gmane.ietf.xml-mime archive

433 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 5). Latest articles →

Fw: Re: XML media types, charset, TAG findings
Fri, 08 Oct 2004 10:49:24 +0900
[email protected] • #983
Proposed media type registration: application/wsdl+xml
Mon, 04 Oct 2004 12:06:02 -0400
David Booth <[email protected]> • #982
Re: Request for comments for Media Type registration ofapplication/ccxml+xml
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:48:28 +0500
Al Gilman <[email protected]> • #981
Please review: DRAFT Registration of application/samlmetadata+xml
Wed, 01 Sep 2004 09:10:55 -0700
[email protected] • #980
Please review: DRAFT Reg of application/samlassertion+xml
Wed, 01 Sep 2004 09:06:50 -0700
[email protected] • #979
Submission of the application/xop+xml Media Type
Thu, 2 Sep 2004 16:38:31 +0200 (MEST)
Yves Lafon <[email protected]> • #978
Re: Request for comments for Media Type registration ofapplication/ccxml+xml
Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:34:30 +0500
Al Gilman <[email protected]> • #977
1
Sat, 28 Aug 2004 02:43:46 +0800
"Eve.maler" <[email protected]> • #976
Re: Hi
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:41:16 +0530
"Eve.maler" <[email protected]> • #975
RE: Message Notify
Sat, 14 Aug 2004 22:23:22 +0530
"Eve.maler" <[email protected]> • #974
Re: Request for comments for Media Type registration ofapplication/ccxml+xml
Sat, 31 Jul 2004 13:50:44 -0400
Al Gilman <[email protected]> • #973
Re: Request for comments for Media Type registration ofapplication/ccxml+xml
Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:54:33 -0400
Al Gilman <[email protected]> • #972
Re: Request for comments for Media Type registration ofapplication/ccxml+xml
Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:54:40 +0900
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #971
Re: Request for comments for Media Type registration ofapplication/ccxml+xml
Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:03:56 +0900
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #970
Re: Request for comments for Media Type registration of application/ccxml+xml
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:37:38 -0700
RJ Auburn <[email protected]> • #969
Re: Request for comments for Media Type registration of application/ccxml+xml
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:05:56 -0700
RJ Auburn <[email protected]> • #968
Re: Request for comments for Media Type registration of application/ccxml+xml
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:18:37 -0700
RJ Auburn <[email protected]> • #967
Fw: Re: Fw: Revising RFC 3023
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:12:14 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #966
Revising RFC 3023
Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:43:07 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #965
An I-D for text/xml, application/xml, etc.
Sun, 25 Jul 2004 09:25:41 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #964
Re: Request for comments for Media Type registration of application/ccxml+xml
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:08:24 +0200
Chris Lilley <[email protected]> • #963
Re: Request for comments for Media Type registration of application/ccxml+xml
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:05:32 +0200
Chris Lilley <[email protected]> • #962
RE: Request for comments for Media Type registration of application/ccxml+xml
Wed, 21 Jul 2004 22:03:48 -0700
Larry Masinter <[email protected]> • #961
Submission: "The 'application/ssml+xml' Media Type" : ietf-xml-mime
Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:35:53 +0200
Max Froumentin <[email protected]> • #960
Request for comments for Media Type registration of application/ccxml+xml
Wed, 21 Jul 2004 07:26:35 -0700
RJ Auburn <[email protected]> • #959
Submission of the application/soap_xop+xml Media Mype
Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:45:58 +0200 (MEST)
Yves Lafon <[email protected]> • #958
Site changes
Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:12:50 +0530
"Eve.maler" <[email protected]> • #957
Notification
Mon, 12 Jul 2004 22:09:20 +0530
"Eve.maler" <[email protected]> • #956
Re: Yahoo!
Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:29:10 +0530
"Eve.maler" <[email protected]> • #955
Forum notify
Sat, 10 Jul 2004 14:29:59 +0530
"Eve.maler" <[email protected]> • #954
Incoming message
Sat, 10 Jul 2004 01:38:57 +0530
"Eve.maler" <[email protected]> • #953
Re: Hi
Fri, 09 Jul 2004 00:02:05 +0530
"Eve.maler" <[email protected]> • #952
Re: Thank you!
Thu, 08 Jul 2004 13:28:01 +0530
"Eve.maler" <[email protected]> • #951
Re: Document
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:12:47 +0800
[email protected] • #950
Weah, hello! :-)
Tue, 02 Mar 2004 17:55:15 +0800
[email protected] • #949
Opera results for dispatch tests, plus comments and new test.
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 19:10:04 +0100
Chris Lilley <[email protected]> • #948
Test
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:23:28 +0100
Chris Lilley <[email protected]> • #947
Re: Application dispatch for application/xml
Sun, 25 Jan 2004 21:38:54 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #946
Re: Application dispatch for application/xml
Sun, 25 Jan 2004 13:35:48 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #945
Application dispatch for application/xml
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 23:26:56 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #944
RE: application/xml+rpc
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:38:40 -0800
Larry Masinter <[email protected]> • #943
RE: application/xml+rpc
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:27:41 -0800
Larry Masinter <[email protected]> • #942
Re: application/xml+rpc
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:51:04 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #941
Re: application/xml+rpc
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:55:28 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #940
Re: application/xml+rpc
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:53:04 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #939
Re: proposed media type registration: application/voicexml+xml
Sat, 20 Dec 2003 23:52:56 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #938
Re: proposed media type registration: application/voicexml+xml
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:55:31 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #937
Re: proposed media type registration: application/voicexml+xml
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:24:29 -0500
Mark Baker <[email protected]> • #936
Re: proposed media type registration: application/voicexml+xml
Sat, 20 Dec 2003 00:20:01 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #935
Re: proposed media type registration: application/voicexml+xml
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:56:29 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #934
Re: proposed media type registration: application/voicexml+xml
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:30:44 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #933
Re: proposed media type registration: application/voicexml+xml
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:40:39 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #932
Re: proposed media type registration: application/voicexml+xml
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:12:56 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #931
RE: proposed media type registration: application/voicexml+xml
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:41:19 -0500
Francois Yergeau <[email protected]> • #930
Re: proposed media type registration: application/voicexml+xml
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:32:59 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #929
Re: Internet draft for sbml+xml media type
Fri, 24 Oct 2003 19:32:07 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #928
Re: Internet draft for sbml+xml media type
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:52:44 -0700
Ben Kovitz <[email protected]> • #927
Re: Internet draft for sbml+xml media type
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:36:47 -0700
Tim Bray <[email protected]> • #926
Re: Internet draft for sbml+xml media type
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:17:18 -0700
Ben Kovitz <[email protected]> • #925
Re: Internet draft for sbml+xml media type
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 13:50:55 -0700
Ben Kovitz <[email protected]> • #924
Re: Internet draft for sbml+xml media type
Thu, 9 Oct 2003 21:04:57 +0200
Chris Lilley <[email protected]> • #923
Internet draft for sbml+xml media type
Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:42:04 -0700
Ben Kovitz <[email protected]> • #922
Re: AddDefaultCharset considered harmful (Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023)
Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:45:42 -0700
Tim Bray <[email protected]> • #921
AddDefaultCharset considered harmful (Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023)
Thu, 25 Sep 2003 16:22:20 -0400
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #920
RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:20:38 -0700
"Addison Phillips [wM]" <[email protected]> • #919
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:59:23 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #918
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:50:02 -0400
"Addison Phillips [wM]" <[email protected]>(by way of Martin Duerst <[email protected]>) • #917
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:45:38 -0400
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #916
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:31:08 -0400
Karl Dubost <[email protected]> • #915
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:56:02 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #914
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
21 Sep 2003 22:06:30 -0500
"Aaron Swartz" <[email protected]> • #913
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Sun, 21 Sep 2003 20:25:45 -0400
"Simon St.Laurent" <[email protected]> • #912
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:08:11 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #911
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
21 Sep 2003 10:52:33 -0500
"Aaron Swartz" <[email protected]> • #910
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:46:49 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #909
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
21 Sep 2003 10:42:22 -0500
"Aaron Swartz" <[email protected]> • #908
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:37:18 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #907
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Sun, 21 Sep 2003 10:04:36 -0400
Elliotte Rusty Harold <[email protected]> • #906
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Sun, 21 Sep 2003 21:08:12 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #905
Re: transcoding nearly certainly wrong?
Sat, 20 Sep 2003 13:08:50 -0700
Tim Bray <[email protected]> • #904
Re: transcoding nearly certainly wrong?
Sat, 20 Sep 2003 21:57:42 +0200
Bert Bos <[email protected]> • #903
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Sat, 20 Sep 2003 09:26:15 +0900
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> • #902
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 23:27:45 +0200
Bjoern Hoehrmann <[email protected]> • #901
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 17:02:15 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #900
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 16:29:55 -0400
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #899
Comments on mime-respect
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 16:16:45 -0400
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #898
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 21:56:14 +0200
Bjoern Hoehrmann <[email protected]> • #897
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 15:20:57 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #896
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 15:03:31 -0400
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #895
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 20:55:39 +0200
Bjoern Hoehrmann <[email protected]> • #894
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 20:55:46 +0200
Bjoern Hoehrmann <[email protected]> • #893
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:39:38 -0400
François Yergeau <[email protected]> • #892
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 11:21:47 -0700
Tim Bray <[email protected]> • #891
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 11:17:36 -0700
Tim Bray <[email protected]> • #890
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:53:08 -0400
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #889
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:19:46 -0400
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #888
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:40:35 -0400
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #887
Re: transcoding nearly certainly wrong?
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:55:02 -0700
Tim Bray <[email protected]> • #886
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:50:00 -0400
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #885
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:10:17 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #884
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.