gmane.mail.postfix.user archive

442 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 5). Latest articles →

[pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18
Fri, 19 Jun 2026 13:34:10 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294007
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Fri, 19 Jun 2026 11:31:08 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294006
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Fri, 19 Jun 2026 09:42:02 +0200
Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294005
[pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18
Fri, 19 Jun 2026 09:29:56 +0200
Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294004
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Fri, 19 Jun 2026 17:24:51 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294003
[pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18
Fri, 19 Jun 2026 17:16:01 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294002
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Fri, 19 Jun 2026 09:11:10 +0200
Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294001
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Fri, 19 Jun 2026 08:41:10 +0200
Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294000
[pfx] Re: debugging help
Fri, 19 Jun 2026 16:30:40 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293999
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Fri, 19 Jun 2026 14:57:10 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293998
[pfx] debugging help
Thu, 18 Jun 2026 21:37:38 -0400
postfix--- via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293997
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Thu, 18 Jun 2026 20:36:22 -0400
Al via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293996
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Thu, 18 Jun 2026 20:34:55 -0400
Al via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293995
[pfx] Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18
Wed, 17 Jun 2026 18:45:30 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293994
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:49:15 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293993
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Wed, 17 Jun 2026 11:55:04 +0200
Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293992
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Tue, 16 Jun 2026 18:15:47 -0400
Al via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293991
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Mon, 15 Jun 2026 11:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
Fred Morris via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293990
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Sun, 14 Jun 2026 19:06:48 -0400
Al via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293989
[pfx] Re: rejection of message due to mismatch in TLS versions
Sun, 14 Jun 2026 20:34:16 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293988
[pfx] Re: How to solve error message with sasl_passwd
Sat, 13 Jun 2026 12:04:46 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293987
[pfx] How to solve error message with sasl_passwd
Sat, 13 Jun 2026 16:57:28 +0200
Freek de Kruijf via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293986
[pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender
Thu, 11 Jun 2026 12:26:27 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293985
[pfx] Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender
Thu, 11 Jun 2026 17:21:32 +0200
Victoriano Giralt via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293984
[pfx] Re: The "danecheck" monitoring tool has been updated
Wed, 10 Jun 2026 18:53:07 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293983
[pfx] Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 18:01:34 +0200
Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293982
[pfx] The "danecheck" monitoring tool has been updated
Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:56:35 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293981
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 09:30:23 -0400
Jim Seymour via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293980
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Tue, 09 Jun 2026 09:22:52 -0400
Bill Cole via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293979
[pfx] Re: Postfix not able to forward emails
Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:52:43 -0400
Bill Cole via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293978
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 14:29:13 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293977
[pfx] Re: Postfix not able to forward emails
Mon, 08 Jun 2026 22:19:31 -0400
Al via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293976
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Mon, 08 Jun 2026 22:01:54 -0400
Al via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293975
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Mon, 08 Jun 2026 22:39:41 +0200
Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293974
[pfx] Re: Postfix not able to forward emails
Mon, 08 Jun 2026 12:36:04 -0400
Bill Cole via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293973
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Mon, 08 Jun 2026 12:24:50 -0400
Bill Cole via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293972
[pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Mon, 8 Jun 2026 12:23:19 -0400
Jim Seymour via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293971
[pfx] Re: Postfix not able to forward emails
Mon, 08 Jun 2026 12:23:22 -0400
Al via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293970
[pfx] I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list
Mon, 08 Jun 2026 11:55:03 -0400
Al via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293969
[pfx] ***SPAM*** Re: Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix?
Mon, 8 Jun 2026 13:46:50 +0300
"Dimitris T. via Postfix-users" <[email protected]> • #293968
[pfx] Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix?
Mon, 8 Jun 2026 08:33:59 +0200
Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293967
[pfx] Re: Postfix not able to forward emails
Sun, 07 Jun 2026 17:27:05 -0400
Bill Cole via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293966
[pfx] Re: empty from envelope?
Sun, 7 Jun 2026 16:48:13 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293965
[pfx] Re: Postfix not able to forward emails
Sun, 7 Jun 2026 16:06:42 -0400
Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293964
[pfx] Postfix not able to forward emails
Sun, 07 Jun 2026 15:49:22 -0400
Al via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293963
[pfx] Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix?
Sun, 7 Jun 2026 15:22:22 -0400
Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293962
[pfx] Re: empty from envelope?
Sun, 7 Jun 2026 15:10:45 -0400
Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293961
[pfx] ANN: TCP Table reference implementation in Python
Sun, 7 Jun 2026 09:57:46 -0700
Fred Morris via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293960
[pfx] Re: empty from envelope?
Sun, 7 Jun 2026 10:18:32 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293959
[pfx] Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix?
Sun, 7 Jun 2026 08:41:01 -0400
Frank Reid via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293958
[pfx] Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix?
Sun, 7 Jun 2026 12:49:45 +0300
"Dimitris T. via Postfix-users" <[email protected]> • #293957
[pfx] Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix?
Sun, 7 Jun 2026 10:34:58 +0200
Joachim Lindenberg via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293956
[pfx] Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix?
Sun, 7 Jun 2026 17:40:12 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293955
[pfx] Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix?
Sun, 7 Jun 2026 11:21:05 +0800
P V Anthony via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293954
[pfx] your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix?
Sat, 6 Jun 2026 21:43:40 -0400
Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293953
[pfx] Re: empty from envelope?
Sat, 6 Jun 2026 21:22:20 -0400
Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293952
[pfx] Re: empty from envelope?
Sat, 6 Jun 2026 08:24:08 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293951
[pfx] Re: empty from envelope?
Fri, 5 Jun 2026 21:30:53 -0400
Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293950
[pfx] Re: empty from envelope?
Fri, 5 Jun 2026 21:14:00 -0400
Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293949
[pfx] Re: empty from envelope?
Fri, 5 Jun 2026 14:29:30 -0700
Mel P via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293948
[pfx] Re: empty from envelope?
Fri, 5 Jun 2026 14:07:57 -0400
Jim Seymour via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293947
[pfx] Re: empty from envelope?
Fri, 5 Jun 2026 10:47:33 -0700
Jim Garrison via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293946
[pfx] Re: rejection of message due to mismatch in TLS versions
Fri, 5 Jun 2026 15:24:31 +0100
Linkcheck via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293945
[pfx] Re: rejection of message due to mismatch in TLS versions
Fri, 5 Jun 2026 10:22:00 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293944
[pfx] Re: rejection of message due to mismatch in TLS versions
Fri, 5 Jun 2026 15:13:10 +0100
Linkcheck via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293943
[pfx] Re: rejection of message due to mismatch in TLS versions
Fri, 5 Jun 2026 10:03:24 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293942
[pfx] rejection of message due to mismatch in TLS versions
Fri, 5 Jun 2026 14:58:26 +0100
Linkcheck via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293941
[pfx] Re: empty from envelope?
Fri, 5 Jun 2026 17:41:45 +1200
Peter via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293940
[pfx] Re: empty from envelope?
Thu, 4 Jun 2026 17:29:42 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293939
[pfx] empty from envelope?
Thu, 4 Jun 2026 17:18:26 -0400
Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293938
[pfx] Re: use postfix/master as "supervisor" only
Tue, 2 Jun 2026 00:07:51 +0100
Colin McKinnon via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293937
[pfx] Re: use postfix/master as "supervisor" only
Mon, 1 Jun 2026 17:54:06 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293936
[pfx] use postfix/master as "supervisor" only
Mon, 1 Jun 2026 22:16:10 +0200
"A.Schulze via Postfix-users" <[email protected]> • #293935
[pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling
Mon, 1 Jun 2026 10:54:51 -0700
David Koski via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293934
[pfx] Re: Delays of few seconds are often observed in send mail
Sat, 30 May 2026 18:02:40 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293933
[pfx] Re: Delays of few seconds are often observed in send mail
Sat, 30 May 2026 21:52:57 +0200
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293932
[pfx] Re: Delays of few seconds are often observed in send mail
Sat, 30 May 2026 21:14:30 +0300
Lafiel Elentari via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293931
[pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling
Fri, 29 May 2026 22:18:38 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293930
[pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling
Fri, 29 May 2026 16:57:14 -0700
David Koski via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293929
[pfx] Re: Call for Testing: OpenDKIM and OpenDMARC
Sat, 30 May 2026 00:15:33 +0200
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293928
[pfx] Call for Testing: OpenDKIM and OpenDMARC
Fri, 29 May 2026 09:34:21 -0700
Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293927
[pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling
Fri, 29 May 2026 11:15:23 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293926
[pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling
Fri, 29 May 2026 10:51:28 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293925
[pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling
Fri, 29 May 2026 08:19:44 +0300
Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293924
[pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling
Thu, 28 May 2026 14:11:16 -0700
David Koski via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293923
[pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Wed, 27 May 2026 19:31:05 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293922
[pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Wed, 27 May 2026 15:50:03 -0700
Mel P via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293921
[pfx] Re: Delays of few seconds are often observed in send mail
Wed, 27 May 2026 23:11:20 +0300
Lafiel Elentari via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293920
[pfx] Re: Delays of few seconds are often observed in send mail
Wed, 27 May 2026 15:22:20 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293919
[pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Wed, 27 May 2026 15:08:21 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293918
[pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Wed, 27 May 2026 11:29:58 -0700
Mel P via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293917
[pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Wed, 27 May 2026 20:28:11 +0200
Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293916
[pfx] Delays of few seconds are often observed in send mail
Wed, 27 May 2026 21:20:20 +0300
Lafiel Elentari via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293915
[pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Wed, 27 May 2026 13:50:08 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293914
[pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Wed, 27 May 2026 18:51:02 +0200
Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293913
[pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Wed, 27 May 2026 09:42:47 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293912
[pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Tue, 26 May 2026 19:06:15 -0700
Mel P via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293911
[pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Mon, 25 May 2026 22:08:43 +0200
Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293910
[pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Mon, 25 May 2026 09:14:51 -0700
Mel P via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293909
[pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Mon, 25 May 2026 10:16:52 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #293908
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.