gmane.ietf.xml-mime archive

433 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 5). Latest articles →

Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 11:04:11 -0400
[email protected] • #883
Re: transcoding nearly certainly wrong?
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:02:05 -0400
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #882
RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:11:09 -0400
Francois Yergeau <[email protected]> • #881
RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:08:42 -0400
Francois Yergeau <[email protected]> • #880
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 15:41:27 +0200
Bjoern Hoehrmann <[email protected]> • #879
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 21:25:06 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #878
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 21:10:52 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #877
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 20:54:01 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #875
transcoding nearly certainly wrong?
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 23:36:41 -0700
Larry Masinter <[email protected]> • #874
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:28:53 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #873
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 03:50:11 +0200
Bjoern Hoehrmann <[email protected]> • #872
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:37:50 -0700
Tim Bray <[email protected]> • #871
RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:53:30 -0400
"Simon St.Laurent" <[email protected]> • #870
RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:16:48 -0400
Francois Yergeau <[email protected]> • #869
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:45:27 GMT
Christoph Schneegans <[email protected]> • #868
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 08:17:05 -0400
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #867
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 22:44:04 -0700
Tim Bray <[email protected]> • #866
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
17 Sep 2003 21:54:07 -0600
"C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <[email protected]> • #865
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 02:42:53 +0200
Bjoern Hoehrmann <[email protected]> • #864
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 08:34:21 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #863
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 08:34:30 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #862
RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:10:53 -0400
Francois Yergeau <[email protected]> • #861
RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:04:12 -0400
Francois Yergeau <[email protected]> • #860
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:55:41 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #859
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:38:47 -0700
Tim Bray <[email protected]> • #858
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 01:30:54 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #857
Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 10:50:11 -0700
Tim Bray <[email protected]> • #856
re: updated: RDF/XML Media Type registration draft
Sat, 23 Aug 2003 00:15:37 -0700
Larry Masinter <[email protected]> • #855
updated: RDF/XML Media Type registration draft
7 Aug 2003 15:26:23 -0500
"Aaron Swartz" <[email protected]> • #854
for review: RDF/XML Media Type registration draft
24 Jul 2003 10:01:47 -0500
"Aaron Swartz" <[email protected]> • #853
Alternate serializations of XML?
Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:31:41 -0700
"Mark Nottingham" <[email protected]> • #852
Re: Request for advice: sbml+xml Media Type
Sun, 6 Jul 2003 21:52:15 -0400
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #851
Re: Request for advice: sbml+xml Media Type
Sat, 5 Jul 2003 01:33:04 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #850
Request for advice: sbml+xml Media Type
Fri, 4 Jul 2003 20:22:00 -0700
Ben Kovitz <[email protected]> • #849
Re: Please review ietf-draft of the "application/soap+xml" media type
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 18:12:40 -0400
[email protected] • #848
Re: Please review ietf-draft of the "application/soap+xml" media type
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:03:38 -0400
[email protected] • #847
Please review ietf-draft of the "application/soap+xml" media type
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 15:43:11 +0200 (MEST)
Yves Lafon <[email protected]> • #846
Re: draft-freed-mime-p4-00.txt
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:45:29 -0500
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #845
Re: draft-freed-mime-p4-00.txt
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:56:54 -0500
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #844
Re: draft-freed-mime-p4-00.txt
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 23:00:16 +0100
Chris Lilley <[email protected]> • #843
Re: draft-freed-mime-p4-00.txt
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:41:58 +0100
Chris Lilley <[email protected]> • #842
Re: draft-freed-mime-p4-00.txt
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:14:51 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] • #841
Re: draft-freed-mime-p4-00.txt
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:02:41 -0500
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #840
Re: draft-freed-mime-p4-00.txt
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:42:20 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] • #839
Re: draft-freed-mime-p4-00.txt
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:46:31 -0500 (EST)
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #838
Re: draft-freed-mime-p4-00.txt
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:19:39 -0500
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #837
draft-freed-mime-p4-00.txt
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:54:17 -0800
"Dan Kohn" <[email protected]> • #836
ABNF srgs
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 21:30:40 -0800
"Dan Kohn" <[email protected]> • #835
Re: CORRECTION: Please review ietf-draft of SMIL media-type registration
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 16:02:07 +0200
Philipp Hoschka <[email protected]> • #834
Please review ietf-draft of SMIL media-type registration
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:42:55 +0200
Philipp Hoschka <[email protected]> • #833
Re: draft-reagle-xenc-mediatype-01.txt
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:51:00 -0500
Aaron Swartz <[email protected]> • #832
Re: draft-reagle-xenc-mediatype-01.txt
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:19:58 +0900
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #831
Re: draft-reagle-xenc-mediatype-01.txt
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:58:25 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #830
Re: draft-reagle-xenc-mediatype-01.txt
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:47:37 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #829
RE: draft-reagle-xenc-mediatype-01.txt
Fri, 09 Aug 2002 12:45:14 +0900
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #827
Re: draft-reagle-xenc-mediatype-01.txt
Fri, 09 Aug 2002 12:14:13 +0900
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #826
Re: draft-reagle-xenc-mediatype-01.txt
Fri, 09 Aug 2002 12:27:56 +0900
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #825
RE: draft-reagle-xenc-mediatype-01.txt
Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:07:18 -0700
"Larry Masinter" <[email protected]> • #824
Re: draft-reagle-xenc-mediatype-01.txt
Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:00:28 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #823
draft-reagle-xenc-mediatype-01.txt
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 14:38:57 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #822
Re: [Fwd: announcing [email protected]]
Thu, 06 Jun 2002 10:54:30 -0400
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #820
[Fwd: announcing [email protected]]
Thu, 06 Jun 2002 09:53:34 -0400
"Simon St.Laurent" <[email protected]> • #819
Request to publish ietf-draft of XML Encryption media-type registration
Wed, 5 Jun 2002 17:21:55 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #818
Re: dangers of application/xml
Sat, 1 Jun 2002 15:24:22 -0400
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #817
RE: dangers of application/xml
Thu, 30 May 2002 23:39:12 -0700
"Larry Masinter" <[email protected]> • #816
RE: dangers of application/xml
Thu, 30 May 2002 23:21:37 -0700
"Dan Kohn" <[email protected]> • #815
Re: Draft registration for application/xenc+xml
Fri, 24 May 2002 12:22:16 -0700
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #814
Re: Draft registration for application/xenc+xml
Fri, 24 May 2002 14:39:04 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #813
Re: Draft registration for application/xenc+xml
Fri, 24 May 2002 14:40:53 -0400
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #812
Re: Draft registration for application/xenc+xml
Fri, 24 May 2002 14:13:59 -0400
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> • #811
Re: Draft registration for application/xenc+xml
Fri, 24 May 2002 13:22:21 -0400
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #810
Re: Draft registration for application/xenc+xml
Fri, 24 May 2002 09:21:35 -0700
Tim Bray <[email protected]> • #809
Re: application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:30:19 -0400
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #808
Re: application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 21:06:47 -0700
Paul Prescod <[email protected]> • #807
Re: application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 23:30:00 -0400
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #806
Re: application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:41:35 -0700
Paul Prescod <[email protected]> • #805
Re: application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:05:18 -0700
Tim Bray <[email protected]> • #804
Re: application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:01:43 -0700
Tim Bray <[email protected]> • #803
Re: application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 17:48:57 -0700
Tim Bray <[email protected]> • #802
Re: application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:04:29 -0400
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #801
Re: application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 15:32:42 +0900
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #800
Re: application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
Wed, 17 Apr 2002 22:34:14 -0700
Tim Bray <[email protected]> • #799
Re: application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
17 Apr 2002 23:03:51 -0400
"Simon St.Laurent" <[email protected]> • #798
Re: application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
Wed, 17 Apr 2002 22:27:39 -0400
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #797
Re: application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
Wed, 17 Apr 2002 20:37:56 -0400
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #796
Re: application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
17 Apr 2002 18:14:17 -0400
"Simon St.Laurent" <[email protected]> • #795
Re: application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
Wed, 17 Apr 2002 16:59:33 -0400
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #794
Re: application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
17 Apr 2002 16:41:17 -0400
"Simon St.Laurent" <[email protected]> • #793
Re: application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
Wed, 17 Apr 2002 16:28:18 -0400
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #792
application/xml in ietf-xml-guidelines
Wed, 17 Apr 2002 14:57:30 -0400
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #791
"Guidelines for the Use of XML in IETF Protocols"
Sat, 6 Apr 2002 11:47:48 -0800
"Larry Masinter" <[email protected]> • #790
updated xmlns media feature
28 Feb 2002 15:48:53 -0500
"Simon St.Laurent" <[email protected]> • #789
Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns
Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:59:07 -0500 (EST)
Ian Graham <[email protected]> • #788
Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns
Tue, 19 Feb 2002 22:24:59 -0500 (EST)
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #787
Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns
Tue, 19 Feb 2002 17:29:56 -0800
Mark Nottingham <[email protected]> • #786
Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns
19 Feb 2002 21:28:05 -0500
"Simon St.Laurent" <[email protected]> • #785
Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns
Tue, 19 Feb 2002 17:07:48 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] • #784
Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns
Tue, 19 Feb 2002 17:06:28 -0800
Mark Nottingham <[email protected]> • #783
Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns
Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:43:33 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] • #782
Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns
Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:20:07 -0800
Mark Nottingham <[email protected]> • #781
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.