gmane.comp.web.zope.devel archive
9417 archived articles, newest first (page 68 of 95). Latest articles →
zope.testing / zope.testrunner path forward:
Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:32:39 +0100Re: Help review #181754
Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:15:38 +0200Re: Help review #181754
Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:01:35 +0200Help review #181754
Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:39:15 +0200Doodle for August bug day
Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:13:44 +0200Zope Tests: 40 OK, 13 Failed, 1 Unknown
Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:58:49 +0200 (CEST)Developer meeting 2010-07-20 at 15:00 UTC
Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:19:45 +0200Re: Zope Tests: 34 OK, 18 Failed, 2 Unknown
Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:16:49 +0300Re: Zope Tests: 34 OK, 18 Failed, 2 Unknown
Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:09:19 +0300Zope Tests: 34 OK, 18 Failed, 2 Unknown
Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:58:48 +0200 (CEST)Which bugtracker to use for z3c.formwidget
Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:18:37 +0200Re: ./bin/test failing with trunk zope.testing
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:25:40 -0400Re: ./bin/test failing with trunk zope.testing
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:58:50 +0200Re: ./bin/test failing with trunk zope.testing
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:56:00 +0200./bin/test failing with trunk zope.testing
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:50:50 +0200Zope Tests: 33 OK, 21 Failed, 2 Unknown
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 13:58:49 +0200 (CEST)Re: IRC meeting summaries from 2010-07-13 and 2010-07-06
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:02:50 +0900Re: IRC meeting summaries from 2010-07-13 and 2010-07-06
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:50:01 +0200Re: IRC meeting summaries from 2010-07-13 and 2010-07-06
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:43:26 +0900Re: IRC meeting summaries from 2010-07-13 and 2010-07-06
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:07:49 +0200Re: IRC meeting summaries from 2010-07-13 and 2010-07-06
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:27:47 +0900Re: IRC meeting summaries from 2010-07-13 and 2010-07-06
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:08:05 +0200Re: IRC meeting summaries from 2010-07-13 and 2010-07-06
Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:55:16 -0400Re: IRC meeting summaries from 2010-07-13 and 2010-07-06
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 02:26:01 +0900Zope Tests: 47 OK, 16 Failed, 2 Unknown
Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:58:49 +0200 (CEST)Re: Zope Tests: 47 OK, 17 Failed
Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:08:30 +0200Zope Tests: 38 OK, 21 Failed, 2 Unknown
Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:58:49 +0200 (CEST)IRC meeting summaries from 2010-07-13 and 2010-07-06
Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:28:40 +0200Re: ZEO TempStorage: Odd behavior on ZEO restart
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:29:20 +0200Re: ZEO TempStorage: Odd behavior on ZEO restart
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:03:16 +0300Zope Tests: 51 OK, 17 Failed, 2 Unknown
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:58:50 +0200 (CEST)Re: Zope 2.12.9 broke ZMySQLDA in the middle of a stable release series
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:39:41 +0200Re: Zope 2.12.9 broke ZMySQLDA in the middle of a stable release series
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:35:03 +0200Re: ZEO TempStorage: Odd behavior on ZEO restart
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 02:20:02 -0400Re: ZEO TempStorage: Odd behavior on ZEO restart
Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:59:29 -0300Re: ZEO TempStorage: Odd behavior on ZEO restart
Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:22:42 -0400Bug day report
Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:54:41 -0400Bug day report
Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:32:52 +0200Re: [Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/2.12/ - LP #143533: Instead of showing "0.0.0.0" as server name when no
Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:15:49 +0200Re: [Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/2.12/ - LP #143533: Instead of showing "0.0.0.0" as server name when no
Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:14:50 +0200Re: [Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/2.12/ - LP #143533: Instead of showing "0.0.0.0" as server name when no
Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:00:05 +0200Re: [Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/2.12/ - LP #143533: Instead of showing "0.0.0.0" as server name when no
Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:52:46 +0200Re: [Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/2.12/ - LP #143533: Instead of showing "0.0.0.0" as server name when no
Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:43:35 +0200Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.12/ - LP #143533: Instead of showing "0.0.0.0" as server name when no
Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:28:06 +0200Zope Tests: 46 OK, 16 Failed, 2 Unknown
Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:58:50 +0200 (CEST)Re: z3c.testsetup test faliure (was Re: Zope Tests: 55 OK, 18 Failed)
Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:58:51 +0530z3c.testsetup test faliure (was Re: Zope Tests: 55 OK, 18 Failed)
Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:57:48 +0530Re: Can ZTK 1.0 support Python 2.7?
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:26:16 -0400Re: Can ZTK 1.0 support Python 2.7?
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:24:03 -0400Re: Zope 2.12.9 broke ZMySQLDA in the middle of a stable release series
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:22:48 -0300Re: Can ZTK 1.0 support Python 2.7?
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:36:12 +0300Re: Can ZTK 1.0 support Python 2.7?
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:58:58 +0200Re: Can ZTK 1.0 support Python 2.7?
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:48:33 +0200Re: Can ZTK 1.0 support Python 2.7?
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:37:42 -0400Re: Can ZTK 1.0 support Python 2.7?
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:33:58 +0200Re: Zope 2.12.9 broke ZMySQLDA in the middle of a stable release series
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:46:29 +0200Re: Zope 2.12.9 broke ZMySQLDA in the middle of a stable release series
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:05:36 -0300Re: Zope 2.12.9 broke ZMySQLDA in the middle of a stable release series
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:03:58 +0200Re: Can ZTK 1.0 support Python 2.7?
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:59:44 +0200Re: Can ZTK 1.0 support Python 2.7?
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:47:49 +0200Re: Zope 2.12.9 broke ZMySQLDA in the middle of a stable release series
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:44:53 +0200Zope 2.12.9 broke ZMySQLDA in the middle of a stable release series
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:13:42 -0300Re: Can ZTK 1.0 support Python 2.7?
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:01:35 -0400Re: Can ZTK 1.0 support Python 2.7?
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:27:06 +0200Re: New releases of Zope2 (incl. a potential security fix)
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:24:23 +0200Re: Can ZTK 1.0 support Python 2.7?
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:23:17 +0200Re: Can ZTK 1.0 support Python 2.7?
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:16:47 +0200Re: New releases of Zope2 (incl. a potential security fix)
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:08:27 -0400Re: Can ZTK 1.0 support Python 2.7?
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:07:07 -0400Can ZTK 1.0 support Python 2.7?
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:12:01 +0200Zope Tests: 53 OK, 16 Failed, 3 Unknown
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:58:50 +0200 (CEST)New releases of Zope2 (incl. a potential security fix)
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:29:54 +0200DZUG conference 2010: Call for papers
Tue, 13 Jul 2010 07:56:13 +0200Developer meeting 2010-07-13 at 15:00 UTC
Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:14:19 +0200Re: Zope Tests: 47 OK, 17 Failed
Mon, 12 Jul 2010 09:29:58 -0400Zope Tests: 47 OK, 17 Failed
Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:01:09 +0200 (CEST)Re: Changelog of differences between ztk 1.0a1 and 1.0a2?
Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:26:11 +0200Re: Changelog of differences between ztk 1.0a1 and 1.0a2?
Mon, 12 Jul 2010 09:52:55 +0200Changelog of differences between ztk 1.0a1 and 1.0a2?
Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:42:47 +0200Re: Zope Toolkit - 1.0a1 release
Sun, 11 Jul 2010 14:17:27 -0400Re: Zope Tests: 55 OK, 18 Failed
Sun, 11 Jul 2010 14:19:58 +0200Zope Tests: 55 OK, 18 Failed
Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:59:08 +0200 (CEST)ZEO TempStorage: Odd behavior on ZEO restart
Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:41:16 +1000access to download.zope.org (for bluebream)
Sun, 11 Jul 2010 02:40:27 +0200Re: z3c.form: Problem with DictionaryField datamanger
Sun, 11 Jul 2010 02:07:56 +0800z3c.form: Problem with DictionaryField datamanger
Sat, 10 Jul 2010 19:56:28 +0200Zope Tests: 67 OK, 16 Failed
Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:59:46 +0200 (CEST)Re: Zope Toolkit - 1.0a1 release
Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:18:05 +0200Re: [zope2] Help needed with security checks and add views
Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:19:54 +0800Re: [zope2] Help needed with security checks and add views
Sat, 10 Jul 2010 12:16:46 +0200Re: [zope2] Help needed with security checks and add views
Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:14:45 +0800[zope2] Looking for a maintainer for ZSQLMethods / Shared.DC.ZRDB
Fri, 9 Jul 2010 23:36:27 +0200Re: Including Paste into the ZTK version list?
Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:24:00 +0200Re: Python 2.7 on the apfy buildbots
Fri, 9 Jul 2010 21:19:22 +0200Re: Python 2.7 on the apfy buildbots
Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:17:48 +0200Re: Python 2.7 on the apfy buildbots
Fri, 9 Jul 2010 21:10:06 +0200Python 2.7 on the apfy buildbots
Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:04:43 +0200Re: [ZTK] toolchain versions
Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:56:04 +0200Re: [ZTK] toolchain versions
Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:44:57 +0200[ZTK] toolchain versions
Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:37:07 +0200
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.