gmane.comp.lang.concatenative archive

1298 archived articles, newest first (page 12 of 13). Latest articles →

Re: [stack] R
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:00:42 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2685
Re: [stack] impure concatenativity: let without translation
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:47:47 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2684
Re: [stack] impure concatenativity: let without translation
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:31:29 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2683
Re: [stack] R
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:21:41 -0400
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2682
Re: [stack] impure concatenativity: let without translation
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:02:13 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2681
Re: [stack] impure concatenativity: let without translation
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:18:56 +0530
rahul <[email protected]> • #2680
Re: [stack] R
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:46:52 -0400
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2679
Re: [stack] impure concatenativity: let without translation
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:25:06 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2678
Re: [stack] R
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:19:28 +0100
Robbert van Dalen <[email protected]> • #2677
[stack] R
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:14:39 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2676
Re: [stack] impure concatenativity: let without translation
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:11:26 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2675
Re: [stack] impure concatenativity: let without translation
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:06:12 -0400
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2674
Re: [stack] impure concatenativity: let without translation
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:04:23 +0100
Robbert van Dalen <[email protected]> • #2673
Re: [stack] impure concatenativity: let without translation
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:51:38 -0700
"Joe Bowbeer" <[email protected]> • #2672
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:47:02 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2671
Re: [stack] impure concatenativity: let without translation
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:31:27 -0400
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2670
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:42:29 -0700
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #2669
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:17:41 -0400
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2668
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:09:55 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2667
Re: [stack] impure concatenativity: let without translation
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:58:04 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2666
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:27:39 -0400
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2665
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:08:49 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2664
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:36:04 -0400
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2663
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:31:25 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2662
Re: [stack] impure concatenativity: let without translation
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:58:27 -0700
"Joe Bowbeer" <[email protected]> • #2661
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:33:48 -0400
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2660
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:05:51 +1100
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]> • #2659
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:30:31 +1100
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]> • #2658
[stack] impure concatenativity: let without translation
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 04:58:13 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2657
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:43:49 +1100
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]> • #2656
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:04:57 +1100
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]> • #2655
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:51:47 +1100
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]> • #2654
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:43:47 -0700
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #2653
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:32:37 +1300
"Chris Double" <[email protected]> • #2652
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 03:29:55 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2651
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 03:06:42 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2650
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:35:56 -0400
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2649
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:17:03 +1100
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]> • #2648
Re: [stack] recursive combinators in other languages
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 07:45:39 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2647
Re: [stack] recursive combinators in other languages
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 13:45:24 +0530
rahul <[email protected]> • #2646
Re: [stack] recursive combinators in other languages
Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:26:29 -0400
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2645
[stack] recursive combinators in other languages
Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:48:25 -0000
"Rahul" <[email protected]> • #2644
Re: [stack] problems with high-level purely linear languages
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:32:02 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2643
Re: [stack] problems with high-level purely linear languages
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:53:31 -0700
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #2642
[stack] problems with high-level purely linear languages
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:12:03 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2641
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:43:13 -0700
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #2640
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:44:29 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2639
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:19:48 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2638
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:24:41 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2637
[stack] Re: disallowing recursive definitions
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Stan Katz <[email protected]> • #2636
[stack] Re: disallowing recursive definitions
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:35:03 -0000
"pml060912" <[email protected]> • #2635
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:58:22 +1100
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]> • #2634
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:19:18 +1100
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]> • #2633
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:54:17 +1100
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]> • #2632
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:58:49 +1100
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]> • #2631
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:41:30 +1100
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]> • #2630
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:11:45 +1100
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]> • #2629
Re: [stack] "tick" stack shuffling notation
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:59:08 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2628
Re: [stack] "tick" stack shuffling notation
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:09:59 -0600
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2627
Re: [stack] "tick" stack shuffling notation
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:04:52 -0600
"Daniel Ehrenberg" <[email protected]> • #2626
[stack] "tick" stack shuffling notation
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:17:15 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2625
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 16:56:54 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #2624
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 13:48:08 -0800
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #2623
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 16:31:01 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #2622
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 16:07:24 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #2621
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 12:29:22 -0800
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #2620
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 12:20:31 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2619
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:06:14 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #2618
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 12:00:18 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2617
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 11:58:45 -0800
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #2616
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 14:22:43 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #2615
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 10:14:21 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2614
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 22:12:27 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2613
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:37:16 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2612
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:15:56 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2611
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:45:39 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2610
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:11:27 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2609
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 15:57:08 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2608
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:30:02 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2607
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 12:18:15 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2606
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 12:13:18 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2605
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:47:01 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2604
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:41:51 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2603
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:26:05 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2602
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:19:16 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2601
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:15:56 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2600
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 08:42:13 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2599
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 08:36:27 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2598
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 08:19:22 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2597
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 11:03:52 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2596
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 11:02:37 -0500
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2595
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:52:31 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2594
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 10:40:21 -0500
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]> • #2593
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:30:48 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2592
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 07:20:38 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2591
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:11:25 -0500
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> • #2590
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 07:00:51 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #2589
Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 01:55:56 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #2588
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 21:33:54 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2587
Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 21:06:04 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #2586
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.