gmane.comp.lang.moo.general

37 articles on record, showing the most recent 37.

[ANN] GammaMOO 1.8.3+gamma0
Wed, 7 Mar 2012 21:31:32 -0500
"Luke-Jr" <[email protected]> • #38
[ANN] GammaMOO 1.8.3+gamma0.rc5
Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:47:28 -0500
"Luke-Jr" <[email protected]> • #37
[ANN] GammaMOO 1.8.3+gamma0.rc4
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:43:09 -0500
"Luke-Jr" <[email protected]> • #36
[ANN] GammaMOO 1.8.3+gamma0.rc3
Sat, 31 Dec 2011 17:08:23 -0500
"Luke-Jr" <[email protected]> • #35
GammaMOO 1.8.2g4r1
Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:30:01 -0500
Luke -Jr <[email protected]> • #34
They perform a similar function to their longer counterparts, but take up less code space.
Thu, 5 Jul 2007 20:53:48 +0200
"cookie Kreuger" <[email protected]> • #33
Using the C interface, I create my property page objects and add them to the client's property sheet.
Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:07:48 +0200
"Detlef Giglio" <[email protected]> • #32
Hot, news?
Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:18:16 -0300
"Kawoh SCHONFELD" <[email protected]> • #31
Unicode, GammaMoo ?
Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:37:48 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #29
Object versioning?
Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:26:08 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #28
Unicode, GammaMoo ?
Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:54:37 -0700
Will Coleda <[email protected]> • #27
FASD project: Online survey launched
Tue, 25 May 2004 10:00:45 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #26
Re: [Lambdamoo-server] GammaMOO
Sat, 01 May 2004 23:07:34 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> • #25
Re: [Lambdamoo-server] GammaMOO
Sat, 01 May 2004 23:07:09 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> • #24
Re: [Lambdamoo-server] GammaMOO
Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:46:12 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #23
Re: [Lambdamoo-server] GammaMOO
Sun, 11 Apr 2004 18:50:06 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> • #22
Re: [Lambdamoo-server] GammaMOO
Thu, 1 Apr 2004 07:01:16 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #21
Re: [Lambdamoo-server] GammaMOO
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:10:57 -0800
"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> • #20
GammaMOO
Sun, 7 Mar 2004 09:58:16 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #19
Re: Non-Printable Characters in Strings
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:38:33 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #18
Re: Non-Printable Characters in Strings
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 22:44:33 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #17
Re: Non-Printable Characters in Strings
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:01:52 +1300
Gavin Lambert <[email protected]> • #16
Re: Non-Printable Characters in Strings
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 06:19:13 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #15
Non-Printable Characters in Strings
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:51:15 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #14
LIST blocks/newlines (Was: Non-Database Format)
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:35:18 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #13
Re: Non-Database Format
Sat, 6 Dec 2003 22:59:46 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #12
Re: Non-Database Format
Sun, 07 Dec 2003 11:05:47 +1300
Gavin Lambert <[email protected]> • #11
Re: Non-Database Format
Sat, 6 Dec 2003 21:31:18 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #10
Re: Non-Database Format
Sun, 07 Dec 2003 09:46:00 +1300
Gavin Lambert <[email protected]> • #9
Re: Non-Database Format
Sat, 6 Dec 2003 16:37:48 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #8
Re: Non-Database Format
Sat, 06 Dec 2003 17:09:42 +1300
Gavin Lambert <[email protected]> • #7
Non-Database Format
Tue, 2 Dec 2003 22:35:20 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #6
Re: Re: Proposal: System Object Tree
Wed, 15 Oct 2003 17:41:27 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #5
Re: Re: Proposal: System Object Tree
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 02:45:01 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #4
Re: Re: Proposal: System Object Tree
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 19:13:51 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> • #3
Re: Proposal: System Object Tree
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 23:59:38 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #2
Proposal: System Object Tree
Tue, 9 Sep 2003 19:54:15 +0000
Luke-Jr <[email protected]> • #1