gmane.linux.rpm.yum archive

3458 archived articles, newest first (page 26 of 35). Latest articles →

Re: RFE: skip-undownloadable - that operates when rpms aren't retrievable
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:08:12 -0400
Matthew Marian <[email protected]> • #12069
RFE: skip-undownloadable - that operates when rpms aren't retrievable
Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:44:14 +1100
David Timms <[email protected]> • #12068
Re: Yum in RHEL5
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:38:52 -0400
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12067
Re: Yum in RHEL5
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:07:17 +0530
"Binand Sethumadhavan" <[email protected]> • #12066
Re: Yum in RHEL5
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:56:03 -0400
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12065
Re: Yum in RHEL5
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:22:11 +0530
"Binand Sethumadhavan" <[email protected]> • #12064
Re: Yum in RHEL5
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:26:23 -0400
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12063
Yum in RHEL5
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:55:00 +0530
"Binand Sethumadhavan" <[email protected]> • #12062
Re: yum 3.2.8 - checksum problem (it works fine on 3.0.5)
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 06:41:15 -0800 (PST)
Nicholas Adrian <[email protected]> • #12061
Re: yum 3.2.8 - checksum problem (it works fine on 3.0.5)
Sat, 08 Mar 2008 02:33:58 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12060
Re: yum 3.2.8 - checksum problem (it works fine on 3.0.5)
Sat, 08 Mar 2008 01:49:19 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12059
yum 3.2.8 - checksum problem (it works fine on 3.0.5)
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 22:35:41 -0800 (PST)
Nicholas Adrian <[email protected]> • #12058
Re: yum does not work any more (Philipp Walderdorff)
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 21:54:27 -0500
"Jim Perrin" <[email protected]> • #12057
Re: yum does not work any more (Philipp Walderdorff)
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 15:06:24 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #12056
Re: yum 3.2.12 list [anything] broken on CentOS 5...
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 15:05:22 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #12055
Re: yum 3.2.12 list [anything] broken on CentOS 5...
Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:45:11 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12054
yum does not work any more (Philipp Walderdorff)
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 19:31:11 +0100
Philipp Walderdorff <[email protected]> • #12053
Re: yum 3.2.12 list [anything] broken on CentOS 5...
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:05:03 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #12052
Re: yum 3.2.12 list [anything] broken on CentOS 5...
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:55:13 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #12051
Re: yum 3.2.12 list [anything] broken on CentOS 5...
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:37:29 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #12050
Re: yum 3.2.12 list [anything] broken on CentOS 5...
Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:35:27 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12049
yum 3.2.12 list [anything] broken on CentOS 5...
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:34:14 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #12048
Re: yum does not work any more
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 08:36:27 -0500
"Jim Perrin" <[email protected]> • #12047
yum does not work any more
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 14:28:38 +0100
Philipp Walderdorff <[email protected]> • #12046
Re: satisfying dependencies for NetDirector package
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:53:44 -0500 (EST)
"Greg Wallace" <[email protected]> • #12045
Re: satisfying dependencies for NetDirector package
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:21:30 +1100
David Timms <[email protected]> • #12044
satisfying dependencies for NetDirector package
Tue, 4 Mar 2008 19:29:41 -0500 (EST)
"Greg Wallace" <[email protected]> • #12043
Odd Failover behavior
Tue, 4 Mar 2008 19:09:11 -0500
"Adam B." <[email protected]> • #12042
yum 3.2.12
Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:35:05 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12041
RE: Yum version 2.2.0-1 hangs when running yum install
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:09:17 +0200
"Timo Halonen" <[email protected]> • #12040
Re: Yum version 2.2.0-1 hangs when running yum install
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:48:19 +1100
David Timms <[email protected]> • #12039
Re: yum 3.2.8 Ctrl-C broken again?
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:00:32 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12038
yum 3.2.8 Ctrl-C broken again?
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:39:38 -0500
Brian Long <[email protected]> • #12037
Yum behavior when no package is found
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:28:50 +0000
"Maucci, Cyrille" <[email protected]> • #12036
Yum version 2.2.0-1 hangs when running yum install
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:42:59 +0200
"Timo Halonen" <[email protected]> • #12035
Re: yum 3.2.11 (fedora rawhide) erroneous success message
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:50:25 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12034
Re: yum 3.2.11 (fedora rawhide) erroneous success message
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:49:23 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #12033
Yum Speedup improvements - Thanks!
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:21:06 -0500
"Shawn Starr" <[email protected]> • #12032
Re: Re: alwaysprompt isn't helpful and assumeyes is dangerous
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:37:45 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #12031
Re: alwaysprompt isn't helpful and assumeyes is dangerous
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:27:07 +1100
Mikel Ward <[email protected]> • #12030
Re: alwaysprompt isn't helpful and assumeyes is dangerous
Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:56:31 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #12029
Re: yum 3.2.11 (fedora rawhide) erroneous success message
Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:51:45 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #12028
alwaysprompt isn't helpful and assumeyes is dangerous
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:17:16 +1100
Mikel Ward <[email protected]> • #12027
Re: yum 3.2.11 (fedora rawhide) erroneous success message
Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:07:14 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12026
Re: yum 3.2.11 (fedora rawhide) erroneous success message
Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:43:51 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #12025
Re: relocate option ??
Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:59:05 +0100
Maxime Quinzin <[email protected]> • #12024
Re: relocate option ??
Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:29:42 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12023
Re: yum 3.2.11 (fedora rawhide) erroneous success message
Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:28:54 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12022
Re: relocate option ??
Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:55:26 +0100
Maxime Quinzin <[email protected]> • #12021
Re: yum 3.2.11 (fedora rawhide) erroneous success message
Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:55:39 +1100
David Timms <[email protected]> • #12020
yum 3.2.11 (fedora rawhide) erroneous success message
Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:35:46 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #12019
Re: Readonly Repo - createrepo a folder up - works
Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:24:32 +1100
David Timms <[email protected]> • #12018
Re: relocate option ??
Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:19:14 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12017
Re: Strange behavior: yum and jre.i586 and java-1.4.2-gcj-compat
Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:19:36 +0100
Dominik Epple <[email protected]> • #12016
relocate option ??
Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:32:24 +0100
Maxime Quinzin <[email protected]> • #12015
Re: Readonly Repo - createrepo a folder up - works
Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:34:46 +0100
"Gerd Bitzer" <[email protected]> • #12014
Re: Readonly Repo - createrepo a folder up - works
Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:30:20 +0700
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[email protected]> • #12013
Re: Readonly Repo - createrepo a folder up - works
Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:50:30 +0100
"Gerd Bitzer" <[email protected]> • #12012
Re: Readonly Repo - createrepo a folder up - works
Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:39:04 +0100
"Gerd Bitzer" <[email protected]> • #12011
Re: Yum 3.2.11 released
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:02:21 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12010
Re: Yum 3.2.11 released
Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:02:42 +0700
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[email protected]> • #12009
Re: Readonly Repo - createrepo a folder up - works
Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:38:32 +0700
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[email protected]> • #12008
Re: Yum 3.2.11 released
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:24:07 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #12007
Re: Readonly Repo - createrepo a folder up - works
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:21:59 +1100
David Timms <[email protected]> • #12006
Re: Readonly Repo - createrepo a folder up - works
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:20:13 +1100
David Timms <[email protected]> • #12005
Re: Readonly Repo - createrepo a folder up.
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:08:41 +0700
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[email protected]> • #12004
Re: Readonly Repo - createrepo a folder up.
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:55:16 +1100
David Timms <[email protected]> • #12003
Re: Readonly Repo - createrepo a folder up.
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:49:58 +0700
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[email protected]> • #12002
Re: Readonly Repo - createrepo a folder up.
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:47:25 +0100
"Gerd Bitzer" <[email protected]> • #12001
Re: Yum 3.2.11 released
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:05:54 +0700
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[email protected]> • #12000
Re: Yum 3.2.11 released
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:27:24 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #11999
Re: Yum 3.2.11 released
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:20:54 +0700
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[email protected]> • #11998
Re: Strange behavior: yum and jre.i586 and java-1.4.2-gcj-compat
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:11:11 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #11997
Re: new Malay translation - synchronized to latest Yum POT
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:56:26 +0100
Tim Lauridsen <[email protected]> • #11996
Strange behavior: yum and jre.i586 and java-1.4.2-gcj-compat
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:42:40 +0100
Dominik Epple <[email protected]> • #11995
new Malay translation - synchronized to latest Yum POT
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:23:15 +0800
"Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan" <[email protected]> • #11994
Re: Readonly Repo - createrepo a folder up.
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:36:03 +1100
David Timms <[email protected]> • #11993
Readonly Repo
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:38:19 +0100
"Gerd Bitzer" <[email protected]> • #11992
Re: problem in yum
Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:13:18 +0300
"Mur obd" <[email protected]> • #11991
Yum 3.2.11 released
Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:02:29 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #11990
Re: yum-utils downloader question....
Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:14:54 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #11989
yum-utils downloader question....
Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:09:48 -0800
"Sabesky, Grant" <[email protected]> • #11988
Re: CentOS / Blue Quartz update broke YUM?
Fri, 8 Feb 2008 07:26:57 -0500
"Mailing Lists" <[email protected]> • #11987
Re: why does "yum search" repeat results?
Thu, 07 Feb 2008 22:24:51 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #11986
Re: CentOS / Blue Quartz update broke YUM?
Thu, 07 Feb 2008 22:24:21 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #11985
Re: Hardcoded paths throughout yum
Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:06:29 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #11984
Hardcoded paths throughout yum
Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:32:42 -0800
"Dan Nicholson" <[email protected]> • #11983
Re: problem in yum
Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:48:14 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #11982
Re: problem in yum
Tue, 5 Feb 2008 10:16:25 +0300
"Mur obd" <[email protected]> • #11981
Re: problem in yum
Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:12:52 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #11980
Re: problem in yum
Tue, 5 Feb 2008 10:08:36 +0300
"Mur obd" <[email protected]> • #11979
Re: problem in yum
Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:13:47 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #11978
problem in yum
Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:47:45 +0300
"Mur obd" <[email protected]> • #11977
Re: Yum on Suse: no generate-rss?
Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:25:07 -0800 (PST)
Francesco Vivoli <[email protected]> • #11976
Re: Tr : Can yum be used to remove a single package?
Tue, 01 Jan 2008 10:19:08 +0100
Littoz <[email protected]> • #11975
Re: Yum on Suse: no generate-rss?
Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:00:16 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #11974
Re: Yum on Suse: no generate-rss?
Fri, 1 Feb 2008 01:28:50 -0800 (PST)
Francesco Vivoli <[email protected]> • #11973
Re: RHEL5, yum 3.2.10, and yum-utils 1.1.11 problem
Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:45:28 +0700
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[email protected]> • #11972
Re: RHEL5, yum 3.2.10, and yum-utils 1.1.11 problem
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:21:08 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #11971
Re: RHEL5, yum 3.2.10, and yum-utils 1.1.11 problem
Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:04:22 +0700
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[email protected]> • #11970
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.