gmane.mail.postfix.user archive
448 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 5). Latest articles →
[pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Tue, 26 May 2026 19:06:15 -0700[pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Mon, 25 May 2026 22:08:43 +0200[pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Mon, 25 May 2026 09:14:51 -0700[pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Mon, 25 May 2026 10:16:52 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Mon, 25 May 2026 04:26:13 -0700[pfx] Re: Is virtual_mailbox_maps redundant when virtual_alias_maps already checks mailbox existence
Fri, 22 May 2026 19:43:27 +1000[pfx] Re: Is virtual_mailbox_maps redundant when virtual_alias_maps already checks mailbox existence
Fri, 22 May 2026 14:57:07 +0530[pfx] Re: multi line configuration parameters with # remarks
Fri, 22 May 2026 14:10:26 +1000[pfx] Re: multi line configuration parameters with # remarks
Thu, 21 May 2026 22:40:58 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: External command delivery using virtual_alias_maps?
Thu, 21 May 2026 22:36:54 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] multi line configuration parameters with # remarks
Thu, 21 May 2026 16:20:51 -0700[pfx] External command delivery using virtual_alias_maps?
Thu, 21 May 2026 23:08:30 +0000[pfx] Re: Duplicate deliveries of expanded addresses (Was: Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases)
Tue, 19 May 2026 17:14:49 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: Duplicate deliveries of expanded addresses (Was: Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases)
Tue, 19 May 2026 19:05:45 +0200[pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.3 and legacy releases 3.10.10, 3.9.11, 3.8.17
Tue, 19 May 2026 07:36:58 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: header_checks sees original From: header despite s mtpd milter correction — execution order question
Tue, 19 May 2026 08:27:38 +0000 (UTC)[pfx] Is virtual_mailbox_maps redundant when virtual_alias_maps already checks mailbox existence
Tue, 19 May 2026 12:23:14 +0530[pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.3 and legacy releases 3.10.10, 3.9.11, 3.8.17
Tue, 19 May 2026 15:40:46 +1200[pfx] Re: Duplicate deliveries of expanded addresses (Was: Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases)
Mon, 18 May 2026 15:57:12 -0700 (PDT)[pfx] Re: Duplicate deliveries of expanded addresses (Was: Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases)
Mon, 18 May 2026 15:56:16 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: header_checks sees original From: header despite smtp d milter correction — execution order question
Tue, 19 May 2026 03:22:47 +1000[pfx] Re: Duplicate deliveries of expanded addresses (Was: Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases)
Mon, 18 May 2026 16:18:56 +0200[pfx] Re: header_checks sees original From: header despite s mtpd milter correction — execution order question
Mon, 18 May 2026 13:20:36 +0000 (UTC)[pfx] Re: header_checks sees original From: header despite smtp d milter correction — execution order question
Mon, 18 May 2026 20:57:11 +1000[pfx] header_checks sees original From: header despite smtpd m ilter correction — execution order question
Mon, 18 May 2026 10:21:32 +0000 (UTC)[pfx] Postfix stable release 3.11.3 and legacy releases 3.10.10, 3.9.11, 3.8.17
Sun, 17 May 2026 10:02:10 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: Duplicate deliveries of expanded addresses (Was: Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases)
Sun, 17 May 2026 02:00:48 +0200[pfx] Re: Duplicate deliveries of expanded addresses (Was: Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases)
Sat, 16 May 2026 18:34:58 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: Duplicate deliveries of expanded addresses (Was: Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases)
Sat, 16 May 2026 23:36:44 +0200[pfx] Re: Duplicate deliveries of expanded addresses (Was: Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases)
Sat, 16 May 2026 14:42:47 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: Duplicate deliveries of expanded addresses (Was: Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases)
Sun, 17 May 2026 04:30:29 +1000[pfx] Duplicate deliveries of expanded addresses (Was: Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases)
Sat, 16 May 2026 17:59:54 +0200[pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling
Sat, 16 May 2026 14:12:21 +1000[pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling
Fri, 15 May 2026 20:06:03 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling
Fri, 15 May 2026 19:57:22 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling
Fri, 15 May 2026 16:49:53 -0700[pfx] Re: SSL Errors
Thu, 14 May 2026 23:37:35 +1000[pfx] Re: SSL Errors
Thu, 14 May 2026 08:38:31 -0400[pfx] Re: SSL Errors
Thu, 14 May 2026 16:43:06 +1000[pfx] Re: SSL Errors
Wed, 13 May 2026 23:24:51 -0700[pfx] Re: SSL Errors
Thu, 14 May 2026 13:54:13 +1000[pfx] Re: SSL Errors
Wed, 13 May 2026 19:49:39 -0700[pfx] Re: SSL Errors
Thu, 14 May 2026 11:36:28 +1000[pfx] SSL Errors
Wed, 13 May 2026 15:48:17 -0700[pfx] Re: PATCH: postfix 3.11.2 build failed with musl lib on linux
Wed, 13 May 2026 11:10:22 -0400[pfx] Re: PATCH: postfix 3.11.2 build failed with musl lib on linux
Wed, 13 May 2026 10:39:49 -0400[pfx] PATCH: postfix 3.11.2 build failed with musl lib on linux
Wed, 13 May 2026 10:05:42 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: postfix 3.11.2 build failed with musl lib on linux
Wed, 13 May 2026 09:14:01 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] postfix 3.11.2 build failed with musl lib on linux
Wed, 13 May 2026 11:03:31 +0800[pfx] Re: Per recipient sender access via an access policy delegation server
Tue, 12 May 2026 19:03:44 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: Per recipient sender access via an access policy delegation server
Tue, 12 May 2026 22:51:26 +0200[pfx] Re: Per recipient sender access via an access policy delegation server
Tue, 12 May 2026 15:52:24 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Per recipient sender access via an access policy delegation server
Tue, 12 May 2026 20:59:21 +0200[pfx] Re: I'd like to understand this
Tue, 12 May 2026 11:30:38 +0200[pfx] Re: I'd like to understand this
Mon, 11 May 2026 20:18:57 +1000[pfx] I'd like to understand this
Mon, 11 May 2026 10:29:38 +0200[pfx] Re: SHA224 Phase out
Sun, 10 May 2026 20:01:07 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: SHA224 Phase out
Sun, 10 May 2026 22:35:28 +0200[pfx] Re: SHA224 Phase out
Mon, 11 May 2026 05:03:28 +1000[pfx] SHA224 Phase out
Sun, 10 May 2026 19:33:39 +0200[pfx] Re: Patch service_name RO logic (was: snapshot 3.12-20260508 postscreen segfault)
Sun, 10 May 2026 11:17:55 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: Patch service_name RO logic (was: snapshot 3.12-20260508 postscreen segfault)
Sun, 10 May 2026 10:36:33 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: Patch service_name RO logic (was: snapshot 3.12-20260508 postscreen segfault)
Sun, 10 May 2026 20:53:42 +1000[pfx] snapshot 3.12-20260508 postscreen segfault
Sun, 10 May 2026 09:16:35 +0200[pfx] Re: virtual_alias_map and processing order
Fri, 8 May 2026 09:59:26 -0400[pfx] Re: virtual_alias_map and processing order
Fri, 8 May 2026 09:36:13 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: virtual_alias_map and processing order
Fri, 8 May 2026 15:35:43 +0200[pfx] virtual_alias_map and processing order
Fri, 8 May 2026 08:35:47 -0400[pfx] Re: Errors in collate output
Thu, 7 May 2026 13:37:49 -0700[pfx] Re: Errors in collate output
Thu, 7 May 2026 20:12:34 +1000[pfx] Errors in collate output
Wed, 6 May 2026 23:56:35 -0700[pfx] Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases
Wed, 6 May 2026 19:27:14 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts
Wed, 6 May 2026 23:39:38 +0200[pfx] Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases
Wed, 06 May 2026 22:46:52 +0200[pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts
Wed, 06 May 2026 22:39:14 +0200[pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts
Wed, 06 May 2026 22:32:28 +0200[pfx] Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases
Wed, 6 May 2026 16:32:28 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts
Wed, 6 May 2026 22:31:48 +0200[pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts
Wed, 6 May 2026 22:30:35 +0200[pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts
Wed, 06 May 2026 16:23:10 -0400[pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts
Wed, 06 May 2026 22:10:45 +0200[pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts
Wed, 6 May 2026 22:00:53 +0200[pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts
Wed, 06 May 2026 21:51:38 +0200[pfx] Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases
Wed, 06 May 2026 21:43:00 +0200[pfx] dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts
Wed, 6 May 2026 21:24:01 +0200[pfx] Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases
Wed, 6 May 2026 14:22:38 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: Avoiding message doubling via virtual aliases
Wed, 06 May 2026 20:11:21 +0200[pfx] Re: Somewhat stange mailq output - mail_version = 3.12-20260416
Wed, 06 May 2026 17:36:09 +0200[pfx] Re: Somewhat strange mailq output - mail_version = 3.12-20260416
Wed, 6 May 2026 11:26:57 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: Somewhat strange mailq output - mail_version = 3.12-20260416
Wed, 6 May 2026 16:46:27 +0200[pfx] Somewhat stange mailq output - mail_version = 3.12-20260416
Wed, 6 May 2026 16:38:10 +0200[pfx] Re: LDAP with TLS or SSL: postmap: "Unable to bind to server" openldap: "TLS negotiation failure"
Thu, 7 May 2026 00:04:52 +1000[pfx] Re: LDAP with TLS or SSL: postmap: "Unable to bind to server" openldap: "TLS negotiation failure"
Wed, 06 May 2026 09:47:17 -0400[pfx] Re: LDAP with TLS or SSL: postmap: "Unable to bind to server" openldap: "TLS negotiation failure"
Wed, 6 May 2026 09:34:18 -0400[pfx] Re: LDAP with TLS or SSL: postmap: "Unable to bind to server" openldap: "TLS negotiation failure"
Wed, 6 May 2026 09:10:20 -0400[pfx] Re: LDAP with TLS or SSL: postmap: "Unable to bind to server" openldap: "TLS negotiation failure"
Wed, 6 May 2026 15:00:31 +0200[pfx] Re: LDAP with TLS or SSL: postmap: "Unable to bind to server" openldap: "TLS negotiation failure"
Wed, 6 May 2026 08:39:28 -0400[pfx] Re: LDAP with TLS or SSL: postmap: "Unable to bind to server" openldap: "TLS negotiation failure"
Wed, 6 May 2026 20:58:54 +1000[pfx] Re: LDAP with TLS or SSL: postmap: "Unable to bind to server" openldap: "TLS negotiation failure"
Wed, 6 May 2026 12:01:00 +0200[pfx] Re: header_checks seems not working
Wed, 6 May 2026 11:39:52 +0200
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.