gmane.ietf.sipping archive

372 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:08:34 -0400
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #16392
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:52:24 +0800
[email protected] • #16391
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:33:51 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16390
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:23:25 +0200
Hans Erik van Elburg <[email protected]> • #16389
答复: RE: Is SDP in an unreliabl e response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:14:26 +0800
[email protected] • #16388
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:08:09 +0800
[email protected] • #16387
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:09:55 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16386
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:55:15 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16385
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:48:16 +0800
[email protected] • #16384
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:44:45 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16383
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:38:57 +0900
OKUMURA Shinji <[email protected]> • #16382
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:21:50 +0800
[email protected] • #16381
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:51:07 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16380
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:33:43 +0800
[email protected] • #16379
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:23:39 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16378
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:44:47 +0900
OKUMURA Shinji <[email protected]> • #16377
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:15:04 +0900
OKUMURA Shinji <[email protected]> • #16376
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:58:04 +0800
[email protected] • #16375
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:34:03 +0800
[email protected] • #16374
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:18:43 +0800
[email protected] • #16373
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:17:15 +0800
[email protected] • #16372
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:26:06 +0800
[email protected] • #16371
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:36:19 +0800
[email protected] • #16370
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:53:17 +0200
Hans Erik van Elburg <[email protected]> • #16369
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:13:39 -0700
Anders Kristensen <[email protected]> • #16368
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:55:42 +0200
"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <[email protected]> • #16367
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:42:57 -0700
Brett Tate <[email protected]> • #16366
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:04:45 -0400
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #16365
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:00:50 -0500
"Kevin P. Fleming" <[email protected]> • #16364
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:47:58 -0400
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #16363
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:08:54 +0200
"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <[email protected]> • #16362
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:46:40 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16361
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:36:40 +0900
OKUMURA Shinji <[email protected]> • #16360
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:42:02 +0900
OKUMURA Shinji <[email protected]> • #16359
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:27:33 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16358
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:42:34 +0900
OKUMURA Shinji <[email protected]> • #16357
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:11:36 +0900
OKUMURA Shinji <[email protected]> • #16356
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:54:52 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16355
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:32:29 -0700
Brett Tate <[email protected]> • #16354
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:22:58 -0400
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #16353
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:14:18 -0400
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #16352
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:51:56 -0700
Brett Tate <[email protected]> • #16351
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:54:08 -0700
Brett Tate <[email protected]> • #16350
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:40:19 -0500
"Kevin P. Fleming" <[email protected]> • #16349
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:36:09 -0400
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #16348
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:26:37 -0400
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #16347
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:09:10 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16346
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:55:41 +0200
Hans Erik van Elburg <[email protected]> • #16345
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:55:26 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16344
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:50:18 +0900
OKUMURA Shinji <[email protected]> • #16343
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:32:12 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16342
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:16:25 +0900
OKUMURA Shinji <[email protected]> • #16341
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:20:52 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16340
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:07:05 +0900
OKUMURA Shinji <[email protected]> • #16339
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:59:45 +0900
OKUMURA Shinji <[email protected]> • #16338
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 09:26:31 -0700
Brett Tate <[email protected]> • #16337
Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:25:34 -0700
Anders Kristensen <[email protected]> • #16336
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:16:10 -0400
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #16335
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:05:31 -0400
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #16334
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:48:35 -0400
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #16333
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:22:36 -0400
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #16332
Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:14:28 -0400
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #16331
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:45:28 +0800
Eric wang <[email protected]> • #16330
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:32:24 +0800
Eric wang <[email protected]> • #16329
Re: About offeranswer draft: //Is this violation of RFC3261
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:40:39 +0800
[email protected] • #16328
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:06:45 +0800
[email protected] • #16327
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:00:43 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16326
答复: RE: RE: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:44:48 +0800
[email protected] • #16325
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:24:33 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16324
答复: RE: About offeranswer draf t:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:48:35 +0800
[email protected] • #16323
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:47:18 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16322
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:43:58 +0800
[email protected] • #16321
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:39:05 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16320
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:29:27 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16319
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:16:30 +0800
[email protected] • #16318
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:49:31 +0800
Eric wang <[email protected]> • #16317
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:43:43 +0800
[email protected] • #16316
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:39:12 +0900
OKUMURA Shinji <[email protected]> • #16315
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:36:22 +0800
[email protected] • #16314
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:56:18 +0800
Eric wang <[email protected]> • #16313
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:15:51 -0400
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #16312
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:55:27 +0200
"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <[email protected]> • #16311
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:26:25 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16310
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:16:44 +0200
Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> • #16309
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:10:27 -0400
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #16308
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:59:50 -0400
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #16307
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:42:03 -0400
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #16306
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:29:41 +0800
Eric wang <[email protected]> • #16305
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:11:44 +0800
[email protected] • #16304
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:07:02 +0800
[email protected] • #16303
[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3398 (2161)
Tue, 13 Apr 2010 03:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #16302
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:04:13 +0900
OKUMURA Shinji <[email protected]> • #16301
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:40:17 +0800
Eric wang <[email protected]> • #16300
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:17:47 +0800
Eric wang <[email protected]> • #16299
答复: Re: About offeranswer draf t:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:14:09 +0800
[email protected] • #16298
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:07:08 +0900
OKUMURA Shinji <[email protected]> • #16297
Re : Re: About offeranswer draft:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:42:48 +0800
[email protected] • #16296
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:22:59 +0900
OKUMURA Shinji <[email protected]> • #16295
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:20:09 +0900
OKUMURA Shinji <[email protected]> • #16294
Re: About offeranswer draft:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:50:52 +0800
Eric wang <[email protected]> • #16293
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.