gmane.ietf.idn archive

1542 archived articles, newest first (page 13 of 16). Latest articles →

Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 20:14:32 -0400
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #452
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 20:04:18 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #451
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 22:05:15 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #450
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 15:54:21 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #449
Re: Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 11:41:34 -0400
tedd <[email protected]> • #448
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 15:03:48 +0200 (CEST)
Erik Nordmark <[email protected]> • #447
Re: Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 11:13:02 +0900
"Soobok Lee" <[email protected]> • #446
Re: Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 10:07:30 +0900
"Soobok Lee" <[email protected]> • #445
Re: [idn] eszet (ss, sz, ß, call it whatever you want)
Wed, 19 Jun 2002 17:07:48 +0200
"Georg Ochsner" <[email protected]> • #444
Re: Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 15:45:36 -0700
"Doug Ewell" <[email protected]> • #443
Re: Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 15:02:19 -0700
"Mark Davis" <[email protected]> • #442
Re: Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 21:30:11 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #441
Re: Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 13:51:33 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #440
Re: Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 10:01:09 -0700
"Doug Ewell" <[email protected]> • #439
Re: Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 09:05:04 -0700
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #438
Re: Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 08:05:26 -0700
"Mark Davis" <[email protected]> • #437
Re: Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 10:12:59 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #436
eszet (ss, sz, ß, call it whatever yo u want)
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 16:01:23 +0200
Codogno Maurizio <[email protected]> • #435
Re: Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 15:41:36 +0200
Dan Oscarsson <[email protected]> • #434
Re: Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 21:22:06 +0800
"James Seng" <[email protected]> • #433
Re: Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 11:41:10 +0200
Dan Oscarsson <[email protected]> • #432
Re: Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 21:32:36 -0700
"Doug Ewell" <[email protected]> • #431
Re: Liason statement from Unicode Consortium
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 18:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
Rick Wesson <[email protected]> • #430
Liason statement from Unicode Consortium
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 20:04:12 -0400
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #429
Re: Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 11:32:23 -0400
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #428
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 20:17:22 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #427
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:16:56 -0700
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #426
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 18:32:09 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #425
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 08:26:35 -0700
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #424
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 13:16:31 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #423
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 06:22:14 -0400
vint cerf <[email protected]> • #422
Re: When will IDNs go live?
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 03:33:48 -0400
"Edmon Chung" <[email protected]> • #421
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 13:44:41 +0900
"Soobok Lee" <[email protected]> • #420
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 19:03:05 -0400
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #419
Re: When will IDNs go live?
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 12:17:12 -0700
liana Ye <[email protected]> • #418
Re: When will IDNs go live?
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 08:38:46 +0800
"James Seng" <[email protected]> • #417
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 08:20:59 +0900
"Soobok Lee" <[email protected]> • #416
When will IDNs go live?
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 10:27:15 +0200
"Georg Ochsner" <[email protected]> • #415
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Sat, 15 Jun 2002 20:00:22 -0400
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #414
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 10:55:35 +0800
"James Seng" <[email protected]> • #413
Re: IDNA: a micro layer above DNS or DNS internationalization ? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Sat, 15 Jun 2002 14:24:22 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #412
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Sat, 15 Jun 2002 14:08:51 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #411
Re: IDNA applicability: per RR/Class or DNS-wide (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Sat, 15 Jun 2002 14:37:59 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #410
Re: One profile for domain names, or many?
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 20:48:55 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #409
Re: One profile for domain names, or many?
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 20:28:42 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #408
Re: One profile for domain names, or many?
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 23:40:12 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #407
Re: One profile for domain names, or many?
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 01:16:51 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #406
Re: One profile for domain names, or many?
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 19:42:07 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #405
Re: Preserve case for IDNs during transportation
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:44:38 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #404
Re: Preserve case for IDNs during transportation
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 20:19:39 -0400
"Edmon Chung" <[email protected]> • #403
Re: Preserve case for IDNs during transportation
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:08:22 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #402
Re: One profile for domain names, or many?
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 23:54:29 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #401
Re: Preserve case for IDNs during transportation
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 19:01:22 -0400
"Edmon Chung" <[email protected]> • #400
Re: One profile for domain names, or many?
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 17:39:39 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #399
Re: One profile for domain names, or many?
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 17:42:26 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #398
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 15:28:52 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #397
Re: One profile for domain names, or many?
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 21:53:56 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #396
Re: Preserve case for IDNs during transportation
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 21:09:09 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #395
Re: profiles and the i18n namespace
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:33:09 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #394
Re: One profile for domain names, or many?
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:29:02 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #393
profiles and the i18n namespace
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:15:51 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #392
Re: One profile for domain names, or many?
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:59:03 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #391
Re: One profile for domain names, or many?
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:20:17 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #390
Preserve case for IDNs during transportation
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:59:45 -0400
"Edmon Chung" <[email protected]> • #389
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:56:58 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #388
Comments???
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:30:43 -0400
tedd <[email protected]> • #387
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:02:38 +0200 (CEST)
Erik Nordmark <[email protected]> • #386
Re: One profile for domain names, or many?
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:03:20 +0200 (CEST)
Erik Nordmark <[email protected]> • #385
Re: One profile for domain names, or many?
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 03:13:22 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #384
Re: One profile for domain names, or many?
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 05:49:06 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #383
Re: One profile for domain names, or many?
Wed, 12 Jun 2002 22:58:19 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #382
One profile for domain names, or many?
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 00:28:10 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #381
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
Wed, 12 Jun 2002 03:12:34 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #380
Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 20:41:15 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #379
Re: IDNA applicability: per RR/Class or DNS-wide
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:19:57 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #378
Re: IDNA applicability: per RR/Class or DNS-wide
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 23:41:39 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #377
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 18:31:31 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #376
Re: IDNA applicability: per RR/Class or DNS-wide
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 17:21:16 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #375
Re: IDNA applicability: per RR/Class or DNS-wide
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 22:00:32 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #374
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 21:51:07 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #373
Re: dual mode
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:50:03 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #372
Re: some comments about draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 20:13:23 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #371
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:32:44 -0700
liana Ye <[email protected]> • #370
dual mode
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 20:39:37 +0200 (CEST)
Erik Nordmark <[email protected]> • #369
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:05:02 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #368
IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 09:59:36 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #367
IDNA: a micro layer above DNS or DNS internationalization ? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 08:39:52 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #366
IDNA applicability: per RR/Class or DNS-wide (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:38:15 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #365
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:46:24 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #364
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 09:39:10 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #363
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 09:24:37 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #362
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:14:56 +0200 (CEST)
Erik Nordmark <[email protected]> • #361
RE: some comments about draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:51:16 +0200
"Codogno Maurizio (Rozzano)" <[email protected]> • #360
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:57:19 +0200 (CEST)
Erik Nordmark <[email protected]> • #359
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 00:19:40 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #358
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 00:48:37 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #357
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Mon, 10 Jun 2002 22:41:21 -0500
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]> • #356
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Mon, 10 Jun 2002 20:31:08 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #355
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Mon, 10 Jun 2002 23:26:50 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #354
Re: some comments about draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 02:33:33 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #353
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.