gmane.comp.php.drupal.devel archive

610 archived articles, newest first (page 6 of 7). Latest articles →

write a simple field type for CCK
Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:21:48 +0800
郭赞 <[email protected]> • #52033
Re: OOP
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:23:02 -0500
Matt Murphy <[email protected]> • #52032
Re: OOP
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:26:55 -0500
Earnie Boyd <[email protected]> • #52031
Re: OOP
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:27:40 -0600
Larry Garfield <[email protected]> • #52030
Re: OOP
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:59:29 -0500
Sam Tresler <[email protected]> • #52029
Re: OOP
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:46:55 +0200
Ashraf Amayreh <[email protected]> • #52028
Re: OOP
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:26:57 -0500
Sam Tresler <[email protected]> • #52027
Re: OOP
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:06:51 -0600
Larry Garfield <[email protected]> • #52026
OOP
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:52:39 +0200
Ashraf Amayreh <[email protected]> • #52025
Re: form_set_error and updating form values
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:55:20 +0000
Athanasios Velios <[email protected]> • #52024
Re: form_set_error and updating form values
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:00:22 +0000
Richard Burford <[email protected]> • #52023
Re: form_set_error and updating form values
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 07:32:40 -0500
Todd <[email protected]> • #52022
Re: form_set_error and updating form values
Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:09:24 +0000
Athanasios Velios <[email protected]> • #52021
Re: form_set_error and updating form values
Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:32:35 +0530
Mukesh Agarwal <[email protected]> • #52020
Re: form_set_error and updating form values
Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:27:19 +0000
Athanasios Velios <[email protected]> • #52019
Re: form_set_error and updating form values
Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:55:06 +0530
Mukesh Agarwal <[email protected]> • #52018
Re: form_set_error and updating form values
Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:23:14 +0000
Athanasios Velios <[email protected]> • #52017
core compatibility in .info files
Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:38:51 +0100
Christoph Burschka <[email protected]> • #52016
Re: form_set_error and updating form values
Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:57:42 +0530
Mukesh Agarwal <[email protected]> • #52015
form_set_error and updating form values
Mon, 20 Feb 2012 08:21:42 +0000
Athanasios Velios <[email protected]> • #52014
Re: check node_access for all nodes
Thu, 9 Feb 2012 13:47:44 -0600
Ken Rickard <[email protected]> • #52013
check node_access for all nodes
Mon, 6 Feb 2012 14:18:18 +0100
Lluís Forns <[email protected]> • #52012
Re: D7 notifications module... status?
Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:54:36 +0000
Joel Willers <[email protected]> • #52011
Re: D7 notifications module... status?
Fri, 3 Feb 2012 06:40:11 -0800
Bill Fitzgerald <[email protected]> • #52010
Re: D7 notifications module... status?
Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:05:05 -0500
Earnie Boyd <[email protected]> • #52009
Re: D7 notifications module... status?
Fri, 3 Feb 2012 05:34:27 -0800
Joel Farris <[email protected]> • #52008
Re: D7 notifications module... status?
Thu, 2 Feb 2012 07:28:25 -0500
Earnie Boyd <[email protected]> • #52007
Re: R: D7 notifications module... status?
Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:13:49 -0800
domenic santangelo <[email protected]> • #52006
Re: D7 notifications module... status?
Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:23:03 -0800
domenic santangelo <[email protected]> • #52005
R: D7 notifications module... status?
Wed, 1 Feb 2012 22:55:06 +0100
[email protected] • #52004
Re: D7 notifications module... status?
Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:50:19 -0500
Earnie Boyd <[email protected]> • #52003
D7 notifications module... status?
Wed, 1 Feb 2012 13:26:39 -0800
domenic santangelo <[email protected]> • #52002
html attributes not filtered and the effect of not filtering
Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:14:52 -0500
Walt Daniels <[email protected]> • #52001
Re: Experience with mod_fcgid
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:52:00 +0200
Ashraf Amayreh <[email protected]> • #52000
Re: Field for a View
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:02:02 +0530
Vaibhav Jain <[email protected]> • #51999
Re: Field for a View
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:27:11 +0200
Fred Jones <[email protected]> • #51998
Re: Field for a View
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:41:55 +0100
Erik Stielstra <[email protected]> • #51997
Re: Field for a View
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 21:39:19 +0200
Fred Jones <[email protected]> • #51996
Re: Field for a View
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:28:22 -0800 (PST)
"Ms. Nancy Wichmann" <[email protected]> • #51995
Field for a View
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 20:52:44 +0200
Fred Jones <[email protected]> • #51994
Re: Is a block used anywhere?
Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:08:13 -0600
Michael Favia <[email protected]> • #51993
Re: Is a block used anywhere?
5 Jan 2012 21:19:14 +0100
[email protected] • #51992
Re: Is a block used anywhere?
5 Jan 2012 21:19:06 +0100
[email protected] • #51991
Re: Is a block used anywhere?
5 Jan 2012 21:18:58 +0100
[email protected] • #51990
Re: Is a block used anywhere?
5 Jan 2012 21:18:51 +0100
[email protected] • #51989
Re: Is a block used anywhere?
5 Jan 2012 21:18:31 +0100
[email protected] • #51988
Re: Is a block used anywhere?
5 Jan 2012 21:18:25 +0100
[email protected] • #51987
Re: Is a block used anywhere?
5 Jan 2012 21:18:19 +0100
[email protected] • #51986
Re: Is a block used anywhere?
5 Jan 2012 21:18:12 +0100
[email protected] • #51985
Re: Is a block used anywhere?
5 Jan 2012 21:18:04 +0100
[email protected] • #51984
Re: Is a block used anywhere?
5 Jan 2012 21:17:55 +0100
[email protected] • #51983
Is a block used anywhere?
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:17:45 -0500
Walt Daniels <[email protected]> • #51982
Re: Views Pager
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:50:03 +0000
Joel Willers <[email protected]> • #51981
Re: Views Pager
Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:49:11 +0200
Tolga <[email protected]> • #51980
Re: Views Pager
4 Jan 2012 07:02:19 +0100
[email protected] • #51979
Re: Views Pager
4 Jan 2012 07:02:12 +0100
[email protected] • #51978
Re: Views Pager
4 Jan 2012 07:02:06 +0100
[email protected] • #51977
Re: Views Pager
4 Jan 2012 07:01:59 +0100
[email protected] • #51976
Re: Views Pager
4 Jan 2012 07:01:54 +0100
[email protected] • #51975
Re: Views Pager
4 Jan 2012 07:01:44 +0100
[email protected] • #51974
Re: Views Pager
4 Jan 2012 07:01:37 +0100
[email protected] • #51973
Re: Views Pager
4 Jan 2012 07:01:30 +0100
[email protected] • #51972
Re: Views Pager
4 Jan 2012 07:01:23 +0100
[email protected] • #51971
Re: Views Pager
4 Jan 2012 07:01:14 +0100
[email protected] • #51970
Views Pager
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 11:30:44 +0530
Vaibhav Jain <[email protected]> • #51969
Re: theme switching based on device & page cache
26 Dec 2011 08:24:48 +0100
[email protected] • #51968
Re: theme switching based on device & page cache
26 Dec 2011 08:24:38 +0100
[email protected] • #51967
Re: theme switching based on device & page cache
26 Dec 2011 08:24:31 +0100
[email protected] • #51966
Re: theme switching based on device & page cache
26 Dec 2011 08:24:22 +0100
[email protected] • #51965
Re: theme switching based on device & page cache
26 Dec 2011 08:24:17 +0100
[email protected] • #51964
Re: theme switching based on device & page cache
26 Dec 2011 08:24:10 +0100
[email protected] • #51963
Re: theme switching based on device & page cache
26 Dec 2011 08:24:02 +0100
[email protected] • #51962
Re: theme switching based on device & page cache
26 Dec 2011 08:23:56 +0100
[email protected] • #51961
Re: theme switching based on device & page cache
26 Dec 2011 08:23:48 +0100
[email protected] • #51960
Re: theme switching based on device & page cache
26 Dec 2011 08:23:34 +0100
[email protected] • #51959
theme switching based on device & page cache
Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:53:24 +0530
Deva <[email protected]> • #51958
Re: Activating additional fields
Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:37:08 +1000
"Yani" <[email protected]> • #51957
Re: Activating additional fields
Sat, 17 Dec 2011 18:31:02 -0800 (PST)
"Ms. Nancy Wichmann" <[email protected]> • #51956
Activating additional fields
Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:25:36 +1000
"Yani" <[email protected]> • #51955
Re: SOLR - multiple indexes on single site?
Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:00:15 +1100
Simon Hobbs <[email protected]> • #51954
Re: SOLR - multiple indexes on single site?
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:53:54 -0600
Jeff Hartman <[email protected]> • #51953
Re: SOLR - multiple indexes on single site?
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:52:03 -0500
Wesley Nichols <[email protected]> • #51952
SOLR - multiple indexes on single site?
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:22:48 -0600
Jeff Hartman <[email protected]> • #51951
Re: Experience with mod_fcgid
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:51:55 +0100
Peter Droogmans <[email protected]> • #51950
Re: Internet Out
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:49:27 -0700
Cameron Eagans <[email protected]> • #51949
Re: Experience with mod_fcgid
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:40:26 +0200
Ashraf Amayreh <[email protected]> • #51948
Internet Out
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:19:04 -0500
Aaron Winborn <[email protected]> • #51947
Re: Internet Out
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:02:03 -0500
Aaron Winborn <[email protected]> • #51946
Re: Experience with mod_fcgid
Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:28:22 +0000
António P. P. Almeida <[email protected]> • #51945
Re: Experience with mod_fcgid
Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:24:47 -0500
Matt Murphy <[email protected]> • #51944
Re: Experience with mod_fcgid
Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:15:06 -0800 (PST)
"Ms. Nancy Wichmann" <[email protected]> • #51943
Re: Experience with mod_fcgid
Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:38:03 +0100
Nikola Kotur <[email protected]> • #51942
Re: Experience with mod_fcgid
Tue, 13 Dec 2011 07:23:30 +0200
Ashraf Amayreh <[email protected]> • #51941
Experience with mod_fcgid
Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:34:15 +0200
Ashraf Amayreh <[email protected]> • #51940
Re: Should google-api-php-client be a library? (webmaster)
Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:26:41 -0600
Jimmy Berry <[email protected]> • #51939
Re: Should google-api-php-client be a library?
Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:50:02 +0100
webmaster <[email protected]> • #51938
Re: Is it not possible to have fields associated to entities that do not have bundles?
Thu, 8 Dec 2011 13:54:19 +0530
Mukesh Agarwal <[email protected]> • #51937
Is it not possible to have fields associated to entities that do not have bundles?
Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:56:02 +0530
Mukesh Agarwal <[email protected]> • #51936
Re: Should google-api-php-client be a library?
Tue, 6 Dec 2011 09:11:32 -0600
Jimmy Berry <[email protected]> • #51935
Re: development Digest, Vol 108, Issue 2
Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:15:29 -0600
Jimmy Berry <[email protected]> • #51934
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.