • #671
Re: [glade--] Treeview, drag_data_get event
Tue, 8 Jun 2004 20:22:02 +0300
Niklas Nylund IB <[email protected]> • #670
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.