gmane.comp.lang.concatenative archive

1298 archived articles, newest first (page 13 of 13). Latest articles →

Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 17:01:40 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2585
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 19:09:44 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2584
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 15:56:16 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2583
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 18:41:07 -0500
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2582
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 18:38:16 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2581
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:12:28 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2580
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 17:58:08 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2579
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 17:52:19 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2578
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 17:40:51 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2577
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 14:36:13 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2576
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 17:20:19 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2575
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 14:20:41 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2574
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:12:52 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2573
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:10:40 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2572
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:09:14 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2571
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 17:09:04 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2570
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:00:18 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2569
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 14:00:14 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2568
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:49:21 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2567
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 15:58:59 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2566
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 15:43:35 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2565
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 14:41:09 -0600
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2564
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 15:36:15 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2563
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 15:32:02 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2562
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 15:17:26 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2561
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 15:11:44 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2560
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:52:24 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2559
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:31:56 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2558
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:22:11 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2557
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 08:53:43 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2556
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:23:25 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2555
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:12:39 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2554
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 18:58:23 -0800
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #2553
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 21:52:32 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2552
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:34:51 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2551
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 21:03:15 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #2550
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 17:34:28 -0800
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #2549
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 18:08:35 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #2548
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:26:51 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2547
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:39:53 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2546
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:14:47 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2545
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 08:14:13 -0600
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2544
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 04:25:58 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2543
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 04:19:19 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2542
[stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 04:04:14 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2541
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Tue, 4 Mar 2008 22:33:12 -0600
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2540
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Tue, 4 Mar 2008 23:25:13 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2539
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Tue, 4 Mar 2008 20:16:39 -0800
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #2538
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Tue, 4 Mar 2008 01:06:57 -0500
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2537
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Tue, 04 Mar 2008 05:42:48 -0000
"zallambo" <[email protected]> • #2536
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:42:46 -0800
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #2535
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:38:52 -0800
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #2534
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 19:16:34 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2533
Re: [stack] Greetings
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:52:10 -0800
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #2532
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 18:15:28 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2531
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:50:38 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2530
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:21:39 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2529
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:15:26 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2528
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 11:48:27 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2527
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 10:40:52 -0800
"Joe Bowbeer" <[email protected]> • #2526
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 13:36:52 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2525
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 13:12:18 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2524
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:58:23 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2523
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:06:40 -0800
"Joe Bowbeer" <[email protected]> • #2522
[stack] Re: Concatenative Hardware Redux (Another 16 Instruction Set)
Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:53:28 -0700
"Adam Marquis" <[email protected]> • #2521
[stack] Greetings
Mon, 03 Mar 2008 08:51:27 -0000
"zallambo" <[email protected]> • #2520
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Sun, 02 Mar 2008 01:14:34 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2519
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 21:34:10 -0600
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2518
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:21:23 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2517
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 19:34:12 -0600
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2516
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Sat, 01 Mar 2008 20:19:19 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2515
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 16:26:29 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2514
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Sat, 01 Mar 2008 17:43:04 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2513
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 17:11:33 -0500
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2512
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 14:08:04 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2511
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:24:41 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2510
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 14:35:18 -0500
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2509
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Sat, 01 Mar 2008 09:46:18 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2508
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 08:17:23 -0600
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2507
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Sat, 01 Mar 2008 08:55:10 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2506
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Sat, 01 Mar 2008 08:51:59 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2505
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:20:50 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2504
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:49:58 -0800
"Joe Bowbeer" <[email protected]> • #2503
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:36:38 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2502
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:19:58 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2501
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:35:06 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2500
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:34:50 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2499
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:26:22 -0500
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2498
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:04:09 -0800
"Joe Bowbeer" <[email protected]> • #2497
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:43:36 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2496
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:19:49 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2495
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:47:51 -0800
"Joe Bowbeer" <[email protected]> • #2494
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:23:03 -0500
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2493
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:58:56 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2492
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:04:09 -0600
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2491
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:00:32 -0600
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2490
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:44:53 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2489
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:43:28 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2488
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.