gmane.ietf.mxcomp archive

373 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 23:20:48 +0200
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #5935
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 inconflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:31:54 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #5934
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:37:22 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #5933
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 21:51:00 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #5932
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:56:05 -0500
wayne <[email protected]> • #5931
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 21:49:13 +0200
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #5930
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 inconflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:44:03 -0700
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <[email protected]> • #5929
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 21:30:20 +0200
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #5928
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:29:52 -0700
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <[email protected]> • #5927
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:24:46 -0500
wayne <[email protected]> • #5926
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:14:58 -0700
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <[email protected]> • #5925
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 inconflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:12:24 -0700
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <[email protected]> • #5924
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:34:01 -0500
wayne <[email protected]> • #5923
Re: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:38:10 -0500
wayne <[email protected]> • #5922
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:27:12 -0500
wayne <[email protected]> • #5921
RE: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:22:17 -0400
Jeff Macdonald <[email protected]> • #5920
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:13:15 -0400
Andrew Newton <[email protected]> • #5919
Re: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:20:38 -0400
Dotzero <[email protected]> • #5918
Re: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:10:55 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #5917
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:49:37 -0700
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <[email protected]> • #5916
RE: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:23:41 -0700
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <[email protected]> • #5915
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:00:52 -0700
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> • #5914
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:56:21 +0100
Graham Murray <[email protected]> • #5913
Re: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:53:13 -0500
wayne <[email protected]> • #5912
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:45:17 -0400
Andrew Newton <[email protected]> • #5911
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:59:29 -0500
wayne <[email protected]> • #5910
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 MARID <[email protected]>
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:53:38 -0400
Andrew Newton <[email protected]> • #5909
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 MARID <[email protected]>
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:15:13 +0200
Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]> • #5908
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:47:17 -0400
Andrew Newton <[email protected]> • #5907
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:21:09 -0700
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> • #5906
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:58:48 -0400
Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> • #5905
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:25:29 +0200
Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]> • #5904
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:08:46 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #5903
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:06:21 -0400
Bill Sommerfeld <[email protected]> • #5902
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #5901
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:08:39 -0400
Bill Sommerfeld <[email protected]> • #5900
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:14:39 -0700
Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[email protected]> • #5899
Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 00:45:26 +0200
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #5898
FUD in Meng's "What To Do"
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:51:12 -0700
Matthew Elvey <[email protected]> • #5897
Re: Research question: How many legitimate mail sources are out there?
Sat, 13 Aug 2005 21:02:57 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #5896
Re: Research question: How many legitimate mail sources are out there?
14 Aug 2005 00:41:02 -0000
John Levine <[email protected]> • #5895
Re: Research question: How many legitimate mail sources are out there?
Sat, 13 Aug 2005 20:17:56 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #5894
Re: Research question: How many legitimate mail sources are out there?
Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:40:01 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #5893
Research question: How many legitimate mail sources are out there?
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 21:09:02 -0700
Matthew Elvey <[email protected]> • #5892
Re: DNA
Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:52:35 -0400
John Leslie <[email protected]> • #5891
Re: DNA
Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:11:35 -0400
John Leslie <[email protected]> • #5890
Re: DNA
Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:23:45 +0200
Kjetil Torgrim Homme <[email protected]> • #5889
Re: DNA
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:31:58 -0400
John Leslie <[email protected]> • #5888
Re: A New Great Anti-Spam Tool??
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:49:07 -0400
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #5887
Re: A New Great Anti-Spam Tool??
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
"william(at)elan.net" <[email protected]> • #5886
A New Great Anti-Spam Tool??
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:48:23 -0400
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #5885
RE: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:16:59 -0400
"Scott Kitterman" <[email protected]> • #5884
Re: DNA
Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:10:41 +0200
Kjetil Torgrim Homme <[email protected]> • #5883
Re: DNA
Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:39:31 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #5882
Re: DNA
Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:10:00 +0200
Kjetil Torgrim Homme <[email protected]> • #5881
DNA (was: Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID)
Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:23:36 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #5880
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:17:33 +0200
Kjetil Torgrim Homme <[email protected]> • #5879
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:52:05 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #5878
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:12:21 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #5877
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Sat, 23 Jul 2005 04:54:36 -0700
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> • #5876
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:58:04 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #5875
Re: SPF and SenderID
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 22:23:49 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #5874
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:15:04 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #5873
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:04:50 -0700
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> • #5872
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:01:39 -0700
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> • #5871
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 21:55:03 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #5870
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:18:02 +0200
Kjetil Torgrim Homme <[email protected]> • #5869
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 08:07:23 -0400
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #5868
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 07:54:46 -0400
John Leslie <[email protected]> • #5867
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 07:43:42 -0400
John Leslie <[email protected]> • #5866
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 07:37:33 -0400
John Leslie <[email protected]> • #5865
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:51:50 +0200
Kjetil Torgrim Homme <[email protected]> • #5864
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:24:28 +0200
Kjetil Torgrim Homme <[email protected]> • #5863
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:11:10 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #5862
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 21:36:45 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #5861
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
gconnor <[email protected]> • #5860
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:59:16 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #5859
Re: SPF and SenderID
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 01:48:52 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #5858
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:42:58 -0400
John Leslie <[email protected]> • #5857
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:51:04 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #5856
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 21:35:16 +0200
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #5855
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:15:24 -0400
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #5854
RE: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:43:43 -0400
"Scott Kitterman" <[email protected]> • #5853
CSV, DKIM, SPF, reputation (was: SPF and SenderID)
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:31:54 +0200
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #5852
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:16:54 +0200
Kjetil Torgrim Homme <[email protected]> • #5851
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:50:14 -0700
Greg Connor <[email protected]> • #5850
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:18:12 -0700
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> • #5849
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
"Greg Connor" <[email protected]> • #5848
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:12:25 -0700
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> • #5847
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 22:59:14 -0700
Greg Connor <[email protected]> • #5846
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 04:33:12 -0700
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> • #5845
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 04:35:04 -0700
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> • #5844
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:12:57 -0400
Terry Fielder <[email protected]> • #5843
Re: Interesting CAM SPAM court case as it relates to 2821 vs 2822
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:02:57 -0400
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #5842
RE: Interesting CAM SPAM court case as it relates to 2821 vs 2822
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:27:40 -0400
"John Glube" <[email protected]> • #5841
Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:56:33 -0700
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> • #5840
Re: FYI: Interesting CAM SPAM court case as it relates to 2821 vs 2822
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:08:59 -0400
Michael Hammer <[email protected]> • #5839
FYI: Interesting CAM SPAM court case as it relates to 2821 vs 2822
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:46:56 -0400
"Hector Santos" <[email protected]> • #5838
Re: SPF and SenderID
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
"william(at)elan.net" <[email protected]> • #5837
Re: SPF and SenderID
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:27:42 -0700
Ted Hardie <[email protected]> • #5836
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.