gmane.mail.postfix.user archive

450 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 5). Latest articles →

[pfx] Re: LDAP with TLS or SSL: postmap: "Unable to bind to server" openldap: "TLS negotiation failure"
Wed, 6 May 2026 12:01:00 +0200
John Fawcett via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293813
[pfx] Re: header_checks seems not working
Wed, 6 May 2026 11:39:52 +0200
Enrico Morelli via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293812
[pfx] Re: header_checks seems not working
Wed, 6 May 2026 11:27:50 +0200
Enrico Morelli via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293811
[pfx] Re: header_checks seems not working
Wed, 6 May 2026 11:59:09 +0300
Atro Tossavainen via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293810
[pfx] Re: header_checks seems not working
Wed, 6 May 2026 10:52:59 +0200
Paul Menzel via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293809
[pfx] Re: header_checks seems not working
Wed, 6 May 2026 10:36:22 +0200
Enrico Morelli via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293808
[pfx] Re: header_checks seems not working
Wed, 6 May 2026 10:20:51 +0200
Paul Menzel via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293807
[pfx] header_checks seems not working
Wed, 6 May 2026 10:13:40 +0200
Enrico Morelli via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293806
[pfx] [OT] Disruption DNS service for .de domains
Wed, 6 May 2026 00:40:13 +0200
Gerald Galster via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293805
[pfx] LDAP with TLS or SSL: postmap: "Unable to bind to server" openldap: "TLS negotiation failure"
Tue, 5 May 2026 12:34:33 -0400
Tom via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293804
[pfx] Re: qmgr stalls when default_destination_rate_delay drops below 1s on a node, with a backed-up queue
Tue, 5 May 2026 10:03:40 -0400
Yoda via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293803
[pfx] Re: qmgr stalls when default_destination_rate_delay drops below 1s on a node, with a backed-up queue
Tue, 5 May 2026 09:57:48 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293802
[pfx] Re: qmgr stalls when default_destination_rate_delay drops below 1s on a node, with a backed-up queue
Tue, 5 May 2026 09:55:46 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293801
[pfx] Re: qmgr stalls when default_destination_rate_delay drops below 1s on a node, with a backed-up queue
Tue, 5 May 2026 09:38:16 -0400
Yoda via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293800
[pfx] Re: qmgr stalls when default_destination_rate_delay drops below 1s on a node, with a backed-up queue
Tue, 5 May 2026 09:29:34 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293799
[pfx] Re: qmgr stalls when default_destination_rate_delay drops below 1s on a node, with a backed-up queue
Tue, 5 May 2026 09:16:42 -0400
Yoda via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293798
[pfx] Re: qmgr stalls when default_destination_rate_delay drops below 1s on a node, with a backed-up queue
Mon, 4 May 2026 15:10:59 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293797
[pfx] Re: qmgr stalls when default_destination_rate_delay drops below 1s on a node, with a backed-up queue
Mon, 4 May 2026 14:20:38 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293796
[pfx] qmgr stalls when default_destination_rate_delay drops below 1s on a node, with a backed-up queue
Mon, 4 May 2026 13:14:14 -0400
Yoda via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293795
[pfx] Postfix stable release 3.11.2 and legacy releases 3.10.9, 3.9.10, 3.8.16
Sun, 3 May 2026 19:43:27 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293794
[pfx] Re: Completely discard outgoing mail not originating from postfix
Sat, 2 May 2026 20:53:09 +0200
Michael Grimm via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293793
[pfx] Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases
Sat, 02 May 2026 15:03:04 +0200
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293792
[pfx] Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases
Sat, 02 May 2026 14:55:27 +0200
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293791
[pfx] Re: Completely discard outgoing mail not originating from postfix
Sat, 2 May 2026 08:48:18 +0200
Michael Grimm via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293790
[pfx] Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases
Fri, 1 May 2026 19:41:47 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293789
[pfx] Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases
Fri, 01 May 2026 22:56:43 +0200
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293788
[pfx] Re: Completely discard outgoing mail not originating from postfix
Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:37 -0400
Bill Cole via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293787
[pfx] Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases
Fri, 01 May 2026 18:10:07 +0200
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293786
[pfx] Re: Completely discard outgoing mail not originating from postfix
Fri, 1 May 2026 16:04:17 +0200
Michael Grimm via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293785
[pfx] Re: Completely discard outgoing mail not originating from postfix
Fri, 1 May 2026 09:41:02 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293784
[pfx] Re: Completely discard outgoing mail not originating from postfix
Fri, 1 May 2026 15:21:06 +0200
Michael Grimm via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293783
[pfx] Re: Completely discard outgoing mail not originating from postfix
Fri, 1 May 2026 15:11:20 +0200
Michael Grimm via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293782
[pfx] Re: Completely discard outgoing mail not originating from postfix
Fri, 1 May 2026 15:11:26 +0200
Michael Grimm via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293781
[pfx] Re: Completely discard outgoing mail not originating from postfix
Fri, 1 May 2026 07:46:43 +0100
Sad Clouds via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293780
[pfx] Re: Completely discard outgoing mail not originating from postfix
Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:52:19 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293779
[pfx] Completely discard outgoing mail not originating from postfix
Thu, 30 Apr 2026 21:21:43 +0200
Michael Grimm via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293778
[pfx] Re: Perform multiple actions based on a single header match?
Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:18:16 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293777
[pfx] Re: Perform multiple actions based on a single header match?
Thu, 30 Apr 2026 01:40:55 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293776
[pfx] Perform multiple actions based on a single header match?
Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:04:05 -0400
Bill Cole via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293775
[pfx] Feedback request: PostgreSQL backend users
Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:01:10 +0200
Ömer Güven via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293774
[pfx] automx2 2026.2 released
Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:19:01 +0200
Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293773
[pfx] Pflogsumm Versions 1.2.0 and 1.2.1 Released
Wed, 22 Apr 2026 14:27:08 -0400
Jim Seymour via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293772
[pfx] Re: Adding a VPN layer on top of TLS secured SMTP submission + IMAP
Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:11:07 +0100
Sad Clouds via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293771
[pfx] Re: Adding a VPN layer on top of TLS secured SMTP submission + IMAP
Wed, 22 Apr 2026 12:04:36 +0200
Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293770
[pfx] Re: Adding a VPN layer on top of TLS secured SMTP submission + IMAP
Wed, 22 Apr 2026 09:55:45 +0100
Sad Clouds via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293769
[pfx] Re: Adding a VPN layer on top of TLS secured SMTP submission + IMAP
Wed, 22 Apr 2026 10:09:08 +0200
Fabian Keil via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293768
[pfx] Adding a VPN layer on top of TLS secured SMTP submission + IMAP
Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:38:02 +0100
Sad Clouds via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293767
[pfx] Re: Postfix site via HTTPS
Mon, 20 Apr 2026 21:44:58 +0300
Eugene R via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293766
[pfx] THREAD CLOSED (was: Postfix site via HTTPS)
Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:22:25 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293765
[pfx] Re: Postfix site via HTTPS
Mon, 20 Apr 2026 11:55:13 -0400
Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293764
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.