gmane.ietf.idn archive

1542 archived articles, newest first (page 12 of 16). Latest articles →

Re: Document Status?
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 15:10:39 +0200
"JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <[email protected]> • #552
Re: Document Status?
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 14:02:03 +0200
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #551
Re: Document Status?
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 17:37:18 +0800
"James Seng" <[email protected]> • #550
Re: Document Status?
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 05:06:10 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #549
Re: Document Status?
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 04:44:30 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #548
Re: Document Status?
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 23:45:43 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #547
Re: Document Status?
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 23:05:25 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #546
Re: Document Status?
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 07:39:18 +0200
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #545
Re: Document Status?
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 07:41:45 +0200
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #544
Re: Document Status?
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 21:39:49 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #543
Re: Document Status?
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 10:32:55 +0800
"James Seng" <[email protected]> • #542
Re: Document Status?
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:07:31 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #541
Re: Document Status?
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:38:31 -0700
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #540
Re: Document Status?
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 09:40:37 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #539
Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-faerber-i18n-email-netnews-names-00.txt
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 23:34:22 +0800
"James Seng" <[email protected]> • #538
Nomcom call for volunteers
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:44:44 -0400
Phil Roberts <[email protected]> • #537
Re: Document Status?
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 09:36:33 +0200 (CEST)
Erik Nordmark <[email protected]> • #536
RE: Document Status?
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:52:47 -0400
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #535
Re: Document Status?
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:36:56 +0800
"James Seng" <[email protected]> • #534
Document Status?
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:25:55 -0400
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #533
Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-stringprep-05.txt
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:18:53 -0700
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #532
Comment on Nameprep <draft-ietf-idn-nameprep-10.txt>
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:04:45 +0200 (CEST)
Erik Nordmark <[email protected]> • #531
Re: Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Sat, 27 Jul 2002 17:06:41 -0700
"Mark Davis" <[email protected]> • #530
Re: Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Sat, 27 Jul 2002 12:20:54 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #529
Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Sun, 28 Jul 2002 06:57:08 +0900
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #528
Re: Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Sat, 27 Jul 2002 07:51:09 -0700
"Mark Davis" <[email protected]> • #527
Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Sat, 27 Jul 2002 06:57:03 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #526
Re: Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Fri, 26 Jul 2002 21:17:47 -0700
"Mark Davis" <[email protected]> • #525
Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Sat, 27 Jul 2002 05:28:44 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #524
RE: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Fri, 26 Jul 2002 17:20:17 -0700
"Michel Suignard" <[email protected]> • #523
Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Thu, 25 Jul 2002 21:41:54 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #522
Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Thu, 25 Jul 2002 00:58:50 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #521
RE: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:38:29 -0400
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #520
Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 23:13:25 +0900 (JST)
Yoshiro YONEYA <[email protected]> • #519
Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 15:47:15 +0200 (CEST)
Erik Nordmark <[email protected]> • #518
Re: Re: proposed charter items for possible URI working group
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 21:02:05 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #517
Re: Re: proposed charter items for possible URI working group
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 02:39:47 +0900
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #516
Re: Re: proposed charter items for possible URI working group
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:49:23 -0700
liana Ye <[email protected]> • #515
Re: proposed charter items for possible URI working group
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 01:54:14 +0900
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #514
Fw: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:56:51 +0800
"James Seng" <[email protected]> • #513
Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Tue, 16 Jul 2002 07:47:23 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #512
Re: Re: Is space allowed in a hostname?
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:07:05 +0900
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #511
Re: Is space allowed in a hostname?
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:25:36 +0200
Dan Oscarsson <[email protected]> • #510
Re: Re: Is space allowed in a hostname?
Tue, 09 Jul 2002 13:00:25 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #509
Re: Re: Is space allowed in a hostname?
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:07:54 +0900
Soobok Lee <[email protected]> • #508
Re: Is space allowed in a hostname?
Tue, 09 Jul 2002 11:40:02 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #507
Re: Re: Is space allowed in a hostname?
Tue, 09 Jul 2002 11:13:29 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #506
Re: Is space allowed in a hostname?
Tue, 09 Jul 2002 17:04:53 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #505
Re: Re: Is space allowed in a hostname?
Tue, 09 Jul 2002 15:46:19 +0200
Dan Oscarsson <[email protected]> • #504
Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:27:49 -0400
"Edmon Chung" <[email protected]> • #503
Re: Re: Is space allowed in a hostname?
Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:55:06 -0700
liana Ye <[email protected]> • #502
Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:04:47 -0700
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #501
Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:37:38 -0400
"Edmon Chung" <[email protected]> • #500
Re: Re: Is space allowed in a hostname?
Mon, 08 Jul 2002 00:19:09 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #499
Re: Is space allowed in a hostname?
Sun, 7 Jul 2002 20:07:08 -0700
"Doug Ewell" <[email protected]> • #498
Comment on draft-hoffman-stringprep-04.txt
Fri, 05 Jul 2002 12:28:15 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #497
Re: Is space allowed in a hostname?
Mon, 08 Jul 2002 00:53:06 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #496
Re: Is space allowed in a hostname?
Sun, 07 Jul 2002 17:44:20 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #495
Re: Is space allowed in a hostname?
Sun, 7 Jul 2002 10:11:07 -0700
"Doug Ewell" <[email protected]> • #494
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-uri-02.txt
Sun, 07 Jul 2002 12:10:14 -0400
[email protected] • #493
Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:37:24 +0800 (SGT)
James Seng <[email protected]> • #492
Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Sun, 7 Jul 2002 09:58:17 -0400
"Edmon Chung" <[email protected]> • #491
Is space allowed in a hostname?
Sun, 07 Jul 2002 12:15:41 +0200
Dan Oscarsson <[email protected]> • #490
IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep
Sun, 7 Jul 2002 16:06:58 +0800
"James Seng" <[email protected]> • #489
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-10.txt
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:35:30 +0200 (CEST)
Erik Nordmark <[email protected]> • #488
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-10.txt
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 14:39:58 -0700
liana Ye <[email protected]> • #487
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-10.txt
Thu, 04 Jul 2002 12:22:22 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #486
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-10.txt
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 18:30:15 +0200 (CEST)
Erik Nordmark <[email protected]> • #485
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-10.txt
Thu, 04 Jul 2002 10:15:13 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #484
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-10.txt
Thu, 04 Jul 2002 17:04:59 +0200
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #483
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-10.txt
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 16:37:14 +0200 (CEST)
Erik Nordmark <[email protected]> • #482
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-10.txt
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 19:01:29 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #481
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-10.txt
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 09:37:43 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #480
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-10.txt
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 10:28:51 +0200 (CEST)
Erik Nordmark <[email protected]> • #479
Re: Problems in normalisation and matching
Tue, 2 Jul 2002 14:35:53 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #478
Re: Problems in normalisation and matching
Tue, 02 Jul 2002 08:30:53 +0200
Dan Oscarsson <[email protected]> • #477
Re: Problems in normalisation and matching
Tue, 2 Jul 2002 00:59:09 +0900
"Soobok Lee" <[email protected]> • #476
Re: Problems in normalisation and matching
Mon, 1 Jul 2002 23:06:37 +0800
"James Seng" <[email protected]> • #475
Re: Problems in normalisation and matching
Mon, 1 Jul 2002 14:01:28 +0900
"Soobok Lee" <[email protected]> • #474
Re: Problems in normalisation and matching
Sun, 30 Jun 2002 20:03:02 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #473
Re: Problems in normalisation and matching
Sun, 30 Jun 2002 19:09:49 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #472
Re: Problems in normalisation and matching
Mon, 1 Jul 2002 08:56:34 +0800
"James Seng" <[email protected]> • #471
Problems in normalisation and matching
Sun, 30 Jun 2002 14:49:10 +0200
Dan Oscarsson <[email protected]> • #470
Re: Last Call: Internationalizing Domain Names In Applications (IDNA) to Proposed Standard
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 17:55:01 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #469
Re: Last Call: Internationalizing Domain Names In Applications (IDNA) to Proposed Standard
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 08:51:09 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #468
draft-hall-dns-datatypes-00.txt
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 09:30:08 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #467
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-10.txt
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 09:19:47 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #466
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-nameprep-11.txt
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 06:38:10 -0400
[email protected] • #465
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-10.txt
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 06:38:25 -0400
[email protected] • #464
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 00:21:09 +0800
tsenglm@計網中心.中大.tw <[email protected]> • #463
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Mon, 24 Jun 2002 21:21:41 +0900
"Soobok Lee" <[email protected]> • #462
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Mon, 24 Jun 2002 07:27:26 -0400
"Edmon Chung" <[email protected]> • #461
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Mon, 24 Jun 2002 18:57:36 +0800
tsenglm@計網中心.中大.tw <[email protected]> • #460
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Sun, 23 Jun 2002 13:51:11 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #459
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Sat, 22 Jun 2002 18:28:57 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #458
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Sun, 23 Jun 2002 08:57:34 +0800
"James Seng" <[email protected]> • #457
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Sat, 22 Jun 2002 12:39:54 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #456
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Sun, 23 Jun 2002 02:43:14 +0900
"Soobok Lee" <[email protected]> • #455
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Sat, 22 Jun 2002 09:25:41 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #454
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Sun, 23 Jun 2002 00:38:05 +0900
"Soobok Lee" <[email protected]> • #453
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.