gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48 archive

397 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: parameterize
Sat, 15 Jan 2011 14:11:34 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2394
Bug report
Sat, 15 Jan 2011 10:35:17 +0100
Emmanuel Medernach <[email protected]> • #2393
parameterize
Sat, 15 Jan 2011 10:34:38 +0100
Joo ChurlSoo <[email protected]> • #2392
Re: parameterize
Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:55:12 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2391
Re: parameterize
Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:23:58 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2390
parameterize
Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:18:20 +0100
Joo ChurlSoo <[email protected]> • #2389
Re: Scheme 48 development?
Wed, 5 Jan 2011 16:07:14 -0500
Jonathan Rees <[email protected]> • #2388
Re: Scheme 48 development?
Tue, 04 Jan 2011 08:32:39 +0100
Hans Nowak <[email protected]> • #2387
Scheme 48 development?
Mon, 03 Jan 2011 09:28:13 +0100
Hans Nowak <[email protected]> • #2386
Re: Scheme 48 development?
Mon, 03 Jan 2011 09:33:27 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2385
Re: Problem when computing the power of huge numbers
Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:33:58 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2384
Re: Problem when computing the power of huge numbers
Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:34:36 +0100
Faried Nawaz <[email protected]> • #2383
Problem when computing the power of huge numbers
Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:14:56 +0100
Diego Alexander Rojas <[email protected]> • #2382
Re: info request for prescheme compilr
Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:29:29 +0200
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2381
info request for prescheme compilr
Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:59:54 +0200
"Michael J. Barillier" <[email protected]> • #2380
[Scheme Steering Committee announcements] ILC 2010 Program and Schedule
Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:00:30 -0400
Mitchell Wand <[email protected]> • #2379
ephemerons (long message, with a brief preamble)
Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:28:56 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2378
Re: Random File Access in Scheme48?
Fri, 6 Aug 2010 21:13:07 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2377
Random File Access in Scheme48?
Fri, 6 Aug 2010 15:01:06 -0400
Jake Bartlett <[email protected]> • #2376
obtaining a lock owned by a terminated thread
Sun, 11 Jul 2010 21:04:13 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2375
Re: small patch to get scsh running
Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:37:49 -0700
Roderic Morris <[email protected]> • #2374
Re: small patch to get scsh running
Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:38:23 +0200
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2373
small patch to get scsh running
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:08:49 -0700
Roderic Morris <[email protected]> • #2372
Inadvertently pushed patches
Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:30:57 +0200
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2371
Re: set-car! and set-cdr! throw vm-exception on lists defined with quotation
Mon, 5 Apr 2010 08:50:35 -0400
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2370
set-car! and set-cdr! throw vm-exception on lists defined with quotation
Sun, 4 Apr 2010 21:15:31 +0000 (UTC)
Andrew Stok <[email protected]> • #2369
s48.org downtime from Tuesday on
Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:40:33 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2368
Re: scheme48: translation error in the latest development branch of today
Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:56:54 +0100
Harald Glab-Plhak <[email protected]> • #2367
Re: Question about prescheme tests???
Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:16:53 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2366
Question about prescheme tests???
Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:01:49 +0100
Seth Burleigh <[email protected]> • #2365
Re: s48 and bibop garbage collector
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:15:55 -0800
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2364
s48 and bibop garbage collector
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:01:34 +0100
Vladimir Konrad <[email protected]> • #2363
Re: COPYING not in lib/
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:07:52 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2362
COPYING not in lib/
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:21:04 -0500
Jonathan Rees <[email protected]> • #2361
Re: a bug report and patch with a fix
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:47:55 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2360
a bug report and patch with a fix
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:16:23 +0100
Artem Mironov <[email protected]> • #2359
Re: misleading error message "ill-formed definition"
Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:40:33 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2358
Fwd: [r6rs-discuss] Volunteering for Scheme language standardization working groups ***deadline January 8***
Thu, 7 Jan 2010 08:22:40 -0500
Jonathan Rees <[email protected]> • #2357
Re: misleading error message "ill-formed definition"
Sat, 2 Jan 2010 19:33:36 -0800
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2356
misleading error message "ill-formed definition"
Sat, 2 Jan 2010 17:07:18 -0500
Jonathan Rees <[email protected]> • #2355
Re: S48 - Crash at GC write barrier
Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:37:51 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2354
Re: Small bug in c/unix/socket.c and parallel installation
Thu, 31 Dec 2009 03:10:01 -0800
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2353
Re: Small bug in c/unix/socket.c and parallel installation
Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:43:38 -0800
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2352
Small bug in c/unix/socket.c and parallel installation
Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:15:27 +0100
"Peng Chang \(Charles\)" <[email protected]> • #2351
Re: S48 - Crash at GC write barrier
Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:19:34 -0800
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2350
Re: bugs in queue operations
Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:29:20 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2349
Re: S48 - Crash at GC write barrier
Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:03:57 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2348
Re: bugs in queue operations
Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:58:50 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2347
Re: S48 - Crash at GC write barrier
Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:56:01 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2346
Re: DYNAMIC-WIND before and after procedures are not protected from interruption
Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:52:32 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2345
Re: bugs in queue operations
Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:14:27 -0800
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2344
Re: bugs in queue operations
Fri, 25 Dec 2009 11:20:50 +0000 (UTC)
Richard Kelsey <[email protected]> • #2343
Re: bugs in queue operations
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:57:29 -0800
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2342
Re: bugs in queue operations
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:09:27 -0500
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2341
Re: bugs in queue operations
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:11:00 -0800
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2340
Re: bugs in queue operations
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:59:09 -0800
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2339
Re: DYNAMIC-WIND before and after procedures are not protected from interruption
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:28:57 -0800
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2338
Re: DYNAMIC-WIND before and after procedures are not protected from interruption
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:24:43 -0500
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2337
S48 - Crash at GC write barrier
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 01:48:56 -0800
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2336
Re: DYNAMIC-WIND before and after procedures are not protected from interruption
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:50:28 -0800
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2335
DYNAMIC-WIND before and after procedures are not protected from interruption
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:31:26 -0500
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2334
Re: bugs in queue operations
Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:53:56 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2333
Re: bugs in queue operations
Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:47:33 -0500
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2332
Re: bugs in queue operations
Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:15:25 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2331
Re: &os-error conditions contain integers, not errnos
Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:55:52 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2330
Re: &os-error conditions contain integers, not errnos
Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:32:43 -0800
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2329
Re: &os-error conditions contain integers, not errnos
Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:21:29 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2328
&os-error conditions contain integers, not errnos
Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:59:54 -0500
Roderic Morris <[email protected]> • #2327
Re: dequeue-signal! starts returning signals only after the second is sent
Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:40:12 -0800
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2326
atomically releasing a lock and waiting on a condition variable
Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:30:18 -0500
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2325
Re: dequeue-signal! starts returning signals only after the second is sent
Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:58:58 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2324
Re: dequeue-signal! starts returning signals only after the second is sent
Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:12:58 -0500
Roderic Morris <[email protected]> • #2323
Re: dequeue-signal! starts returning signals only after the second is sent
Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:22:57 -0800
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2322
dequeue-signal! starts returning signals only after the second is sent
Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:16:26 +0100
Roderic Morris <[email protected]> • #2321
Re: Interrupt handlers are not called
Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:42:11 +0100
Michael Sperber <[email protected]> • #2320
Re: Interrupt handlers are not called
Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:41:03 -0800
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2319
Re: Interrupt handlers are not called
Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:03:29 -0800
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2318
Interrupt handlers are not called
Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:03:31 -0500
Roderic Morris <[email protected]> • #2317
Fwd: [Scheme-reports] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters
Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:51:40 -0400
Jonathan Rees <[email protected]> • #2316
Re: maybe-commit fails unconditionally
Sun, 25 Oct 2009 02:56:53 +0000 (UTC)
Richard Kelsey <[email protected]> • #2315
Re: maybe-commit fails unconditionally
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:31:44 -0400
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2314
Re: maybe-commit fails unconditionally
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:08:39 -0400
Roderic Morris <[email protected]> • #2313
Re: maybe-commit fails unconditionally
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:33:16 -0400
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2312
Re: maybe-commit fails unconditionally
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 07:39:31 -0700
Robert Ransom <[email protected]> • #2311
maybe-commit fails unconditionally
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:13:07 +0000 (UTC)
Roderic Morris <[email protected]> • #2310
Re: Autotools macro to test for pthreads fails with "Resource lost" on hurd
Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:53:40 +0000 (UTC)
Thomas Schwinge <[email protected]> • #2309
Re: Autotools macro to test for pthreads fails with "Resource lost" on hurd
Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:16:06 +0000 (UTC)
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #2308
Re: Autotools macro to test for pthreads fails with "Resource lost" on hurd
Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:01:19 -0700
Daniel Moerner <[email protected]> • #2307
Re: maybe-commit-and-make-ready-and-block
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:45:05 -0400
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2306
Re: maybe-commit-and-make-ready-and-block
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:38:40 -0400
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2305
bugs in CML placeholders
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:27:26 -0400
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2304
Re: relinquishing timeslices in a transaction
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:07:56 -0400
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2303
Re: relinquishing timeslices in a transaction
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:51:39 +0000 (UTC)
Richard Kelsey <[email protected]> • #2302
relinquishing timeslices in a transaction
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:15:54 -0400
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2301
bugs in queue operations
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:05:21 -0400
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2300
maybe-commit-and-make-ready-and-block
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:14:05 -0400
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2299
bug in auto-integrator
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:30:32 -0400
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #2298
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.